Connect with us

Boston, MA

Boston Celtics are making it difficult for Nets’ Kevin Durant

Published

on

Boston Celtics are making it difficult for Nets’ Kevin Durant


There are 285 gamers in NBA background that’ve shown up in a minimum of 75 championship game. Amongst them, just Michael Jordan has a greater racking up typical than Kevin Durant, a two-time Finals MVP that may have one of the most frightening offending arsenal basketball has actually ever before seen.

Yet in Video game 1 of his first-round match versus the Celtics—and also a protection that’s overstocked with rate, size, athleticism, experience and also durability—Durant was a covering of himself. He required 24 shots to rack up 23 factors and also transformed it over 6 times. There was no rhythm, or frustrating stretch where he controls the video game and also takes what he desires.

According to Basketball Recommendation’s Video game Rating statistics, which uses “a harsh action of a gamer’s performance for a solitary video game,” this was the fifth-worst championship game of Durant’s whole occupation. Taking a look at his box rating plus/minus, which determines the factors added on a per 100 properties basis about what an ordinary gamer would certainly create, it was the worst.

Advertisement

Boston had much to do with that said, performing a distinct tactical plan that got all 5 gamers to deal with Durant like the all-time wonderful he is. Their objective wasn’t to object to every shot Durant took (which they almost did) yet rather to restrict the number of he might obtain. They refuted every little thing. When he came off an easy pindown or go across display, they didn’t simply switch over and also allow him capture the pass tidy. They made the minute seem like a quake, with neighboring protectors abandoning their own assignment just to collide with Durant’s body.

They leading secured him, fronted the blog post with aid over the leading and also transformed every enter a fumbling suit. Absolutely nothing was offered. When Al Horford got on Andre Drummond, he invested most properties attempting to secure Durant at the very same time, zoning up precede or perhaps tough increasing him off the sphere. Below the Webs ultimately attract a nasty, yet not prior to they need to distinct from a first down display right into a Kyrie Irving pick-and-roll.

The Celtics didn’t relinquish their switch-everything system, yet they likewise decreased to allow Durant choice that he intended to separate versus throughout the video game. If you’re questioning what the distinction in between the normal period and also the playoffs are, this series virtually sums it up. The Webs run a broad pindown for Durant and also have Seth Curry established the display, bringing Derrick White right into the activity, really hoping Boston will certainly switch over. Boston … does not switch over.

Throughout all 4 quarters, when Durant didn’t have the sphere along the boundary, his guy typically wasn’t in a normal aid placement. Rather, he’d face-guard KD with his back to the sphere, signaling that Boston was greater than satisfied to allow the Webs go 4-on-4.

Airspace was restricted. Durant was fouled 8 times and also provided just a few open appearances, almost all by means of shift shuffles, come before by a Celtics turn over or missed out on layup. Whatever else remained in a group, with arms jabbing in, bodies flying from behind and also drives that were removed by aid protectors. There were circumstances when Durant avoided a pass and after that saw a colleague attempt to assault from a seemingly slim 2nd side, yet those openings were knocked closed in a millisecond by gamers that understand just how to liquidate going complete rate without shedding their equilibrium.

Advertisement

When 2 got on the sphere, Durant made noticeable passes that Boston awaited. When he permeated past the first layer of protection, aid was waiting. The Celtics didn’t appreciate Bruce Brown.

Scroll to Proceed

“Absolutely Nothing versus Dragic, yet it was KD to the edge large open or Dragic with a 3,” Marcus Smart informed the Boston World concerning the play listed below. “I’m taking my possibilities, and also I’m selecting KD.”

Going individually versus Jayson Tatum, his key protector, was difficult, either. There aren’t a lot of gamers active that can strike a turn-around over Durant on one play and after that boil down and also obstruct his fadeaway. (Tatum likewise knocked a side-step 3 by Irving with a bit greater than 6 mins continuing to be in a one-possession video game. He’ll make numerous All-Defensive groups in his occupation.)

Overall, this is what the Celtics have actually done all period long. Tatum, Smart, Horford, White, Jaylen Brown and also Give Williams all have great impulses on the sphere, assist the assistant and also play like a hoggish NFL second that recognizes a yellow flag can’t be thrown on each and every single play. Holding, bumping, pushing. Below’s Williams, late in the 3rd quarter, still declining to yield a millimeter.

Advertisement

Fouls are dealt with as the expense of working. Durant will certainly pierce remarkably challenging shots since that’s that he is, yet if every property moving forward is as much of a work as what he underwent in Video game 1, this collection might not last long.

At the very same time, there were likewise a couple of plays in which Boston’s hostile approach backfired, be it on a late driving layup by Irving where Horford declined to move off Durant in the strongside edge or an earlier dunk by Claxton, large open below the edge since Tatum and also Horford were glued to Brooklyn’s finest gamer.

The plan to reduce the effects of Durant throughout 48 mins may not exist. Yet the Celtics came close in Video game 1, almost performing an emotionally and also literally laborious tactical plan to excellence. That’s the bright side. The problem is they still practically shed, and also, undoubtedly, Durant won’t play as badly once more. The Webs have yet to transform him right into their point player, which aided him devitalize the Bucks throughout in 2015’s 2nd round (a collection Milwaukee ultimately won, regardless of KD’s regular misuse of a going down Creek Lopez). Also when indisputable are made and also optimal initiative is used, this guy will certainly modest you.

Yet if any type of group in the organization can precisely claim it’s constructed for this kind of difficulty (also without Robert Williams III), it’s the Celtics. Defenses around the organization have every factor to be distressed over Durant. At the very same time, wonderful offending skills have every factor to really feel similarly concerning Boston’s protection. 

Extra NBA Protection:
• The 3rd Sprinkle Bro Has Actually Shown Up
• The Chess Suit In Between Nikola Jokic and also Draymond Eco-friendly
• The Raptors Are a Beautifully Weird Experiment

Advertisement





Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Boston, MA

Q&A: Chad Finn on 'The Boston Globe Story of the Celtics'

Published

on

Q&A: Chad Finn on 'The Boston Globe Story of the Celtics'


Book Club

Columnist Chad Finn dives into the details of how his new book, “The Boston Globe Story of the Celtics,” came together.

Last month, “The Boston Globe Story of the Celtics,” a comprehensive book of nearly every recorded moment in Celtics history, was released. The book’s editor Chad Finn, a sports columnist for The Boston Globe and Boston.com, collected hundreds of Celtics stories written by renowned sports reporters, such as Bob Ryan and Jackie MacMullan, since the team’s inception in 1946.

For Boston.com’s Book Club, Finn joined Boston.com sports writer Hayden Bird to discuss his process and insights in editing his book. Watch the full video, or read highlights of the discussion below.

Advertisement

Below is an abbreviated version of the discussion, which has been edited and condensed for clarity.

Bill Russell, left, star of the Boston Celtics is congratulated by coach Arnold “Red” Auerbach after scoring his 10,000th point in the NBA game against the Baltimore Bullets in Boston Garden on Dec. 12, 1964. (AP Photo/Bill Chaplis, file)

How did you approach creating this book?

With something like this, where it’s a compilation of the Globe‘s coverage of the Celtics throughout their mutual histories, the one thing you’re really wondering about is: Was everything covered?

I think it was a little bit more complicated, a little bit more reason to worry about it, with the Celtics book because of the race element with Bill Russell. Did they cover some of the stuff that players endured back then? Not being able to eat with their teammates when they would go to North Carolina for an exhibition game or something like that. So it was very satisfying, and also a bit of a relief, to find out that the Globe … had covered every single step, every single significant story along the way with the Celtics, from their launch in 1946 until putting out banner No. 18 a couple of weeks ago.

How daunting was the research process?

The first thing you have to do is sit down and make a thorough list of every significant thing chronologically that happened in Celtics history. Once you have that list of 450 different things that happened in Celtics lore, then you go into the archives and you say, “Do we have this?”

A lot of it is also our researcher, Jerry Manion, who’s just an absolute expert at finding what you’re looking for. I can’t tell you how many times in putting this book together where I would message Jerry and say, “Can you find that?” and I’d have it five minutes later. To be able to have that kind of support when you’re putting together a project that could be overwhelming is incredible. I’m incredibly grateful for that.

How did a game recap from 70-80 years ago compare to today?

The game stories and the stories from the coverage tended to be play by play, whereas nowadays, it’s a little bit of a look ahead, or a little bit of context on what you just saw, because you know about Jayson Tatum’s dunk and Jaylen Brown’s three-pointer that tied the game. Back then, that was news to you in the morning. You didn’t see it yourself. 

Advertisement
Boston Celtics Larry Bird is defended by Detroit Pistons SF Mark Aguirre during Game 6 of the 1991 NBA Eastern Conference Semifinals. The Pistons beat the Celtics, 117-113. Bird had 12 points, 4 assists and 4 rebounds. (Barry Chin/Globe Staff)

What’s your favorite lead or passage?

One is Bob Ryan’s lead when they drafted Larry Bird. Red Auerbach took him while he still had a year left of college in Indiana State because back then there was a loophole … where you could draft a player if his college class had graduated. 

Bob Ryan had seen Larry Bird play in person. He knew what Red had just pulled off, and his lead basically said Red didn’t just look like he swallowed the canary, it looked like he swallowed the whole aviary — perfect lead for Larry Bird. The whole column turned out to be prescient about how Larry’s career would go. I have some favorite stories in the book, but that one would be right up there in the top five just because of how he started it, how he wrote it, and how right he was.

What’s something you learned about the Celtics or the Globe’s coverage that stuck out to you?

I learned that the quality of writing really elevated in the late ‘60s. People took more chances with their writing.

In 1969, Leigh Montville got hired at the Globe, and I think if you asked every Globe columnist that has worked here the last 50 years, they would tell you Leigh Montville was the best columnist of all in terms of pure writing ability. He was lyrical, and he joined the beat covering the Celtics in Bill Russell’s last year. 

There was another writer at the same time named Bob Sales. His style was very easy to read and thoughtful, and did not shy away from opinions that probably were considered pretty progressive at the time. He was very supportive of the Black players on the Celtics. I thought Bob Sales, even more than Leigh Montville because he came before him, was somebody who really changed the style of writing about the Celtics and the approach that people took to it. 

Then a whole different topic, but Bob Ryan came around. He started the Globe the same day as [Peter] Gammons in 1968 as interns. When he took over the NBA beat in the early ‘70s, it changed everything. 

Advertisement

Celtics history is so intertwined with integration in basketball. How did the Globe cover that at the time?

If there was an incident, or if they were not treated as equals — which happened a lot — to their white teammates, the Globe wrote about it. And I wasn’t sure going into the book if that was going to be the case, and it was. 

There are still misconceptions about how the Celtics handled race, and a big part of that is because their team — that a certain generation remembers so well — is Bird, McHale, Danny Ainge. There was a perception: Oh yeah, Celtics, Boston, White. I mean they had the best white players, but it had nothing to do with race why they were here, and Celtics history tells you that.

Look at Celtics history, and Red just wanted to win. He didn’t care about the race or color of his players. He just wanted the best players, and that was well ahead of its time back then.

Bob Ryan sitting in the same seat as he did for the first Celtics game he attended in 1964. (Barry Chin/Globe Staff)

You lived through much of this history as a fan. How was looking at it different from the standpoint as editor of this book?

You get into the eighties, and Magic and Bird change the game in a bunch of different ways — saying they save the league really isn’t an exaggeration. To have grown up watching that, it was really cool to be able to get into that phase of the book where we are doing things that I remember and that I witnessed. 

But it was the hardest chapter in the book to edit, and it’s by far the biggest chapter in the book, for two reasons. Obviously they accomplished a lot, and they won the three titles in that era, and there were so many memorable games, the Lakers and the rivalry, the Sixers, and later on the Pistons. And with a book like this, you can’t just put the championships in it. There were so many games that resonated with people along the way. 

The other thing was the quality of the writing was mind-blowing. It was Bob Ryan at the peak of his powers; it was Dan Shaughnessy, Montville; Jackie MacMullan came along in the late ‘80s. So the hardest thing I had to do with this book was pick which story to use without being redundant when two or three of them wrote about the same subject. Which one do I use?

Advertisement

What does this book mean to you and your connection to the team?

I dedicated the book to my daughter who’s the biggest Celtics fan I know. I also dedicated to Bob Ryan, who is my writing hero.

I also think just writing about the family aspect of it — that’s become a really big thing with the Celtics themselves. I’ve never seen a team that was as connected and as willing to allow people around the players, their kids, their wives, to be as big a part of things as the 2024 Celtics were. 

I think it bonded them together even more where they’ve developed this culture, where it’s just greater than what they have on the court.


What is your favorite memory of being a Celtics fan?

Kelly Chan

Content Producer


Kelly Chan is a content producer at Boston.com. She designs multimedia content on-site and across social media platforms, and experiments with new ways to engage readers.

Advertisement





Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Boston, MA

Wu urges state lawmakers to approve revised Boston commercial tax plan

Published

on

Wu urges state lawmakers to approve revised Boston commercial tax plan


Boston Mayor Michelle Wu spoke to a joint committee on Beacon Hill Wednesday to advance her revised tax proposal.

The mayor urged lawmakers to approve it in time for Gov. Maura Healey’s signature. Wu called the revised plan, with more protections for small businesses, a compromise, balancing the needs of residents and the business community.

Boston’s commissioner of assessing used a paperclip as a visual aid during the presentation to lawmakers to illustrate a new balance: An effort to offset revenue losses caused by vacant business space by shifting and increasing the tax burden onto commercial properties.

“We need residents to have enough money in their pockets at the end of every month to go out and support our businesses,” Wu said.

Advertisement

She warned that homeowners could face steep property tax increases without the plan, which would likely be passed on to renters.

Lawmakers, however, pushed back, questioning the city’s financial needs.

“We all have to think about tightening our belts,” said Massachusetts State Sen. Susan Moran.

Wu countered, citing the need to address long-overdue salary adjustments for municipal workers.

“We had to sort of adjust the salaries after about four years of not having cost-of-living increases for municipal workers — the police contract, for example,” she explained.

Advertisement

Mayor Michelle Wu announced that she’s reached a deal to temporarily raise tax rates for local businesses amid a revenue shortfall. 

The revised proposal includes measures to protect small businesses, such as raising the personal property tax exemption threshold from $10,000 to $30,000.

Still, some critics remain unconvinced. Business owner Lou Murray argued the tax hike would ultimately trickle down to consumers.

“You tax somebody, they pass on the cost down the ladder,” Murray said.

Supporters like Boston resident Chaton Green said the tax proposal is critical for those already struggling on fixed incomes.

Advertisement

“I was sitting next to a 90-year-old woman, and she said, ‘I still have to work.’ And that broke me,” Green shared.

Because the proposal would temporarily raise Boston’s commercial property tax rate above the state limit, the mayor needs legislative approval to pass it on to the governor.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Boston, MA

Boston University Halts Admissions for Art History PhDs

Published

on

Boston University Halts Admissions for Art History PhDs


Boston University (BU) has suspended admissions for various Humanities and Social Sciences PhD tracks, including its art history program, for the 2025–2026 academic year. The news was first reported yesterday, November 19, by Inside Higher Ed.

BU did not make a public announcement, but an undated update to the PhD information page on the Graduate School of Arts and Sciences’s website indicates that admissions to its PhD programs in History of Art and Architecture, American and New England Studies, Anthropology, Classical Studies, English, History, Linguistics, Philosophy, Political Science, Religion, Romance Studies, and Sociology were temporarily suspended.

Inside Higher Ed’s report references emails between school administrators suggesting that the move was due in part to the financial implications of a recently ratified contract with the Boston University Graduate Workers Union (BUGWU). The contract, which ended a seven-month strike in October, ensured that the university’s PhD candidates are afforded a minimum yearly stipend of $45,000 with an annual 3% raise in addition to the school covering tuition throughout the agreement’s three-year lifespan. Additional contract points include expanded healthcare coverage, commuter benefits, and subsidized dental insurance among other benefits. Though the $45,ooo minimum was a significant raise, the university did not concede to BUGWU’s demands for a $17,000 increase in yearly stipends and 7% annual cost-of-living adjustments — a conflict that led to the longest strike in the university’s history.

As reported by Inside Higher Ed, emails between Stan Sclaroff, dean of BU’s College of Arts and Sciences (CAS), and Malika Jeffries-EL, associate dean of the university’s Graduate School of Arts and Sciences, implied that the financial requirements of the ratified contract were points of concern for meeting the needs of existing doctoral student cohorts.

Advertisement

However, Colin Riley, a spokesperson for the university, told Hyperallergic that the school “initiated [its] review of PhD programs through a task force in 2022 and began implementation of the recommendations this fall.”

BU also decided to reduce doctoral cohort sizes for the 2025–2026 academic year, Riley said, citing factors including “student success; job prospects and placements; the recommendations of the 2022 PhD Task Force on PhD Education; and ensuring we can honor the five-year funding commitments we have made to our currently enrolled doctoral students.”

A spokesperson for the Service Employees International Union Local 509 in Massachusetts, under which BUGWU organizes, did not immediately respond to Hyperallergic‘s inquiry.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending