Connect with us

Connecticut

CT federal court nominee takes another GOP pasting but moves closer to confirmation

Published

on

CT federal court nominee takes another GOP pasting but moves closer to confirmation


Quinnipiac law professor Sarah Russell’s  nomination to the federal court took another beating from Senate Republicans in Washington Thursday over a letter she signed calling for the mass release of criminals from prisons and jails during the COVID pandemic.

Russell was not present in person at what amounted to her second appearance before the committee. Following her acrimonious, in-person, first appearance in November, Republicans succeeded in blocking her nomination from moving to the floor for a vote. President Biden resubmitted her nomination a week ago, leading to Thursday’s hearing.

Texas Senator Ted Cruz led the Republican attack Monday, using an easel and charts to attack the 2020 letter Russell signed with 1,500 others, a letter she said she could not recall at her first appearance and failed to submit to the committee under its records request.

“It is easy to see why she would want to forget this letter,” Cruz said. “The letter demanded that due to COVID, the governor of Connecticut should ‘immediately release to the maximum extent possible people incarcerated pre-trial and post conviction. In other words, let everyone out.”

Advertisement

“The people of Connecticut would be horrified to know that a woman who called on the governor to release violent criminals is now going to be a federal judge with the power to release violent criminals into their community. This is not mainstream. This is extreme.”

Connecticut U.S. Sen. Richard Blumenthal tried to defend Russell.

“There is nothing new here,” Blumenthal said. “This committee has already heard these allegations and more. This nominee is extraordinarily well qualified as a scholar, a litigator, a teacher,  over decades. And that is the reason why the people of Connecticut  do strongly support her nomination and why President Biden commendably has nominated her.”

“As to this letter, Sarah Russell has disavowed the views in it. She has told this committee that signing it was a mistake. It was overbroad. She didn’t write it. She didn’t edit it. She doesn’t agree with its views. And maybe I’m the only one on this committee, but there are a few letters I’ve  signed that I look back and said, ‘Gee maybe not such a good idea.’ She was among 1,500 signatories.”

At the end of the committee meeting, Russell was approved for second time by an 11-10 party line vote, meaning her nomination again moves to the full Senate, which Democrats narrowly control by a 51-49 margin, for a confirmation vote.

Advertisement

Carl Tobias, a law professor who tracks federal judicial nominations at the University of Richmond, called the Republican criticism expected and probably of no consequence. He predicted the Senate will confirm the Russell nomination by a narrow vote in coming weeks.

Russell’s nomination is supported by a number of groups, including The Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights, which said Thursday that her “significant experience rooting out disparities in the criminal-legal system and protecting the rights of all people — including her critical work as a public defender — will greatly benefit the District of Connecticut and add incredibly valuable perspectives to the judiciary.”

Russell is a law professor at Quinnipiac University, who has taught at Yale University and worked as a public defender in federal court. She is part of the cohort of federal judges nominated by Biden, who called on the senate at the start of his term to confirm federal judges that diversity the court by race, ethnicity, sexual orientation and professional background.



Source link

Advertisement

Connecticut

The ranks of unaffiliated CT voters are growing

Published

on

The ranks of unaffiliated CT voters are growing


The number of registered Democrats is dropping in Connecticut as more voters have chosen to register without a political party.

Advertisement

The Democratic share of Connecticut voters dropped almost 2 percentage points since 2020, the Republican portion increased 0.7 percentage points, and voters unaffiliated with any party increased by 1%.

But Democratic candidates aren’t necessarily losing votes as the party loses registrants — made clear after Democrats flipped control of 28 towns and cities in the Nov. 4 election.

window.addEventListener(“message”,function(a){if(void 0!==a.data[“datawrapper-height”]){var e=document.querySelectorAll(“iframe”);for(var t in a.data[“datawrapper-height”])for(var r,i=0;r=e[i];i++)if(r.contentWindow===a.source){var d=a.data[“datawrapper-height”][t]+”px”;r.style.height=d}}});

Across the nation, more voters are straying away from political parties. According to Gallup polls, a record 43% of people across the nation self-identified as independent in both 2023 and 2024. Since 2000, the number of self-identifying independents has only reached 43% one other time — in 2014.

But within the state, towns and cities are split on this change. Just under half of towns saw a decrease in the percentage of all voters who were unaffiliated, while a little more than half saw an increase.

Advertisement

window.addEventListener(“message”,function(a){if(void 0!==a.data[“datawrapper-height”]){var e=document.querySelectorAll(“iframe”);for(var t in a.data[“datawrapper-height”])for(var r,i=0;r=e[i];i++)if(r.contentWindow===a.source){var d=a.data[“datawrapper-height”][t]+”px”;r.style.height=d}}});

For Republican and Democratic registration, though, this is not the case. Nearly every town in the state saw a decrease in registered Democrats 2024 to 2025, with many seeing percent changes of over 1% in just one year.

Republicans got a big bump in party registration — accounting for 0.8% more of all registered voters 2023 to 2025. More than 100 towns saw percent increases in registered Republicans 2024 to 2025, and cities like Hartford and New Haven saw the largest percent increases, following a larger state-wide trend.

More than 20 towns held municipal primaries in 2025, which can affect party registration trends.

Despite having closed primaries, Connecticut is one of ten states that has a higher percent of unaffiliated voters than Democrats or Republicans, as of August 2025 data from Ballotpedia.

Advertisement

window.addEventListener(“message”,function(a){if(void 0!==a.data[“datawrapper-height”]){var e=document.querySelectorAll(“iframe”);for(var t in a.data[“datawrapper-height”])for(var r,i=0;r=e[i];i++)if(r.contentWindow===a.source){var d=a.data[“datawrapper-height”][t]+”px”;r.style.height=d}}});

While the Republican party is gaining registrants state-wide, only two towns have more registered Republicans than any other party. Most towns had a plurality of unaffiliated voters, but in many places, registered Democrats and unaffiliated voters are neck in neck.

This <a target=”_blank” href=”https://ctmirror.org/2025/11/14/ct-unaffiliated-voters/”>article</a> first appeared on <a target=”_blank” href=”https://ctmirror.org”>CT Mirror</a> and is republished here under a <a target=”_blank” href=”https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/”>Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License</a>.<img src=”https://ctmirror.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/cropped-CTMirror_bug_rgb-180×180.jpg” style=”width:1em;height:1em;margin-left:10px;”><img id=”republication-tracker-tool-source” src=”https://ctmirror.org/?republication-pixel=true&post=1145053&amp;ga4=G-9GVNVL530Q” style=”width:1px;height:1px;”><script> PARSELY = { autotrack: false, onload: function() { PARSELY.beacon.trackPageView({ url: “https://ctmirror.org/2025/11/14/ct-unaffiliated-voters/”, urlref: window.location.href }); } } </script> <script id=”parsely-cfg” src=”//cdn.parsely.com/keys/ctmirror.org/p.js”></script>



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Connecticut

Undocumented immigrants do pay taxes

Published

on

Undocumented immigrants do pay taxes


Setting the record straight on what undocumented immigrants do – and don’t – contribute to the communities they live in.

They have often been accused of draining resources.

Many undocumented people have been paying taxes – like a landscaping business owner we spoke with.

For some, the question is how much undocumented people pay in taxes compared to how much is spent to provide them services.

Advertisement

There’s a lot of things we won’t tell you about this undocumented man; name, age, where he lives…

But he’s been here for 20 years and works as a landscaper to support his wife and two American born kids.

“I came here for most of the reasons that other people come, to seek a better life,” he said.

We asked him what he thinks when he hears people say undocumented immigrants “don’t” pay taxes.

“Since I came here, since I got my first job, I always paid taxes. State tax, federal tax, have a few vehicles, pay tax,” he said.

Advertisement

Elizabeth Ricci, an immigration attorney, tells us yes , it’s a no brainer, you can’t say undocumented people don’t pay taxes in the U.S.

“It’s intellectually dishonest. So everyone’s paying taxes, the question is to what level,” Ricci said.

State Senator Rob Sampson (R-Wolcott) supports immigration reform and believes undocumented people cost Connecticut more than it gets in tax revenue.

“The amount of taxes paid by illegal immigrants is about half of what a lawful resident would pay. They’re not able to work lawfully. They’ve got to work under the table,” Sampson said.

A study by the Institute on Taxation and Economic Policy (ITEP) – which some have described as left leaning – said based on estimates in 2022, undocumented immigrants paid approximately $406 million of state and local taxes in Connecticut. There’s no estimate on what they cost the state.

Advertisement

Our research doesn’t really focus on the net effects, but we know that undocumented immigrants are working and paying taxes,” Marco Guzman with ITEP said.

Another study by the Federation for Immigration Reform (FAIR) – described by some as a right-leaning – looked at estimates of both how much undocumented people paid in to the system in Connecticut and how much programs for them, and their children cost. It concluded they cost Connecticut $1.3 billion in 2023.

“They have human needs, and if they can’t afford to pay for it, then somebody else is, and that is the taxpayers of Connecticut,” Ira Mehlman from FAIR said.

The undocumented man we spoke with said whatever numbers you want to quote, he believes by starting his own landscaping business to support his family, and employ others, he’s a net positive to our state.

“I’m not here to steal from the state or steal from other people, I’m just here for a better future,” he said.

Advertisement

The State of Connecticut’s Office of Policy and Management has hard data indicating in fiscal 2024 and 2025 combined, our state spent $80 million on Medicaid for undocumented children up to age 15 and pregnant, or postpartum mothers.

It is worth noting when undocumented people do pay taxes, they often don’t receive the services they pay for, namely, social security.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Connecticut

Connecticut House votes to add $500 million to ‘rainy day fund’

Published

on

Connecticut House votes to add 0 million to ‘rainy day fund’


HARTFORD, Conn. (WTNH) — Shortly before 10 p.m. on Wednesday, the Connecticut House of Representatives signed off on a plan to set aside a $500 million surplus into the state’s “rainy day fund” as a temporary stopgap against cuts from Washington.

The $500 million will sit in the state’s budget reserves and be available for use at the direction of Governor Ned Lamont — who must get sign-off from the legislature’s leadership — until the legislature reconvenes for its regular session next February.

When lawmakers were crafting the legislation, they envisioned the funds being used to fill in the gaps created by the federal government shutdown, as well as cutbacks included in President Donald Trump’s signature “Big Beautiful Bill.”

Even with a deal in place to end the shutdown, the legislature’s majority Democrats held to their course and pushed for the deposit into the budget reserves. Funding for programs like SNAP food assistance, Democrats reasoned, should be guaranteed by the state in the face of uncertainty at the federal level.

Advertisement

“To bank on Washington not falling back into chaos or dysfunction is probably not a bet we’re willing to make when we’re talking about pretty important programs,” State Rep. Matt Ritter, the Democratic House Speaker, said.

Ritter’s Democratic caucus voted uniformly in favor of the $500 million measure and were joined by a majority of the House’s Republicans. State Rep. Vincent Candelora, the House GOP leader, helped craft the funding bill and voted in favor of it’s passage. Most of Candelora’s top lieutenants and key committee leaders also voted in favor. 21 members, mostly members of the GOP caucus’s more conservative wing, broke ranks and opposed the bill.

Candelora said that, with the shutdown over and the need to backfill programs like SNAP and the LIHEAP heating assistance program now negated, he is hopeful the money will not be spent — though some Democrats have floated using the funds to counteract cuts to Affordable Care Act subsidies that are currently set to take effect in the new year.

“I imagine most of that money will be intact and it will return to the rainy day fund,” Candelora said.

Now that it has won approval in the House, the bill heads to the State Senate, which is scheduled to convene on Thursday.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending