Connect with us

News

Why the era of ageing wine in concrete may finally have come

Published

on

Why the era of ageing wine in concrete may finally have come

Frog’s Leap has all the time been an exception amongst Napa Valley wineries. The Williams household, who based it, had been preaching the natural gospel lengthy earlier than most of their neighbours. They’ve treasured previous vine varieties which can be much less trendy and extra obscure than essentially the most worthwhile Cabernet Sauvignon. They even appear to have managed an amicable and profitable transition from one technology to a different. And John Williams and his son Rory had been Napa’s first to undertake a winemaking observe that has been spreading everywhere in the world.

Wooden, particularly oak, has lengthy been the fabric of selection for ageing and, usually, fermenting wine in. It clearly has an affinity with the flavours of wine and, most significantly, encourages simply the correct quantity of oxygen wanted to stabilise and make clear it. Historic civilisations could have used clay pots and the like, however picket barrels succeeded amphorae as containers for each storage and transport as way back because the third century AD.

In direction of the tip of the twentieth century, it turned a badge of honour among the many world’s wine producers to boast about what number of new French oak barrels they purchased every year. Certainly, for a lot of wine producers the world over, the best annual value is their funding in new barrels, which maintain the equal of about 300 bottles. They’ll value $1,000 every and could also be used for not more than three years.

Up to now, an oak barrel — certainly, ageing wine in any respect — was considered a luxurious in poorer components of Europe. In direction of the tip of the final century, they usually hoped to interchange their previous concrete vats, usually as massive as a room, with new stainless-steel tanks which can be a lot simpler to wash. The deserted wine co-ops that now dot the Languedoc, as an example, are full of those ghostly vessels, usually nonetheless encrusted with the purple tartrate crystals deposited by pink winemaking. A few of the extra energetic wine farmers would use dynamite to rid themselves of those concrete dinosaurs.

But concrete has turn into more and more à la mode in wine manufacturing. This century many wineries have experimented with big concrete egg-shaped containers, that are alleged to encourage motion and helpful contact with the lees. And glamorous new wineries, equivalent to these designed for the glitzy likes of Château Cheval Blanc in St-Emilion and Masseto in Bolgheri, boast concrete fermentation vessels in all sizes and styles. Maybe the truth that, regardless of the prevailing trend elsewhere, Bordeaux’s most costly wine, Petrus, has all the time been fermented in concrete has performed a small half in encouraging this phenomenon.

Advertisement

Nevertheless it applies solely to fermentation. Most advantageous wine continues to be aged in wooden, even when producers and shoppers have broadly taken towards the pronounced “oaky” flavours related to new, small barrels so the dimensions and common age of the oak barrel or vat has been rising.

At Frog’s Leap, they’re flying within the face of present observe in northern California, the place demand for brand spanking new French oak barrels has lengthy been so nice that the most important French coopers established outposts there a few years in the past.

In addition to utilizing an array of concrete eggs, which John Williams describes as “space-eaters”, they’ve put in two 13,000-US gallon concrete “rooms” during which they age their Chardonnay and Sauvignon Blanc. They’re thrilled by the extra texture of their wines. Certainly, so happy are they by this retro materials that they’ve additionally invested in 100 small, sq. 240-US gallon concrete cubes for his or her unusually zesty Zinfandel, with “tremendously thrilling” outcomes, says John Williams. (The outcomes for Cabernet Sauvignon are much less conclusive; it appears the Bordeaux pink wine grape actually appreciates its keep in oak, maybe as a result of it permits extra oxygen ingress.)

One in every of concrete’s nice benefits over oak is its regular temperature, however its attraction to the Williamses can also be each monetary and ecological. “It takes one 75-year-old oak tree to supply two barrels for wine use and people barrels have a usable lifetime of three to 5 years,” says John Williams.

Against this, the lifespan of a concrete container is limitless, decreasing their carbon footprint.

Advertisement

In reality, producing the cement for concrete is comparatively heavy on sand and greenhouse gasoline emissions however a minimum of the Williams are sourcing their new vessels near residence — from Sonoma Solid Stone, whose principal enterprise is producing sinks, simply over the hill in Petaluma. The Frog’s Leap concrete containers need to be rinsed every year with a heavy answer of tartaric acid (the most typical acid in wine) however are nonetheless simpler to keep up than oak.

Such enthusiasm for ageing wine in concrete could also be uncommon in Napa Valley but it surely has turn into more and more widespread in Spain the place some see concrete (and, in some areas, clay tinajas) as a healthful revival of native custom.

Extremely revered vintner Telmo Rodriguez determined that his new Lanzaga vineyard in Rioja can be all-concrete, reproducing how wine was made there within the Thirties. He was inspired by his companion Pablo Eguzkiza, who had expertise of creating wine in concrete when working at Petrus in Bordeaux. “I actually like picket tanks,” Eguzkiza admits, “however they’re very tough to preserve in good situation (they all the time need to be full).” Lanzaga’s concrete cylinders maintain as much as 100 hectolitres (2,640 US gallons).

Different outstanding followers of concrete embrace Michel Chapoutier of France and Australia, who has lengthy favoured it for grape varieties significantly liable to oxidation equivalent to Grenache, and Sebastian Zuccardi of Argentina. When Zuccardi constructed a brand new vineyard in Valle de Uco, excessive in Argentine wine nation, he intentionally centered on concrete vessels as a result of he wished to precise native characters unaffected by the flavour of oak. He too factors out that he’s merely reviving a fabric that was widespread domestically within the Thirties.

But not everyone seems to be satisfied. On the opposite aspect of the Andes in Chile, Burgundy-trained winemaker François Massoc is very sceptical of what he describes as “concrete tanks in every kind of shapes rising like mushrooms everywhere in the world”. Whereas concrete evangelists argue that wine can “breathe” in concrete, he claims “they neglect that the internal pores [of the concrete tank] aren’t linked with the outside pores, so that is unattainable”.

Advertisement

Williams and Chapoutier counter that so long as the concrete is unlined, it isn’t oxygen outdoors wine containers that works its magic however minute quantities of oxygen trapped within the skinny layers of the inside of the container. Concrete-aged wines definitely don’t seem like starved of oxygen, and sometimes appear to have freshness and extra texture, although maybe I’m imagining a sure graininess.

Massoc can also be involved about potential contamination from chemical compounds utilized in making them, noting that, “Cheval Blanc made a big research earlier than selecting their concrete, and we have to keep in mind that Kees [this famous château’s chief adviser] is a geologist, so he knew what he was doing. That’s the explanation why they’ve an exquisite and technically extraordinary vineyard. Others? I don’t know.”

Ageing in concrete could be very a lot in keeping with the present vogue for pure fruit flavours. It appears to be nicely suited to many a energetic white wine and to reds for comparatively early consumption. However for complicated reds designed for lengthy ageing, the coopers in all probability want lose no sleep.

Advertisement

Concrete suggestions

Whites

  • M Chapoutier, Bila-Haut Occultum Lapidem 2017 Côtes du Roussillon 13%. £15 Frazier’s, £16.99 Noble Grape, £19.99 Flagship Wines

  • Gerard & Pierre Morin, Cuvée Ovide 2018 Sancerre 13%. £21 The Sourcing Desk

  • Frog’s Leap, Shale & Stone Chardonnay 2019 Napa Valley 13.2%. £25 VINUM, £27.17 Justerini & Brooks, £27.90 Hedonism and from $23.95 from many US retailers

Reds

  • Bertrand-Bergé, Origines 2019 Fitou 14.5%. £9.50 The Wine Society

  • Alto las Hormigas, Clasico Malbec 2018/9 Mendoza 13.5%. £12ish broadly accessible

  • Dom des Espiers 2020 Côtes-du-Rhône 14.5%. £12.82 Stone, Vine & Solar

  • Lanzaga, Corriente 2017 Rioja 14%. £16.20 Sincere Grapes

  • Frontonio, Microcosmico Garnacha 2018 IGP Valdejálon 13.5%. £17.95 Winedirect.co.uk, £17.99 NYWines

  • Zuccardi, Concreto Malbec 2018 Mendoza 14%. £28.75 Frazier’s, £29.95 Winedirect.co.uk

Tasting notes on Purple Pages of JancisRobinson.com. Extra stockists from Wine-searcher.com

Observe Jancis on Twitter @JancisRobinson

Advertisement

Observe @FTMag on Twitter to search out out about our newest tales first

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

News

Menendez Brothers Resentenced to Life With Parole, Paving Way for Freedom

Published

on

Menendez Brothers Resentenced to Life With Parole, Paving Way for Freedom

Lyle and Erik Menendez were resentenced on Tuesday to life in prison with the possibility of parole, setting the stage for their possible release after more than three decades behind bars for killing their parents in their Beverly Hills mansion.

The decision, by Judge Michael V. Jesic of Los Angeles Superior Court, came after a day of testimony by family members, who said the brothers had turned their lives around inside prison through education and self-help groups. They urged the court to reduce the brothers’ sentences for the 1989 killings.

“This was an absolutely horrific crime,” Judge Jesic said as he delivered his ruling. But as shocking as the crime was, Judge Jesic said, he was also shocked by the number of corrections officials who wrote letters on behalf of the brothers, documented support that clearly swayed his decision.

“I’m not suggesting they should be released,” he said. “That’s not for me to decide.”

But, he continued: “I do believe they have done enough over the last 35 years to get that chance.” The brothers’ futures, he said, would now be in the hands of Gov. Gavin Newsom and state parole-board officials.

Advertisement

While Judge Jesic’s decision was the most important legal step so far in the brothers’ long effort to win release, it is not the final step. In reducing the brothers’ sentences, the judge has allowed them to be immediately eligible for parole.

Now the attention will be on the state’s parole officials. The brothers were already scheduled to appear before the board on June 13 as part of Mr. Newsom’s consideration of clemency, a separate process that has unfolded in parallel to the resentencing effort.

It was unclear if the June hearing would address both the resentencing and clemency request. A spokesperson for Mr. Newsom said his office was reviewing the judge’s decision and determining next steps.

Lawyers for the brothers made only brief statements after the hearing, thanking supporters.

Anamaria Baralt, a cousin of the brothers who testified on Tuesday, faced the dozens of cameras assembled outside the courthouse. “I have been crying all day long. These are tears of joy, for sure,” she said.

Advertisement

Nathan J. Hochman, the Los Angeles district attorney who has opposed resentencing for the brothers, did not provide statements after the ruling. He and his team have argued repeatedly that the brothers failed to demonstrate that they have “full insight” into their crimes. The brothers, they argued, never renounced their claim that they killed their parents because they feared their parents would kill them first, which prosecutors maintained was a lie.

The decision to resentence the brothers is a remarkable turn in a saga that has gripped the nation’s attention for decades. The brothers tried unsuccessfully to appeal their convictions for many years, and they had said that over time, their hopes of being released had diminished. As the years passed, the brothers evolved into cultural icons in their own right, amassing a loyal following as a series of docudramas and documentaries retold their stories for a younger audience.

In 1989, the story of sexual abuse and murder in one of America’s ritziest cities was irresistible to the media and public, and it foreshadowed an even greater obsession with another Los Angeles story — the murder case against O.J. Simpson.

The brothers said they burst into the den of their Beverly Hills mansion on a Sunday evening in 1989 and killed their parents with shotguns because they had endured years of sexual abuse from their father. They said they feared their parents would kill them to keep the abuse secret. At the time, Lyle was 21 and Erik, 18.

Now two middle-aged men, the brothers appeared remotely at the resentencing hearing on Tuesday from their prison near San Diego, sitting stoically in blue jumpsuits while witness after witness testified on their behalf.

Advertisement

After Judge Jesic said that he would resentence the brothers — but before he said what the new sentence would be — the brothers made statements. Through a video feed, they took responsibility for the crimes and apologized to their relatives in the courtroom, who could be heard softly sobbing.

Lyle spoke first, saying that all the choices he made in August 1989 were his own, including “the choice to reload, return to the den and run up to my mother and shoot her in the head.” And he took responsibility, he said, for making a “mockery of the criminal legal system” by lying to the police and trying to solicit others to lie for him on the witness stand at trial.

He said that at the time, he was a young man “scared and filled with rage,” who was too ashamed of the sexual abuse happening in his house to find someone and ask for help.

Erik also took responsibility for the crimes and said he had spent a long time wondering what his parents must have been thinking the night they were murdered, and “the terror they must have felt when their own son fired a gun at them.”

Back then, the case played out as a sort of reckoning of the policies and culture of the 1990s: the tough-on-crime measures that left California’s prisons overcrowded; the societal attitudes about sexual abuse that eyed the brothers’ story with skepticism; the gavel-to-gavel televised trial coverage; and the late-night comics who regularly mocked the brothers as privileged dilettantes.

Advertisement

Their first trial, in 1993, landed during a tumultuous time in Los Angeles. Officers in the beating of Rodney King had been acquitted of assault, catalyzing deadly riots.

After their first trial ended in mistrials — the brothers were tried together with separate juries — they went on trial a second time after Mr. Simpson’s acquittal.

This time, the brothers faced different rules in the courtroom. Cameras were banned, and the judge limited testimony and evidence about sexual abuse. The jury convicted the brothers of murder, and they were sentenced to life in prison without the possibility of parole.

In recent years, the brothers have drawn sympathy from many young people who were not alive at the time of the crimes. Learning about the case online, they have come to believe that the brothers were mistreated by the criminal justice system and the media, and have rallied to their cause on social media.

Laurel Rosenhall contributed reporting.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

News

Donald Trump lauds Saudi Arabia as he unveils AI and defence deals

Published

on

Donald Trump lauds Saudi Arabia as he unveils AI and defence deals

Donald Trump hailed the US’s relationship with Saudi Arabia on Tuesday, just hours after the White House unveiled what it said was $600bn worth of defence, artificial intelligence and other deals with the kingdom. 

The US president lauded the kingdom and its de facto leader, Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman, as he began the first leg of his dealmaking, three-nation tour of the oil-rich Gulf.

“He’s an incredible man, I’ve known him a long time now. There’s nobody like him,” Trump said to a packed auditorium in Riyadh. Among the guests were Elon Musk, the world’s richest man, private equity baron Stephen Schwarzman, Nvidia boss Jensen Huang and dozens of other US executives.

The US-Saudi relationship had been a “bedrock” of security and prosperity, Trump said. He added: “Today, we reaffirm the bond and take the next steps to make our relationship closer, stronger, more powerful than ever before . . . And it will remain that way.”

Advertisement

In a press release before Trump’s speech, the White House had hailed “Saudi Arabia’s $600bn commitment to invest in the US” and “economic ties that will endure for generations to come”.

Prince Mohammed said the two countries would work over the coming months to increase the total to $1tn.

“We are working on partnership opportunities with the US worth $600bn, including agreements of more than $300bn announced today during this forum,” the crown prince said.

The deals unveiled by the White House included a commitment by Saudi Arabia’s new state-owned AI company, Humain, to build AI infrastructure in the kingdom using several “hundred thousands” of Nvidia’s most advanced chips over the next five years.

That would make it one of the biggest AI chip orders by a state company, underlining the scale of Prince Mohammed’s ambitions to position Saudi Arabia as a global AI hub and boosting Nvidia’s desire to build “sovereign AI” infrastructure around the world.

Advertisement

The first phase of Humain’s investment would involve deploying 18,000 of Nvidia’s latest “Blackwell” servers, the chipmaker said. Based on the price of a single Nvidia graphics processing unit, estimated at $30,000-$40,000, the Saudi investment would run into multiple billions of dollars.

AMD, one of Nvidia’s main competitors in the AI chip market, is also co-investing up to $10bn with Humain to deploy its own infrastructure in the country. Amazon made a similar $5bn commitment covering data centre infrastructure.

Nvidia shares rose 5.6 per cent on Tuesday, while AMD’s gained 4 per cent. Amazon was 1.3 per cent higher.

Tesla chief and Trump adviser Elon Musk, left, and Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang along with Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman © Brendan Smialowski/AFP/Getty Images

Jimmy Goodrich, senior adviser for technology analysis to the Rand Corporation think-tank, said the “massive scale” of the Middle East AI announcements would “undoubtedly eat into future US data centre growth”.

“Instead of offshoring the future economic revolution to the Middle East, a better approach would be to channel Gulf state money into American re-industrialisation and energy dominance,” Goodrich said.

Advertisement

The White House also cited on Tuesday what it said was a “nearly $142bn” agreement to provide Riyadh “with state-of-the-art warfighting equipment and services from over a dozen US defence firms”.

It added this would include air force and space capabilities, missile defence, maritime and border security, land forces modernisation and upgrades to communication systems.

The US also referred to plans by Saudi Arabian DataVolt to invest $20bn in AI data centres and energy infrastructure in the US.

Trump is looking to secure deals and investment pledges worth more than $1tn on his trip to the Gulf, which will also include stops in Qatar and the United Arab Emirates.

The traditional US allies are among the biggest buyers of American weapons, boast sovereign wealth funds that collectively manage in excess of $3tn and have all stated their ambitions to invest heavily in AI. 

Advertisement

Many of the US’s most powerful tech executives were also in Riyadh, including Musk, Huang and OpenAI’s Sam Altman as Saudi Arabia hosted a glitzy investment forum. Top financiers including Blackstone’s Schwarzman, BlackRock’s Larry Fink and Citigroup’s Jane Fraser also attended. 

US tech companies have been increasingly looking to the Gulf, which manages some of the world’s largest and most active sovereign wealth funds, to raise capital and lure investments. 

The Trump administration last week scrapped a Biden-era rule under which Saudi Arabia, along with dozens of other countries including India and Singapore, would have faced limitations on their purchases of the most powerful US-designed AI chips.

Riyadh launched Humain, which will be chaired by Prince Mohammed and owned by the Public Investment Fund, the $940bn sovereign wealth fund, to steer its strategy and investments in the sector on Monday, the day before Trump arrived. 

Just days after Trump’s inauguration in January, Prince Mohammed committed Saudi Arabia to investing $600bn in the US over the next four years — the same amount that was announced on Tuesday.

Advertisement

The UAE followed up with a similar gesture in March, pledging to invest $1.4tn over the next 10 years. It is also seeking to establish itself as a leading AI hub and has taken a strategic decision to invest in US tech. 

Analysts question how the Gulf states will be able to deploy such a vast scale of capital in the timeframes announced, particularly Saudi Arabia as it grapples with lower oil prices, a widening budget deficit and the scale of its own domestic projects.

Additional reporting by Michael Acton in San Francisco

Continue Reading

News

Takeaways from Sean 'Diddy' Combs' ex-girlfriend Cassandra Ventura's testimony

Published

on

Takeaways from Sean 'Diddy' Combs' ex-girlfriend Cassandra Ventura's testimony
Madeline Halpert

BBC News in New York court

Reuters/Jane Rosenberg In a courtroom sktech, Sean "Diddy" Combs watches as his former girlfriend Casandra "Cassie" Ventura reacts during testimony to prosecutor Emily JohnsonReuters/Jane Rosenberg

Prosecutors’ star witness, Sean “Diddy” Combs’ ex-girlfriend Casandra Ventura, took the stand on Tuesday in the hip-hop mogul’s sex trafficking trial, accusing the rapper of controlling her life and coercing her into “humiliating” sex acts.

Mr Combs has pleaded not guilty to charges including racketeering conspiracy, sex trafficking, and transportation to engage in prostitution.

Family and friends have come to court in large numbers to support Mr Combs, whose legal team has not yet questioned Ms Ventura.

Ms Ventura, who is pregnant, told prosecutors about the alleged physical and emotional abuse she endured at the hands of the rapper during so-called “freak-offs”, or sexual encounters the couple had with male escorts.

Advertisement

Here are some of the most notable parts of her first five hours of testimony.

Warning: This story contains details that some readers may find distressing.

Ms Ventura fell ‘in love’ with Mr Combs

Prosecutors began by questioning Ms Ventura – one of their two central witnesses in the case – about her 11-year, on-and-off relationship with Mr Combs.

Now 38 and pregnant in her third trimester with her third child, Ms Ventura met Mr Combs when she was a 19-year-old aspiring singer and he was 37. Mr Combs’ record label would later sign Ms Ventura as an artist, and shortly after, their romantic relationship began.

Advertisement

Their relationship progressed over a series of several trips. At the time, she testified, she felt like they were in a monogamous relationship, though she knows now that he had other girlfriends.

She said she “fell in love” with the “larger than life entrepreneur and musician”. But it was not long before she noticed another side to him, she said.

REUTERS/Jane Rosenberg A court sketch shows as Sean "Diddy" Combs watches as his former girlfriend Casandra "Cassie" Ventura is sworn in as a prosecution witness
REUTERS/Jane Rosenberg

Mr Combs wanted to ‘control’ every part of her life, Ms Ventura says

Mr Combs wanted to “control” her life, Ms Ventura said. She said he paid for her home, her cars, her phone and other technology that he would sometimes take away to “punish” her.

“Control was everything, from the way that I looked … to what I was working on,” Ms Ventura said.

Eventually, she claimed, the control turned violent. Mr Combs would “bash on my head, knock me over, drag me and kick me” frequently, Ms Ventura testified, sometimes through tears.

Advertisement

She alleged that she was left with swollen lips, black eyes and knots on her forehead.

Ms Ventura felt ‘humiliated’ by ‘freak-offs’

Prosecutors spent hours on Tuesday asking Ms Ventura about so-called “freak-offs”.

Ms Ventura told the court how Mr Combs introduced her to the sexual events during the first year of their relationship: They would hire a male escort or stripper to have sex with Ms Ventura while Mr Combs watched.

Ms Ventura told the court that she first tried the encounters to make Mr Combs “happy”. But she said they humiliated her, and sometimes lasted three to four days.

Advertisement

“I felt pretty horrible about myself,” she told the court, wiping away tears. “It made me feel worthless.”

Ms Ventura told the court she never wanted to have sex with anyone but Mr Combs, and claimed she would take myriad drugs – marijuana, ecstasy and ketamine – to help her perform to Mr Combs’ satisfaction, but also to “disassociate”.

The drugs were “a way to not feel it for what it really was”, she said, “having sex with a stranger I didn’t really want to be having sex with”.

Mr Combs flew male escorts in for freak-offs, court hears

As prosecutors pressed Ms Ventura about the “freak-offs”, she told the court of how Mr Combs would direct her to find male escorts, strippers or dancers to have sex with while he watched.

Advertisement

She alleged that Mr Combs would pay the men anywhere from $1,500 to $6,000 in cash, depending on their performance.

They found the men through stripper companies and sites like Craigslist. Some of their photos were displayed to the jurors, including Daniel Phillip, who finished his testimony earlier on Tuesday.

Ms Ventura and Mr Combs had the enounters in cities around the world, including Los Angeles, New York, Las Vegas and Ibiza, Spain, Ms Ventura testified.

Sometimes, men would be flown in during vacations, she alleged, and Mr Combs would direct her to ask staff to pay for and arrange their travel, calling them new employees.

Among other charges, prosecutors are trying to prove that Mr Combs engaged in sex trafficking – human trafficking for the purpose of sexual exploitation – and transportation to engage in prostitution.

Advertisement

Mr Combs ‘directed’, Ms Ventura says

As prosecutors pressed Ms Ventura for graphic details, one key element emerged: Ms Ventura claimed that Mr Combs controlled every part of the encounters.

He chose the outfits she wore – down to the extremely high heels she kept on for hours – as well as the sexual acts that transpired and the lighting, Ms Ventura told jurors.

“If Sean wanted something to happen, that was what was going to happen,” she said. “I couldn’t say no.”

Sometimes, Ms Ventura said, she would take the lead on which male escorts to hire because Mr Combs was “very busy”, but she only did so at his direction, she said.

Advertisement

She said freak-offs had a very specific “pattern” of sexual acts each time.

“He was controlling the whole situation,” she alleged. “He was directing it.”

At times, Ms Ventura said, she tried to tell Mr Combs that she felt “horrible”. But when he dismissed her concerns, she said, she relented, worried he would get angry or question their relationship.

Ms Ventura is expected to continue her testimony on Wednesday, when she could also face cross-examination.

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending