Connect with us

Boston, MA

Bruins notebook: Penalty kill top priority coming off break

Published

on

Bruins notebook: Penalty kill top priority coming off break


One can go all the way back to last summer and see how much Marco Sturm was concerned about the penalty kill.

Early in the season, it looked like new Bruins’ coach worries about the kill would pay dividends. But after a good start to the season on the PK, the B’s have tumbled down to 28th in the NHL, killing just a 76.4% success rate.

Trying to fix the kill was some of the coaching staff’s most important “homework” for the extended Olympic break, said Sturm upon the players’ return to the Warrior Ice Arena for practices last week.

The most obvious thing they have to do is cut down on penalties. Their plummet toward the bottom of the PK rankings has – surprise, surprise – coincided with them shooting up in the “minor penalties taken” category. They have taken 243, second only to the Florida Panthers’ 255.

Advertisement

But it also sounds like they plan to tweak their diamond structure as well. What exactly they will be doing differently is hard to tell in practice, especially with the fluid nature of the sport. But Sturm said it’s all part of the season-long chess match between the league’s power plays and penalty kills.

“Power plays get better. They do. If you look at us at the start, we were all out and we did exactly what we wanted to do. The things is, after a certain time and certain games – (assistant coach Steve Spott) Spotter calls it a ‘copy league’ – what it means is you can … see certain weaknesses on the PK,” said Sturm. “With the diamond, they got us pretty much and we just couldn’t handle it and didn’t have an answer. And also we were taking way too many, too. That was a little bit of the downfall. Again, we try to have something in place right now that hopefully fits our group and players better.”

The diamond, he said, giveth and taketh away.

“What I really like on the diamond is you take away the one-timers,” said Sturm. “The old way (the four-man box), the flanks were always available. You think about (Alex) Ovechkin and all those guys, you kind of take that away. You can be very aggressive. But you will give up probably the low 2-on-1s. That would be the downside of it. And now guys slowly figure out how to beat it, any system. That’s what can happen, and it’s already happening, so that’s why we want to be ahead of the curve a little bit.”

Going into the season, the first order of business was to identify some players who could kill, especially after the team traded away PK stalwarts Brad Marchand, Charlie Coyle and Brandon Carlo at last season’s trade deadline.

Advertisement

The regulars on the back end are Nikita Zadorov, Charlie McAvoy, Hampus Lindholm and Andrew Peeke. Up front, there are stalwarts Sean Kuraly, Mark Kastelic, Pavel Zacha and Elias Lindholm. But rookie Fraser Minten and Tanner Jeannot, who had not killed in several years, are also heavily in the rotation. Sturm feels he’s got the personnel to do the job, though he said he could mix up the pairings.

Kuraly leads all forwards in PK time a game at 3:05 a game and he’s done it throughout his career. Pinpointing any one area as the problem, he said, is futile.

“We were on a roll earlier in the season. Does that mean power plays figure out what we’re doing and we didn’t adjust well enough? I don’t know. It’s a culmination of a lot of things,” said Kuraly. “As players, you definitely take it on to yourself to think of what we can do better. It’s just all the little things. Can we win more faceoffs and get more clears? On clears, can we do cooperate clears and share on our clears? Can we be a little bit better up ice, be a little stiffer and put ourselves in a better spot? Can we be better with our stick detail? Can we communicate better?

“I think it’s a culmination of all those things. They look at all these numbers and all these stats and if it was one thing, I think it would be pretty easy to clean up or at least address. I think it’s just a culmination of all those things to make a penalty kill good. And I think can we get on and off the ice and change quick is part of it. A lot of things make a penalty kill good. Of those six or seven things, if we can improve them five or 10 percent, we could have a really good penalty kill.”

Like the media on the Garden’s ninth floor, players on the kill can often see on video after the fact they had more time on a play. Communication, said Kuraly, is huge.

Advertisement

“Just by saying a few words, and I always talk with my linemates,” said Kuraly. “David Backes was the one that insisted I do that a long time ago, you make them look better if you just throw any sort of communication at them. ‘Time’ or ‘take a look.’ ‘Heads up.’ It’s pretty primitive what you can say to them. Just give them a clue, even if you think it might not help. There’s a lot of times where, even if you tell a guy he’s got some time, you settle down a little more and make just a little bit better play.”

Loose pucks

Charlie McAvoy will be taking a crack at his dream on Sunday morning when he and his USA teammates take on Canada for the Olympic gold medal. Sturm, though, is a little nervous about how he’ll be able to transition back NHL hockey, which restarts for the B’s on Thursday with a big game against Columbus.

“Knowing Charlie, I know this is something he’s been looking forward to, probably his whole life. I know he will be great,” said Sturm. “I know it’s going to be a challenge (upon his return). From my experience coming back, the mental part of it is just, because you’re so emotionally involved in those Olympics, it drains you … it’s going to be a challenge, especially Charlie because he plays a lot. It’s a mental drain and that’s why we just have to manage every day the right way so we can have the best outcome.” … Zacha appears on schedule to be ready to play next Thursday against the Blue Jackets. He was able to shed the non-contact jersey for the regular sweater on Saturday.



Source link

Advertisement

Boston, MA

Editorial: With Boston’s World Cup win, could we host Olympics?

Published

on

Editorial: With Boston’s World Cup win, could we host Olympics?


The World Cup economic windfall boosting Boston gives rise to a question: Could the Hub host the Olympics?

Certainly Bostonians have more than risen to the occasion in terms of welcoming international visitors to our city and showing them a good time (and vice versa, Tartan Army). But it takes more than great hosts and a convivial atmosphere to pull off an epic sporting event.

It takes money, lots of it, political transparency, and a process open to public scrutiny and feedback. In other words, no, we couldn’t.

Public reception to the 2014 Olympics bid was tepid at best, as it would entail multiple construction projects. And when big construction projects are presented in Boston, taxpayers get suspicious. Big Dig, anyone?

Advertisement

Boston 24 announced it estimated the Games would produce at least $4.8 billion in revenues from television broadcast rights, ticket sales, corporate sponsorships and other revenues, the Associated Press reported. They assumed nearly $4.6 billion in costs, including $176 million for a temporary Olympic Stadium, $90 million for the athletes’ village, about $754 million to build other Olympic venues and another $132 million to rent other locations.

They reportedly announced all this to answer critics who said the privately funded Boston 2024 withheld details of the bid to prevent the public from assessing whether the Games could be staged, as promised, without the need for taxpayer money.

We learned the answer to that soon enough.

In this case, as the Herald reported that year, details from Boston 2024’s so-called bid book indicated that plans sent to the U.S. Olympic Committee called for the Hub to fund “land acquisition and infrastructure costs” at Widett Circle, where a temporary Olympic stadium was being proposed. It came after months of promises that the group planned to run a privately funded Olympics.

“They’ve been saying for months, ‘No taxpayer (money),’ ” said Evan Falchuk, a vocal bid critic who pushed for a statewide ballot question on hosting the games. “Then you read what they told the USOC. … It’s a devastating blow to their credibility. There’s a reason why voters don’t trust what they’ve heard and (Boston 2024 has) got a lot of work to do to earn that trust.”

Advertisement

And all this talk of money came before any cost overruns made an appearance. London’s budget for the 2012 Summer Games escalated by about 300%, ending somewhere in the $14 billion range. What were the chances we’d fare any better?

No wonder Bostonians gave the Olympics idea the cold shoulder.

But what of the city’s World Cup success story? For starters, Gillette Stadium is already built, and the only large element requiring a cash infusion was the MBTA, which shelled out $35 million to upgrade Foxboro Station in advance of the Cup. They’ll make a nice chunk of that back, as the T spiked round-trip Commuter Rail ticket prices between South Station and Gillette Stadium for fútbol fans to $80.

In this case, Bostonians are on the winning side, reaping benefits from free-spending (and thirsty) visitors, and reveling in the good vibes.

It would be great for the city if megaprojects, or even minor ones, came with the guarantee of financial transparency before shovels hit the dirt. Optimists should look at White Stadium before calling it a day.

Advertisement
Editorial cartoon by Gary Varvel (Creators Syndicate)

 



Source link

Continue Reading

Boston, MA

With Columbia Threadneedle out, Boston Triathlon director is looking for a new sponsor – The Boston Globe

Published

on

With Columbia Threadneedle out, Boston Triathlon director is looking for a new sponsor – The Boston Globe


Michael O’Neil is on the hunt for the next John Hancock.

As many Boston sports fans know, the insurance company first sponsored the Boston Marathon 40 years ago, helping usher in the modern professional era of the race as well as tens of millions of dollars in community fund-raising each year.

O’Neil wants to make a similar leap for the race he runs, the Boston Triathlon. This will be the first year without a naming-rights sponsor after nine years with Ameriprise Financial-owned Columbia Threadneedle Investments. O’Neil is seeking a successor that can help make an impact on the race the way Hancock once did with the marathon, a sponsorship role now played by Bank of America.

“We’re looking for that next transformational partner that wants to do something like that,” O’Neil said.

Advertisement

The 18-year-old triathlon draws nearly 2,500 athletes to Carson Beach in South Boston each August, for sprint and Olympic-distance triathlons, and also features free kids’ races the day before at the same location; Amazon has been a big sponsor for the “Kids Day” events.

O’Neil says he would like to extend the race beyond loops in South Boston to showcase more of the city and boost tourism; the Meet Boston tourism bureau is also among the race’s sponsors. Another hope of O’Neil’s: to continue community efforts that he and his race management firm, Ethos, undertook with support from Columbia Threadneedle, including donations to Boston Medical Center and the city’s “Swim Safe” program to provide swim lessons for kids. (O’Neil started an affiliated nonprofit to help expand this community work in 2024.)

He expects the race’s naming-rights sponsorship to cost “in the mid-six figures” annually.

“We’re over this hump now, after 18 years, we’re an institution,” O’Neil said. “We’re seeking a Boston-based company, that’s headquartered here or has a large presence here, that wants to make an impact on the community. … We know how to do that.”

This is an installment of our weekly Bold Types column about the movers and shakers on Boston’s business scene.

Advertisement

Jon Chesto can be reached at jon.chesto@globe.com. Follow him @jonchesto.





Source link

Continue Reading

Boston, MA

Red Sox Star ‘Open’ to Trade Talks With Boston’s Season Spiraling

Published

on

Red Sox Star ‘Open’ to Trade Talks With Boston’s Season Spiraling


Although it is just June 22, it’s certainly starting to seem like the Boston Red Sox could end up being sellers later on this summer when the 2026 Major League Baseball trade deadline gets here.

Boston took two out of three games from the Seattle Mariners over the weekend, but still finds itself 13 games under .500 at 31-44. Right now, Boston is six games out of an American League Wild Card spot as well. Boston needs a long winning streak to turn the tide. If not, the club will certainly trade pieces away. The conversation has gotten loud enough around the team that Red Sox starter Sonny Gray said he “would be open” to having a conversation about waiving his no-trade clause if someone from the club approached him about it to Tim Healey of The Boston Globe.

“If someone came to me from the Red Sox and made a decision that that’s the direction that this team was going to go, I would be open for a conversation,” Gray said to Healey. “Whatever happens from then, only time will tell. But I would be open for a conversation.

Advertisement

Could Sonny Gray Be The Next Star Out Of Boston?

Jun 18, 2026; Boston, Massachusetts, USA; Boston Red Sox starting pitcher Sonny Gray (54) pitches against the Toronto Blue Jays during the first inning at Fenway Park. Mandatory Credit: Eric Canha-Imagn Images | Eric Canha-Imagn Images
Advertisement

“Holding veto power is ‘an earned thing’ and means a lot, Gray said. He negotiated it into the three-year, $75 million deal he signed with the Cardinals heading into 2024.”

Advertisement

When it comes to Gray, he has been a major addition for Boston so far this season. He has a 3.12 ERA in 13 starts to go along with a 55-to-17 strikeout-to-walk ratio in 69 1/3 innings pitched. Gray is also 8-1 on the season. Even in a campaign full of losses for Boston, Gray has been able to consistently be a stopper for the club.

If he were to become available, he would be an intriguing, although imperfect trade candidate. From a talent perspective, he’s awesome and would help a contender. But from a contract point of view, he has a $30 million mutual option for the 2027 season with a $10 million buyout. Mutual options rarely get picked up. The buyout is very high and could be a barrier. That will be a bridge to cross later on, though. What’s important to note right now is the fact that Gray is “open” to a conversation about a trade. It doesn’t mean that it will happen, but it’s possible.

Advertisement
Add us as a preferred source on Google



Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending