Connect with us

Maine

Opinion: Maine dairy urgently needs state support

Published

on

Opinion: Maine dairy urgently needs state support


Even as the snow barreled out of the sky last week, Maine’s dairy farmers were up in the early hours of the morning, firing up their generators and moving snow, all to get the cows milked, ensuring Maine’s food supply.

This is not only a labor of love for many farmers, but the bare minimum of a dairy farmer’s day. We milk our cows, once, twice or for some three times a day, every day, 365 days a year, regardless of the weather.

Our farms have weathered more than just the increasing effects of climate change on our seasonal patterns. We have weathered low prices set by a federal pricing system that few people actually understand. We have weathered increasing costs due to inflation and high costs of everything in Maine, due to our location in the country. We have weathered labor shortages and supply-chain issues. Yet, every day, we continue to wake up and get the cows milked, to be sure our neighbors and fellow Mainers have food on their table.

The people of Maine have long recognized the importance of our dairy farms and their interdependence within our rural communities. This recognition has come in the form of the Dairy Stabilization Program which, for the last 20-plus years, has provided some stability for our farms in a system of constantly varying federal pricing. The stabilization program uses cost of production data, researched every three years, that is then sent to the Legislature to decide the level of support for the program. This program is a lifeline for our farms, and it has almost consistently been funded at a level below current cost of production.

Advertisement

Last session in the Legislature, the Appropriations and Financial Affairs Committee allocated funds to expedite the Cost of Production Study, to be sure they could adequately increase the program. The study, once returned, offered a harsh reality: Our farms continue to receive prices far below cost of production, and the funds needed increase the program to the full amount needed to achieve short-run break-even cost of milk production on our farms would be too high a price to pay.

In good faith, members of the Maine Dairy Industry Association worked and negotiated with the Agriculture Conservation and Forestry Committee to determine an increase to the program that would be meaningful to farmers and realistic for the budget. Our farms were willing to take a 75% cut to achieve an increase of 25% to the program numbers, forgoing the option of a large one-time payment, in order to bolster the program. Gov. Janet Mills offered her support and included this increase in her budget change package after the Joint Standing Committee on Agriculture, Conservation and Forestry voted the measure out unanimously.

The majority party on the appropriations committee then made the decision to go against the governor’s plan, scrap the months of work that went into the planning and only offer an increase of 10%, citing the stakeholder group formed by the Legislature as the reason for the minimal increase. The unfortunate reality of the situation is the 25% increase was not enough, but as a community we recognized the importance of working within the system in place and the need to compromise. We were met with an even more disappointing decision by the committee.

Maine is losing farms at an alarming rate. The realities of the business, pricing challenges and the absolute commitment dairy farming takes is too much for many to reckon with. In our corner of the country, we have 146 dairy farms left. Every one of them plays an important role in our food security, self reliance and climate goals. We offer jobs in our rural communities, and opportunities for other small businesses to exist in those communities. Every dollar that comes onto our farms goes right back out. Many of us don’t have savings accounts, let alone money for retirement. The land we work and soil we tend is the basis of our life’s work, an investment not always realized in our lifetime, but made in good faith for the generations to follow.

Collectively, we must invest in this industry before it is too late. These farms, this land and our food security is worth protecting.

Advertisement

Use the form below to reset your password. When you’ve submitted your account email, we will send an email with a reset code.

« Previous

Opinion: The Trump tax cuts were neither panacea nor rip-off

Next »

Advertisement
Opinion: Support for the right to repair should not be ignored
Advertisement



Source link

Maine

NECEC conservation plan will not protect Maine’s mature forests | Opinion

Published

on

NECEC conservation plan will not protect Maine’s mature forests | Opinion


Robert Bryan is a licensed forester from Harpswell and author or co-author of numerous publications on managing forests for wildlife. Paul Larrivee is a licensed forester from New Gloucester who manages both private and public lands, and a former Maine Forest Service forester.

In November 2025, the Department of Environmental Protection (DEP) approved a conservation plan and forest management plan as mitigation for impacts from the NECEC transmission corridor that runs from the Quebec border 53 miles to central Maine.

As professional foresters, we were astonished by the lack of scientific credibility in the definition of “mature forest habitat” that was approved by DEP, and the business-as-usual commercial forestry proposed for over 80% of the conservation area.

The DEP’s approval requires NECEC to establish and protect 50,000 acres to be managed for mature-forest wildlife species and wildlife travel corridors along riparian areas and between mature forest habitats. The conservation plan will establish an area adjacent to the new transmission corridor to be protected under a conservation easement held by the state. Under this plan, 50% of the area will be managed as mature forest habitat.

Advertisement

Under the forest management plan, a typical even-aged stand will qualify as “mature forest habitat” once 50 feet tall, which is only about 50 years old. These stands will lack large trees that provide wildlife denning and nesting sites, multiple vegetation layers that mature-forest birds use for nesting and feeding habitats and large decaying trees and downed logs that provide habitat for insects, fungi and small mammals, which in turn benefit larger predators.

Another major concern is that contrary to the earlier DEP order, the final approval allows standard sustainable forestry operations on the 84% of the forest located outside the stream buffers and special habitats. These stands may be harvested as soon as they achieve the “mature forest habitat” definition, as long as 50% of the conserved land is maintained as “mature.”

After the mature forest goal is reached, clearcutting or other heavy harvesting could occur on thousands of acres every 10 years. Because the landowner — Weyerhaeuser — owns several hundred thousand acres in the vicinity, any reductions in harvesting within the conservation area can simply be offset by cutting more heavily nearby. As a result, the net
mature-forest benefit of the conservation area will be close to zero.

Third, because some mature stands will be cut before the 50% mature forest goal is reached, it will take 40 years — longer than necessary — to reach the goal.

In the near future the Board of Environmental Protection (BEP) will consider an appeal from environmental organizations of the plan approval. To ensure that ecologically mature forest develops in a manner that meets the intent of the DEP/BEP orders, several things need to change.

Advertisement

First and most important, to ensure that characteristics of mature forest habitat have time to develop it is critical that the definition include clear requirements for the minimum number of large-diameter (hence more mature) trees, adjusted by forest type. At least half the stocking of an area of mature forest habitat should be in trees at least 10 inches in diameter, and at least 20% of stands beyond the riparian buffers should have half the stocking in trees greater than or equal to 16 inches in diameter.

Current research as well as guidelines for defining ecologically mature forests, such as those in Maine Audubon’s Forestry for Maine Birds, should be followed.

Second, limits should be placed on the size and distribution of clearcut or “shelterwood” harvest patches so that even-aged harvests are similar in size to those created by typical natural forest disturbance patterns. These changes will help ensure that the mature-forest block and connectivity requirements of the orders are met.

Third, because the forest impacts have already occurred, no cutting should be allowed in the few stands that meet or exceed the DEP-approved definition — which needs to be revised as described above — until the 50% or greater mature-forest goal is reached.

If allowed to stand, the definitions and management described in the forest management plan would set a terrible precedent for conserving mature forests in Maine. The BEP should uphold the appeal and establish standards for truly mature forest habitat.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Maine

Rage Room in Portland, Maine, Developing ‘Scream Room’ Addition

Published

on

Rage Room in Portland, Maine, Developing ‘Scream Room’ Addition


For a lot of people throughout Maine, there’s some built up frustration that they’ve just been keeping inside.

That frustration can come in a lot of different forms. From finances to relationships to the world around you.

So it makes plenty of sense that a rage room opened in Portland, Maine, where people can let some of that frustration out.

It’s called Mayhem and people have been piling in to smash, crush and do dastardly things to inanimate objects that had no idea what was coming.

Advertisement

But Mayhem has realized not everyone is down with swinging a sledgehammer. So they’ve decided to cook up something new.

Mayhem Creating ‘Scream Room’ at Their Space in Portland, Maine

Perhaps the thought of swinging a baseball bat and destroying a glass vase brings you joy. The thought of how sore your body will be after that moment makes you less excited.

Mayhem Portland has heard you loud and clear and is developing a new way to get the rage out. By just screaming.

Mayhem is working on opening their very first scream room. It’s exactly what you think it is, a safe place to spend some time just screaming all of the frustration out.

There isn’t an official opening date set yet but it’s coming soon along with pricing.

Advertisement

Mayhem in Portland, Maine, Will Still Offer Rage Rooms and Paint Splatter

While a scream room is on the way, you can still experience a good time at Mayhem with one of their rage rooms or a paint splatter room.

Both can be experienced in either 20-minute or 30-minute sessions.

All the details including some age and attire requirements can be found here.

TripAdvisor’s Top 10 Things to do in Portland, Maine

Looking for fun things to do in Portland, ME? Here is what the reviewers on TripAdvisor say are the 10 best attractions.

This list was updated in March of 2026

Advertisement

Gallery Credit: Chris Sedenka

Top 15 of The Most Powerful People in Maine

Ever wonder who the most powerful players are in Maine? I’ve got a list!

Gallery Credit: Getty Images





Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Maine

Maine competition gives creative entrepreneurs the chance to win money

Published

on

Maine competition gives creative entrepreneurs the chance to win money


BANGOR, Maine (WABI) – If you’ve ever wondered what goes into pitching a good business idea, you might want to stop by a Big Gig event.

The Big Gig Entrepreneurship Pitch Off brings professionals from across the state together to network and pitch their early-stage business ideas for a chance to win $500.

Tuesday’s competition was held at the Salty Brick Market in Bangor, and it drew a lot of spectators.

“The winners of each semifinal event get $500 and the opportunity to compete for $5,000, so that can make a huge impact on a business that’s just getting off the ground,” said Renee Kelly, a Big Gig organizer.

Advertisement

The winner of the competition, Colin McGuire, was also grateful for the opportunity to showcase his idea “Art on Tap,” which would connect local artists with local venues trying to put on events.

“The support tonight is huge, and it’s just giving me more enthusiasm for running with the idea,” he said.

The season finale of the competition will be held May 19th.

The location is yet to be determined.

If you’d like to apply to compete in the contest, you can go to biggig.org.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending