Connect with us

Northeast

Local officials attack New York City plan to house migrants in Staten Island church: 'Hurting this community'

Published

on

Staten Island officials had harsh words for New York City’s latest plan to open a migrant shelter in a local church.

Staten Island Borough President Vito Fossella, alongside Councilwoman Kamillah Hanks and Councilman David Carr, held a last-minute press conference on Monday attacking a proposal to place 15 cots in the Faith United Methodist Church for single adult men. 

“Out of the blue, in the dark of the night, we were just told last week that ‘guess what, despite all your best efforts, we’re going to open up a migrant shelter…which is wrong. We come here united,” Fossella, a Republican, said, according to the New York Post.

The bipartisan group of community leaders agreed that opening a migrant shelter would be “hurting this community and the people.”

FURIOUS STATEN ISLAND RESIDENT VOWS COMMUNITY WILL STOP MIGRANT SHELTER IN ITS TRACKS: ‘THIS IS GROUND ZERO’

Advertisement

Staten Island Borough president Vito Fossella said that the city only gave him a few days’ notice before insisting that a local church would open a migrant shelter. (Photo by Helen H. Richardson/MediaNews Group/The Denver Post via Getty Images)

“Some people in this community wake up every day trying to figure out, ‘How do we make Portland Richmond better? How do we make the North Shore better?’” Fossella said.

He added, “And then along comes the agencies, [which] say, ‘Guess what? Here’s a way we can make it better: We’re gonna’ dump a migrant shelter right in the middle of your neighborhood.’”

“How is that any degree of common sense? It’s not,” he said. “We have to stand and fight back.”

Hanks, a Democratic councilwoman, agreed with Fossella and criticized the city for giving them such short notice, the New York Post reported.

Advertisement

“The residents of this district are tired — they’re tired of constantly waking up one day to find that an institution they trusted has made the decision that they feel will have a negative impact on their community and their safety,” Hanks continued.

She added, “We deserve a reasonable expectation that communities will be provided with adequate notice and will not intentionally keep us in the dark while decisions are made.”

NYC-Migrant-Protests-Roosevelt-Hotel

Staten Island residents and local leaders have attacked New York City’s attempts to shelter migrants in their neighborhoods. (Julia Bonavita/Fox News Digital)

Carr, a Republican, noted that it was unlikely the church could even be equipped to be converted into a shelter, insisting that Staten Island is not under any obligation to provide shelter for migrants.

“We should be talking about closing shelters, winding them down, not opening up new ones like the one that they intend to put behind us,” he said, indicating the church behind them.

“I’m not just against migrant shelters in my backyard,” Carr continued. “I’m against migrant shelters in everyone’s backyard.”

Advertisement

NYC RESIDENTS PROTEST ON STATEN ISLAND AS MIGRANT CRISIS WORSENS, CLAIM THEY ARE ‘NOT BEING VETTED’: REPORT

Speaking with Fox News Digital, Fossella said that Staten Island has frequently pushed back against some of New York City’s efforts to open more migrant shelters in their borough. For example, in September, a Staten Island judge ruled that a school being used to house migrants had to be vacated.

“From day one, we’ve been pretty clear that we feel that this policy is unsustainable. And clearly, it’s been unsustainable,” he said.

Vito Fossella

Fossella attacked New York City’s “right to shelter” mindset when it comes to welcoming migrants.

He further attacked the way New York City has been handling the migrant crisis over the past few years.

“Every day, people from all over the world come, and they roll the dice and once they cross the border, they are sent to wherever they want to go. And the unfortunate situation in New York City is the belief that’s wrong, that there’s this so-called ‘right to shelter’ that the city has an obligation to accommodate them, to put them up in hotels, to feed them, to give them mopeds, to give them iPhones. It’s wrong. It’s just not true,” Fossella said.

Advertisement

As of Monday night, Fossella stated that he had not yet heard back from the city.

Fox News Digital reached out to the New York City mayor’s office for a comment.

Read the full article from Here

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Vermont

He flipped off a trooper and got charged. Now Vermont is on the hook for $175,000

Published

on

He flipped off a trooper and got charged. Now Vermont is on the hook for $175,000


ST. ALBANS, Vt. (AP) — Vermont has agreed to pay $175,000 to settle a lawsuit on behalf of a man who was charged with a crime for giving a state trooper the middle finger in 2018, the state chapter of the American Civil Liberties Union said Wednesday.

The lawsuit was filed in 2021 by the ACLU of Vermont on behalf of Gregory Bombard, of St. Albans. It says Bombard’s First Amendment rights were violated after an unnecessary traffic stop and retaliatory arrest in 2018.

Trooper Jay Riggen stopped Bombard’s vehicle in St. Albans on Feb. 9, 2018, because he believed Bombard had shown him the middle finger, according to the lawsuit. Bombard denied that but says he did curse and display the middle finger once the initial stop was concluded.

Bombard was stopped again and arrested on a charge of disorderly conduct, and his car was towed. He was jailed for over an hour and cited to criminal court, according to the ACLU. The charge was eventually dismissed.

Advertisement

Under the settlement signed by the parties this month, the state has agreed to pay Bombard $100,000 and $75,000 to the ACLU of Vermont and the Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression for legal fees.

“While our client is pleased with this outcome, this incident should never have happened in the first place,” said Hillary Rich, staff attorney for the ACLU of Vermont, in a statement. “Police need to respect everyone’s First Amendment rights — even for things they consider offensive or insulting.”

The Vermont State Police did not have a comment on the settlement.

Bombard said in a statement provided by the ACLU that he hopes the Vermont State Police will train its troopers “to avoid silencing criticism or making baseless car stops.”

___

Advertisement

This story has been updated to correct the name of an organization to the Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression, instead of the Foundation of Individual Rights and Expression.



Source link

Continue Reading

Northeast

The squad is put on notice after Bowman is trounced, Missouri member's nomination is up next

Published

on

Join Fox News for access to this content

Plus special access to select articles and other premium content with your account – free of charge.

By entering your email and pushing continue, you are agreeing to Fox News’ Terms of Use and Privacy Policy, which includes our Notice of Financial Incentive.

Please enter a valid email address.

Having trouble? Click here.

Rep. Cori Bush of Missouri is in the campaign spotlight, after the first member of the group of progressive and diverse House Democrats went down to defeat in a Democratic Party congressional primary.

Rep. Jamaal Bowman of New York was soundly defeated by Westchester County executive George Latimer on Tuesday in a high-profile and divisive Democratic Party primary in New York’s 16th Congressional District.

Advertisement

Bowman has the dubious honor of becoming the first House member of either party to be defeated by a primary challenger so far in the 2024 election cycle. 

And Bowman also became the first member of the Squad to be ousted from Congress.

THIS HOUSE DEMOCRAT BECOMES THE FIRST SQUAD MEMBER DEFEATED IN A PRIMARY

U.S. Representative Jamaal Bowman (D-NY) speaks to the crowd while he campaigns in the Bronx borough of New York City, on June 22, 2024. REUTERS/Joy Malone (REUTERS/Joy Malone)

The contentious battle between a member of the Squad and his more moderate challenger spotlighted the Democrats’ deep divisions over the war between Israel and Hamas in Gaza.

Advertisement

Bowman – who has been outspoken about his support for Palestinians amid the war in Gaza and has charged that Israel has committed genocide – was targeted by roughly $14 million in spending by a group affiliated with the American Israel Public Affairs Committee, the deep-pocketed pro-Israel group that supported Latimer.

AOC EASILY WINS DEMOCRATIC PRIMARY

That spending – part of an overall $25 million shelled out by all sides in the primary to run ads -helped the race earn a page in the record books as the most expensive congressional primary in the nation’s history.

The spotlight may now shift to Missouri’s First Congressional District, a deep blue seat which includes the city of St. Louis and its northern suburbs. 

Cori Bush at DC protest

Rep. Cori Bush faces a tough Democratic primary challenge in Missouri’s August 6 primaries. (Paul Morigi/Getty Images for Communications Workers of America (CWA))

That’s where the second-term Bush is facing a primary challenge from St. Louis County prosecutor Wesley Bell, who is being supported by AIPAC.

Advertisement

The scant polling in the race suggests Bush faces a tough challenge as she seeks renomination in the August 6 primary.

CLICK HERE TO GET FOX NEWS APP

Ahead of Bowman’s double-digit defeat to Latimer, Bush took to social media on Tuesday afternoon to apparently take aim at AIPAC.

“Let me be clear: #WeDecide our future. Not far-right megadonors who want to meddle in our Democratic elections.” she emphasized.

The big question going forward in the Bush-Bell primary is whether DMFI and United Democracy Project, the AIPAC-affiliated group that shelled out big bucks to help topple Bowman, will also spend big in the Missouri primary to target Bush, who has also been critical of Israel.

Advertisement

Squad members mostly represent deep blue seats with high concentrations of minority voters.

Rep. Jamaal Bowman of New York is fighting for his political life in Tuesday's Democratic primary

Rep. Jamaal Bowman (D-NY) greets Senator Bernie Sanders (I-VT) and Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez while he campaigns in the Bronx borough of New York City, U.S., June 22, 2024.  REUTERS/Joy Malone (REUTERS/Joy Malone)

But while New York’s 16th Congressional District, which Bowman represents, includes parts of the New York City borough of the Bronx, most of it lies in the southern half of suburban Westchester County.

While Bowman went down to defeat, Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez – a founding member of the Squad – on Tuesday easily won renomination in New York’s 14th Congressional District, which includes portions of the Bronx and Queens.

Get the latest updates from the 2024 campaign trail, exclusive interviews and more at our Fox News Digital election hub.

Read the full article from Here

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Boston, MA

New report says Boston has fourth worst traffic in the US – Boston News, Weather, Sports | WHDH 7News

Published

on

New report says Boston has fourth worst traffic in the US – Boston News, Weather, Sports | WHDH 7News


BOSTON (WHDH) – A new report says Boston has some of the worst traffic on Earth, ranking fourth in the US and eighth overall in the world. 

The findings are part of the INRIX Global Traffic Scorecard, released by the transportation analytics firm INRIX. 

New York City led the US and the world, with the average driver spending 101 hours in traffic in 2023, according to INRIX. 

Boston drivers spent 88 hours in traffic, behind only New York, Chicago, and Los Angeles among US cities. 

Advertisement

The average cost of congestion per driver in Boston reached $1,543. Within the downtown area, drivers’ speeds averaged just 10 miles-per-hour.

Some of Boston’s worst traffic was on I-93. 

Though Boston traffic was 14% worse in 2023 than it was in 2022, traffic levels were still down 1% compared to prepandemic figures in 2019, according to INRIX.

(Copyright (c) 2024 Sunbeam Television. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.)

Join our Newsletter for the latest news right to your inbox
Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending