Connect with us

Connecticut

Exclusive | Ex-CBS anchor Josh Elliott back on Connecticut dating scene after ugly Liz Cho split

Published

on

Exclusive | Ex-CBS anchor Josh Elliott back on Connecticut dating scene after ugly Liz Cho split


Ex-CBS host Josh Elliott is looking for love eight months after he filed for divorce from “Eyewitness News” anchor Liz Cho.

“Josh is out and about on the dating scene in Fairfield County,” a spy exclusively tells Page Six. “He’s been seen at the bars in the area where middle-aged singles congregate.” 

A second source tells Page Six, “Josh isn’t dating anyone, but he is open to meeting people. His daughter is his priority.”

Page Six can also reveal that Elliott moved out of his and Cho’s estimated $4.2 million Connecticut marital home in January.

Advertisement
Josh Elliott (pictured above back in July) is “open” to dating eight months after filing for divorce from Liz Cho. FOX Image Collection via Getty Images
The former CBS anchor (seen here in 2016 with his estranged wife) has been on the dating scene in Connecticut. Kristina Bumphrey/Starpix / Shutterstock

In court papers dated Jan. 29 and obtained by Page Six, Cho revealed Elliott moved out of their home and into a new residence without her knowledge.

Cho claimed she was notified by Optimum on Jan. 21, regarding her ex installing internet at his new home.

“The Defendant learned for the first time from said communication that on or about January 15, 2026, the Plaintiff secured an unfurnished rental residence located in Southport, Connecticut,” the filing read.

“It is now clear that the Plaintiff surreptitiously entered a new lease…” the court papers continued.

A rep for Elliott did not respond to Page Six’s request for comment.

Advertisement
Elliott moved out of the Connecticut home he shared with Cho earlier this year. Getty Images
The former “Good Morning America” anchor divorced from Cho in June after a decade of marriage. Getty Images

Page Six broke the ousted CBS anchor filed for divorce from Cho after a decade of marriage on June 20, 2025.

“The marriage of the parties has broken down irretrievably,” the court papers read. Elliott asked for a “dissolution of the marriage” and for “an equitable distribution of all property, both real and personal.”

Cho responded to her estranged husband’s complaint on Nov. 6 and filed a cross-complaint against him. She also stated their marriage “has broken down irretrievably.”

The divorce became messy when Cho requested “copies of written correspondence, emails, cards, WeChat messages, Facebook messages, social media messaging, instant messaging, telephonic text messages, transcribed voicemail messages or any written forms of communication” between Elliott and “any person, other than the defendant, with whom [Elliott] have or have had a romantic and/or sexual relationship, from July 11, 2015, to the present.”

Elliott objected the request on the “grounds that the time frame of the request for production is unreasonable, unnecessary, harassing and not likely to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence.”

Advertisement

Cho also requested “monies spent for the benefit of any person with whom you have had a romantic and/or sexual relationship, other than the defendant,” “property given or transferred by you to any person with whom you have had a romantic and/or sexual relationship, other than the defendant,” “monies spent for your benefit by any person with whom you have had a romantic and/or sexual relationship with, other than the defendant.”

The TV personality in addition requested financial records, documentation proving Elliott’s search for employment — as he was ousted from CBS in 2017 — travel invoices, and more. Elliott objected to the requests.

A source close to the couple previously told Page Six, “This is standard in a divorce. Her lawyer is doing a thorough document request. The documents she is requesting are standard.” The insider also insisted there is no evidence Elliott had a relationship with anyone outside the marriage.

As Page Six reported, Cho requested documentation from Elliott, including financial. Kristina Bumphrey/Starpix / Shutterstock
He objected her requests, as their divorce proceedings have turned nasty. Cindy Ord

Also in the Jan. 29 court filing, Cho filed a motion for contempt against Elliott regarding their jointly owned marital Connecticut mansion.

Cho claimed Elliott arranged for a moving truck to come to the marital residence while she was on vacation with her daughter on Jan. 19.

Advertisement

Cho claimed Elliott moved a “significant amount of furniture and furnishings from the marital residence,” and their “two Portuguese water dogs,” which she alleged at the time of the filing were not returned.

The court docs continued to allege, “On Tuesday, January 6, 2026, [Cho] realized that she was missing a valuable watch and earrings from her jewelry bag. As [Elliott] is the only other person who had access to the missing watch and jewelry, [Cho] believes [Elliott] is in possession of such personal property.”

She claimed his alleged actions are a “willful violation” of the court’s orders.

The insider alleged Elliott was the one to take care of the dogs and that he took “a small amount of furniture.”

In Elliott’s response to her filing, he objected to her request and claimed her allegations are “false and inflammatory.”

Advertisement

He claimed in court papers, “[Cho] alleges [Elliott] ‘ransacked’ and ‘abandoned’ the marital residence — claims that are patently false and intended to annoy, harass and intimidate [Elliott].

“[Elliott] did not ransack the marital home. He did not damage the property. He did not render the residence uninhabitable. He removed limited personal property and furnishings so he would have a safe haven from [Cho’s] escalating and erratic behavior direct at not only [Elliott], but his minor child as well.”

Cho accused Elliott (seen in 2019) of taking their two dogs. Getty Images
She also accused him of taking her earrings — claims he denied in court papers. GC Images

In a separate filing, he continued to defend his actions by alleging, “[Elliott] removed only limited furniture items and furnishings, many from the basement, solely to furnish a new residence after removing himself and his child from a hostile environment created by [Cho]. All property remains intact and subject to equitable distribution.”

In regard to the jewelry claim, Elliott said, “Perhaps most egregious is [Cho’s] baseless accusation that [Elliott] stole her jewelry. This allegation is made without evidence, without corroboration and without even a good-faith attempt to verify the truth.”

He then accused her of “monitoring and listening to [Elliott’s] private phone calls; rifling through [Elliott’s] personal belongings and closet; leaving the marital residence for extended periods without communication despite the presence of two dogs requiring daily care” and more claims.

Advertisement

He is requesting that the court deny her motion for contempt and they are due in court on March 20.

Lawyers for Cho and Elliott did not respond to Page Six’s request for comment regarding the divorce.

Elliott accused his estranged wife of escalating and erratic behavior. Lawyers for Cho did not respond to Page Six’s request for comment. Jamie McCarthy
Elliott is in talks to return to television to join Gayle King and Nate Burleson on “CBS Mornings.” Brian Ach

Elliott, 54, and Cho, 55, met while working for ABC and got married in July 2015.

This was the second marriage for both, as they each share a daughter from their previous relationships.

Cho has been with ABC on “Eyewitness News” since 2003, while Elliott was with ABC’s “Good Morning America” from 2011 to 2014.

Advertisement

After a brief stint with NBC, he joined CBSN as lead daytime anchor in March 2016. Nearly a year later, he was let go from the company.

Elliott has been out of the spotlight in recent years, but is now in talks to join Gayle King and Nate Burleson on “CBS Mornings,” Awful Announcing reported.



Source link

Advertisement

Connecticut

Soaring fertilizer prices from Iran war impacting Connecticut farmers

Published

on

Soaring fertilizer prices from Iran war impacting Connecticut farmers


The Iran war is having a big impact on farmers in Connecticut who are now dealing with soaring fertilizer prices. It’s a crucial material that helps grow or produce the food you buy at the grocery store.

“I go to the grocery store, and you see how expensive it is,” Jon Hermonot, an owner of Fairholm Farm, said.

High supermarket prices have Hermonot wincing whenever he makes a grocery run, but he has a good understanding of how prices are set, as he owns Fairholm Farm. It’s a dairy farm in Woodstock. Hermonot says it’s a very demanding and intensive operation with small profit margins.

“We put a lot of our money back into it, and we want this farm to be here,” he said.

Advertisement

He has hundreds of cows to feed and care for, but doing so has gotten harder ever since the Iran war began, especially because of the price of fertilizer.

“You combine that with the price of fuel and the other costs on the dairy farm, and to top that off, it’s like a perfect storm right now,” he said.

At the farm, they have seen the price of fertilizer double in about a month, in the tens of thousands of dollars. It’s used to grow the corn that goes into the feed the dairy cows eat.

“No fertilizer, no food. No farms, no food,” Paul Larson, president of the Connecticut Farm Bureau board, said.

He said fertilizer is crucial to grow many types of crops.

Advertisement

“Whether it’s vegetables, you’re raising hay, corn silage,” he said.

Larson explained that natural gas, a key component in fertilizer production, is affected by the war. That region produces a lot of it, and tankers are unable to get through the Strait of Hormuz, leading to a jump in price on the world market. Larson said farmers across Connecticut are noticing.

“It went around $400 in early February, but then after this war started in Iran, we’re now up to $850 to $900 a ton,” Larson said.

UConn vegetable and hemp specialist and educator Shuresh Ghimire said the timing isn’t great. Farmers have to decide now what to grow and how much to plant, so they’re ready for harvest in the fall.

“Not enough fertilizer would mean decreased crop yields. And that would also translate to increased produce prices at grocery stores later in the summer and fall,” he said.

Advertisement

Ghimire says even if the war ended quickly, there’s no immediate relief for farmers.

“The prices are not going to come down the day after. It will take some time to come down,” he said.

Larson and Hermenot hope President Trump secures a peace deal soon that ends the conflict and reopens trade to stabilize prices.

“That would be amazing. That would take the edge off of this,” Larson said.

“Maybe coming down to an agreement that can maybe open up the channel for oil to be flowing again,” Hermenot said.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Connecticut

Eversource flying helicopters to inspect electric lines in several Connecticut municipalities

Published

on

Eversource flying helicopters to inspect electric lines in several Connecticut municipalities


NEW HAVEN, Conn. (WTNH) — Eversource is conducting aerial inspections of electrical lines in several municipalities in the state this week, according to officials.

A low-flying helicopter will survey the condition of the electrical lines to identify potential issues before they cause power outages, officials said.

The helicopters will fly along the utility right-of-way Wednesday through Friday between 8 a.m. and 3 p.m. depending on the weather, officials said.

Inspections are expected in:

Advertisement
  • Avon
  • Bloomfield
  • Bolton
  • Cromwell
  • East Hartford
  • Hartford
  • Manchester
  • Rocky Hill
  • Simsbury
  • West Hartford
  • Wethersfield
  • Windsor

Between Monday and Tuesday, Eversource helicopter inspected Berlin, Bethany, Bristol, Cheshire, Durham, Farmington, Meriden, Middlefield, New Britain, Newington, Plainville, Plymouth, Prospect, Southington and Wolcott.



Source link

Continue Reading

Connecticut

‘I don’t think we have balance’: Gov. Lamont tours solar facilities in East Windsor

Published

on

‘I don’t think we have balance’: Gov. Lamont tours solar facilities in East Windsor


About a third of the state’s solar energy is collected in East Windsor, and another facility could be coming.

Neighbors have been airing their concerns about more solar in town. Gov. Ned Lamont toured a facility on East Road with lawmakers and people who live in the neighborhood across the street to hear some of those concerns on Tuesday.

“I love clean, renewable power that’s also affordable, but I also love open space, protecting open space, and I don’t think we have that balance right now,” Lamont said. “We’re taking open space, we’re taking fields and commercializing them. In this case with solar, I think that’s going the wrong direction.”

Neighbor Amanda Berube described a constant humming coming from the facility.

Advertisement

“We built our home prior to the solar array going in, and we had built it for the peace and quiet that the area offered up, surrounded by farmland,” she said. “We deal with a ringing noise that comes from this facility from sunup to sundown. And it’s extremely loud, and it just permeates through our home if we have our windows open.”

Berube also told the governor about a fire that started from one of the transformers on the facility’s property last March.

“If the wind had been blowing in a different direction that day into the panels, we don’t have the support apparatus to put that out,” East Windsor First Selectman Jason Bowsza (D) said. “We can’t use PFAS.  We don’t have fire hydrants out here.”

East Windsor and Ellington State Representative Jamie Foster backs a bill that would upgrade fire reporting. She said she’s confident it will pass.

“There’s no plan for when there’s been an incident on a solar field, and there’s a fire,” she said. “Who determines the point of safety? It certainly shouldn’t be just the developer on their own who gets to say, ‘yep, safe. I’m turning it back on.’ They obviously have a financial incentive to turn it back on.”

Advertisement

Plans for a proposed solar project called Saltbox Solar would build arrays across from Berube’s neighborhood, throughout East Windsor, and in Ellington. It would produce 160,000 megawatts of energy annually, according to the project’s website.

John Hoffman, the owner of Hockanum Valley Farm, said the proposed site for Saltbox Solar is prime, meaning it can produce food year-round.

“It drains well, and we are in a 45-inch rainfall zone in this state,” he said. “And you can grow, especially food. So, vegetables and corn silage or hay for dairy cows. And we have a big concentration of dairy cattle to be fed right in this area.”

Flat land near transmission lines is ideal infrastructure to build solar arrays, which is why companies drift towards East Windsor.

Saltbox Solar has not yet been considered by the state siting council, which approves solar projects, such as the recently approved 150-acre expansion of Gravel Pit Solar in East Windsor.

Advertisement

Currently, municipalities lack representation on the siting council. The governor said it was too early to announce his support for a bill that would implement local representation, but he admitted there needs to be a change.

“I will say we ought to make sure we have legislation in place that guides the Siting Council and DEEP towards what we think are our broad interests,” he said.

DESRI, the parent company of Saltbox Solar and Gravel Pit, was unavailable for comment.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending