Connect with us

Connecticut

CT Jan. 6 defendants included in mass pardon from Trump

Published

on

CT Jan. 6 defendants included in mass pardon from Trump


Making good on a campaign promise, newly inaugurated President Donald Trump on Monday issued clemency to all defendants federally charged in connection with the Jan. 6, 2021, attack on the U.S. Capitol he incited.

Eleven Connecticut residents had been charged in connection with the Justice Department’s investigation into Jan. 6. Two other defendants, Victoria Bergeson and Maurcio Mendez, both of Groton, were arrested on the day of the riot and charged with violation of the D.C. Code for unlawful entry to the Capitol grounds. They were each sentenced to 180 days of confinement and two years of probation.

Connecticut Public reached out to each defendant charged via the DOJ investigation or their legal counsel for comment on the pardons. All either declined or did not return calls or emails, except for Heather Shaner, who represented Carla Krzywicki. Krzywicki was part of a mother-daughter duo from Canterbury. Investigators say they climbed a bike rack to enter the Capitol.

“I am happy for my clients, if it makes their lives easier,” Shaner said. “I am terrified for the future of democracy.”

Advertisement

Shaner said Krzywicki benefited from probation because it provided her access to mental health treatment. She also said her client was extremely remorseful and had educated herself since the Capitol attack.

Shaner called the pardons “cynical horse [expletive].”

“I think it’s a big middle finger to America,” Shaner said. “It just validates the original Big Lie that the election was stolen. It’s just, ‘I’m a big boy. I can do anything the [expletive] I want. Ha ha, now I’m president.’”

Shaner’s attitude about the pardon stood in contrast to New Haven-based attorney Norm Pattis, who on Monday celebrated the broad pardon.

Meet the CT residents investigated by the DOJ after January 6, 2021

Advertisement

CREDIT: Courtesy of US Attorney’s office for the District of Columbia

In this screen grab from video, Ridgefield, Connecticut resident Patrick McCaughey is shown in the Lower West Terrace tunnel of the US Capitol building on January 6, 2020. Federal prosecutors said he used a police riot shield to pin an officer to a door frame, as a crowd of rioters in the tunnel fought with officers and tried to force their way into the building.

Patrick Edward McCaughey III, Ridgefield

McCaughey was charged with and convicted of seven felonies and two misdemeanors. Prosecutors presented evidence that McCaughey participated in the “savage beating” of a police officer at the Capitol. He was alleged to have participated in using a riot shield to pin a police officer in Capitol doors, as seen in dramatic footage. He had been sentenced to seven and a half years in prison. CT Post reported Tuesday that his mother said he was currently en route to Connecticut after being released from prison in Ohio.

Advertisement

Image from the Statement of Facts as part of the Criminal Complaint. Emphasis not added. Description from the Statement of Facts: “As MARKEY continued to push himself toward the police line, he raised the baton (Figure 4), struck an as-yet unidentified officer […] in the face shield with his left hand…”

US District Court

/

District of Columbia

Image from the Statement of Facts as part of the Criminal Complaint. Emphasis not added. Description from the Statement of Facts: “As MARKEY continued to push himself toward the police line, he raised the baton (Figure 4), struck an as-yet unidentified officer […] in the face shield with his left hand…”

Richard Markey, Wolcott

Advertisement

Markey pleaded guilty to assaulting, resisting or impeding police using a dangerous weapon. He had been sentenced to two and a half years in prison.

Image from the Statement of Facts as part of the Criminal Complaint. Emphasis not added. Description from the Statement of Facts: “Based upon my review of Capitol surveillance footage, LAVIN and KRZYWICKI entered the U.S. Capitol through the Senate Wing Door at approximately 2:24 pm on January 6, 2021.”

US District Court

/

District of Columbia

Advertisement
Image from the Statement of Facts as part of the Criminal Complaint. Emphasis not added. Description from the Statement of Facts: “Based upon my review of Capitol surveillance footage, LAVIN and KRZYWICKI entered the U.S. Capitol through the Senate Wing Door at approximately 2:24 pm on January 6, 2021.”

Jean Lavin and daughter Carla Krzywicki, Canterbury

Lavin and Krzywicki had each received 36 months of probation after pleading guilty to charges that they breached the Capitol during the insurrection. Krzywicki had also been sentenced to three months of home detention, and Lavin had been sentenced to two months of home detention.

Brothers Thomas and Michael Kenny, Greenwich

Each pleaded guilty to charges of disorderly conduct in a Capitol building and parading, demonstrating or picketing in a Capitol building. They were due to be sentenced Jan. 28, 2025.

Advertisement

Image from the Statement of Facts as part of the Criminal Complaint. Emphasis not added. Description from the Statement of Facts: “Final photograph presented to Witness-1 for 3rd party identification. (DiGiovanni highlighted in yellow).”

US District Court

/

District of Columbia

Image from the Statement of Facts as part of the Criminal Complaint. Emphasis not added. Description from the Statement of Facts: “Final photograph presented to Witness-1 for 3rd party identification. (DiGiovanni highlighted in yellow).”

Gino DiGiovanni Jr., Derby

Former Derby Alderman DiGiovanni pleaded guilty to entering and remaining in a restricted building. In April 2024, he was sentenced to 10 days in prison and 12 months of supervised release.

Advertisement

Image from the Statement of Facts as part of the Criminal Complaint. Description from the Statement of Facts: “Footage of the Senate Chamber depicts Richard T. CROSBY, Jr. on the Senate dais (center) on January 6, 2021 shortly after the evacuation of Vice President Pence and Senators from the Chamber.”

US District Court

/

District of Columbia

Image from the Statement of Facts as part of the Criminal Complaint. Description from the Statement of Facts: “Footage of the Senate Chamber depicts Richard T. CROSBY, Jr. on the Senate dais (center) on January 6, 2021 shortly after the evacuation of Vice President Pence and Senators from the Chamber.”

Richard T. Crosby Jr., Harwinton 

Advertisement

Crosby breached the Senate chamber and stood on the dais alongside the so-called “QAnon Shaman.” He pleaded guilty to four charges. He was due to be sentenced in February.

Image from the Statement of Facts as part of the Criminal Complaint. Emphasis not added. Description from the Statement of Facts: “Open-source video shows that COHEN then made physical contact with the group of officers— pushing and shoving them wi9ht his hands as the crowd surged forward.”

US District Court

/

District of Columbia

Advertisement
Image from the Statement of Facts as part of the Criminal Complaint. Emphasis not added. Description from the Statement of Facts: “Open-source video shows that COHEN then made physical contact with the group of officers— pushing and shoving them with his hands as the crowd surged forward.”

Benjamin Cohen, Westport 

Cohen pleaded guilty to assaulting, resisting or impeding officers. Prosecutors said he took part in the pushing of a line of police officers. His case was dismissed on Tuesday before sentencing.

Image from the Statement of Facts as part of the Criminal Complaint. Emphasis not added. Description from the Statement of Facts: “CLEARY stood near the Tunnel entrance as rioters moved furniture from an office toward the Tunnel.”

US District Court

/

Advertisement

District of Columbia

Image from the Statement of Facts as part of the Criminal Complaint. Emphasis not added. Description from the Statement of Facts: “CLEARY stood near the Tunnel entrance as rioters moved furniture from an office toward the Tunnel.”

James Roe Cleary, Waterford 

Cleary was charged with multiple counts, including engaging in physical violence in a restricted building. He pleaded not guilty and his case had been continued to March 2025.

Image from the Statement of Facts as part of the Criminal Complaint. Emphasis not added. Description from the Statement of Facts: “BAOUCHE was seen entering the US Capitol through the Upper West Terrace Door at approximately 2:35 EST.”

US District Court

Advertisement

/

District of Columbia

Image from the Statement of Facts as part of the Criminal Complaint. Emphasis not added. Description from the Statement of Facts: “BAOUCHE was seen entering the US Capitol through the Upper West Terrace Door at approximately 2:35 EST.”

Jeremy Baouche, New London

Baouche, an Electric Boat employee, pleaded guilty to parading, demonstrating, or picketing in a Capitol building. He had been sentenced to 30 days in prison and two years of probation.

Federal delegation reacts

Advertisement

Some members of Connecticut’s all-Democratic federal delegation were quick to respond to the pardons.

Sen. Chris Murphy (D-Conn.) called the pardons a “massive celebration of political violence.”

“I just don’t think that we can over hype how dangerous it is that today… he is pardoning, he is expunging the prosecutions of the people who tried to tear down our Capitol, who tried to install into power the loser of the 2020 election,” Murphy said.

Sen. Richard Blumenthal (D-Conn.) called Trump’s decision “sickening.”

“The mass pardons for people who committed a violent insurrection, not only injuring but in some cases causing the deaths of police officers, is absolutely abhorrent,” Blumenthal told reporters. “These January 6 rioters were lawfully convicted by a jury of peers, everyday Americans, and it is a discredit to our criminal justice system for the president of the United States to issue pardons to people who sought to prevent a peaceful transition of power.”

Advertisement

Rep. Jim Himes, who was at the building during the Capitol breach that day, posted on social media that the pardons were “a grotesque abuse of authority and a betrayal of our democracy.”

Connecticut Republican Party Chairman Ben Proto said Tuesday the party would only provide a statement on Trump’s Jan. 6 pardons “when there is a statement from [the Connecticut Democratic Party] on Biden pardons and clemency.”





Source link

Advertisement

Connecticut

Connecticut moves to crack down on bottle redemption fraud

Published

on

Connecticut moves to crack down on bottle redemption fraud


It’s a scheme made famous by a nearly 30-year-old episode of the sitcom Seinfeld.

Hoping to earn a quick buck, two characters load a mail truck full of soda bottles and beer cans purchased with a redeemable 5-cent deposit in New York, before traveling to Michigan, where they can be recycled for 10 cents apiece. With few thousand cans, they calculate, the trip will earn a decent profit. In the end, the plan fell apart.

But after Connecticut raised the value of its own bottle deposits to 10 cents in 2024, officials say, they were caught off guard by a flood of such fraudulent returns coming in from out of state. Redemption rates have reached 97%, and some beverage distributors have reported millions of dollars in losses as a result of having to pay out for excess returns of their products.

On Thursday, state lawmakers passed an emergency bill to crack down on illegal returns by increasing fines, requiring redemption centers to keep track of bulk drop-offs and allowing local police to go after out-of-state violators.

Advertisement

“I’m heartbroken,” said House Speaker Matt Ritter, D-Hartford, who supported the effort to increase deposits to 10 cents and expand the number of items eligible for redemption. “I spent a lot of political capital to get the bottle bill passed in 2021, and never in a million years did I think that New York, New Jersey and Rhode Island residents would return so many bottles.”

The legislation, Senate Bill 299, would increase fines for violating the bottle bill law from $50 to $500 on a first offense. For third and subsequent offenses, the penalty would increase from $250 to $2,000 and misdemeanor punishable by up to one year in prison.

In addition, it requires redemption centers to be licensed by the state’s Department of Energy and Environmental Protection (previously, those businesses were only required to register with DEEP). As a condition of their license, redemption centers must keep records of anyone seeking to redeem more than 1,000 bottles and cans in a single day.

Anyone not affiliated with a qualified nonprofit would be prohibited from redeeming more than 4,000 bottles a day, down from the previous limit of 5,000.

The bill also seeks to pressure some larger redemption centers into adopting automated scanning technologies, such as reverse vending machines, by temporarily lowering the handling fee that is paid on each beverage container processed by those centers.

Advertisement

The bill easily passed the Senate on Wednesday and the House on Thursday on its way to Gov. Ned Lamont.

While the bill drew bipartisan support, Republicans described it as a temporary fix to a growing problem.

House Minority Leader Vincent Candelora, R-North Branford, called the switch to 10-cent deposits an “unmitigated disaster” and said he believed out-of-state redemption centers were offloading much of their inventory within Connecticut.

“The sheer quantity that is being redeemed in the state of Connecticut, this isn’t two people putting cans into a post office truck,” Candelora said. “This is far more organized than that.”

The impact of those excess returns is felt mostly by the state’s wholesale beverage distributors, who initiate the redemption process by collecting an additional 10 cents on every eligible bottle and can they sell to supermarkets, liquor stores and other retailers within Connecticut. The distributors are required to pay that money back — plus a handling fee — once the containers are returned to the store or a redemption center.

Advertisement

According to the state’s Department of Revenue Services, nearly 12% of wholesalers reported having to pay out more redemptions than they collected in deposits in 2025. Those losses totaled $11.3 million.

Peter Gallo, the vice president of Star Distributors in West Haven, said his company’s losses alone have totaled more than $2 million since the increase on deposits went into effect two years ago. As time goes on, he said, the deficit has only grown.

“We’re hoping we can get something fixed here, because it’s a tough pill to be holding on to debt that we should get paid for,” Gallo said.

Still, officials say they have no way of tracking precisely how many of the roughly 2 billion containers that were redeemed in the state last year were illegally brought in from other states. That’s because most products lack any kind of identifiable marking indicating where they were sold.

“There’s no way to tell right now. That’s one of the core issues here,” said state Rep. John-Michael Parker, D-Madison, who co-chairs the legislature’s Environment Committee.

Advertisement

Parker said the issue could be solved if product labels were printed with a specific barcode or other feature that would be unique to Connecticut. Such a solution, for now, has faced technological challenges and pushback from the beverage industry, he said.

Not everyone involved in the handling, sorting and redemption of bottles is happy about the upcoming changes — or the process by which they were approved.

Francis Bartolomeo, the owner of a Fran’s Cans and Bart’s Bottles in Watertown, said he was only made aware of the legislation on Monday from a fellow redemption center owner. Since then, he said, he’s been contacting his legislators to oppose the bill and was frustrated by the lack of a public hearing.

“I know other people are as flabbergasted as I am because they don’t know where it comes out of,” Bartolomeo said “It’s a one sided affair, really.”

Bartolomeo said one of his biggest concerns with the bill is the $2,500 annual licensing fee that it would place on redemption centers. While he agreed that out-of-state redemptions are a problem, he said it should be up to the state to improve enforcement.

Advertisement

“We’re cleaning up the mess, and we’re going to end up being penalized,” Bartolomeo said. “Get rid of it and go back to 5 cents if it’s that big of a hindrance, but don’t penalize the redemption centers for what you imposed.”

Lynn Little of New Milford Redemption Center supports the increased penalties but believes the solution ultimately lies with better labeling by the distributors. She is also frustrated by the volume caps after the state initially gave grants to residents looking to open their own bottle redemption businesses.

“They’re taking a volume business, because any business where you make 3 cents per unit (the average handling fee) is a volume business, and limiting the volume we can take in, you’re crushing small businesses,” Little said.

Ritter said that he opposed a move back to the 5-cent deposit, which he noted was increased to encourage recycling. However, he said the current situation has become politically untenable and puts the state at risk of a lawsuit from distributors.

“We’re getting to a point where we’re going to lose the bottle bill,” Ritter said. “If we got sued in court, I think we’d lose.”

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Connecticut

Stanley Black & Decker To Shutter New Britain Manufacturing Facility

Published

on

Stanley Black & Decker To Shutter New Britain Manufacturing Facility


NEW BRITAIN, CT — Stanley Black & Decker on Thursday said it has decided to close its manufacturing facility in New Britain.

Debora Raymond, vice president of external communications for the manufacturer, said the decision is a result of a “structural decline in demand for single-sided tape measures.”

The New Britain facility predominantly makes these products, according to Raymond.

“These products are quickly becoming obsolete in the markets we serve,” Raymond said, via an emailed statement Thursday.

Advertisement

The decision is expected to impact approximately 300 employees, according to Raymond.

“We are focused on supporting impacted employees through this transition, including providing options for employment at other facilities, severance, and job placement support services for both salaried and hourly employees,” Raymond said.

As of Thursday at 4:30 p.m., no Worker Adjustment and Retraining Notification (WARN) Act notice had been filed with the state Department of Labor.

The company’s corporate headquarters remains at 1000 Stanley Dr., New Britain.

Gov. Ned Lamont released the following statement on the decision:

Advertisement

“Although Stanley has made the decision to discontinue operations for manufacturing outdated products, a change in workforce opportunities is difficult for employees, their families, and any community.,” Lamont said. “However, I am hopeful that these skilled workers will be repurposed with the help of Stanley Black & Decker, a company that will still proudly be headquartered here in Connecticut. My administration is working closely with local and state leaders to support affected workers and to reimagine the factory site so it can continue to create opportunity and strengthen New Britain’s economic future.”

New Britain Mayor Bobby Sanchez said he is “deeply disappointed” the company will be closing its Myrtle Street operations.

“For generations, Stanley Works has been part of the fabric of our city, providing good-paying jobs, supporting families, and helping build New Britain’s proud reputation as the ‘Hardware City,’” Sanchez said.

According to the mayor, his office’s immediate focus is on helping affected workers and their families. The mayor has been in contact with Lamont’s office, and they will be working closely to make sure employees have access to job placement services, retraining opportunities and support, Sanchez said.

“We will continue aggressively pursuing economic development opportunities and attracting businesses that are looking for a true community partner, a city ready to collaborate, innovate and grow alongside them,” Sanchez said. “New Britain has reinvented itself before, and we will do so again.”

Advertisement

Stanley Black & Decker, founded in 1843, operates manufacturing facilities worldwide, according to its website. It reports having 43,500 employees globally, and makes an array of products, such as power tools and equipment, hand tools, and fasteners.





Source link

Continue Reading

Connecticut

Police video shows Vince McMahon’s 100 mph car crash in Connecticut

Published

on

Police video shows Vince McMahon’s 100 mph car crash in Connecticut


Newly released police video shows former WWE executive Vince McMahon ram his luxury sports car into the rear end of another vehicle on a Connecticut highway last summer as he was being followed by a state trooper.

McMahon, now 80, was driving his 2024 Bentley Continental GT at more than 100 mph on the Merritt Parkway when he crashed in the town of Westport, according to state police.

A trooper’s dashcam video shows McMahon accelerating away, then braking too late to avoid crashing into the back of a BMW. The Bentley then swerves into a guardrail and careens back across the highway, creating a cloud of dirt and car parts.

“Why were you driving all over 100 mph?” state police Detective Maxwell Robins asked McMahon after catching up to the wrecked Bentley, which can cost over $300,000.

Advertisement

News Roundups

Catch up on the day’s news you need to know.

By signing up, you agree to our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy.

“I got my granddaughter’s birthday” McMahon replied, explaining he was on his way to see her. The encounter was recorded on police bodycam video.

No one was seriously injured in the July 24 crash, which happened the same day that WWE legend Hulk Hogan died of a heart attack in Florida.

Advertisement

Besides damage to the rear of the BMW, another vehicle driving on the opposite side of the parkway was struck by flying debris. The driver of that third car happened to be wearing a WWE shirt, according to the police video.

McMahon was cited for reckless driving and following too closely. A state judge in October allowed McMahon to enter a pretrial probation program that will result in the charges being erased from his record next October if he successfully completes the program. He was also ordered to make a $1,000 charitable contribution.

McMahon’s lawyer, Mark Sherman, said the crash was just an accident.

“Not every car accident is a crime,” Sherman said. “Vince’s primary concern during this case was for the other drivers and is appreciative that the court saw this more of an accident than a crime that needed to be prosecuted.”

State police said Robins was trying to catch up to McMahon on the parkway and clock his speed before pulling him over. They said the incident was not a pursuit, which happens when police chase someone trying to flee officers. They also said it did not appear McMahon was trying to escape — though in the video the detective suggests otherwise.

Advertisement

“I’m trying to catch up to you and you keep taking off,” Robins says.

“No, no no. I’m not trying to outrun you,” McMahon says.

An accident information summary provided to the media shortly after the crash did not mention that a trooper was following McMahon.

The Associated Press obtained the videos Wednesday through a public records request. They were first obtained by The Sun newspaper.

The trooper’s bodycam video also shows him asking McMahon whether he was looking at his phone when the crash happened. McMahon said he was not and adds that he hadn’t driven his car in a long time.

Advertisement

After Robins tells McMahon that his car is fast, McMahon replies, “Yeah, too (expletive) fast.”

The videos also show McMahon talking to the driver he rear-ended. Barbara Doran, of New York City, told the AP last summer that McMahon expressed his concern for her and was glad she was OK. She said she was heading to a ferry to Martha’s Vineyard at the time of the crash.

After McMahon was given the traffic summons, he shook hands with Robins and another trooper and they wished him well.

McMahon stepped down as WWE’s CEO in 2022 amid a company investigation into sexual misconduct allegations. He also resigned as executive chairman of the board of directors of TKO Group Holdings, the parent company of WWE, in 2024, a day after a former WWE employee filed a sexual abuse lawsuit against him. McMahon has denied the allegations. The lawsuit remains pending.

McMahon bought what was then the World Wrestling Federation in 1982 and transformed it from a regional wrestling company into a worldwide phenomenon. Besides running the company with his wife, Linda, who is now the U.S. education secretary, he also performed at WWE events as himself.

Advertisement
1-on-1 with Lash Legend: Former Texas A&M basketball star turned WWE’s next big thing

Legend, alongside Nia Jax, will compete for the WWE women’s tag team titles against Rhea Ripley and Iyo Sky on Friday at American Airlines Center.

Wrestling legend Kevin Von Erich flashes the ‘claw’ as he’s photographed in the studio,...
After iconic wrestling career, why Kevin Von Erich calls right now ‘the best part of life’

The legendary Texan has seen every up and down of professional wrestling. Now, he enjoys the fruits of his labor through family.



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending