Connect with us

Boston, MA

South Boston to crack down on public drinking at St. Pat’s parade, as BPD warns about spiking

Published

on

South Boston to crack down on public drinking at St. Pat’s parade, as BPD warns about spiking


Local News

Officials promise tougher enforcement after last year’s chaos, while police urge paradegoers to protect their drinks and watch for signs of spiking.

Empty beer boxes, candy, and confetti littered the street during the annual St. Patrick’s Day parade on March 17, 2024. Jessica Rinaldi/Globe Staff

  • MBTA announces schedule changes, detours as nearly 1 million expected to attend Sunday’s St. Patrick’s Day parade


  • Your St. Paddy’s Day parade survival guide

Boston officials are warning that public drinking will not be tolerated at this Sunday’s St. Patrick’s Day parade in South Boston, as police also urge attendees to be vigilant about drink spiking during one of the city’s busiest nightlife weekends.

Advertisement

The Boston Police Department issued a community alert ahead of the celebration reminding attendees that public drinking, providing alcohol to minors, and open containers in public are illegal.

Police also cautioned attendees about the risks of drink spiking — when drugs such as “roofies” are secretly placed into beverages. These substances are often colorless, odorless, and tasteless and can cause disorientation, confusion, temporary paralysis, or unconsciousness, leaving victims vulnerable, according to the BPD statement. 

Police advised having drinks served directly by a bartender or server and to keep beverages attended at all times. BPD also suggested using drink-testing tools, such as test strips or special nail polish designed to detect drugs, and covering drinks when they are not being actively consumed. 

“Let’s work together to ensure a safe and enjoyable spring break for all,” police said. 

The warnings come as local officials say they are backing stronger enforcement after last year’s parade weekend saw incidents of violence and disorder. 

Advertisement

City Councilor Ed Flynn, U.S. Rep Stephen Lynch, state Sen. Nick Collins, and state Rep. David Biele wrote a joint letter to education leaders across Massachusetts, asking them to notify Boston-area college presidents and high school superintendents about the public safety protocols and potential consequences for students who break the law. 

“As elected officials, we have given our full support to public safety officials to enforce the law and keep the community safe,” they wrote.  

The group said it has spent the past year working with state and local agencies on a task force to address the “unacceptable ‘anything goes’ atmosphere” that developed last year. Issues included public drinking, disturbing incidents of violence, public assaults, people standing on rooftops without roof decks, overcrowded bars, beer cans thrown at parade marchers, and public urination on private property. 

“The Task Force is committed to restoring the Evacuation Day & St. Patrick’s Parade to a family-friendly event — inclusive for our seniors, persons with disabilities, and young children and families — that not only focuses on celebrating a consequential victory during the American Revolution, but to honor the service and sacrifice of our veterans, military families and first responders, as well as our proud immigrant heritage,” the group wrote.

In addition, the task force said they have developed strategies to address public drinking and underage alcohol smuggling on the MBTA, and Boston Fire Department Commissioner Paul Burke said there will be enforcement over roof deck overcrowding.

Advertisement

The City of Boston Licensing Board told Boston.com that it has reminded establishments about special rules in place for parade day.

Rules that licensees must follow include not serving alcohol before 12 p.m. without express permission, alcohol service must end by 7 p.m., and all patrons must leave licensed premises by 7:30 p.m. 

The spiking problem

Concerns about drink spiking were also discussed during a City Council hearing Thursday led by Councilor Gabriela Coletta Zapata.

Zapata said dozens of drink-spiking incidents are reported in Boston each year. The city recorded 116 reports in 2022, 107 in 2023, and 71 in 2024.

While the numbers have declined, experts believe many cases go unreported, she said.

Advertisement

Flynn said he has been meeting with Boston police monthly to discuss the issue and safety planning ahead of the parade.

The hearing also included testimony from residents, including one woman who said she was drugged in late 2022 at age 56 and taken to Massachusetts General Hospital.

She said she was denied a toxicology screen because she had not been sexually assaulted.

“I’m grateful I wasn’t, but a victim should not have to experience the worst-case scenario to receive basic medical evidence collection,” she said.

Wu administration officials and Boston police testifying at the hearing said a number of steps have been taken to try to prevent drink spiking, including distributing thousands of drink covers to bars and restaurants so patrons can protect their beverages. 

Advertisement

But the woman who testified said she had never encountered the covers.

“Where are they? I live in Boston, go out often, and have never seen one,” she said. 

“Any one of you could be drugged today, via a glass of water, coffee, wine. Your teenage daughter, your son, your mother, your father — nobody’s immune,” she added. 

Councilor Erin Murphy questioned whether the approach is effective, saying she has never seen people using the drink covers and that they could imply victims are responsible for preventing their drinks from being tampered with.

Boston Police Capt. Det. Terry Thomas said bars and restaurants are encouraged to remake drinks for anyone who suspects their beverage may have been spiked.

Advertisement

Zapata said the concerts are particularly relevant heading into St. Patrick’s Day celebrations — “one of the busiest weekends for nightlife” in Boston.

“We know Boston is safe, but we also know that drink spiking has been a concern in the city over the last several years,” Zapata said. “Public safety means making sure people can enjoy [themselves] without worrying that their drink could be tampered with.”

Sign up for the Today newsletter

Get everything you need to know to start your day, delivered right to your inbox every morning.

Advertisement





Source link

Boston, MA

Your next Uber ride in Boston could be a taxi

Published

on

Your next Uber ride in Boston could be a taxi


Boston taxis will be able to pick up passengers who request Uber and Lyft rides under a new pilot program announced by Mayor Michelle Wu Tuesday.

Customers who get a cab through a ride-hailing app will still see the cost upfront on their phone as opposed to the typical taxi fare structure. 

“The goal of the pilot is to give Boston passengers more options to hail a taxi and to allow Boston’s licensed taxis to participate directly in meeting the demand for trips generated through Uber and Lyft,” the city said in a news release.

Advertisement

Wu said the yearlong pilot will allow cab drivers to earn more while reducing wait times for passengers. 

“We’re thankful for the collaboration and advocacy from our taxicab drivers to introduce this new transportation service, and excited to support the people who keep our city moving,” the mayor said.

The program excludes taxi trips to Boston’s Logan Airport, and allows the Hackney Division to make exceptions during some special events in the city.

Uber’s website informs users “you might get matched with a Boston taxi driver.”

“If so, you’ll enjoy the same 24/7 availability and affordable prices you know with UberX while riding to your destination in a cab,” Uber says.

Advertisement

The city said it expects taxi drivers will now be able to “access a significantly larger number of trips than most currently serve.”

“This change is a major boost for taxi drivers in Boston and the passengers we serve,” said Balwinder Gill, who has owned and operated a Boston taxi for 25 years.



Source link

Continue Reading

Boston, MA

Editorial: With Boston’s World Cup win, could we host Olympics?

Published

on

Editorial: With Boston’s World Cup win, could we host Olympics?


The World Cup economic windfall boosting Boston gives rise to a question: Could the Hub host the Olympics?

Certainly Bostonians have more than risen to the occasion in terms of welcoming international visitors to our city and showing them a good time (and vice versa, Tartan Army). But it takes more than great hosts and a convivial atmosphere to pull off an epic sporting event.

It takes money, lots of it, political transparency, and a process open to public scrutiny and feedback. In other words, no, we couldn’t.

Public reception to the 2014 Olympics bid was tepid at best, as it would entail multiple construction projects. And when big construction projects are presented in Boston, taxpayers get suspicious. Big Dig, anyone?

Advertisement

Boston 24 announced it estimated the Games would produce at least $4.8 billion in revenues from television broadcast rights, ticket sales, corporate sponsorships and other revenues, the Associated Press reported. They assumed nearly $4.6 billion in costs, including $176 million for a temporary Olympic Stadium, $90 million for the athletes’ village, about $754 million to build other Olympic venues and another $132 million to rent other locations.

They reportedly announced all this to answer critics who said the privately funded Boston 2024 withheld details of the bid to prevent the public from assessing whether the Games could be staged, as promised, without the need for taxpayer money.

We learned the answer to that soon enough.

In this case, as the Herald reported that year, details from Boston 2024’s so-called bid book indicated that plans sent to the U.S. Olympic Committee called for the Hub to fund “land acquisition and infrastructure costs” at Widett Circle, where a temporary Olympic stadium was being proposed. It came after months of promises that the group planned to run a privately funded Olympics.

“They’ve been saying for months, ‘No taxpayer (money),’ ” said Evan Falchuk, a vocal bid critic who pushed for a statewide ballot question on hosting the games. “Then you read what they told the USOC. … It’s a devastating blow to their credibility. There’s a reason why voters don’t trust what they’ve heard and (Boston 2024 has) got a lot of work to do to earn that trust.”

Advertisement

And all this talk of money came before any cost overruns made an appearance. London’s budget for the 2012 Summer Games escalated by about 300%, ending somewhere in the $14 billion range. What were the chances we’d fare any better?

No wonder Bostonians gave the Olympics idea the cold shoulder.

But what of the city’s World Cup success story? For starters, Gillette Stadium is already built, and the only large element requiring a cash infusion was the MBTA, which shelled out $35 million to upgrade Foxboro Station in advance of the Cup. They’ll make a nice chunk of that back, as the T spiked round-trip Commuter Rail ticket prices between South Station and Gillette Stadium for fútbol fans to $80.

In this case, Bostonians are on the winning side, reaping benefits from free-spending (and thirsty) visitors, and reveling in the good vibes.

It would be great for the city if megaprojects, or even minor ones, came with the guarantee of financial transparency before shovels hit the dirt. Optimists should look at White Stadium before calling it a day.

Advertisement
Editorial cartoon by Gary Varvel (Creators Syndicate)

 



Source link

Continue Reading

Boston, MA

With Columbia Threadneedle out, Boston Triathlon director is looking for a new sponsor – The Boston Globe

Published

on

With Columbia Threadneedle out, Boston Triathlon director is looking for a new sponsor – The Boston Globe


Michael O’Neil is on the hunt for the next John Hancock.

As many Boston sports fans know, the insurance company first sponsored the Boston Marathon 40 years ago, helping usher in the modern professional era of the race as well as tens of millions of dollars in community fund-raising each year.

O’Neil wants to make a similar leap for the race he runs, the Boston Triathlon. This will be the first year without a naming-rights sponsor after nine years with Ameriprise Financial-owned Columbia Threadneedle Investments. O’Neil is seeking a successor that can help make an impact on the race the way Hancock once did with the marathon, a sponsorship role now played by Bank of America.

“We’re looking for that next transformational partner that wants to do something like that,” O’Neil said.

Advertisement

The 18-year-old triathlon draws nearly 2,500 athletes to Carson Beach in South Boston each August, for sprint and Olympic-distance triathlons, and also features free kids’ races the day before at the same location; Amazon has been a big sponsor for the “Kids Day” events.

O’Neil says he would like to extend the race beyond loops in South Boston to showcase more of the city and boost tourism; the Meet Boston tourism bureau is also among the race’s sponsors. Another hope of O’Neil’s: to continue community efforts that he and his race management firm, Ethos, undertook with support from Columbia Threadneedle, including donations to Boston Medical Center and the city’s “Swim Safe” program to provide swim lessons for kids. (O’Neil started an affiliated nonprofit to help expand this community work in 2024.)

He expects the race’s naming-rights sponsorship to cost “in the mid-six figures” annually.

“We’re over this hump now, after 18 years, we’re an institution,” O’Neil said. “We’re seeking a Boston-based company, that’s headquartered here or has a large presence here, that wants to make an impact on the community. … We know how to do that.”

This is an installment of our weekly Bold Types column about the movers and shakers on Boston’s business scene.

Advertisement

Jon Chesto can be reached at jon.chesto@globe.com. Follow him @jonchesto.





Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending