Connect with us

Boston, MA

Boston organizers gear up for ‘safe and joyous’ Pride activities

Published

on

Boston organizers gear up for ‘safe and joyous’ Pride activities


Pride event organizers in Boston are gearing up for a month of fun-filled events — and making sure that, as the president of Boston Pride for the People put it, those events are “safe and joyous.”

Organizers are taking those steps as federal agencies issued a public service announcement earlier this month about possible targeting of LGBTQ+ related events during Pride Month. Boston police told GBH News there are no known threats against local Pride events.

“There needs to be awareness without alarm,” said Tanya Neslusan, the executive director of the LGBTQ+ advocacy group MassEquality.

“I don’t think the general public needs to be concerned,” she added. “Organizers of Pride events need to be aware of the threats and work with proper authorities, who are apprised of whatever threats there are.”

Advertisement

Adrianna Boulin, the president of Boston Pride for the People, said her group is aware of the advisory and is working to keep this year’s event safe.

“We are in close contact with our partners at the City and state who will help us prioritize the safety of everyone who comes to Pride while allowing for the true message and celebration of LGBTQ+ Pride to shine,” Boulin wrote to GBH News.

Wolf Hamel, committee member of the Boston Dyke March on June 7, is also keeping safety in mind.

“This is something we’ve been thinking about for a while,” Hamel said. “We kind of develop our own contacts with people who pay attention to kind of our local, right-wing folks — you know, like NSC-131, or something like that, the folks who organized Straight Pride.”

Last year’s Boston Dyke March attracted between three and four thousand people. Hamel said their group recruits and trains community safety volunteers called the “dyke patrol,” who are trained in de-escalation and crowd management, and Hamel suggests attendees seek out community volunteers if they run into any problems.

Advertisement

“We try to use our volunteers to create a buffer so that, you know, people feel welcome at our event and safe at our event,” Hamel said.

Nina Selvaggio is executive director of Greater Boston PFLAG, an advocacy and equity-affirming group of parents, families, and friends of LGBTQ+ individuals. She said her group will march in the June 8 Boston Pride for the People parade, but is keenly aware of safety amid an intense national climate.

Selvaggio attributes the vitriol, domestically, to the election year.

“I think it’s frightening. We are in a moment in time that’s incredibly charged,” she told GBH News.

Selvaggio specifically points to anti-trans hatred and some 500 bills introduced at the state level around the country to restrict rights of LGBTQ+ people. She also cited the hoax bomb threat at Boston Children’s Hospital, and the Southern Poverty Law Center’s identification of several active hate groups in Massachusetts.

Advertisement

“Because it is really based in hate and fear, and I think it’s hard for little kids to understand that someone would hate them or want to do them harm, simply because of who they are, who they love,” Selvaggio said.

Sergeant Detective John Boyle, a Boston Police spokesman, tells GBH News there is no known threat against Boston Pride events. Doyle said there will be a police presence at the Boston Pride for the People parade and that, as always, if people “see something, say something” — report it.

While Boston police will be on hand at the Dyke March, Hamel said many in the LGBTQ+ community have had negative experiences with police.

“There’s a lot of people who got maced by the Boston cops. There’s a lot of people who had hearing damage from the sirens. And they just don’t feel safe with a large police presence around,” Hamel said.

The national public service announcement, issued May 10 by the FBI and DHS, said “foreign terrorist organizations (FTOS) or their supporters may seek to exploit increased gatherings associated with upcoming June 2024 Pride Month.”

Advertisement

The federal agencies flagged specific potential indicators of a more serious threat, like specific and violent threats, unusual surveillance of events, and attempts to bypass security.

Boston’s Pride parade and other events are rooted in commemorating the Stonewall riots of 1969, which served as the catalyst for the gay rights movement. Many in the LGBTQ+ community see June Pride events as an opportunity to celebrate civil rights wins and create a joyous atmosphere for LGBTQ+ families and allies.

Selvaggio said she’s not surprised by the national public service announcement, and while it is difficult to explain homophobia or transphobia to a child, their approach will be for families and children to march with bubbles and noisemakers and lead with love.

“We can’t be silenced. We won’t be silenced,” Selvaggio said. “We think it’s important to celebrate who we are, to be out and proud — and, at the same time, working to ensure that our folks are safe.”

Advertisement





Source link

Boston, MA

Families of two killed in US boat strikes near Venezuela file wrongful-death suit in Boston – The Boston Globe

Published

on

Families of two killed in US boat strikes near Venezuela file wrongful-death suit in Boston – The Boston Globe


The lawsuit against the federal government was filed Tuesday morning by lawyers from the political advocacy group American Civil Liberties Union on behalf of Samaroo’s sister, Sallycar Korasingh, and Joseph’s mother, Lenore Burnley.

Maritime lawsuits can be filed in any federal court in the US, the ACLU noted, and they said they chose Boston because of the long history of such suits here.

The complaint alleges the deaths amount to extrajudicial slayings, or the unlawful killing of an individual by a government.

“I miss him terribly. We all do,” Burnley said of her son, in a statement announcing the lawsuit. “We know this lawsuit won’t bring Chad back to us, but we’re trusting God to carry us through this, and we hope that speaking out will help get us some truth and closure.”

Advertisement

The strike that allegedly took both men’s lives came on Oct. 14, as they made the short journey to the island that’s only a handful of miles off Venezuela’s coast.

For Joseph, according to the lawsuit, it was to be a long-delayed homecoming. The farmer and fisherman had been in Venezuela since April for work, as sometimes happened with him. On top of that, the suit said, he had a hard time finding a boat back to the small fishing village on Trinidad’s north coast where he lived with his common-law wife and three children.

On Oct. 12, he called his wife to tell her the 20-mile boat trip was finally happening: He’d be back in two days, according to the lawsuit.

He’d be with Samaroo, a coworker and fishing buddy who had moved to Las Cuevas a year earlier after his release from prison. He was imprisoned for 15 years for his role in a killing, according to the lawsuit. Media reports say it was the homicide of a street vendor, but don’t provide further detail about what happened.

Samaroo told his sister he was returning on the Oct. 14 boat because he wanted to see their mother, who had fallen ill.

Advertisement

Neither man, their families and the Trinidadian government claim, was involved in the drug trade.

Korasingh, Samaroo’s sister, said he had “paid his debt to society and was just trying to get back on his feet again” when the strike killed him.

“If the U.S. government believed Rishi had done anything wrong, it should have arrested, charged, and detained him, not murdered him,” she said in a statement. “They must be held accountable.”

On Oct. 14, the news came in the form of a social-media post from the president of the United States.

Trump posted that he’d authorized a “lethal kinetic strike on a vessel affiliated with a Designated Terrorist Organization (DTO) conducting narcotrafficking” in international waters near Venezuela. “Intelligence confirmed the vessel was trafficking narcotics, was associated with illicit narcoterrorist networks, and was transiting along a known DTO route.” Six “male narcoterrorists,” Trump said, died in the strike.

Advertisement

If was the latest of what would ultimately be more than 30 such strikes on boats near Venezuela, whose leadership Trump has blamed for the influx of drugs coming into the United States. Ultimately, tensions escalated to the point that US military forces entered Venezuela and arrested its president, the dictator Nicolas Maduro, in a raid earlier this month.

In the Oct. 14 post announcing the strike, the president attached a video of the men’s last moments. A small boat appears to sit in the middle of the frame. Suddenly, a dart of light comes from off the screen above, striking the boat, which explodes into a fireball.

Joseph’s mother, Burnley, saw the reports of the strike on the news and called her son’s wife.

“They immediately feared that Mr. Joseph was aboard this boat, as the timing of the strike directly coincided with Mr. Joseph’s journey by boat from Venezuela to Las Cuevas,” lawyers wrote in the lawsuit.

They called his phone, but it was dead. And, the complaint said, “The line remains dead to this day.”

Advertisement

Their remains were not found. Both families have filed missing-persons reports and sought more information, but non has been available. Both families, according to the lawsuit, have held funerals.

As justification, Trump has said that the US is essentially in conflict with the large drug-trafficking organizations that smuggle drugs into the United States.

In the lawsuit, the families allege the strike was illegal because drug traffickers — even violent ones — do not qualify under international law as an entity that a country can claim it’s in armed conflict against. But even if that were the case, the suit claims, the government should not target civilians.

“As a result, even in the context of an armed conflict, the killings of Mr. Joseph and Mr. Samaroo would constitute a grave breach of the 1949 Geneva Conventions, and thus a war crime, making its perpetrators punishable under federal and international law,” the complaint states.

The lawyers are suing under the century-old Death on the High Seas Act, which allows family members of people killed in international waters to sue for wrongful death.

Advertisement

Ultimately, this suit is seeking unnamed monetary damages for the families. The complaint is not seeking an injunction ordering the government to change its behavior.


Sean Cotter can be reached at sean.cotter@globe.com. Follow him @cotterreporter.





Source link

Continue Reading

Boston, MA

Blazers Have No Luck Against Celtics in Boston

Published

on

Blazers Have No Luck Against Celtics in Boston


The Portland Trail Blazers lost an ugly game to the Boston Celtics on Monday night, with a final score of 102-94. The game seemed over before it began as Boston took a massive lead early. Portland was able to make a couple pushes to make the game closer, but were never able to take the lead or seriously threaten to steal it.

The Blazers were led in scoring by Jerami Grant’s 19 points, 10 of which came from the free throw line. Toumani Camara added 18 points and Jrue Holiday had 14. Only two Blazers shot 50% or better from the field: Robert Williams (3-3) and Sidy Cissoko (1-2).

The Celtics were led by 23 points from Payton Pritchard, including buzzer-beaters to end both the first and second quarters. They also got 20 points from Jaylen Brown and 18 points from Derrick White.

Donovan Clingan finished the game with 9 points, 15 rebounds and 4 blocks. He made three of his four shots from inside the arc, but attempted five threes and made just one. His rebounding and shot-blocking abilities were on full display and he was very important for Portland’s pushes throughout the game.

Advertisement

Clingan’s effectiveness inside the paint takes a hit in Deni Avdija’s absence, as he doesn’t get quality shots. However, he was still efficient with the attempts he did get.

It’s hard to win games when you lose the first quarter 32-11. A 4-21 shooting performance from the field and 1-12 from deep in the quarter put the Blazers in a massive hole from the get-go. Boston didn’t do anything incredible, 54% from the field and 29% from three, but it was enough to go up huge on Portland.

It marked the second straight game that the Blazers set a season low in first quarter points after logging just 12 points in the first frame against the Toronto Raptors. They also set a new season low for points in a first half with just 37.

Portland just could not get the lid off the basket in this game. They shot just 42% from the field, 26% from deep and 67% from the free throw line. Without any consistency scoring the ball, every run quickly ended as the misses began to pile up.

While the Blazers played good defense throughout the game, Boston was able to win by just making a couple more shots and ride their huge first quarter to survive every push Portland made.

Advertisement

Portland stays on the road to face the Washington Wizards tomorrow at 4:00 p.m. PST.



Source link

Continue Reading

Boston, MA

How much snow has Boston gotten so far? What we know Monday

Published

on

How much snow has Boston gotten so far? What we know Monday


play

Many Boston residents awoke Monday, Jan. 26, to over 18 inches of thick, white snow outside their windows after the strongest part of the highly anticipated winter storm moved through overnight.

It’s the biggest snowstorm Boston has seen for nearly four years. According to the National Weather Service, the last time Boston got more than 8 inches of snow from a single storm was on Feb. 25, 2022.

Advertisement

Boston’s Logan International Airport reported a total of 18.6 inches of snow as of 7 a.m., and the city was expected to get at least 3 to 4 more inches from the storm.

And the snow on the ground is supposed to stick around.

“We’re looking at temperatures falling back into the teens and single digits overnight, so we’re not really expecting the snow to go really anywhere,” said Francis Tarasiewicz, a meteorologist with the National Weather Service in Norton.

The massive storm dumped several inches of snow onto most of the state Sunday and early Monday, according to the National Weather Service. Check out the snow totals for several Massachusetts communities.

Advertisement

Massachusetts snow totals so far

Here are the most recent snowfall totals reported in several Massachusetts cities and towns as of Monday, Jan. 26, according to the National Weather Service:

  • Amherst: 13.5 inches (as of 12:40 a.m. on Jan. 26)
  • Boston: 18.6 inches (as of 7 a.m. on Jan. 26)
  • Braintree: 16 inches (as of 11:07 p.m. on Jan. 25)
  • Dighton: 16 inches (as of 12 a.m. on Jan. 26)
  • Duxbury: 8.5 inches (as of 5:14 p.m. on Jan. 25)
  • Eastham: 13 inches (as of 6 a.m. on Jan. 26)
  • Fitchburg: 17 inches (as of 10:30 p.m. on Jan. 25)
  • Foxboro: 11 inches (as of 10 p.m. on Jan. 25)
  • Greenfield: 7.5 inches (as of 6:32 p.m. on Jan. 25)
  • Ipswich: 17.2 inches (as of 10:35 p.m. on Jan. 25)
  • Lowell: 16.8 inches (as of 10:46 p.m. on Jan. 25)
  • Marston Mills: 12 inches (as of 6 a.m. on Jan. 26)
  • Martha’s Vineyard: 10 inches (as of 6 a.m. on Jan. 26)
  • Nantucket: 8 inches (as of 5:30 p.m. on Jan. 25)
  • Norton: 12.8 inches (as of 12 a.m. on Jan. 26)
  • Plymouth: 17.5 inches (as of 6:53 a.m. on Jan. 26)
  • Shrewsbury: 19 inches (as of 8 a.m. on Jan. 26)
  • Springfield: 16.5 inches (as of 12 a.m. on Jan. 26)
  • Worcester: 10.9 inches (as of 6:30 p.m. on Jan. 25)

What does the weather look like in Massachusetts on Monday, Jan. 26?

Now that the bulk of the storm has passed, light to moderate snow is expected to fall in Massachusetts throughout Monday, Jan. 26, and into Tuesday, Jan. 27, according to NWS.

Eastern Massachusetts, including Boston and Lawrence, could see up to 3 to 4 more inches of snow, the weather service said.

Worcester, Provincetown, and Fitchburg could see 2 to 3 inches, Greenfield could see 2 inches, and Hyannis, Springfield, Pittsfield, and Great Barrington could see 1 to 2 inches, NWS said.

New Bedford, Martha’s Vineyard, and Nantucket could see less than an inch of snow on Monday, Jan. 26, according to NWS.

Advertisement

“Any lingering snow showers should be wrapped up by around 11 p.m. or so,” Tarasiewicz said.

Temperatures are expected to be below freezing throughout much of the state on Monday and Tuesday.

MA weather watches and warnings

Massachusetts radar

Sign up for weather texts



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending