Connect with us

Connecticut

CT legislature OKs emergency heating funds: ‘People heating their homes with their ovens’

Published

on

CT legislature OKs emergency heating funds: ‘People heating their homes with their ovens’


With temperatures plummeting across Connecticut, state lawmakers voted Wednesday for $17 million in emergency funding to keep residents warm during the coming cold weeks.

Lawmakers unanimously approved bipartisan legislation for $13.5 million for the Connecticut Energy Assistance Program and another $3.5 million for Operation Fuel, a nonprofit that has been helping families with fuel bills for the past 46 years.

The state Senate voted 35-0 with one member absent, while the House of Representatives voted 147-0 with four members absent.

About 58,000 households have already exhausted their allotment this year, and they will be applying now to receive additional money, officials said. Gov. Ned Lamont immediately signed the bill before 3:30 p.m. Wednesday, and the money will be allotted as quickly as possible.

Advertisement

While low-income customers who use electricity and natural gas cannot be shut off during the winter by the regulated utilities, those receiving fuel deliveries are not protected.

Using unspent federal COVID relief funds, lawmakers said they were stepping up to provide one-time money when the federal government did not provide supplemental funds.

“Due to a shortfall in federal funding, the funding has returned to pre-pandemic levels, but the need out there has not,” said Sen. Matt Lesser, a Middletown Democrat who co-chairs the human services committee. “There are families out there who are trying to get through the entire winter on only $180 of heating assistance. It is 21 degrees outside in Hartford today, and $180 just does not go very far in terms of buying heating oil. There are people out there who are struggling.”

Lesser added, “We’re hearing lots of reports of people heating their homes with their ovens, running space heaters, and racking up major electric bills. The need out there is really great, and meanwhile, we had unspent [federal] funds that we’re going to be able to provide real relief starting immediately.”

The money will generally go to families who are already receiving benefits and who automatically qualify if they receive food stamps or other benefits, such as state supplements for the aged, blind and disabled. The maximum income allowed is 60% of the state’s median income, which is $54,338 per couple.

Advertisement

Cloe Poisson / Special to the Courant

State Sen. Matt Lesser, who co-chairs the legislature’s human services committee, says too many families have experienced the cold this year due to a lack of fuel assistance. Photo by Cloe Poisson/Special to the Courant

High needs in many districts

Sen. Jorge Cabrera, a Hamden Democrat, told the story of when he was young and his family had left the oven open in their home in the winter.

“I realized that we didn’t have the money to heat our home that particular week,” Cabrera said on the Senate floor. “It dawned on me that people are taking real risks.”

Decades later, Cabrera said Wednesday that he has heard similar instances and “heartbreaking stories” from senior citizens and others in his state Senate district in the Naugatuck Valley.

Advertisement

Sen. Herron Gaston, a Bridgeport Democrat, said he represents a district with many low-income residents who need financial assistance.

“I hear time and time again from constituents that they need help,” Gaston said.

A woman in his district had left her stove on for so long that the fire department told her that she could not stay in the home because the carbon monoxide levels were so high, Gaston said.

“On Valentine’s Day, this is an act of love,” Gaston said of the funding. “This is an act of compassion. … This is a moral call.”

Sen. Ceci Maher, a Wilton Democrat serving her first term, said some lawmakers might be surprised to learn that the needs are present even in affluent Fairfield County.

Advertisement

Sen. Jeff Gordon, a Woodstock Republican, said the money is important in his often-rural district that stretches to towns like Ashford, Chaplin and Eastford.

“More and more people are needing the help,” Gordon said, “especially for those who have any kind of medical condition.”

Senate majority leader Bob Duff of Norwalk said he personally had an oil delivery that was more than $4 per gallon.

“There are a lot of families who cannot pay that bill,” Duff said, adding that it is unhealthy for senior citizens to live in homes that are too cold. “My constituents say, ‘We need help.’ … That’s why we’re here today. … This is something that we have to do today because the need is greater than it had been before. It cannot wait until the budget is done in May. We have to do this today, which is why we have an emergency-certified bill.”

Senate Republican leader Kevin Kelly of Stratford, a major champion of increased fuel funding for years, joined in support. He has repeatedly called for increasing the benefit levels, not just the overall funding.

Advertisement

“I rise, grateful that we are going to do something,” Kelly said on the Senate floor. “Something is always better than nothing. … The people who are going to benefit from this are feeling the dysfunction of Washington, which has funded this in the past. … These families are having a tough time.”

With cold temperatures at times in an up-and-down winter, approved applications had increased by 8.6% over last year by mid-January, and nearly 60% of applicants had already exhausted their benefits. Due to the federal cuts, benefit levels were decreased at a time when demand for assistance increased.

“I understand Washington isn’t doing its job,” Kelly said. “We watch it on the nightly news. … This is a start – by no means, an end. … I wish and hope we can do more.”

Senate Republican Leader Kevin Kelly has been pushing for years for increased home heating assistance. Here, he stands with colleagues Sens. Eric Berthel (left), Lisa Seminara and Tony Hwang of Fairfield at the state Capitol complex.

Alison Cross

Senate Republican Leader Kevin Kelly has been pushing for years for increased home heating assistance. Here, he stands with colleagues Sens. Eric Berthel (left), Lisa Seminara and Tony Hwang of Fairfield at the state Capitol complex.

Democrats directly blamed the dysfunction on the U.S. House Republicans, but Republicans blamed both sides in Washington, D.C.

“When we speak of dysfunction at the federal level, I think we need to be more specific,” said Senate President Pro Tem Martin Looney, pointing directly at House Republicans.

Advertisement

But House Republican leader Vincent Candelora of North Branford said there is enough blame to go around.

“Last I knew, we had a two-party system in the federal government,” Candelora said when asked by The Courant. “So, I wouldn’t deem it a Republican dysfunction. Clearly, it’s a Democrat and Republican dysfunction in Washington.”

Christopher Keating can be reached at ckeating@courant.com 



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Connecticut

In one affluent CT town, uncommonly little public resistance to affordable housing plan

Published

on

In one affluent CT town, uncommonly little public resistance to affordable housing plan


Despite hitting widespread public opposition to its affordable housing plans in several wealthy Connecticut towns, Vessel Technologies has gotten mostly support for its proposed 64-unit apartment building in Avon.

Only one resident spoke against the plan at a hearing Tuesday night, and letters and email about the project ran 6-1 in favor of it, zoning officials said.

The town is expected to decide next month whether New York-based Vessel may build 64 small, high-tech apartments off Avonwood Road near Route 44.

The company has invoked Connecticut’s 8-30g law, which sharply limits the authority of local zoning commissions over affordable housing proposals.

Advertisement

Vessel has encountered a range of responses to similar 8-30g plans elsewhere: Cheshire approved one relatively quickly, while Granby recently rejected another. Vessel took Simsbury, Glastonbury and Rocky Hill to court after they tried to keep it out; the company negotiated a compromise with Rocky Hill, reached a settlement with Simsbury and is still pursuing its Glastonbury suit.

In most of those communities, groups of homeowners were outspoken in urging the town to stop Vessel from building. Mostly they cited concerns about too much density and traffic, but objections included water runoff from the parking lots, architecture that wouldn’t conform with the surrounding neighborhoods and excessive building height.

In some towns, hearings on Vessel plans have been adjourned to larger venues to accommodate overflow crowds. But in Avon, Vessel has gotten more pushback from the planning and zoning commission than from the public.

Only two residents spoke at Tuesday night’s hearing, with one man emphasizing that 8-30g doesn’t prohibit the commission from voting “no.” Instead, it gives developers an advantage afterward if they appeal a rejection — and that only comes into play if they’re willing to take the town to court, he said.

Avonwood Road homeowner Nancy Maccoll told commissioners that parking and traffic are serious issues with the Vessel plan. Since Avonwood is a cul de sac, Maccoll said it can’t accommodate overflow cars from Vessel ending up parked along the roadside.

Advertisement

“I’ve lived here for over 20 years. Avonwood Road is a very small, tiny road, there’s one lane going in and one gong out. I find it totally unacceptable that you would even consider people parking on the street,” she said.

There’s heavy traffic already when the Reggio Magnet School is in session, and putting even more cars through the Avonwood and Waterville Road traffic light will cause backups, she said.

But even though Avonwood has nearly 200 apartments, no other people spoke Tuesday night.

Two commissioners raised reservations about parking and fire safety, noting that 8-30g lists public health and safety as the two factors that could justify rejecting affordable housing plans.

After company President Josh Levy agreed to add three spaces to the 70 already planned, one commissioner pressed for more and warned that overflow visitors would end up parking along the street and potentially blocking firetrucks and other motorists. Levy said his consultants would work with town staff to see if reconfiguring the landscaping would allow a couple additional spaces.

Advertisement
An illustration of Vessel Technologies’ proposed apartment project in Avon. (Courtesy of Town of Avon)

Commissioner Robin Baran, though, cautioned that the zoning rules that cover Vessel’s plan require only 67 spaces.

“One thing I’ve learned in eight years here is that you have to vote to the regulation. That is legally how we have to vote,” she said. “I share everyone’s concerns up here and favor working together to maximize the parking, but this has been deemed a suitable property (under Avon’s long-term development plan) for affordable housing and apartment buildings.”

Vessel plans a four-story building with 61 one-bedroom, 560-square-foot apartments and three two-bedroom, 560-square-foot units. Levy would set aside 30% as “affordable” under state regulations, so rents would be restricted for 40 years to be affordable to people earning no more than 60% or 80% of the area’s median income.

Levy said that would work out to monthly rates of $1,240 at 60% and $1,450 at 80%, but noted those figures change every year based on state data. The other 70% of units would probably be leased in the $1,600 to $1,700, but that estimate isn’t firm, Levy said.

The commission discussed the public safety language in 8-30g, but Chairman Lisa Levin noted that the law brings that into play only when those concerns “clearly outweigh” the need for affordable housing and cannot be addressed by reasonable changes to the plan.

Advertisement

“This applicant has been making every effort to accommodate and make the reasonable changes with the overflow parking,” she said. “I don’t know that we can ask more.”

When one commissioner suggested more than 30% of the apartments should be limited to affordable rents, Levy said that would leave no way to control expense increases in the future. He said Vessel would be willing to talk with town officials if Avon wanted to provide long-term tax caps.

The commission closed the hearing Tuesday, and may vote when it takes up the matter again July 16.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Connecticut

Man who killed 2 Connecticut officers likely fueled by a prior interaction with police, report says

Published

on

Man who killed 2 Connecticut officers likely fueled by a prior interaction with police, report says


The ambush killings of two Connecticut police officers was likely fueled by an angry interaction the gunman had with police earlier, along with building pressures in his personal life and his abuse of alcohol and drugs, according to a report released Wednesday by the state’s Inspector General.

The report detailing how Bristol police Sgt. Dustin DeMonte and Officer Alex Hamzy were gunned down in the driveway of a home also found that a third officer who survived the 2022 attack was justified in fatally shooting the gunman, identified by police as Nicholas Brutcher.

Inspector General Robert Devlin’s investigation — required by law in cases of deadly force — describe Brutcher in a downward spiral in the face of mounting debt, his ex-wife’s pregnancy with a former friend, and a scolding by his mother following a traffic stop that evening.

Nevertheless, “It must be emphasized that Nicholas Brutcher is the murderer here,” it said. “It would be wrong to place any blame for the attack on the traffic stop officers or others in Nicholas Brutcher’s life.”

Advertisement

Brutcher made a false call to 911 on the night of Oct. 12, 2022, asking for help with his brother, who he claimed had been acting aggressively since the two were pulled over in a traffic stop after a bar fight earlier that night, the report said.

As DeMonte, Hamzy and Officer Alec Iurato approached Brutcher’s home in response to the call, Brutcher opened fire with an AR-15 style rifle from a hiding spot in some bushes in front of his parents’ house next door, striking all three officers, according to the report. Wearing a camouflage shirt, pants and vest, he then stood over DeMonte and Hamzy where they had fallen and fired dozens more shots at them in front of his horrified parents, Joseph and Catrina Brutcher, who had come outside.

“How proud are you of me? How proud?” Brutcher said as he fired, possibly addressing his parents, according to the report.

His mother’s nonstop screams were caught on police body camera video.

“I don’t think I ever screamed like that before in my life,” Catrina Brutcher told investigators. “My son walked over to one of the officers that was down and just shot him point blank in his head. I was just screaming at him to stop.”

Advertisement

Joseph Brutcher said his son was “in a trance-type thing.”

Iurato, struck in the leg, was able to get away. Bracing himself against a police cruiser, he fired a single shot, striking Brutcher and killing him, the report said.

Friends and relatives said Brutcher had in recent months talked about suicide, describing a morbid side that found its way into a stand-up comedy act that one friend called “dark and tasteless.”

“He told jokes about dead babies, suicide, and disabled persons,” the report said.

The evening had begun at a bar where Brutcher had planned to perform during an open-mic forum, but instead got into a drunken fight with a patron, leading a bartender to call police, according to the report.

Advertisement

After Brutcher and his brother, Nathan, left the bar, officers pulled over their truck and had it towed, saying Nicholas Brutcher was too drunk to drive and Nathan Brutcher had an expired driver’s license. Their mother was called to pick them up. At the scene, she scolded a belligerent Nicholas, an interaction that likely left him feeling humiliated, the report said.

“I was embarrassed and I told him that,” Catrina Brutcher said. “I said, `Nick you’re embarrassing your family; you’re embarrassing our name.’”

Authorities concluded there was not enough evidence to charge Nathan Brutcher, who was struck in the initial round of gunfire.

Nicholas Brutcher fired a total of 83 rounds: 59 from the assault rifle and 24 from a 9 mm handgun, the report said.

“Twenty-four shots landed on Officer Hamzy. Six shots landed on Sergeant DeMonte,” it said.

Advertisement

Brutcher had 14 registered firearms, according to the report, including the assault weapon, now banned in Connecticut. He had purchased the weapon in 2010 and was grandfathered in under the law, but there is no record that he applied for a required certificate of possession or the large capacity magazines in his possession.

His blood alcohol level at .234 was about three times the legal limit to drive, toxicology results showed.

An analysis of his phone suggested that Brutcher was in a “toxic” relationship with a woman, who on the day of the attack told him she may have been pregnant. Information on the phone also indicated he had gotten another woman pregnant, whose due date was in October 2022, around the time of the shooting, the report said.

“The analysis of Nicholas Brutcher’s phone, interviews of family/friends, and a comprehensive review of all collected evidence provided insight into the stressors of Nicholas Brutcher’s life that likely contributed to the ambush attack on officers,” the report said.

DeMonte, 35, was a 10-year veteran officer and co-recipient of his department’s 2019 Officer of the Year award. His wife was expecting their third child at the time of his death.

Advertisement

Hamzy, 34, worked eight years for his hometown police force. Like DeMonte, he was an adviser to a police cadet program.

Iurato joined the Bristol department in 2018.

—-

Thompson reported from Buffalo, New York.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Connecticut

Connecticut car dealerships hit by cyberattack

Published

on

Connecticut car dealerships hit by cyberattack


MILFORD, Conn. (WTNH) — For the seventh consecutive day, car dealerships, parts suppliers and repair shops are dealing with a nationwide outage of a widely used software that was caused by a cyberattack.

CDK, a software used by 15,000 retail dealerships nationwide, experienced back-to-back cyberattacks last week. It caused the company to shut down all of its systems as an abundance of caution, but the issue has still not been resolved.

For dealerships like Napoli Nissan in Milford, the last seven days have been a time warp. 

“We’re going 65-70 years back in time,” said Brendan Camilleri, the general sales manager. “Everything is all hand-written. Invoices are hand-written…everything from service to sales.”

Advertisement

Camilleri said the software is used for everything from purchasing to repairs. He added while business continues while the system down, the work is piling up.

“Over the last several years, we’ve automated everything to make a buyer’s experience much more smoother, and without having software to back us up makes it incredibly difficult,” he said, adding it has also caused delays for customers purchasing cars. 

Service shops like Turnpike Motors in Newington said it is also affected by the cyberattack, which is causing delays in getting parts from its suppliers.

“If we call up and ask them if there’s a part they may have showed it in the inventory at one point, and they have to get out of the chair and go to the shelf to see if they actually have it,” Doug Fernandez, who owns Turnpike Motors, said. “All their inventory is frozen. They can’t keep count of it. They don’t know if they have one or 10 of anything right now.”

Fernandez and Camilleri both said they’ve received no indication as to when the software could be back online, but added the implications could have a ripple effect for months.  

Advertisement

“It’s just messy,” Fernandez said. “The worst part about it is there’s a financial hit because you’re going to have to quote stuff out to deliver things and you’re going to have the wrong information and as the businesses we’re going to have to pay for those differences. And there’s just going to be a bunch of invoices and things that get lost.” 

CDK Global did not respond to News 8’s request for comment.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending