Maine
Maine investigating moldy cannabis that led to state’s first recall
One week after the state recalled a handful of cannabis products for failing mold and yeast tests, it remains unclear how the contaminated products made it to the market.
The recall, announced last week, impacts one strain of cannabis flower and three strains of pre-rolls, all of which were produced by Cannabis Cured, a cultivator and retailer headquartered in Fairfield. It was the state’s first cannabis recall since the market launched four years ago.
Maine’s recreational cannabis is required to be tested, and Cannabis Cured maintains that the samples passed an initial round of testing.
“Before anything is placed on a shelf at Cannabis Cured, every item must have successfully met all of Maine’s rigorous quality and safety standards,” the company said in a statement on its website. “During a subsequent audit test conducted by the state, a portion of the products that they tested continued to meet state standards, while a portion did not.”
The company said all tainted products were immediately removed from shelves.
“Cannabis Cured puts safety and product quality above all else,” it said, adding that customers who bought the contaminated product could seek a refund or replacement at any of the company’s recreational locations.
Cannabis Cured declined to answer any other questions about the recall until it has completed “a thorough due diligence process and review,” but it did not say when that might be.
STATE SAYS LAB NOT AT FAULT
John Hudak, director of the Office of Cannabis Policy, said there was a “knee-jerk reaction” after the announcement to place the blame on the testing facility.
But Hudak was clear that “the issues did not exist within the cannabis testing facilities” and none of the state’s four labs is under investigation.
He defended the labs in a notice sent to industry members Friday.
“This recall was not necessitated by any misconduct by any cannabis testing facility operating in the state, nor any concerns regarding the methods, technology, processes or procedures used by these testing facilities,” Hudak wrote, adding that he has no concerns about the integrity of any of the labs.
Hudak would not say which lab tested the cannabis samples, citing an ongoing investigation.
The recall applies to 1-gram pre-rolls and packs of five pre-rolls of the strain GG4 sold between Aug. 27 and Sept. 9; 1/8-ounce packages of flower and 1-gram pre-rolls of a strain called Jelly Donutz, which were sold from Aug. 28 to Sept. 9; and five pre-roll packs of the strain Portal, sold from Aug. 28 to Sept. 3, the Office of Cannabis Policy said in its statement.
Inhaling cannabis containing unsafe levels of mold can lead to sinus issues, allergies, headaches, dizziness or fatigue,” the office said in the statement. “Any consumer who has ingested these products and is experiencing symptoms or adverse reactions should contact their physician immediately.”
HOW TESTING WORKS
Not every cannabis product on a store’s shelf has been individually tested. Rather, cultivators and manufacturers are required to submit “representative” samples of each batch. Sample sizes vary based on product and batch size and must be taken from multiple parts of the product. For cannabis flower, pre-roll and trim, for example, sample sizes range from 6.5 grams for a 2.5 kilogram batch and up to 22 grams for a 10 kilogram batch.
A contaminated batch hitting the market doesn’t automatically mean nefarious activity, Hudak said.
“This typically happens when there’s improper sample selection collection from the batches that are produced,” Hudak said.
This can happen accidentally because of improper training or intentionally, by not selecting a truly representative sample.
Hudak would not speculate on what happened in the case with Cannabis Cured, but he praised the “robust” testing and tracking system that raised a red flag.
It’s not the first time an issue has been caught, he said, but it is the first time the product had already been stocked on shelves and sold to consumers.
Yeast and mold are the most common contaminants that cause a sample to fail a test, according to Chris Altomare, founder and CEO of Portland-based Nova Analytics, one of the four licensed testing labs in the state. Altomare declined to say whether Nova Analytics tested the recalled product, citing confidentiality.
Maine requires recreational cannabis be tested for filth and foreign materials, mold and mildew, harmful microbes, potency, homogeneity and cannabinoid profiles, moisture content, heavy metals, residual solvents, and pesticides. The state does not require medical cannabis to be tested.
Mold is the most difficult test to pass, Altomare said.
“It’s easy not to fail for pesticides – you just don’t use pesticides,” he said. “Mold is just a really prevalent thing. It’s hard to control.”
MAKING IMPROVEMENTS
The failure threshold for yeast or mold contamination is 10,000 colony-forming units per gram.
Employees at Nova Analytics are trying to identify which microbes are most commonly found in samples that fail the required tests and whether they’re all harmful.
The goal, Altomare said, is to help the state improve its yeast and mold regulations.
Hudak, though, said the state’s standard is solid. It’s used by many other states and is the threshold recommended by the American Herbal Pharmacopoeia, he said.
“I’m always interested in new research and new data,” he said, but “what I don’t want is for yeast and mold (regulations) to be driven by business decisions rather than the health and safety of consumers.”
Hudak said the office will review what happened both internally and externally to learn what it might need to do better or how the office can help prevent another recall.
However, he added, it’s important not to overreact.
“One recall is four years is a pretty good track record,” Hudak said. “I don’t think that upending the way that samples are collected is likely necessitated here.”
The contaminated product was sold at Cannabis Cured’s adult-use retail locations in Bangor, Carrabassett Valley, Damariscotta, Eliot, Fairfield, Stratton and Thomaston, the office said in its statement. The company’s Portland location was not listed.
Hudak said the tracking system only records “from seed to sale,” so it wasn’t clear how much product has been returned. Cannabis Cured and Sweet Relief are keeping track of that information and will share it with the state, he said, adding that any of the contaminated product on the shelf that wasn’t sold has been accounted for and “destroyed.”
Maine
Maine police lieutenant, 2 others seriously injured in head-on crash
A police lieutenant in Maine and two others suffered serious injuries when another driver crashed head-on into his police cruiser in Turner while the lieutenant was on his way home from work on Monday, authorities said Tuesday.
Monmouth Police Lt. Dana Wessling, 52, of Turner, was extricated from his cruiser and flown to Maine Medical Center in Portland with serious but non-life-threatening injuries, the Androscoggin County Sheriff’s Office said in a statement.
The other driver, Sean McNeil, 41, of Minot, and his passenger, a 47-year-old woman from Turner, were both taken by ambulance to Central Maine Medical Center with serious but non-life-threatening injuries.
The conditions of Wessling, McNeil and the unidentified woman were not known on Tuesday.
On Monday, at 4:49 p.m., the Androscoggin County Regional Communications Center received a report of a two-vehicle, head-on crash at the intersection of Turner Center Road and Bradford Road in Turner.
Deputies along with Turner Fire-Rescue were immediately dispatched to the scene, the Androscoggin County Sheriff’s Office said.
A preliminary investigation found that Wessling was traveling west on Turner Center Road in his take-home cruiser, a black 2022 Ford Interceptor that is owned by the Town of Monmouth.
McNeil, driving his silver 2013 Ford F150 pickup truck, was traveling east on Turner Center Road when McNeil came around a curve, crossed the center line and was in Wessling’s lane when the two vehicles collided, authorities said.
Both vehicles had extensive front-end damage and were totaled, authorities said.
Wessling, who was on his way home at the end of his shift, had just picked up his 7-year-old son at daycare, the Androscoggin County Sheriff’s Office said. His son was taken by private vehicle to a local hospital to be examined for precautionary reasons.
Investigators from the sheriff’s office and the Lewiston Police Department were on scene to reconstruct the crash.
The crash investigation remains under investigation.
Turner is a small town in Maine, just north of Lewiston. The town’s population was 5,817 at the 2020 census.
This is a developing story. Check back for updates as more information becomes available.
Download the FREE Boston 25 News app for breaking news alerts.
Follow Boston 25 News on Facebook and Twitter. | Watch Boston 25 News NOW
Maine
Janet Mills wants to ensure Maine is ready for the next big storm
The first bill sponsored in Maine’s 132nd Legislature is a measure to help the state prepare for and respond to major storms.
Gov. Janet Mills, with support from both Democrats and Republicans, introduced resources and tools that can help support businesses and communities react to potential damage from inclement weather.
The bill is sponsored by Democratic Senate President Mattie Daughtry, Democratic House Speaker Ryan Fecteau, Senate Republican leader Trey Stewart and Republican House Minority Leader Billy Bob Faulkingham.
The bill would establish the Home Resiliency Program, which would provide grants up to $15,000 for homeowners to make improvements that would help mitigate storm impacts. The Maine Bureau of Insurance would oversee the $15 million program.
Mills also seeks to invest in Maine Emergency Management Agency resources, using special revenue funds from the Bureau of Insurance. The investments would fund communication technology upgrades, as well as providing financial support for ongoing disaster investigations.
“Last year, my Administration and the Legislature made the largest investment in storm recovery and resilience in Maine history,” Mills said in a Tuesday statement.
“That funding was significant, but it’s clear that it was only a down payment on the critical recovery and resilience work Maine must do to prepare our people and communities for the storms we know will become more frequent and intense in the years ahead.”
In the past two years, Maine communities have suffered devastation from storms that battered the state with high winds, unseasonable rainfall and intense flooding. Some pier owners are still rebuilding from storms that struck in December 2023.
The legislation would also establish a State Resilience Office, funded through a five-year grant from the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, that would focus on strategies to reduce flood and storm damages to public and private infrastructure.
Financial support for the projects would be taken from federal funding and already existing fees processed by the Bureau of Insurance, rather that from the general state budget.
Maine
The list of Maine parents waiting for a lawyer grew by 700 percent in 2024
Like many of her colleagues, family law attorney Taylor Kilgore has been watching the list of child protection cases in need of lawyers grow over the past year.
When the state removes children from their parents’ care because of concerns about abuse or neglect, those parents are guaranteed an attorney under Maine law.
Increasingly, they aren’t getting one. Over the course of 2024, the number of child protection cases in need of at least one attorney increased 700 percent, according to a list compiled by the judicial branch. On January 3 of last year, the state lacked attorneys for 14 cases, the list showed. On December 30, that number stood at 112.
The list is sent to the Maine Commission on Public Defense Services, which distributes it to attorneys on its roster. The list is used to help find attorneys for parents who can’t afford them, but it also serves as a way for the state to understand the size of the problem.
In late October, Kilgore came up with an idea to help get cases off the list. Her plan was to ask the state to let her look at the confidential cases and then pitch them to other attorneys, who she thought would be more likely to accept cases if they had a sense of the circumstances and amount of work that would be involved. Child protection case records are typically kept confidential to protect the identity of the involved children and parents.
She pitched the idea to Jim Billings, executive director of the Maine Commission on Public Defense Services, the independent commission tasked with paying and managing the roster of attorneys representing clients who can’t afford a private attorney. Billings brought the idea to the judicial branch, which agreed to let Kilgore have access to the unstaffed cases in Lewiston.
But after getting a look behind the curtain at the Lewiston courthouse, Kilgore has concerns about whether the list is properly accounting for the problem.
“I don’t think the list is actually accurate,” Kilgore said.
Maine’s system for removing children from parents consists of several government entities: the Department of Health and Human Services, which investigates child abuse and neglect; the Attorney General’s Office, which represents the department in court; and the judicial branch, which oversees the proceedings and ultimately rules on cases.
Together, these three bodies oversee a growing number of children and parents whose cases are hidden from public view.
The system removes around 1,000 children a year, and is one that federal auditors found failed to follow its own rules. It also seems increasingly unable to provide parents with the legal representation guaranteed to them by law, a problem highlighted in a child welfare watchdog report published last week.
“The shortage of defense attorneys for parents has caused weeks and months-long delays in the progress of reunification cases, harming children, parents, and increasing staff workload,” Maine’s child welfare ombudsman Christine Alberi wrote in her annual report to lawmakers.
The report follows a December letter of no confidence in the head of DHHS’s Office of Child and Family Services, which investigates allegations of child abuse and neglect. The letter was signed by 150 caseworkers.
Kilgore’s experience raises questions about whether the system is capable of accurately tallying all the families and children it is failing.
‘The list is not perfect’
In late November and early December, Kilgore spent two weeks reviewing cases in the Lewiston court and calling attorneys to try to get them to take cases off the list.
She found four cases that had been staffed for at least three weeks, but had not been removed from the list. More concerning were cases she found that needed attorneys but didn’t appear on the list.
Kilgore had an associate go to the courthouse and take notes on the cases on the docket call, writing down the docket number any time a case lacked counsel. From that, she was able to identify three cases in need of attorneys that were not on the list. Additionally, a criminal defense attorney who heard about Kilgore’s work contacted her about a client. The attorney asked if she knew the status of the client’s child protection case. But when Kilgore looked, she found the case was not on the list.
“I had to write back and say ‘they’re not identified anywhere in this list as needing counsel,’” Kilgore said.
The judiciary distributes a similar list for criminal cases without an attorney, and MCPDS executive director Jim Billings said Kilgore’s experience mirrors accounts he’s heard from attorneys on the criminal side.
There are cases that are on the list that should probably come off because they have already been staffed, Billings said. Conversely, Billings has heard from criminal defense attorneys that there are unrepresented criminal defendants who should be on the list, but are not.
“The list is not perfect,” Billings said. “But right now it’s the best tool we have to try and track the cases and triage as best we can.”
Judicial branch spokesperson Barbara Cardone did not respond to multiple emails with questions about how the list is compiled, maintained and updated.
Kilgore’s project fits into the commission’s effort to ensure poor Mainers get the representation guaranteed to them under state and federal law. The list of criminal cases grew throughout 2024. At the end of December, there were nearly 1,000 unstaffed cases, including more than 140 cases that involved defendants in jail.
To combat this problem, MCPDS is in the process of opening and staffing public defender offices across Maine. The commission has also hired Machias-based attorney Molly Owens as chief of the new system’s parents’ counsel division. Owens is tasked with building a team of public defenders devoted to representing indigent parents in child protection cases. She is in the process of hiring three attorneys to join the nascent team.
Three years from now, MCPDS wants the parents’ counsel defender team to have between 20 to 25 attorneys, allowing them to represent one parent in about half the state’s cases.
Owens praised Kilgore’s efforts to understand and staff child protection cases in Lewiston and said she would like to see those efforts replicated.
“Do I think there are cases that are not on the list? If Taylor is finding them, then yes,” she said.
“I don’t know how I would know how common that is until we do what Taylor is doing.”
Parents who wish to maintain custody of their children are fighting against a system that a recent federal audit found failed to follow its own rules when investigating allegations of child abuse or neglect.
A capable attorney can help identify those missteps, put pressure on the department and use those errors to argue on behalf of parents in court. Attorneys can also connect clients to services that can help move them toward reunification with their children.
But a lack of attorneys makes that kind of zealous representation less likely, which in turn results in more families separated and more cost to the state.
Cases are confidential, so it’s unclear how often judges disagree with the state or rule in favor of parents. The Monitor asked the judicial branch for insight into this issue but was told the judiciary could not provide data on when the courts rule against the department.
The Monitor also submitted a public records request in October to both DHHS and the Attorney General’s Office, which represents the department in court, seeking data on how often the state loses in court. Neither agency has provided records or an estimate of when they will be able to fulfill the request.
One recent decision from the Maine Supreme Court shows how even repeated failures by the department can have little impact on the outcomes of cases.
On October 3, the high court published a memorandum decision in an appeal of a termination of parental rights out of Portland. The memo notes that the lower court was right to terminate the parental rights of the mother despite the fact that the judge in the case ordered the department to file a rehabilitation and reunification plan “seven times during the pendency of the case and never did so.”
Maine’s child removal rate has made it an outlier in the United States. Only Maine and Nebraska took more children into state custody in 2022 than in 2018, according to the most recent federal data.
More children entering state custody increases demand for attorneys at the same time as the supply is falling. The number of attorneys rostered with MCPDS representing a parent in at least one case fell by more than half, from 230 to 110, between 2018 and 2024.
‘We can’t do it alone’
The December 30 edition of the parents’ counsel list contained 112 cases. This translates to an even greater number of attorneys, since each parent in a case is entitled to an attorney, and representing more than one parent in a case would present a conflict of interest. Some cases involve multiple children, sometimes with multiple partners, and thus could require three or more attorneys.
Of those cases, 79 were added to the list more than a month prior. Twenty-seven were added to the list before October, meaning that parents in those cases could have been waiting for representation for three months or longer while their children were in state custody.
Seven of the cases were added before July 2024. On the December 16 list, there was a case dating from April 2023 — over a year and a half earlier. By the end of the year, after The Monitor asked Judiciary spokesperson Barbara Cardone about the case and received no response, it had been removed. Given the concerns raised about the accuracy of the list, it’s unclear whether the case had finally been staffed in late December, or if it had been staffed earlier but had not been removed from the tally.
An additional five cases had no dates at all.
Kilgore started her project in late November. She reviewed 43 docket numbers in Lewiston and was able to find representation for 21 of the 56 parents involved in those 43 cases.
One of the cases involved a parent who had been on the list since February. By Kilgore’s count, the parent had been without an attorney for 281 days. Confidentiality rules prevented Kilgore from disclosing details of the case, but she noted that it had procedural issues that desperately required an attorney.
“The case was kind of on fire,” she said. “In my opinion, the parent’s rights were being violated.”
Kilgore was able to find an attorney to take the case, and said that overall she thinks the experiment was successful. Billings agreed.
“I think it shows that if there are devoted resources, even in a market that we think is saturated, we can still make some progress on the list if the effort is put in,” Billings said.
Next month, Kilgore is going to bring the experiment to the Portland courthouse.
But the problem is larger than finding attorneys, said Owens, the parents’ counsel chief. DHHS and the courts need to be held accountable and find ways to keep families together while keeping kids safe, she said.
“A lot of departments and agencies got us here,” Owens said. “We want to be part of the solution, but we can’t do it alone.”
This story was originally published by The Maine Monitor, a nonprofit civic news organization. To get regular coverage from the Monitor, sign up for a free Monitor newsletter here.
-
Business7 days ago
These are the top 7 issues facing the struggling restaurant industry in 2025
-
Culture7 days ago
The 25 worst losses in college football history, including Baylor’s 2024 entry at Colorado
-
Sports6 days ago
The top out-of-contract players available as free transfers: Kimmich, De Bruyne, Van Dijk…
-
Politics5 days ago
New Orleans attacker had 'remote detonator' for explosives in French Quarter, Biden says
-
Politics5 days ago
Carter's judicial picks reshaped the federal bench across the country
-
Politics3 days ago
Who Are the Recipients of the Presidential Medal of Freedom?
-
Health2 days ago
Ozempic ‘microdosing’ is the new weight-loss trend: Should you try it?
-
World7 days ago
Ivory Coast says French troops to leave country after decades