Connect with us

News

With the BA.2 subvariant on the rise, what’s safe and what’s not? A medical expert explains | CNN

Published

on

With the BA.2 subvariant on the rise, what’s safe and what’s not? A medical expert explains | CNN



CNN
 — 

As the USA navigates a 3rd yr of the Covid-19 pandemic, instances are rising modestly within the Northeast, Philadelphia has reinstituted an indoor masks mandate and a few faculties are requiring masks through the last days of the spring semester.

Folks within the US gained’t face a shutdown just like the one at the moment in place in Shanghai, the place nobody is allowed to go away their residential compounds, Covid testing is necessary and meals provides are working low. It’s unlikely most People will see native governments convey again even reasonable pandemic restrictions. That leaves it largely to people to guard themselves.

After three years, most individuals understand how to do this: vaccines, masks, bodily distancing, handwashing and – let’s not neglect – air flow.

However as we head into places of work, colleges and public areas, there are some issues we will management – like masking – and others that aren’t in our management, similar to whether or not our places of work have improved air flow.

Advertisement

How ought to folks weigh which precautions they wish to observe? Ought to indoor masks mandates come again? Are there settings the place folks ought to think about masking open air? What if it’s important to return to the workplace, and others aren’t masking? And will we skip massive indoor occasions once more?

To assist us with these questions, I spoke with CNN Medical Analyst Dr. Leana Wen, an emergency doctor and professor of well being coverage and administration on the George Washington College Milken Institute College of Public Well being. She can also be writer of “Lifelines: A Physician’s Journey within the Struggle for Public Well being.”

The next dialog has been flippantly edited for size and readability.

CNN: Are you able to give us a fast refresher – what protecting measures are efficient towards this very contagious BA.2 variant?

Dr. Leana Wen: BA.2 is a subvariant of the Omicron variant. It seems to be much more contagious than Omicron. Like earlier variants, it’s unfold by means of direct contact and is airborne. Somebody coughing and sneezing will exhale droplets that may transmit the virus. The virus can be carried on microscopic aerosols which might be expelled by respiratory. As well as, surfaces might play a larger position in Omicron transmission. Somebody who coughed onto their hand after which touched a door might seed virus there and transmit it to you when you contact that door after which your nostril or mouth.

Advertisement

The protecting measures we talked about early within the pandemic nonetheless work towards Omicron. Masks work very nicely, although right here I might urge that folks put on an N95 or equal masks, similar to a KN95 or KF94. A easy material masks is far much less efficient, particularly towards a variant as contagious as BA.2.

Air flow is essential. The chance of out of doors transmission is exponentially decrease than indoor transmission, and a well-ventilated, much less crowded area additionally has a lot decrease danger than folks packed collectively in an unventilated area. Surfaces play much less of a task than aerosol transmission, however it’s nonetheless good follow to clean your palms nicely or to make use of hand sanitizer when you shake folks’s palms and contact incessantly used surfaces. That can scale back not solely this coronavirus transmission however different respiratory and gastrointestinal pathogens, too.

We even have extra instruments at our disposal than we did in 2020. Specifically, now we have vaccines and boosters, which shield very nicely towards extreme sickness and likewise scale back the chance of Covid-19 an infection. Testing previous to getting along with others tells folks if they’re infectious and must keep away from the gathering. That’s one other key safety measure that we now have entry to.

CNN: What ought to folks think about when deciding what precautions they wish to convey again, like canceling restaurant reservations or masking up indoors?

Wen: I’d think about three issues. First, what’s the Covid-19 danger in your group? I’ve talked earlier than about how the brand new pointers from the US Facilities for Illness Management and Prevention can be utilized right here. In case your group is in an orange, or “excessive danger,” space by the CDC’s metrics, you must masks indoors. If it’s in inexperienced or yellow – or “low” or “medium” danger – you possibly can select to not, relying on the opposite two elements.

Advertisement

The second factor to consider is, what’s your medical scenario and the circumstances of others in your family? In case you are usually wholesome and totally vaccinated and boosted, your likelihood of extreme sickness from Covid-19 may be very low. That’s totally different in case you are immunocompromised or dwell with somebody who’s aged with a number of medical situations. You’d wish to have the next threshold for warning relying on your loved ones’s medical scenario.

Third, how necessary is it to you to proceed to keep away from Covid-19? After all, none of us wish to get contaminated by the coronavirus, and nobody must be attempting to get it. However there are some individuals who wish to keep away from it in any respect prices and others who settle for that in the event that they have interaction in journey, resume events, dine in eating places and have interaction in different pre-pandemic actions, they’ll have some stage of danger. That’s a private resolution that can differ from individual to individual.

CNN: Does it make sense to masks in some conditions however not others?

Wen: Completely. Danger is additive. You’ll be able to convey again some issues which might be decrease danger or larger worth however nonetheless take some precautions. For instance, when you work in an workplace that has fairly good air flow and is well-spaced, and requires proof of vaccination, chances are you’ll think about not masking in that setting. However you may nonetheless resolve to masks in crowded, indoor locations like grocery shops and prepare stations. Once more, I’d urge that in case you are sporting a masks, put on an N95 or equal masks, as a result of it will likely be your finest likelihood of defending towards the very contagious BA.2 variant.

CNN: What about open air? Is BA.2 so contagious that it might transmit there?

Advertisement

Wen: The chance of out of doors transmission may be very low to the purpose that it’s nearly nonexistent. Out of doors social gatherings are very secure, and definitely decrease danger than the equal setting indoors. I don’t assume that folks must masks open air, however there could also be conditions the place somebody is extraordinarily susceptible – for instance, a most cancers affected person on chemotherapy – and desires to be additional cautious. In that case, they need to undoubtedly be at liberty to put on a masks when in out of doors and extra crowded settings.

CNN: What if it’s important to return to the workplace, and others aren’t masking?

Wen: You might want to resolve what’s finest for you, with the understanding that one-way masking with an N95 or equal works very nicely – that’s, even when others round you aren’t masking, you might be nonetheless well-protected when you put on a well-fitting, high-quality masks always.

It additionally relies on the specifics of your office. Let’s say you’re employed in a well-ventilated workplace, everybody round you is vaccinated, and you might be well-distanced from the subsequent individual. You would resolve to take away your masks when sitting at your desk, however put it on once more to enter a crowded elevator or a convention room the place you’re sitting shoulder-to-shoulder with different folks. You would resolve to go to an out of doors lunch along with your colleagues, however skip the blissful hour in a packed bar. These are all affordable choices relying on how you concentrate on your personal danger.

CNN: Ought to folks keep away from indoor gatherings, understanding that outbreaks can occur?

Advertisement

Wen: Not essentially. It once more relies on what’s occurring in your group, what your medical scenario is, and the way a lot you wish to preserve avoiding Covid-19. For me, my space, in Baltimore Metropolis, is in a inexperienced or “low-risk” space for Covid-19 transmission, in line with the CDC. My husband and I are vaccinated and boosted. Now we have two little youngsters who’re too younger to be vaccinated, however we additionally acknowledge that it’s going to be very troublesome to maintain them from getting the coronavirus given how transmissible this new variant is.

As such, I’m attending massive occasions, together with indoor conferences and conferences. I’d want that these occasions require proof of vaccination and same-day unfavourable check outcome. In the event that they don’t, they’re much less secure, and I definitely perceive if others wish to keep away from them in the intervening time—simply as I perceive if others will wish to preserve attending them. This, to me, isn’t any totally different from a choice to return to the fitness center, resume journey or dine indoors in eating places. Some will assume these actions are well worth the danger. Others won’t.

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

News

Donald Trump says he ‘may or may not’ strike Iran

Published

on

Donald Trump says he ‘may or may not’ strike Iran

Unlock the White House Watch newsletter for free

Donald Trump has made his most explicit comments yet about possible US military action against Iran, saying that the next week would be “very big” in determining the course of the war between Israel and the Islamic republic.

Speaking after Iran’s supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei warned Washington of “irreparable damage” if it intervened, Trump suggested Tehran wanted to negotiate but had left it perilously late.

“I may do it. I may not do it. I mean, nobody knows what I’m going to do,” Trump said at the White House on Wednesday morning, a day after receiving a Situation Room briefing on the conflict.

Advertisement

“The next week is going to be very big — maybe less than a week,” he added in remarks that hinted at a possible timeframe for the US decision.

Hours later, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said in a statement that he had a “very warm” conversation with Trump on Tuesday night.

Netanyahu said Israel was “advancing step by step” to remove Iran’s nuclear and ballistic missile threats, adding: “We are attacking nuclear installations, missiles, command centres and the symbols of the regime.”

But he also acknowledged that Israel was “sustaining many losses, painful losses” from Iran’s missile strikes. 

The Pentagon on Monday ordered the USS Nimitz aircraft carrier and three missile-guided destroyers to redeploy from the South China Sea to the Middle East, a journey that is likely to take about a week.

Advertisement

The US president said he had not given Netanyahu any indication of greater US involvement in the strikes against Iran.

But he said he had told Netanyahu to “keep going” with his attacks.

Trump added that Tehran, which was engaged in indirect talks with Washington over its nuclear programme before Israel launched its war, had suggested sending a delegation to the White House for talks. He described the move as “courageous”, even though he said Iran was “totally defenceless” and in an “unsustainable” position.

“Iran’s got a lot of trouble and they want to negotiate,” he said, adding that he had told the Iranians “it’s very late to be talking”, while cautioning “nothing’s too late.”

Oil prices fell after Trump’s remarks, which investors saw as potentially dovish, with the Brent crude benchmark down 2 per cent from Tuesday’s close, before it pared back some of its losses.

Advertisement

However, Iran’s mission to the UN denied Trump’s account, posting on X: “No Iranian official has ever asked to grovel at the gates of the White House . . . Iran does NOT negotiate under duress.”

In a televised message to the Iranian people earlier in the day, Khamenei hit out at Trump’s call for Tehran’s “unconditional surrender”, which the US president suggests would mean the complete destruction of the country’s nuclear programme.

Israel says the programme is aimed at developing a weapon, although Iran says it is purely peaceful.

“Those with wisdom who know Iran, its people and history, will never use the language of threat to address this nation because they will never surrender,” the Iranian supreme leader said.

“The Americans should know that any US military engagement will undoubtedly result in irreparable damage,” he added.

Advertisement

When asked about Khamenei’s comments, Trump said: “I say, ‘good luck’.”

Testifying before Congress on Wednesday, US defence secretary Pete Hegseth said the Pentagon “stands ready to execute” any decision the president makes about going to war, though he declined to say whether the Pentagon would assist Israel in striking Iran.

“President Trump’s word means something. The world understands that. And at the defence department our job is to stand ready and prepared with options,” Hegseth said. “We already have in many ways . . . re-established deterrence. The question is, in the coming days exactly what direction that goes.”

Should Trump decide to involve the US more directly, he could make the most decisive difference by striking Fordow, a key Iranian nuclear facility buried half a kilometre beneath a mountain, with US B-2 bombers and 30,000-pound GBU-57 massive ordnance penetrators, known as “bunker busters”.

Earlier on Wednesday, Israel said it had hit a production site to make centrifuges to enrich uranium — a process that can yield both nuclear fuel and weapons-grade material — as well as sites manufacturing parts for surface-to-surface and surface-to-air missiles.

Advertisement

Later in the evening, an Iranian missile salvo targeted Tel Aviv and central Israel, with early reports suggesting all the projectiles had been intercepted.

Additional reporting by Demetri Sevastopulo in Washington, Neri Zilber in Tel Aviv and Andrew England in London

Continue Reading

News

What's in the Senate's version of Trump's 'big bill'?

Published

on

What's in the Senate's version of Trump's 'big bill'?

For more politics coverage and analysis, sign up for Here’s the Deal, our weekly politics newsletter, here.


The “One Big Beautiful Bill Act” (let’s say “OBBBA”) is President Donald Trump’s signature agenda item in Congress.

It will affect the daily lives of tens of millions of Americans. It is a massive project, with potentially the largest tax cuts, spending cuts and additions to the national debt in U.S. history.

WATCH: Can Trump’s “big, beautiful bill” make it through the Senate?

This week, we have a critical, new development to dive into: the Senate Finance Committee’s own draft of how it wants to handle tax cuts and Medicaid cuts.

Advertisement

(For the most adventurous among us, all 549 pages can be found here.)

The big picture

  • Tax cuts. The Senate draft would add and lengthen some tax cuts, both for businesses and individuals.
  • Green energy cuts. It would slightly delay the elimination of tax credits for solar and wind energy. The Senate draft would push back cuts for nuclear, geothermal and hydropower far more significantly.
  • Medicaid cuts. It would cut Medicaid more than the House-passed bill.

OK, let’s go a little deeper.

A close-up of the words “One Big Beautiful Bill Act” printed on an agenda for a House Rules Committee’s hearing in May on President Donald Trump’s plan for extensive tax cuts. Photo by Nathan Howard/Reuters

Some tax specifics

  • Individual tax rates. Senate and House Republicans are in sync on this. They would make current tax rates permanent. Without action, nearly all individuals will see a tax increase.
  • Standard deductions. The Senate draft would give most adults a bigger tax deduction from the start. Without extending Trump’s 2017 tax cuts, the standard deduction that many individuals take to lower their tax burden is slated to decrease nearly in half at the end of the year. The Senate would not just keep but raise the deduction amounts — to $16,000 for individuals and $32,000 for married couples filing jointly.
  • Child tax credit. The current tax credit of $2,000 per child is set to drop to $1,000 at the end of the year. The Senate would raise the credit to $2,200 permanently. The House would raise the credit to $2,500, but only until 2028.

Green energy

  • A slash to green energy funds. The House and Senate are both moving to eliminate major tax credits for wind and solar from the 2022 Inflation Reduction Act.
  • But the Senate gives a slightly longer phase-out, allowing a partial tax credit for projects that start construction next year or in 2027. The House would end the credit almost as soon as the bill is enacted.

Medicaid

  • Targeting the “provider” tax. This is the most notable cut that the Senate draft is adding. Right now, states use a loophole to help them get more federal dollars for Medicaid. They tax hospitals and doctors (a “provider tax”) and spend that money back with the hospitals and doctors. The more states spend, the more the federal government will match.
  • A cut on this tax. For states that expanded Medicaid, the Senate draft would gradually reduce the maximum amount of provider taxes, which is currently up to 6%, until it reaches a 3.5% threshold by 2031. Many Republicans like this reform, but others say it would significantly cut funds available for Medicaid. The House bill would block new provider taxes.
  • Work requirements. Both the House and Senate would add an 80-hours-a-month work requirement for “able-bodied” adults, or those without disabilities, on Medicaid. The Senate makes one significant change: exempting parents of children under 14 years old from the requirement. (There currently is no federal work requirement for Medicaid.)

What now?

This Senate version is experiencing some initial turbulence.

Four Republican senators have openly questioned the Medicaid cuts in the House bill: Sens. Lisa Murkowski of Alaska, Jerry Moran of Kansas, Susan Collins of Maine and Josh Hawley of Missouri.

And now, West Virginia Sen. Jim Justice has told a Semafor reporter that he wants the Senate’s Medicaid section to revert to the House version, which would ban new or increased provider taxes.

Hawley told me Tuesday that the cut to the provider tax was a total surprise to him and others. Trump, too, was surprised when alerted about the change and its ramifications for rural hospitals, Hawley said.

Advertisement

This is not unusual. Big bills often have big problems when they are released.

But. Republicans are trying to get this historic legislation through Congress — not just the Senate — in the next two weeks.

At this point in the process, similar large bills (think the Affordable Care Act) usually take months to get through the Senate and back through the House again.

Republicans are determined to pass a version of the bill, but increasingly my sources are saying the question is “not if, but when.”

Support PBS News Hour

Advertisement

Your donation makes a difference in these uncertain times.


Advertisement
Continue Reading

News

Video: Inside Trump’s Shifting Stance on Iran

Published

on

Video: Inside Trump’s Shifting Stance on Iran

President Trump spent the first months of his term holding back Israel’s push for an assault on Iran’s nuclear program. With the war underway, he has now expressed support for Israel. Jonathan Swan, a White House reporter for The New York Times, breaks down how the president got to this point.

Continue Reading

Trending