Connect with us

News

Why the era of ageing wine in concrete may finally have come

Published

on

Why the era of ageing wine in concrete may finally have come

Frog’s Leap has all the time been an exception amongst Napa Valley wineries. The Williams household, who based it, had been preaching the natural gospel lengthy earlier than most of their neighbours. They’ve treasured previous vine varieties which can be much less trendy and extra obscure than essentially the most worthwhile Cabernet Sauvignon. They even appear to have managed an amicable and profitable transition from one technology to a different. And John Williams and his son Rory had been Napa’s first to undertake a winemaking observe that has been spreading everywhere in the world.

Wooden, particularly oak, has lengthy been the fabric of selection for ageing and, usually, fermenting wine in. It clearly has an affinity with the flavours of wine and, most significantly, encourages simply the correct quantity of oxygen wanted to stabilise and make clear it. Historic civilisations could have used clay pots and the like, however picket barrels succeeded amphorae as containers for each storage and transport as way back because the third century AD.

In direction of the tip of the twentieth century, it turned a badge of honour among the many world’s wine producers to boast about what number of new French oak barrels they purchased every year. Certainly, for a lot of wine producers the world over, the best annual value is their funding in new barrels, which maintain the equal of about 300 bottles. They’ll value $1,000 every and could also be used for not more than three years.

Up to now, an oak barrel — certainly, ageing wine in any respect — was considered a luxurious in poorer components of Europe. In direction of the tip of the final century, they usually hoped to interchange their previous concrete vats, usually as massive as a room, with new stainless-steel tanks which can be a lot simpler to wash. The deserted wine co-ops that now dot the Languedoc, as an example, are full of those ghostly vessels, usually nonetheless encrusted with the purple tartrate crystals deposited by pink winemaking. A few of the extra energetic wine farmers would use dynamite to rid themselves of those concrete dinosaurs.

But concrete has turn into more and more à la mode in wine manufacturing. This century many wineries have experimented with big concrete egg-shaped containers, that are alleged to encourage motion and helpful contact with the lees. And glamorous new wineries, equivalent to these designed for the glitzy likes of Château Cheval Blanc in St-Emilion and Masseto in Bolgheri, boast concrete fermentation vessels in all sizes and styles. Maybe the truth that, regardless of the prevailing trend elsewhere, Bordeaux’s most costly wine, Petrus, has all the time been fermented in concrete has performed a small half in encouraging this phenomenon.

Advertisement

Nevertheless it applies solely to fermentation. Most advantageous wine continues to be aged in wooden, even when producers and shoppers have broadly taken towards the pronounced “oaky” flavours related to new, small barrels so the dimensions and common age of the oak barrel or vat has been rising.

At Frog’s Leap, they’re flying within the face of present observe in northern California, the place demand for brand spanking new French oak barrels has lengthy been so nice that the most important French coopers established outposts there a few years in the past.

In addition to utilizing an array of concrete eggs, which John Williams describes as “space-eaters”, they’ve put in two 13,000-US gallon concrete “rooms” during which they age their Chardonnay and Sauvignon Blanc. They’re thrilled by the extra texture of their wines. Certainly, so happy are they by this retro materials that they’ve additionally invested in 100 small, sq. 240-US gallon concrete cubes for his or her unusually zesty Zinfandel, with “tremendously thrilling” outcomes, says John Williams. (The outcomes for Cabernet Sauvignon are much less conclusive; it appears the Bordeaux pink wine grape actually appreciates its keep in oak, maybe as a result of it permits extra oxygen ingress.)

One in every of concrete’s nice benefits over oak is its regular temperature, however its attraction to the Williamses can also be each monetary and ecological. “It takes one 75-year-old oak tree to supply two barrels for wine use and people barrels have a usable lifetime of three to 5 years,” says John Williams.

Against this, the lifespan of a concrete container is limitless, decreasing their carbon footprint.

Advertisement

In reality, producing the cement for concrete is comparatively heavy on sand and greenhouse gasoline emissions however a minimum of the Williams are sourcing their new vessels near residence — from Sonoma Solid Stone, whose principal enterprise is producing sinks, simply over the hill in Petaluma. The Frog’s Leap concrete containers need to be rinsed every year with a heavy answer of tartaric acid (the most typical acid in wine) however are nonetheless simpler to keep up than oak.

Such enthusiasm for ageing wine in concrete could also be uncommon in Napa Valley but it surely has turn into more and more widespread in Spain the place some see concrete (and, in some areas, clay tinajas) as a healthful revival of native custom.

Extremely revered vintner Telmo Rodriguez determined that his new Lanzaga vineyard in Rioja can be all-concrete, reproducing how wine was made there within the Thirties. He was inspired by his companion Pablo Eguzkiza, who had expertise of creating wine in concrete when working at Petrus in Bordeaux. “I actually like picket tanks,” Eguzkiza admits, “however they’re very tough to preserve in good situation (they all the time need to be full).” Lanzaga’s concrete cylinders maintain as much as 100 hectolitres (2,640 US gallons).

Different outstanding followers of concrete embrace Michel Chapoutier of France and Australia, who has lengthy favoured it for grape varieties significantly liable to oxidation equivalent to Grenache, and Sebastian Zuccardi of Argentina. When Zuccardi constructed a brand new vineyard in Valle de Uco, excessive in Argentine wine nation, he intentionally centered on concrete vessels as a result of he wished to precise native characters unaffected by the flavour of oak. He too factors out that he’s merely reviving a fabric that was widespread domestically within the Thirties.

But not everyone seems to be satisfied. On the opposite aspect of the Andes in Chile, Burgundy-trained winemaker François Massoc is very sceptical of what he describes as “concrete tanks in every kind of shapes rising like mushrooms everywhere in the world”. Whereas concrete evangelists argue that wine can “breathe” in concrete, he claims “they neglect that the internal pores [of the concrete tank] aren’t linked with the outside pores, so that is unattainable”.

Advertisement

Williams and Chapoutier counter that so long as the concrete is unlined, it isn’t oxygen outdoors wine containers that works its magic however minute quantities of oxygen trapped within the skinny layers of the inside of the container. Concrete-aged wines definitely don’t seem like starved of oxygen, and sometimes appear to have freshness and extra texture, although maybe I’m imagining a sure graininess.

Massoc can also be involved about potential contamination from chemical compounds utilized in making them, noting that, “Cheval Blanc made a big research earlier than selecting their concrete, and we have to keep in mind that Kees [this famous château’s chief adviser] is a geologist, so he knew what he was doing. That’s the explanation why they’ve an exquisite and technically extraordinary vineyard. Others? I don’t know.”

Ageing in concrete could be very a lot in keeping with the present vogue for pure fruit flavours. It appears to be nicely suited to many a energetic white wine and to reds for comparatively early consumption. However for complicated reds designed for lengthy ageing, the coopers in all probability want lose no sleep.

Advertisement

Concrete suggestions

Whites

  • M Chapoutier, Bila-Haut Occultum Lapidem 2017 Côtes du Roussillon 13%. £15 Frazier’s, £16.99 Noble Grape, £19.99 Flagship Wines

  • Gerard & Pierre Morin, Cuvée Ovide 2018 Sancerre 13%. £21 The Sourcing Desk

  • Frog’s Leap, Shale & Stone Chardonnay 2019 Napa Valley 13.2%. £25 VINUM, £27.17 Justerini & Brooks, £27.90 Hedonism and from $23.95 from many US retailers

Reds

  • Bertrand-Bergé, Origines 2019 Fitou 14.5%. £9.50 The Wine Society

  • Alto las Hormigas, Clasico Malbec 2018/9 Mendoza 13.5%. £12ish broadly accessible

  • Dom des Espiers 2020 Côtes-du-Rhône 14.5%. £12.82 Stone, Vine & Solar

  • Lanzaga, Corriente 2017 Rioja 14%. £16.20 Sincere Grapes

  • Frontonio, Microcosmico Garnacha 2018 IGP Valdejálon 13.5%. £17.95 Winedirect.co.uk, £17.99 NYWines

  • Zuccardi, Concreto Malbec 2018 Mendoza 14%. £28.75 Frazier’s, £29.95 Winedirect.co.uk

Tasting notes on Purple Pages of JancisRobinson.com. Extra stockists from Wine-searcher.com

Observe Jancis on Twitter @JancisRobinson

Advertisement

Observe @FTMag on Twitter to search out out about our newest tales first

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

News

Malaysia expects surge of Chinese investment, economy minister says

Published

on

Malaysia expects surge of Chinese investment, economy minister says

Unlock the Editor’s Digest for free

Chinese chipmakers and technology companies are heading to Malaysia in droves, its economy minister Rafizi Ramli said, as Beijing prepares to face more tariffs when Donald Trump returns as US president this month.

The moves by Chinese companies, which are expected to result in billions of dollars of investment in Malaysia in the coming years, would rival the US companies that have dominated the country’s market, he said.

“Chinese [companies] are very keen to go outside and expand beyond their domestic market,” Rafizi told the Financial Times in an interview. “Those companies are now looking at relocating or expanding into Malaysia.”

Advertisement

Trump has threatened to impose 60 per cent tariffs on Chinese imports when he re-enters the White House on January 20, rattling investors and putting companies on alert to restructure their supply chains.

Malaysia has been a big beneficiary over the past decade of such “China-plus-one” strategies, where multinational companies complement their Chinese operations with investments in regional countries to diversify risk and lower costs.

It has also positioned itself as a crucial player in global supply chains for high-tech industries such as artificial intelligence, with long-standing semiconductor manufacturing operations in Penang in the north and a burgeoning hub for data centres in the southern state of Johor.

US companies have dominated these sectors in Malaysia, but Rafizi said he expected a wave of Chinese investment on the back of initiatives his government was putting in place to develop the industries further.

Joe Biden’s administration has restricted sales of advanced chips by US companies to China, posing a potential threat to their investments in Malaysia, where many of the products are manufactured, and opening the door for Chinese competitors.

Advertisement

Rafizi said he made a 10-day trip in June to China, where he met 100 AI, tech and biomedical companies to assess their appetite for investing in Malaysia. He added that these efforts had resulted in two investment delegations from China in the past few months.

“Chinese investments usually come with their own ecosystem,” he said. “We will be seeing more and more, especially if we can secure the first two or three anchor investors from China.”

He added that many companies were also seeking to increase exposure to the fast-growing south-east Asian market as China’s economic momentum slows and trade with the US faces additional barriers.

This week, Malaysia signed an agreement with Singapore to create a vast special economic zone between the two countries. Malaysia hopes the initiative will add $26bn a year to its economy by 2030, bringing in 20,000 skilled jobs and 50 new projects.

Between 2019 and 2023, Malaysia attracted $21bn of investment into its semiconductor industry and $10bn into data centres — the storage facilities that enable fast-growing technologies such as AI, cloud computing and cryptocurrency mining. In the past year alone, US tech companies Amazon, Nvidia, Google and Microsoft committed nearly $16bn, mostly for data centres in Johor.

Advertisement

TikTok owner ByteDance is the largest Chinese group to invest in Johor, with a $2bn commitment last year.

Rafizi said that while historically, Malaysia had been happy to accept any foreign investment, it was becoming more selective as it sought to contribute more value to the products and services it produced.

He added that while increasing US-China tensions would harm global trade, it could prompt Chinese companies to give Malaysia a bigger role in chip design, rather than just manufacturing, which would generate more income as the country climbed the value chain.

“The unintended consequence of some tariff measures targeted at Chinese companies basically helps countries like Malaysia to weed out the more genuine and long-term investments from China compared to the ones that just look to use Malaysia as a manufacturing outpost,” he said.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

News

USDA report finds Boar's Head listeria outbreak was due to poor sanitation practices

Published

on

USDA report finds Boar's Head listeria outbreak was due to poor sanitation practices

Boar’s Head meats are displayed at a Safeway store on July 31, 2024 in San Rafael, Calif. The USDA released a new report on what led to the listeria outbreak.

Justin Sullivan/Getty Images


hide caption

toggle caption

Advertisement

Justin Sullivan/Getty Images

A U.S. Department of Agriculture report has found that “inadequate sanitation practices” at a Boar’s Head facility in Virginia contributed to a listeria outbreak that left 10 people dead and dozens hospitalized around the country last year.

The report, released Friday by the U.S. Department of Agriculture’s Food Safety and Inspection Service (FSIS), reviewed the listeria outbreak linked to the deli meat supplier’s facility in Jarratt, Va.

In one case, inspectors said they found “meat and fat residue from the previous day’s production on the equipment, including packaging equipment.” Other instances included dripping condensation “on exposed product” and “cracks, holes and broken flooring that could hold moisture and contribute to wet conditions.” 

Advertisement

The outbreak lasted from July through November 2024, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. With cases reported in over 19 states, it was the largest outbreak of the foodborne bacterial illness since 2011.

In an email to NPR, a spokesperson for Boar’s Head said: “We continue to actively cooperate with the USDA and government regulatory agencies on matters related to last year’s recall, and we thank them for their oversight.”

In addition, the spokesperson said the company is working to implement enhanced food safety programs, “including stronger food safety control procedures and more rigorous testing at our meat and poultry production facilities.”

Boar’s Head recalled its ready-to-eat liverwurst products linked to the outbreak in July. The recall later expanded to dozens of products, including sliced hams and sausages, all of which were manufactured at the Virginia plant.

USDA inspection reports show sanitation violations were routine and not isolated at the plant, NPR previously reported. The reports found dead bugs, dripping ceilings, mildew and black mold near machines at the plant.

Advertisement

In September, Boar’s Head permanently closed its Jarratt plant and the company announced it would discontinue making any liverwurst products.

Friday’s report also included a review of FSIS’s own practices and procedures to prevent the spread of listeria, including ways to enhance its regulatory and sampling approach to the illness. The report cited “equipping FSIS inspectors with updated training and tools to recognize and respond to systemic food safety issues” as one of the steps the agency would take to protect the public from listeria.

Continue Reading

News

Los Angeles Geared Up for Fire Risk, but Fell Short

Published

on

Los Angeles Geared Up for Fire Risk, but Fell Short

Follow continuing coverage of the wildfires in Southern California.

The alert came in blaring, hot-pink, all-caps: Be prepared for a “LIFE THREATENING & DESTRUCTIVE WINDSTORM!!!”

The notice on Monday was one in a series of warnings issued by the National Weather Service about the powerful Santa Ana winds that were about to blow through Southern California, which hadn’t seen serious rain in months.

Officials in Los Angeles, a city that is accustomed to treacherous fire conditions, turned to a well-worn playbook. The city predeployed nine trucks in vulnerable areas and called in 90 extra firefighters. The county fire department moved 30 extra engines into the field and called up 100 off-duty firefighters. The U.S. Forest Service brought in trucks and support units, as well as bulldozers, helicopters and planes.

But by Tuesday afternoon, five hours after a fire ignited high in a canyon in the oceanside Pacific Palisades neighborhood, it was clear their preparations would not be enough. As furious wind gusts approaching 100 miles per hour tore through the city and propelled showers of embers that ignited entire neighborhoods, Anthony Marrone, the chief of the Los Angeles County Fire Department, stood at a command post on the edge of the Pacific Ocean.

Advertisement

Blasted by dust and dirt kicked up by the relentless wind, he snapped a picture with his phone of smoke obscuring the sun and looked out at a panorama of flames, smoke and debris. The fire, he thought to himself, looked unstoppable. It was moving “like a funnel, like a speedway,” he said. “I knew that if we had one start, we probably weren’t going to be able to contain it.”

The conflagrations that killed at least 11 people and destroyed thousands of homes have raised questions about whether the dozens of federal, state, county and city fire departments involved in this week’s fire response deployed enough resources — and the extent to which modern firefighting tools are effective against the megafires that have become increasingly common in California over the past decade.

It was only hours before a situation that bore no resemblance to an ordinary red-flag alert, the kind set off when the Santa Ana winds blow in over the Mojave Desert from the inland West, began to evolve. A second huge fire broke out in Altadena, the unincorporated area adjacent to Pasadena, destroying more than 5,000 structures. A third ignited in Sylmar, to the north, and yet another, the next day, in the Hollywood Hills.

Chief Marrone quickly acknowledged that the 9,000 firefighters in the region were not enough to stay ahead of the fires.

“We’re doing the very best we can, but no, we don’t have enough fire personnel,” he said at a news briefing on Wednesday afternoon. “The L.A. County Fire Department was prepared for one or two major brush fires, but not four.”

Advertisement

The hurricane-force winds, low humidity and parched landscape created unusually perilous conditions: On the first day, when the Palisades and Eaton fires broke out, it was too windy by late afternoon to send up the aircraft whose drops of water and fire retardant might have helped slow the spread of the blazes.

Chief Marrone said the parched terrain and the concentration of homes, surrounded by forested hillsides, also combined to create an indefensible landscape.

“The next time I’m not going to do anything differently because I don’t feel that I did anything wrong this time,” he said in an interview.

Los Angeles city fire officials had a similar view. “The fire chief did everything she could with the resources she had,” Patrick Leonard, a battalion chief with the Los Angeles Fire Department, said, referring to the city’s fire chief, Kristin Crowley.

The question of resources will almost certainly arise in the weeks ahead as the fire response is analyzed. The Los Angeles Fire Department has said for years it is dangerously underfunded. A memo sent to city leaders in December by Chief Crowley complained that recent budget cuts had “severely limited the department’s capacity to prepare for, train for, and respond to large-scale emergencies, including wildfires.”

Advertisement

But there are a host of other factors at play. Fire experts have long warned that climate change and more home-building outside of urban areas are straining firefighters’ ability to prevent and contain fires. As fires have grown in size and complexity, California has explored mitigation through thinning brush out of forests, safer power grids and shoring up home protection. But it has been far from enough, they say.

The fires in Los Angeles have also raised the critical question of how departments can battle so many powerful infernos at once. After the Woolsey fire burned more than 1,600 structures in the northern part of the county in 2018 — at the same time that other major fires were raging across the state — Los Angeles County commissioned an assessment that found that the simultaneous outbreaks had slowed the ability of other fire agencies to fight the blaze because they were already busy.

Lori Moore-Merrell, the head of the U.S. Fire Administration, a division of the Federal Emergency Management Agency, who flew this week to Los Angeles to inspect the firefighting efforts and damage, said she believed that the reason for the widespread devastation was not the firefighting response.

“They deployed enough,” Dr. Moore-Merrell said in an interview. “This fire was so intense. There isn’t a fire department in the world that could have gotten in front of this.”

The question of predeployment will almost certainly prove one of the keys to understanding the response.

Advertisement

It nearly always involves weighing a host of unknown factors. Firefighting experts agree that having engines and firefighters very close to the site of an outbreak is essential, especially in very windy conditions; fires in those cases must be stamped out immediately, or they will very likely begin to spread out of control.

“Once a wind-driven fire is well established you’re not going to put it out,” said Patrick Butler, a former assistant chief of the Los Angeles Fire Department who ran the response to many of the major fires the city has faced over the past decade.

With the threat of highly destructive fires increasing, he said, fire authorities should “flood” fire-prone areas with extra fire engines and crews during times of high winds.

But such predeployments are enormously costly, and fire chiefs often have a tough task convincing political leaders to repeatedly spend the money on them — especially when no fires break out.

Chief Butler, who now runs the fire department in Redondo Beach, Calif., said he prepositioned firefighters on a large scale at least 30 times during heightened fire threats. Fires broke out after those threats just three times, but to him, it was worth the cost.

Advertisement

“I’m not in the business of making decisions that are politically palatable,” he said.

Chief Marrone began preparing for his own predeployments after meteorologists at the National Weather Service, on the first weekend of the new year, issued a bulletin warning of a “Particularly Dangerous Situation” — code words for a severe weather warning, the kind the federal government issues only about two dozen times a year. Based on the conditions in Los Angeles, it was clear that fire would almost certainly ensue.

The chief authorized overtime and supplemental state funding to add 100 people for duty drawn from a pool of around 2,000 off-duty firefighters so they could have more units prepositioned in areas known to be vulnerable to fire, including Santa Clarita and the Santa Monica mountains.

He prepositioned four strike teams, each with five trucks, and asked the California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection, the state fire agency known as Cal Fire, to preposition two more teams. The staffing was typical for a red-flag wind event, he said. Early on Tuesday morning, the chief ordered that 900 firefighters who were finishing their shifts stay on the job. The decision increased the number of county firefighters on duty to 1,800.

And the U.S. Forest Service, which fights fires in national forests, also began mobilizing. Adrienne Freeman, an agency spokeswoman, said that on Monday, the day before the winds kicked up and the first fires started, the agency had 30 trucks from out of state and Northern California in place at four Southern California forests and at a local coordination center. On Monday night, the agency called in 50 more trucks that arrived on Tuesday, she said.

Advertisement

The city fire department proceeded with prepositioning the nine fire trucks it was deploying on Tuesday morning, according to an internal document reviewed by The New York Times, three each in Hollywood, Sunland Valley — in the northwestern part of the city — and near the city of Calabasas in the western foothills. The extra 90 firefighters the city was predeploying were called up on overtime. No extra trucks were sent to Pacific Palisades.

Those extra firefighters the city of Los Angeles called on made up less than a tenth of the approximately 1,000 on duty on any given day. And the 100 additional people called up by the county added to its daily firefighting force of 900.

Mr. Leonard, the city battalion chief, said the trucks were positioned based on historical patterns of fire during high-wind events.

“Predicting where the fire is going to start is a scientific guess,” he said.

Then the wind started, and the first embers started flying.

Advertisement

Chief Crowley, with the city department, texted the chiefs in the counties surrounding Los Angeles at 10:35 a.m. Tuesday, five minutes after the Palisades fire was first reported, notifying them, according to an account of the messages shared with The Times.

Chief Marrone responded immediately. “What do you need?” he texted.

The Ventura County chief said he was sending strike teams. “They’re on the road now,” he wrote.

Orange County’s chief said he could provide three strike teams of five trucks each, along with a helicopter and a crew that uses hand tools to cut firebreaks.

The Los Angeles Fire Department put out a call for off-duty members to come to their stations and scoured mechanic yards for vehicles.

Advertisement

Tens of thousands of people were being evacuated out of Pacific Palisades as the fire spread out of the foothills, leaping across the four lanes of Pacific Coast Highway and wiping out restaurants and homes along the coast.

Then, at 6:18 p.m. on Tuesday, came more stunning news: the second major fire, in Altadena, had ignited.

Chief Marrone put Eaton Canyon, the site of the new fire, into a navigation app and set off from the Palisades. Stuck in bumper-to-bumper freeway traffic, he could see the fresh fire and its smoke swelling into the sky.

Around 9 p.m., he called Brian Marshall, the chief of fire and rescue for the California Office of Emergency Services.

“I said, ‘We are out of resources, we need help,’” Chief Marrone said. He requested 50 strike teams, a total of 250 fire engines and 1,000 firefighters.

Advertisement

At 10:29 p.m., a third major fire ignited in Sylmar, in the northernmost part of the San Fernando Valley, about 25 miles northwest of downtown Los Angeles, and a fourth broke out near Santa Clarita on Wednesday afternoon.

Mutual aid teams from across the West, and beyond, began streaming toward Los Angeles.

Firefighters tried and failed to stay ahead of the furious flames.

“Resources were scarce” during the initial hours of the blazes, said Capt. Jason Rolston of the Orange County Fire Authority, who was among those who traveled to join the firefighting effort in Los Angeles. “There were too many houses to protect, and not enough fire engines.”

The wind was gusting so powerfully that smoke boiled across the terrain. Firefighters said the barrage of ash and soot was so overwhelming at times that they struggled to even move through the fire zone.

Advertisement

“There would be times when you couldn’t see 10 feet in front of the rig,” said Capt. Shawn Stacy, another Orange County firefighter who deployed to the Palisades fire. “What went wrong is that you had 80-m.p.h. winds.”

Some firefighters said there was so much demand on water systems that they ran out of water.

Capt. Ryan Brumback of the Los Angeles County Fire Department said he was five hours into an all-out effort to save buildings in Altadena from the Eaton fire early Wednesday morning when the hydrants started running dry — a situation firefighters also faced in the Palisades.

Suddenly, he said, “we noticed our hoses became very limp and soft.” The problem, he said, was that a power shut-off intended to prevent additional ignitions also shut off the pumps that help with water pressure in Altadena. “It was devastating, because you want to do all that you can do.”

By Friday, both initial major fires were still burning with little containment, and others that ignited later in the week also required aggressive responses, particularly in the Hollywood Hills on Wednesday evening and in the West Hills, northwest of Los Angeles, late on Thursday. Fire officials were still focused on saving lives and homes, and said they would spend time later looking at whether their preparations had been sufficient.

Advertisement

“It wasn’t for a lack of preparation and decision making that resulted in this catastrophe,” Chief Marrone said at a news briefing on Saturday. “It was a natural disaster.”

The coming analysis, several experts said, will have to take into account that the standard guidelines that have long determined red-alert fire responses may no longer apply, as weather and fires become more virulent.

“There’s going to be a real reckoning about land use, escape routes, water pressure, water supply,” said Zev Yaroslavsky, a former longtime Los Angeles City Council member and county supervisor. Mr. Yaroslavsky said the fire might serve as a “Pearl Harbor” moment for the city, an alarm bell that signals fundamental new questions about how the city approaches the threat of wildfires.

“A lot,” he said, “will be reassessed.”

Nicholas Bogel-Burroughs and Ivan Penn contributed reporting.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending