Connect with us

News

Why the US declined to send Ukraine long-range missiles, tanks

Published

on

Why the US declined to send Ukraine long-range missiles, tanks

When President Volodymyr Zelensky visited Washington on Wednesday, the US introduced that it could lastly be sending Patriot missiles to Ukraine, 300 days into the struggle. Nonetheless, the Biden administration declined to offer Ukraine ATACM long-range missiles as a result of wariness about escalation dangers, and declined to ship US tanks due to operational issues. But analysts warn towards overstating the variations between Kyiv and Washington.

The Patriot air defence weaponry was simply one of many Christmas items Kyiv needs.

“We’re grateful for [the US’s] help, however it isn’t sufficient,” Zelensky informed Ukrainian troops close to the frontline on the jap battleground metropolis Bakhmut on Tuesday. “It’s a trace – it isn’t sufficient.” 

High Zelensky advisor Mykhailo Podolyak posted a tweet in early December titled: “My Christmas Wishlist”. Along with Patriots, Podolyak requested for the US’s ATACM long-range missiles, US Abrams tanks and German Leopard and Marder tanks. 


“Ukraine needs to conduct a large-scale offensive as quickly as it will possibly, and that requires a big military corps and many protected mobility,” defined Shashank Joshi, defence editor of The Economist. “They don’t have sufficient to equip your entire corps, as [head of the Ukrainian armed forces] Normal Valery Zaluzhny informed my colleagues at The Economist. So the Ukrainians are very open in regards to the want for extra armoured autos.” 

At the same time as issues stand, “Russia nonetheless has an awesome benefit over Ukraine on the subject of long-range artillery and tanks”, famous Michal Baranowski, managing director of Warsaw-based GMF East, a part of the German Marshall Fund.  

“There’s one side of the Ukrainians’ calls for that’s somewhat distinct and that’s the ATACMs,” Joshi added. They want to use these long-range missiles, which might hit targets inside Russia, to “degrade Russian logistics and create the circumstances for what we’d name manoeuvre; cellular advance”. So the calls for for tanks and ATACMs are “two sides of the identical coin; it’s all about setting the stage for offensives”. 

‘Escalation is major concern’ 

Responding to Ukrainian calls for throughout Zelensky’s go to, Joe Biden was extra specific than ever in refusing to ship Kyiv ATACMs, which might have the ability to strike targets inside Russia. The US president warned it risked alienating European NATO members. “They’re not trying to go to struggle with Russia,” he mentioned. 

Advertisement

“With ATACMs, escalation is the first concern,” Joshi mentioned. “They might assault fairly deep inside Russia, and if the Ukrainians have been to make use of them to take action, that would effectively trigger a fissure inside NATO about the best way to reply. There’s a variety of European international locations, together with in southern Europe, which are cautious of escalation.” 

In the meantime US defence officers have argued that Ukraine already has all of the tanks it wants and that M1 Abrams are too difficult for the Ukrainian navy to function. 

This isn’t a diplomatic excuse to paper over fear about escalating the struggle, Joshi mentioned.

“Relating to tanks, I don’t assume escalation is the first American concern; as an alternative I feel it’s actually a query of sustainability. New tanks use an terrible lot of gasoline – Abrams particularly are extraordinarily gasoline hungry. Upkeep takes a variety of effort, whereas spare components are in enormous demand. And Ukraine solely has expertise of Soviet-era tanks. So pragmatic sensible issues are on the forefront of US calculations right here,” Joshi added. 

The dissonance between Washington and Kyiv on this query of arms provides shouldn’t be overplayed, urged Mark Cancian, a senior fellow on the Middle for Strategic and Worldwide Research in Washington DC. “It’s solely the ATACMs that signify a coverage distinction,” he put it. 

Advertisement

‘Jarring to German strategic tradition’ 

As for the opposite objects on Podolyak’s want checklist, Germany has lengthy refused to ship Ukraine Leopard and Marder tanks – prompting in September a livid tweet from Ukrainian Overseas Minister Dmytro Kuleba. “What’s Berlin afraid of that Kyiv just isn’t?” Kuleba railed.  

German Chancellor Olaf Scholz is the important thing determine right here. A lot has been made from what Germans name the nation’s Zeitenwende (turning level) – a pivot away from Berlin’s longstanding emollience in the direction of Moscow. However Scholz has drawn a line at sending tanks – regardless of stress inside his ruling coalition, with even Overseas Minister Annalena Baerbock hinting that he ought to change course. 

“The Zeitenwende is a course of that has began however many individuals, myself included, assume it hasn’t gone far sufficient,” Baranowski mentioned. “On the one hand, Germany is sending Ukraine anti-aircraft missiles and also you couldn’t think about that even only a few months in the past. However on the tank subject, it’s simply Scholz who’s holding again on this in Germany; sending tanks has turn into a logo of his resistance to stress.” 

That mentioned, Ukraine is completely depending on Soviet-era tanks as a result of no Western nation has despatched Kyiv any Western-designed tanks – not the US, not the UK, probably the most beneficiant of Western European international locations to the Ukrainian struggle effort. 

Consequently, Scholz declining to offer Ukraine tanks is “partly about security in numbers”, Joshi mentioned. If Germany despatched tanks at this stage and “obtained thus far forward of the Western European consensus, that might be very jarring to German strategic tradition”. 

Advertisement

On the similar time, Germany has urgent navy wants of its personal. Berlin has slowly however steadily elevated defence spending from an infamously low base. But two current tales counsel extra funding is required.  

Earlier this month, it emerged that not a single certainly one of Germany’s flagship Puma tanks was operational after a coaching train. This got here after German media reviews that the Bundeswehr solely had sufficient ammunition for 2 days of intense fight. 

So the Bundeswehr “not being in nice form” offers one other clarification for Scholz not sending Kyiv tanks, as Joshi put it. 

Must be ‘considered’ 

It’s not simply the German navy which wants to extend manufacturing to maintain tempo with demand. Analysts have lengthy warned that the US has sharply decreased its personal weapons provides by sending so many arms to Ukraine, particularly at a time when tight labour markets have made it more durable for defence contractors to ramp up manufacturing.  

So Western international locations are going to need to be “considered” of their weapons transfers to Ukraine, Joshi mentioned. “Manufacturing charges and industrial capability are going to be vital constraints on the speed of arms donations to Ukraine over the course of 2023, though after all Russia too has vital provide constraint downside, particularly on the subject of issues like ammunition and artillery shells.” 

Advertisement

On this context, some observers fear that the subsequent Home Majority Chief Kevin McCarthy’s repeated vow to not give Ukraine a “clean cheque” will present itself as Washington dialling down its help for Kyiv when McCarthy’s Republicans take cost of the chamber in January. 

Nonetheless, Zelensky’s go to could effectively have lessened scepticism inside the GOP about arms transfers to Ukraine.

“It was very profitable,” Cancian urged. “Whenever you appeared on the response of Congress, you could possibly see solely a handful of Republicans exhibiting opposition. Zelensky hit all the fitting notes in his speech, particularly when it got here to assuring People that the cash was being spent responsibly.” 

© France Médias Monde graphic studio

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

News

US retailers stretch out Black Friday deals to lure flagging shoppers

Published

on

US retailers stretch out Black Friday deals to lure flagging shoppers

Stay informed with free updates

US retailers are extending their one-day seasonal Black Friday discount offers into a sales event lasting weeks in a bid to tempt US consumers to keep spending, as data suggests that their spree which has driven economic growth is beginning to falter.

Walmart, Amazon, Target and Macy’s are among the US retailers already offering deep discounts under the banner of Black Friday, long before it actually arrives this week.

Despite this, general merchandise unit sales were down 3 per cent year-on-year in the week ending 16 November according to data from Circana, which compiles retail point-of-sale data.

Advertisement

The National Retail Federation forecasts that winter holiday sales will reach almost $1tn in the US in November and December, a record $902 a head. But the rate of spending growth is expected to be about 2.5-3.5 per cent, the slowest since 2018.

“We’re seeing this drag-out of incentives to try to widen the window within which [retailers] can draw more consumers,” said Gregory Daco, chief economist at adviser EY Parthenon. “The likely reality in this holiday season is that we see fairly subdued sales because volumes are growing, but at a moderate pace — and [retailers have] much less pricing power.”

Retailers were “incentivising via discounts and different forms of promotions” for those at the lower end of the income spectrum while also “trying to grab higher-income individuals to make purchases during this wider window”, he said.

Although headline inflation has ebbed from the historic highs of the past couple of years, consumers “remain extremely frustrated by the persistence of high prices”, the University of Michigan said this week in a monthly survey.

Consumer spending has been the main driver of America’s robust economic growth in recent months. But consumer confidence is still well below the long-run average, sentiment surveys show.

Advertisement

The prospect of a fresh round of tariffs under Donald Trump’s incoming presidency raises the risk that inflation could take off again, economists have warned — posing a fresh drag on sentiment.

“Donald Trump’s return to the White House with a Republican majority [probably leads] to higher inflation, slower GDP growth and increased budget deficits,” Roland Fumasi, food and agribusiness analyst at Rabobank, said in a note.

If Trump increases tariffs, that would “lead to a rebound in inflation and a slowdown in economic growth”, he said.

“The negative impact on growth could be mitigated by tax cuts and deregulation by a Republican Congress. However, this would increase the budget deficit and reinforce inflation, especially in combination with reduced immigration,” he added.

Black Friday is one of the busiest times of year for consumer goods stores, and the period between Thanksgiving and Cyber Monday — the Monday following the holiday, when electronics vendors discount goods — is critical to retailers’ annual revenue.

Advertisement

NRF chief economist Jack Kleinhenz said that households’ finances were in “good shape”, offering “an impetus for strong spending heading into the holiday season”, although “households will spend more cautiously”.

Brian Cornell, Target chief executive, told analysts this week that consumers were becoming “increasingly resourceful” in the way that they shopped, “focusing on deals and then stocking up when they find them”.

The store group, which disappointed Wall Street this week by forecasting flat sales in the fourth quarter, ran a three-day “Early Black Friday” promotion in early November. On Thursday it launched a promotion titled “Black Friday deals” which will last to the end of the month, including items such as half-price Christmas trees and headphones.

Walmart, the world’s largest retailer, launched the first of two week-long “Black Friday Deals” events on November 11. The second will begin on Monday, offering markdowns on televisions, iPhones, toys and jeans, among other items.

Amazon’s “Black Friday Week” began on Thursday. Home Depot’s “Black Friday Savings” offer lasts from November 7 to December 4.

Advertisement

Additional reporting by Will Schmitt in New York and Madeleine Speed in London

Continue Reading

News

Two killed and one injured as plane crashes in Colorado mountain range

Published

on

Two killed and one injured as plane crashes in Colorado mountain range

Two people were killed and one was injured after a Civil Air Patrol plane crashed near Storm Mountain in Colorado.

Authorities responded to a report of a plane crash roughly 80 miles north of Denver shortly after 11 a.m. on Saturday, the Larimer County Sheriff’s Office said.

Emergency crews and deputies found three passengers on board. Two were confirmed dead while the third was transported to a local hospital with severe injuries, the sheriff’s office said.

The plane belonged to the Thompson Valley Composite Squadron of the Civil Air Patrol, a civilian auxiliary of the US Air Force. The plane, which the National Transportation Safety Board identified as a Cessna 182, was conducting a routine aerial photography training mission when the incident occurred, Colorado Civil Air Patrol confirmed.

Advertisement

Pilot Susan Wolber and aerial photographer Jay Rhoten lost their lives in the crash while co-pilot Randall Settergren suffered injuries, the state’s Governor Jared Polis announced Saturday.

Aerial photos show the wreckage from the crash

Aerial photos show the wreckage from the crash (Fox31 Denver)

These individuals “served the Civil Air Patrol as volunteers who wanted to help make Colorado a better, safer place for all. The State of Colorado is grateful for their commitment to service and it will not be forgotten,” the governor said.

The sheriff’s office is still working on recovery operations, which it expects will take several days “due to the extreme, rugged terrain,” authorities said. An investigation into the crash is also ongoing.

Major General Laura Clellan, the Adjutant General of Colorado of the state’s department of Military and Veterans Affairs, also issued a statement in the wake of the tragedy.

Advertisement

“The volunteers of Civil Air Patrol are a valuable part of the Department of Military and Veterans Affairs, and the lifesaving work they do on a daily basis directly contributes to the public safety of Coloradans throughout the state,” she said. “Our thoughts and deepest condolences are with the families of those involved in the crash. I would also like to thank all of the first responders who assisted with rescue efforts.”

Colorado Civil Air Patrol missions “range from search-and-rescue of lost hikers or hunters, location of downed aircraft, and transport of emergency personnel or medical materials,” the statement said.

Loveland Fire Rescue Authority, Thompson Valley EMS, UCHealth LifeLine, Larimer County Parks Rangers, Loveland Police Department, the United States Forest Service, and the Colorado Air National Guard also assisted with the incident response.

Continue Reading

News

Starbucks pares hedging programme despite coffee market surge

Published

on

Starbucks pares hedging programme despite coffee market surge

Starbucks has slashed its use of hedges against coffee price shocks even as the price of beans has soared, raising concerns that it may be unusually exposed to market swings. 

The world’s largest café chain held less than $200mn worth of fixed-price contracts for so-called green, or unroasted, coffee at the end of its fiscal year in September, according to its newly filed annual report, down from $1bn as recently as 2019. 

The decline has occurred at a time when roasters confront supply deficits after persistently poor crops in major exporters such as Brazil. Benchmark coffee futures rose above $3 a pound in New York on Friday to a 13-year high, following a more than 70 per cent gain in the past 12 months. 

Starbucks buys 3 per cent of the world’s coffee to supply its 40,000 cafés and retail businesses. A team based in Lausanne, Switzerland manages purchasing high-quality arabica beans under a subsidiary named the Starbucks Coffee Trading Company. The decline in the value of its fixed-price contracts has attracted attention on Wall Street. 

“They are substantially less hedged than they used to be. It makes the next 12 months of coffee prices more important than they’ve ever been,” said Gregory Francfort, a restaurant analyst at Guggenheim Securities.   

Advertisement

New Starbucks chief executive Brian Niccol is in the the early stages of a plan to revive flagging sales at cafés. One of his goals is to restore its appeal as a community coffee house. “At Starbucks, coffee comes first,” he said in video remarks last month. 

The company is not alone among roasters in letting price-cover slip during an explosive market rally. Data from the US commodity futures regulator shows commercial traders have sharply reduced their contracts to buy arabica.

A coffee trader familiar with Starbucks’ operations says the majority of its purchases are made with so-called “price-to-be-fixed” contracts, which establish a quantity, delivery month and the amount of price premium to New York’s futures market. The final purchase price is agreed later.

“When a market rallies significantly and quickly, as coffee has done, the roasting community in general tends to let coverage decline,” the trader said.

Starbucks’ 56 “tier one” suppliers range from global commodities trading houses such as Louis Dreyfus and Olam to farmer co-operatives. The company in 2021 said it bought 800mn lbs of coffee annually — an amount that would cost $2.4bn at current benchmark prices. 

Advertisement

Starbucks had $1.1bn in green coffee purchase obligations on its books as of September, according to its annual report.

The company buys green coffee using two types of contracts: fixed-price and price-to-be-fixed, according to its annual report. For the latter, the company also uses derivatives contracts to insure against market gyrations. 

Line chart of $mn showing Starbucks cuts value of 'fixed-price' coffee purchases

“Like others, right now we’re remaining agile in a very dynamic market,” Starbucks said in response to questions. “An example of that agility is that our current priced coverage is slightly lower than our typical range of 9-18 months.”  

Starbucks executives rarely discuss coffee hedging with Wall Street, but in 2021 — another period of furious price rises — then-CEO Kevin Johnson told analysts the company purchased 12 to 18 months in advance, and at the time had locked in prices for the next 14 months.

“We may be the only large buyer of green coffee that uses this approach, and that will serve us well as it gives us a significant advantage relative to our competitors who, if they don’t buy this far in advance, will certainly not have that cost structure that we put in place,” he said.

The value of Starbucks’ price-to-be-fixed contracts has fluctuated, ending the fiscal year in September at $929mn, according to the annual report.

Advertisement

That sum was more than a year ago, but well below levels of 2021 and 2022. Coffee derivatives contracts held by Starbucks were worth $154mn, the lowest September value since 2020. 

Starbucks’ coffee trading operation is headed by Andres Berron, an eight-year employee of the company, according to his LinkedIn page. The company declined to make him available for comment. 

Starbucks said its approach to purchasing coffee hasn’t changed. The company pointed out that its current stocks of physical coffee are a cushion against volatility in the spot market.

Inventories of unroasted and roasted beans combined were worth about $920mn as of September, according to the annual report, the lowest fiscal year-end figure since 2021. 

“We keep a healthy and ample green coffee inventory that outpaces other roasters,” Starbucks said. 

Advertisement

Global coffee production has been rocked by poor weather. The US Department of Agriculture last week cut its production forecast for Brazil, the top supplier, citing irregular rainfall and high temperatures that could depress its next harvest. 

“The global coffee market just can’t seem to catch a break,” said Kona Haque, a commodities analyst at ED&F Man in London. “Just when you think maybe this year we’re going to get a big crop and finally get back to a surplus and rebuild our stocks, you get another adverse-weather event in either Brazil or Vietnam, and things get tight again.” 

“Because markets now are tighter than usual, there is upward pressure on prices,” she added. “In a rising price environment, clearly you want to be hedged. You do not want to be exposed to rising spot prices.” 

Continue Reading

Trending