Connecticut
ACLU of Connecticut calls for video release in prisoner wrongful death lawsuit
The ACLU of CT urged the Appellate Court to release the video of J’Allen Jones’ death during a hearing on Thursday morning. Jones died in 2018 when he was forcefully restrained by correctional officers.
Maia Nehme
Staff Reporter
Maia Nehme, Contributing Photographer
On March 25, 2018, J’Allen Jones died after he was forcefully restrained by multiple correctional officers at Garner Correctional Institution. Six and a half years later, attorneys at the American Civil Liberties Union of Connecticut are fighting to get the video of Jones’ death released to the public.
Shortly after Jones’ death, his family filed a lawsuit against correctional officers and a nurse who were in Jones’ vicinity when he became unresponsive. The defendants submitted the video footage to the court in March of this year, as part of an attempt to prevent the case from going to trial. Jones’ family then requested the video’s release to the public this month — a condition the defendants did not explicitly prohibit.
The ACLU of CT, which is not involved in the lawsuit, also requested the video’s release but was denied by the Superior Court, which said that the video was sealed. In response, the ACLU of CT filed a petition for the video’s release with the Appellate Court on Oct. 7.
“As the sole evidence of what happened to Mr. Jones at the hands of the Department of Correction, and as a court filing that has never been sealed, the public should have access to the video as guaranteed by state law and the First Amendment,” ACLU of Connecticut Legal Director Dan Barrett said in a press release. “It is imperative the people know what is being done in our names behind prison walls.”
During a hearing on Thursday, Barrett and Assistant Attorney General Terrence O’Neill — who represents the defendants in the lawsuit — each had ten minutes to state their case to the Appellate Court. Barrett and O’Neill also fielded frequent questions from Appellate Court Judges Nina Elgo, Robert Clark and Dawne Westbrook.
Barrett emphasized the distinction between a protective order, which was placed on the video, and a sealing order. Though protective orders are used to manage the dissemination of sensitive legal documents, they do not prohibit all public access to those documents.
O’Neill argued that the question of whether to seal the video should be returned to the Superior Court. He also expressed confusion about how the Superior Court had secured a CD of the video, stating that he and his fellow attorneys had collected both CD copies they brought to court.
“With respect, we have no idea how it got there, Your Honor,” O’Neill said. “We don’t know where this third disc came from.”
The judges then adjourned the court, setting the next session for Tuesday, Oct. 29.
Requests for video release reignite community backlash to Jones’ death
The calls from the ACLU of CT and Jones’ family to release the video have sparked more community awareness of and outrage over Jones’ death.
On the day he died, Jones – who was diagnosed with schizophrenia – was slated for a transfer to the prison’s psychiatric ward for treatment. Garner Correctional Institution is the DOC’s designated mental health facility.
After Jones refused to comply with a strip search, multiple correctional officers pepper-sprayed him in the face, punched him and forced him onto a bed over a nearly half-hour period. The correctional officers and a nearby nurse did not administer CPR or call 9-1-1 for seven minutes after Jones fell unconscious.
The state Office of the Chief Medical Examiner classified Jones’ death as a homicide.
Ashley McCarthy, the DOC’s director of external affairs, declined the News’ request for comment on Jones’ family’s lawsuit, noting that the DOC does not comment on matters of active litigation.
On Oct. 18, more than 20 people rallied outside the DOC’s headquarters in Wethersfield, Connecticut to call for the video’s release and a more transparent criminal justice system.
Stop Solitary CT, a group that advocates for improved conditions and the elimination of solitary confinement in prisons, organized the “Justice for J’Allen” protest. Other attendees included members of Black Lives Matter 860 and the New Britain Racial Justice Coalition, as well as state Rep. Anne Hughes.
Barbara Fair, a community organizer with Stop Solitary CT, later told the News that Jones’ death underscores the importance of halting prison strip searches.
“They serve no purpose but to demean, degrade and dehumanize human beings just because [DOC staff] have the power to do it,” Fair said.
The DOC’s strip search policy states that these searches are always required in certain situations, such as when a person is first admitted to a prison. Staff can also conduct strip searches if they have “reasonable suspicion” that an incarcerated person is hiding contraband like drugs or weapons.
“We are focused on the health and well-being of everyone in our facilities,” McCarthy wrote to the News when asked about the DOC’s use of strip searches.
McCarthy also noted the DOC submitted a proposal earlier this year to the state legislature for the use of body scanners in prisons, which would reduce the need for strip searches. If funding for body scanners was made available to the DOC, she said, the agency would install the scanners throughout its prisons.
The lawsuit is scheduled to go to trial on Feb. 20, 2025.
Connecticut
State police investigating suspicious incident in Burlington
BURLINGTON, Conn. (WFSB) – Connecticut State Police are investigating a suspicious incident at a residence on Case Road in Burlington.
Multiple state troopers and police vehicles were seen at the home conducting an investigation. A viewer reported seeing nine police cars and numerous troopers at the scene.
State police said there is no threat to the public at this time. The investigation is ongoing.
No additional details about the nature of the suspicious incident have been released.
Copyright 2026 WFSB. All rights reserved.
Connecticut
Ecuadorian national with manslaughter conviction sentenced for illegally reentering United States through Connecticut
NEW HAVEN, CT. (WFSB) – An Ecuadorian national with a manslaughter conviction was sentenced to 12 months and one day in prison for illegally reentering the United States through Connecticut after being deported.
40-year-old Darwin Francisco Quituizaca-Duchitanga was sentenced and had used the aliases Darwin Duchitanga-Quituizaca and Juan Mendez-Gutierrez.
U.S. Border Patrol first encountered Quituizaca in December 2003, when he used the alias Juan Mendez-Gutierrez and claimed to be a Mexican citizen. He was issued a voluntary return to Mexico.
Connecticut State Police arrested him in March 2018 on charges related to a fatal crash on I-91 in North Haven in March 2017. He was using the alias Darwin Duchitanga-Quituizaca at the time.
ICE arrested him on an administrative warrant in Meriden in August 2018 while he was awaiting trial in his state case. An immigration judge ordered his removal to Ecuador in September 2018, but he was transferred to state custody to face pending charges.
Quituizaca was convicted of second-degree manslaughter in January 2019 and sentenced to 30 months in prison.
After his release, ICE arrested him again on an administrative warrant in Meriden in August 2023. He was removed to Ecuador the next month.
ICE arrested Quituizaca again on a warrant in Meriden on June 28th, 2025, after he illegally reentered the United States. He pleaded guilty to unlawful reentry on July 30th.
He has been detained since his arrest. U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement investigated the case.
The case is part of Operation Take Back America, a nationwide initiative by the Department of Justice to combat illegal immigration and transnational criminal organizations.
Copyright 2026 WFSB. All rights reserved.
Connecticut
Justice Department sues Connecticut and Arizona as part of effort to get voter data from the states
HARTFORD, Conn. (AP) — Officials in Connecticut and Arizona are defending their decision to refuse a request by the U.S. Justice Department for detailed voter information, after their states became the latest to face federal lawsuits over the issue.
“Pound sand,” Arizona Secretary of State Adrian Fontes posted on X, saying the release of the voter records would violate state and federal law.
The Justice Department’s Civil Rights Division announced this week it was suing Connecticut and Arizona for failing to comply with its requests, bringing to 23 the number of states the department has sued to obtain the data. It also has filed suit against the District of Columbia.
Attorney General Pam Bondi said the department will “continue filing lawsuits to protect American elections,” saying accurate voter rolls are the ”foundation of election integrity.”
Secretaries of state and state attorneys general who have pushed back against the effort say it violates federal privacy law, which protects the sharing of individual data with the government, and would run afoul of their own state laws that restrict what voter information can be released publicly. Some of the data the Justice Department is seeking includes names, dates of birth, residential addresses, driver’s license numbers and partial Social Security numbers.
Other requests included basic questions about the procedures states use to comply with federal voting laws, while some have been more state-specific. They have referenced perceived inconsistencies from a survey from the U.S. Election Assistance Commission.
Most of the lawsuits target states led by Democrats, who have said they have been unable to get a firm answer about why the Justice Department wants the information and how it plans to use it. Last fall, 10 Democratic secretaries of state sent a letter to the Justice Department and the Department of Homeland Security expressing concern after DHS said it had received voter data and would enter it into a federal program used to verify citizenship status.
Connecticut Attorney General William Tong, a Democrat, said his state had tried to “work cooperatively” with the Justice Department to understand the basis for its request for voters’ personal information.
“Rather than communicating productively with us, they rushed to sue,” Tong said Tuesday, after the lawsuit was filed.
Connecticut, he said, “takes its obligations under federal laws very seriously.” He pledged to “vigorously defend the state against this meritless and deeply disappointing lawsuit.”
Two Republican state senators in Connecticut said they welcomed the federal lawsuit. They said a recent absentee ballot scandal in the state’s largest city, Bridgeport, had made the state a “national punchline.”
-
Detroit, MI5 days ago2 hospitalized after shooting on Lodge Freeway in Detroit
-
Technology2 days agoPower bank feature creep is out of control
-
Dallas, TX4 days agoDefensive coordinator candidates who could improve Cowboys’ brutal secondary in 2026
-
Health4 days agoViral New Year reset routine is helping people adopt healthier habits
-
Nebraska2 days agoOregon State LB transfer Dexter Foster commits to Nebraska
-
Iowa2 days agoPat McAfee praises Audi Crooks, plays hype song for Iowa State star
-
Nebraska2 days agoNebraska-based pizza chain Godfather’s Pizza is set to open a new location in Queen Creek
-
Entertainment1 day agoSpotify digs in on podcasts with new Hollywood studios