Connect with us

News

Why the era of ageing wine in concrete may finally have come

Published

on

Why the era of ageing wine in concrete may finally have come

Frog’s Leap has all the time been an exception amongst Napa Valley wineries. The Williams household, who based it, had been preaching the natural gospel lengthy earlier than most of their neighbours. They’ve treasured previous vine varieties which can be much less trendy and extra obscure than essentially the most worthwhile Cabernet Sauvignon. They even appear to have managed an amicable and profitable transition from one technology to a different. And John Williams and his son Rory had been Napa’s first to undertake a winemaking observe that has been spreading everywhere in the world.

Wooden, particularly oak, has lengthy been the fabric of selection for ageing and, usually, fermenting wine in. It clearly has an affinity with the flavours of wine and, most significantly, encourages simply the correct quantity of oxygen wanted to stabilise and make clear it. Historic civilisations could have used clay pots and the like, however picket barrels succeeded amphorae as containers for each storage and transport as way back because the third century AD.

In direction of the tip of the twentieth century, it turned a badge of honour among the many world’s wine producers to boast about what number of new French oak barrels they purchased every year. Certainly, for a lot of wine producers the world over, the best annual value is their funding in new barrels, which maintain the equal of about 300 bottles. They’ll value $1,000 every and could also be used for not more than three years.

Up to now, an oak barrel — certainly, ageing wine in any respect — was considered a luxurious in poorer components of Europe. In direction of the tip of the final century, they usually hoped to interchange their previous concrete vats, usually as massive as a room, with new stainless-steel tanks which can be a lot simpler to wash. The deserted wine co-ops that now dot the Languedoc, as an example, are full of those ghostly vessels, usually nonetheless encrusted with the purple tartrate crystals deposited by pink winemaking. A few of the extra energetic wine farmers would use dynamite to rid themselves of those concrete dinosaurs.

But concrete has turn into more and more à la mode in wine manufacturing. This century many wineries have experimented with big concrete egg-shaped containers, that are alleged to encourage motion and helpful contact with the lees. And glamorous new wineries, equivalent to these designed for the glitzy likes of Château Cheval Blanc in St-Emilion and Masseto in Bolgheri, boast concrete fermentation vessels in all sizes and styles. Maybe the truth that, regardless of the prevailing trend elsewhere, Bordeaux’s most costly wine, Petrus, has all the time been fermented in concrete has performed a small half in encouraging this phenomenon.

Advertisement

Nevertheless it applies solely to fermentation. Most advantageous wine continues to be aged in wooden, even when producers and shoppers have broadly taken towards the pronounced “oaky” flavours related to new, small barrels so the dimensions and common age of the oak barrel or vat has been rising.

At Frog’s Leap, they’re flying within the face of present observe in northern California, the place demand for brand spanking new French oak barrels has lengthy been so nice that the most important French coopers established outposts there a few years in the past.

In addition to utilizing an array of concrete eggs, which John Williams describes as “space-eaters”, they’ve put in two 13,000-US gallon concrete “rooms” during which they age their Chardonnay and Sauvignon Blanc. They’re thrilled by the extra texture of their wines. Certainly, so happy are they by this retro materials that they’ve additionally invested in 100 small, sq. 240-US gallon concrete cubes for his or her unusually zesty Zinfandel, with “tremendously thrilling” outcomes, says John Williams. (The outcomes for Cabernet Sauvignon are much less conclusive; it appears the Bordeaux pink wine grape actually appreciates its keep in oak, maybe as a result of it permits extra oxygen ingress.)

One in every of concrete’s nice benefits over oak is its regular temperature, however its attraction to the Williamses can also be each monetary and ecological. “It takes one 75-year-old oak tree to supply two barrels for wine use and people barrels have a usable lifetime of three to 5 years,” says John Williams.

Against this, the lifespan of a concrete container is limitless, decreasing their carbon footprint.

Advertisement

In reality, producing the cement for concrete is comparatively heavy on sand and greenhouse gasoline emissions however a minimum of the Williams are sourcing their new vessels near residence — from Sonoma Solid Stone, whose principal enterprise is producing sinks, simply over the hill in Petaluma. The Frog’s Leap concrete containers need to be rinsed every year with a heavy answer of tartaric acid (the most typical acid in wine) however are nonetheless simpler to keep up than oak.

Such enthusiasm for ageing wine in concrete could also be uncommon in Napa Valley but it surely has turn into more and more widespread in Spain the place some see concrete (and, in some areas, clay tinajas) as a healthful revival of native custom.

Extremely revered vintner Telmo Rodriguez determined that his new Lanzaga vineyard in Rioja can be all-concrete, reproducing how wine was made there within the Thirties. He was inspired by his companion Pablo Eguzkiza, who had expertise of creating wine in concrete when working at Petrus in Bordeaux. “I actually like picket tanks,” Eguzkiza admits, “however they’re very tough to preserve in good situation (they all the time need to be full).” Lanzaga’s concrete cylinders maintain as much as 100 hectolitres (2,640 US gallons).

Different outstanding followers of concrete embrace Michel Chapoutier of France and Australia, who has lengthy favoured it for grape varieties significantly liable to oxidation equivalent to Grenache, and Sebastian Zuccardi of Argentina. When Zuccardi constructed a brand new vineyard in Valle de Uco, excessive in Argentine wine nation, he intentionally centered on concrete vessels as a result of he wished to precise native characters unaffected by the flavour of oak. He too factors out that he’s merely reviving a fabric that was widespread domestically within the Thirties.

But not everyone seems to be satisfied. On the opposite aspect of the Andes in Chile, Burgundy-trained winemaker François Massoc is very sceptical of what he describes as “concrete tanks in every kind of shapes rising like mushrooms everywhere in the world”. Whereas concrete evangelists argue that wine can “breathe” in concrete, he claims “they neglect that the internal pores [of the concrete tank] aren’t linked with the outside pores, so that is unattainable”.

Advertisement

Williams and Chapoutier counter that so long as the concrete is unlined, it isn’t oxygen outdoors wine containers that works its magic however minute quantities of oxygen trapped within the skinny layers of the inside of the container. Concrete-aged wines definitely don’t seem like starved of oxygen, and sometimes appear to have freshness and extra texture, although maybe I’m imagining a sure graininess.

Massoc can also be involved about potential contamination from chemical compounds utilized in making them, noting that, “Cheval Blanc made a big research earlier than selecting their concrete, and we have to keep in mind that Kees [this famous château’s chief adviser] is a geologist, so he knew what he was doing. That’s the explanation why they’ve an exquisite and technically extraordinary vineyard. Others? I don’t know.”

Ageing in concrete could be very a lot in keeping with the present vogue for pure fruit flavours. It appears to be nicely suited to many a energetic white wine and to reds for comparatively early consumption. However for complicated reds designed for lengthy ageing, the coopers in all probability want lose no sleep.

Advertisement

Concrete suggestions

Whites

  • M Chapoutier, Bila-Haut Occultum Lapidem 2017 Côtes du Roussillon 13%. £15 Frazier’s, £16.99 Noble Grape, £19.99 Flagship Wines

  • Gerard & Pierre Morin, Cuvée Ovide 2018 Sancerre 13%. £21 The Sourcing Desk

  • Frog’s Leap, Shale & Stone Chardonnay 2019 Napa Valley 13.2%. £25 VINUM, £27.17 Justerini & Brooks, £27.90 Hedonism and from $23.95 from many US retailers

Reds

  • Bertrand-Bergé, Origines 2019 Fitou 14.5%. £9.50 The Wine Society

  • Alto las Hormigas, Clasico Malbec 2018/9 Mendoza 13.5%. £12ish broadly accessible

  • Dom des Espiers 2020 Côtes-du-Rhône 14.5%. £12.82 Stone, Vine & Solar

  • Lanzaga, Corriente 2017 Rioja 14%. £16.20 Sincere Grapes

  • Frontonio, Microcosmico Garnacha 2018 IGP Valdejálon 13.5%. £17.95 Winedirect.co.uk, £17.99 NYWines

  • Zuccardi, Concreto Malbec 2018 Mendoza 14%. £28.75 Frazier’s, £29.95 Winedirect.co.uk

Tasting notes on Purple Pages of JancisRobinson.com. Extra stockists from Wine-searcher.com

Observe Jancis on Twitter @JancisRobinson

Advertisement

Observe @FTMag on Twitter to search out out about our newest tales first

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

News

Federal Workers Who Were Fired and Rehired by the Trump Administration

Published

on

Federal Workers Who Were Fired and Rehired by the Trump Administration

Even as the Trump administration continues to slash federal jobs, a number of federal agencies have begun to reverse course — reinstating some workers and pausing plans to dismiss others, sometimes within days of the firings.

Advertisement

Note: Some dates on the chart are approximate, based on available information.

The Office of Personnel Management on Tuesday revised earlier guidance calling for probationary workers to be terminated, adding a disclaimer that agencies would have the final authority over personnel actions. It is unclear how many more workers could be reinstated as a result.

Advertisement

Here’s a look at some of the back-and-forths so far:

Rehiring Some Essential Workers

Trump-appointed officials fired, then scrambled to rehire some employees in critical jobs in health and national security.

Advertisement

Workers reviewing food safety and medical devices

Advertisement

Around Feb. 15 The Food and Drug Administration fired about 700 probationary employees, many of whom were not paid through taxpayer money.

Advertisement

Workers involved in bird flu response

Advertisement
icon Around Feb. 14 The Department of Agriculture continued plans to fire thousands of employees, including hundreds in a plant and animal inspection program.
icon Days later The agency said it was trying to reverse the firings of some employees involved in responding to the nation’s growing bird flu outbreak.

Workers who maintain the U.S. nuclear arsenal

Advertisement

icon Feb. 13 The Energy Department began laying off 1,000 of its probationary employees, including more than 300 who worked at the National Nuclear Security Administration, which maintains and secures the country’s nuclear warheads. A spokesperson for the Energy Department disputed that number, saying fewer than 50 at the N.N.S.A. were fired.

Rehired After Political Pushback

Advertisement

Public opposition from both Democrats and Republicans has also resulted in some fired workers getting called back.

Advertisement

Workers managing a 9/11 survivors’ health program

icon Around Feb. 15 The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention cut hundreds of employees, including 16 probationary workers who manage the World Trade Central Health Program, which administers aid to people who were exposed to hazards from the terrorist attacks on Sept. 11, 2001.
icon Several days later After bipartisan pushback, the Trump administration said that fired employees would return to their jobs.

Advertisement

Scientific researchers, including military veterans

Advertisement
icon Feb. 18 The National Science Foundation fired 168 employees, or roughly 10 percent of its work force.
icon Less than two weeks later The foundation began reversing dismissals of 84 probationary employees, in response to a ruling by a federal judge and guidance from the Office of Personnel Management to retain the employment of military veterans and military spouses.

Temporary Reinstatements and Pauses on Firings

The firing spree has prompted a slew of lawsuits, which in some cases have resulted in temporary reversals.

Advertisement

Employees at a federal financial watchdog

Advertisement
icon Feb. 11 Officials fired almost 200 employees at the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, a financial industry watchdog, and ordered the rest to stop their work.

Advertisement

Employees at an international aid department

icon A day later A federal judge ordered the Trump administration to temporarily halt the layoffs.
icon Two weeks later The judge ruled that the administration could proceed with plans to lay off or put on paid leave many agency employees. U.S.A.I.D. moved to fire around 2,000 U.S.-based workers and put up to thousands of foreign service officers and others on paid leave.

Workers from multiple agencies have also filed complaints with the office of a government watchdog lawyer who himself has been targeted by Mr. Trump for termination. In response to requests from that office, an independent federal worker board has considered some of the claims and temporarily reinstated some workers.

Advertisement

Workers at the Agriculture Department

Advertisement

icon Feb. 13 The Agriculture Department began cutting thousands of jobs, including around 3,400 in the Forest Service.
icon Three weeks later The Merit Systems Protection Board issued a stay ordering the department to reinstate fired workers while an investigation continued.

Advertisement

Six workers from six federal agencies

Advertisement
icon Feb. 14 The Office of Personnel Management sent an email ordering federal agencies to fire tens of thousands of probationary employees.
icon Less than two weeks later The Merit Systems Protection Board temporarily reinstated six fired federal workers from the Departments of Agriculture, Education, Energy, Housing and Urban Development and Veterans Affairs, and the Office of Personnel Management.

The back-and-forth and lack of transparency surrounding the administration’s cost-cutting moves have deepened the confusion and alarm of workers across the federal government at large, many of whom also have to interpret confusing email guidance and gauge the veracity of various circulating rumors.

“The layoffs and then rehires undermine the productivity and confidence not only of the people who left and came back but of the people who stayed,” said Stephen Goldsmith, an urban policy professor at Harvard’s Kennedy School and a former mayor of Indianapolis.

Advertisement

Are you a federal worker? We want to hear from you.

The Times would like to hear about your experience as a federal worker under the second Trump administration. We may reach out about your submission, but we will not publish any part of your response without contacting you first.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

News

Trump has undermined US economic exceptionalism

Published

on

Trump has undermined US economic exceptionalism

Unlock the White House Watch newsletter for free

In his first address to Congress since beginning a tumultuous second term, US President Donald Trump proudly claimed on Tuesday night that he was “just getting started”. That is a bad omen for the world’s largest economy. The optimism among companies and investors that came with the businessman’s election victory is rapidly waning. After the president confirmed tariffs on Mexico, Canada and China on Monday night, the S&P 500 initially erased all the gains it had made since the November polls. Consumer confidence has plunged. Manufacturers are reporting steep declines in new orders and employment, and bearish investor sentiment has shot well above its historic average.

Uncertainty is clouding the data and forecasts. Still, it is clear that the president has squandered what was a decent economic inheritance. Not long ago price pressures were fading, the US Federal Reserve was on the cusp of a steady rate-cutting cycle into a resilient economy, and the S&P 500 was gliding upwards. This is no longer true.

The depressing turnaround is a product of the administration’s pursuit of on-and-off import duties, and a chaotic policy agenda. The White House may believe it has a plan but America’s economic exceptionalism, from its relentless consumer spending and booming stock market to its reputation for dependable economic governance, is the collateral damage.

Advertisement

Personal expenditure — a bulwark of recent US growth — fell in January, by its most in nearly four years. With pandemic-era inflation not yet fully extinguished, and the reality of Trump’s price-raising tariff plans now dawning, consumers’ expectations for inflation in the year ahead have surged. The Fed has so far responded to forthcoming price pressures by putting rate cuts on hold, leaving borrowers facing a higher cost of credit. Elon Musk’s planned clear-out of public sector employees is also set to raise joblessness in an already cooling labour market.

Animal spirits are under pressure too. Perhaps naively, many businesses and investors expected import duties to be merely a negotiating tool. But Trump also believes tariffs are about “protecting American jobs”. After the latest salvo towards North American neighbours, the president offered a one-month reprieve for automakers on Wednesday, and was moving to broaden it on Thursday.

The unpredictability of tariff carve-outs, reversals and steps against other trading partners makes it impossible for businesses to plan. Retaliatory measures will also hurt exporters. The broader deluge of policy announcements — some of which have had significant geopolitical ramifications — adds to the decision-making paralysis facing boardrooms and traders.

Faith in US economic and financial institutions is also being tested. Trump has filled regulatory bodies with his chums. The Fed’s independence is an ongoing concern. Then there are zany economic ideas, from building a cryptocurrency reserve to a rumoured “Mar-a-Lago accord” to devalue the dollar. Some analysts note that the dollar’s recent weakness amid economic turmoil suggests financial markets may be beginning to question the safe haven status of the currency.

It is true that the administration’s tax cuts and deregulation efforts are yet to get started. But since they are likely to be paired with tariffs on more trading partners, rash policymaking and a clampdown on undocumented immigrants — which make up an estimated 5 per cent of workers — optimism around near-term US economic growth feels increasingly like blind hope. The contours of Trump’s economic agenda have sharpened. It is already worse than everyone thought, and he is just six weeks in.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

News

Steve Carell announces that a charity will fund proms for students affected by LA fires

Published

on

Steve Carell announces that a charity will fund proms for students affected by LA fires

Steve Carell attends the “Despicable Me 4” New York Premiere at Jazz at Lincoln Center in June.

Dia Dipasupil/Getty Images


hide caption

toggle caption

Advertisement

Dia Dipasupil/Getty Images

Steve Carell is making amends for a memorable but painful episode of The Office.

The Golden Globe-winning actor announced in a video posted on YouTube that the charity Alice’s Kids will cover the costs of prom tickets for hundreds of high school seniors in Altadena after a series of wildfires ravaged much of Los Angeles in January.

“Attention! Attention, all seniors,” Carell said in a video posted to the charity’s YouTube channel.

Advertisement

“Alice’s Kids wanted me to let you know that they will be paying for all of your prom tickets. And if you’ve already paid for your prom tickets, they will reimburse you for your prom tickets,” he said.

“It’s a pretty good deal,” he added.

YouTube

Advertisement

The Virginia-based children’s charity said that the prom promise will support approximately 800 students across six high schools, estimating the total cost to be around $175,000.

Ron Fitzsimmons, the executive director of Alice’s Kids, said Carell was asked to announce the pledge because so many young people binge-watched The Office during the pandemic.

“Steve has supported us for years. When I started talking to principals about paying for the tickets, someone at some point actually mentioned Steve’s name … and he told me that Steve was actually pretty popular with high schoolers because they ‘discovered’ The Office during COVID and they saw Despicable Me,” Fitzsimmons said in an email to NPR.

“So, I came up with the idea of having Steve announce our gesture, and he agreed immediately to cut the video.”

Carell’s promotion of this charitable act calls to mind one of the most polarizing episodes of the beloved American series The Office.

Advertisement

In the season six episode “Scott’s Tots,” Carell’s character, Michael Scott, famously pledges to pay for a class of high school seniors’ college tuition, only to reveal that he lacks the funds to fulfill his promise.

In contrast, students need not worry in this real-world scenario, as Alice’s Kids is fully covering the costs.

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending