Washington
The Washington counties where home prices are increasing the most
Essential Tips for Moving Into a New Home, Apartment
Moving into a new residence can be overwhelming, but with careful planning and a few key strategies, you can make the transition smooth and stress-free. Discover essential tips for preparation, organization, and settling into your new space.
Home prices are on the rise in Washington state.
Statewide, the median sales price of a home in Washington during the first quarter of 2025 was $636,200, representing a 1.6% increase from the same period in 2024, according to the Washington Center for Real Estate Research at the University of Washington.
The center’s latest housing market report stated that home prices increased in all of the state’s 16 metropolitan counties compared to a year ago. Zooming out for a statewide view, rural Lincoln County in Eastern Washington saw the biggest relative increase at 22.1%. The median home price in Lincoln was $274,500 in the first quarter of this year.
In Kitsap County, the relative increase was 2.1% and the median home price was $543,600. In King County, the increase was 1.1% and the median home price was $940,900, representing the highest median price in the state.
“Washington state’s housing market was mixed in the first quarter of 2025, with sales and inventory increasing and new building permits declining compared with a year ago,” the report stated. Approximately 7,500 building permits were issued in the first quarter of 2025, representing an 18.9% decrease from the same period last year.
Here’s more on the report and where home prices are increasing the most in the state.
Where have housing prices increased the most in Washington state?
These are the 10 counties in Washington state that saw the biggest relative increases in home prices in the first quarter of 2025 compared to a year ago, according to the housing market report:
- Lincoln County
- % change by year: 22.1
- Median home price Q1 2025: $274,500
- Pacific County
- % change by year: 19.4
- Median home price Q1 2025: $358,300
- Columbia County
- % change by year: 17.7
- Median home price Q1 2025: $268,700
- San Juan County
- % change by year: 17.5
- Median home price Q1 2025: $866,700
- Skamania County
- % change by year: 15.5
- Median home price Q1 2025: $531,200
- Wahkiakum County
- % change by year: 12.1
- Median home price Q1 2025: $467,500
- Klickitat County
- % change by year: 11.1
- Median home price Q1 2025: $437,500
- Grant County
- % change by year: 10.5
- Median home price Q1 2025: $372,200
- Skagit County
- % change by year: 10.3
- Median home price Q1 2025: $610,000
- Cowlitz County
- % change by year: 10
- Median home price Q1 2025: $413,700
What are the least and most affordable counties in Washington?
The least affordable county in Washington state is San Juan County, according to the report. Garfield County in southeastern Washington is the most affordable. The median home price in Garfield was $212,200 in the first quarter of 2025.
However, all “the state’s 39 counties, and especially those in the central Puget Sound region, present affordability issues for first-time buyers,” the report stated.
What are the best cities to buy a home in the US?
A new report from the personal finance company WalletHub examined the best and worst places for first-time home buyers in the country. It took 300 cities and compared them across a number of factors, including affordability, market attractiveness and quality of life, according to the report.
Palm Bay on the eastern coast of Florida ranked as the best place for first-time home buyers in the country, according to the report. “It’s among the leading cities in the country when it comes to active home listings per capita and new building permits per capita, so there are plenty of older and brand-new homes to choose from,” the report stated. “In addition, while it’s a stereotype that millennials struggle to buy homes, Palm Bay has the fifth-highest millennial home-ownership rate.”
But several Washington locations also ranked relatively highly as being good places to buy a home. Spokane Valley ranked 33rd, Yakima ranked 45th and Spokane ranked 46th.
Housing data shared by Redfin showed the median sale price of a home in Spokane Valley was $430,000 in May 2025. Yakima had a median sale price of $360,000, and Spokane had a median sale price of $390,000.
How much do you need to earn to buy a home in Washington state?
A January 2025 report from Realtor.com found that home buyers in 36 states needed to earn a six-figure income to reasonably afford a home. Washington ranked sixth among states where buyers needed the highest incomes to buy a home. The median household income recommended to buy a house in Washington was $176,669.
Realtor based its findings on the median monthly mortgage payments in each state.
“The calculation uses median home list prices from December 2024 and a 6.93% mortgage rate for a 30-year fixed loan,” the report stated. “It includes estimated property taxes and insurance costs. It also assumes buyers put down 10% and didn’t spend more than 30% of their gross income on their mortgage payments each month.”
According to the U.S. Census Bureau, the median household income in Washington state in 2023 dollars was $94,952.
Washington
Trump’s proposed 250ft Washington arch clears key planning hurdle
Donald Trump’s plans to build a skyline-altering arch in the nation’s capital won initial approval Thursday from a key federal commission, but its members put off a decision on whether a federal law that limits building heights should be applied to this project.
Despite overwhelming public opposition, the National Capital Planning Commission voted to approve preliminary site and building plans for the 250ft (76m) arch the Republican president wants to build on a traffic circle at the Virginia end of the Memorial Bridge from Washington.
The project, one of several being pursued by Trump in his quest to reshape parts of the nation’s capital to his liking, moved a step closer to reality with the vote.
Staff had recommended in its report on the project that the commission grant such approval and request a series of changes so the arch would comply with the Height of Buildings Act. The suggested changes included redistributing the heights among the main structure of the arch, the habitable roof, where an observation deck is planned, and the statues that would top it.
But commissioners, led by chair Will Scharf, voted to continue deliberations on whether the law indeed applies.
The staff report said the commission has long applied the law in its approval process. Scharf said the applicant, which is the interior department, had, as requested, provided a legal analysis that he said makes a “compelling argument” that the law “is not binding on the federal government”.
The interior department oversees the federal land where the arch would be built.
Eight of the 12 commissioners, including Scharf and two others appointed by Trump, voted for preliminary approval. One was against, and the remaining three commissioners voted present.
“This is a complex project,” Scharf said before the vote. He said a vote on final approval could come at the agency’s next meeting, in September.
All 12 commissioners listened to a summary of the staff report and its recommendations, and heard from several dozen people who had signed up to testify about the project.
As the commissioners met, construction continued at the White House on a $400m ballroom Trump is building there and crews draped tarps over the stone columns at the north entrance to the mansion, where work is being done to scrape off layers of paint.
Some of those who testified against Trump’s project opposed building a celebratory arch so close to Arlington national cemetery. Others suggested it would be more appropriate for a neighborhood near the Capitol and sporting venues.
Opponents say the arch is too big and would disrupt the carefully designed view between the Lincoln Memorial and Arlington national cemetery that was meant to symbolize the reunification of the north and the south after the civil war.
The arch would be more than twice as tall as the Lincoln Memorial, which is 99ft (30m) tall, and close to half the height of the Washington Monument, at about 555ft (169m) tall.
Concerns about vehicular traffic and pedestrian safety also were expressed on Thursday. Others insisted that Congress must approve the arch – a position Trump disagrees with.
The US Commission of Fine Arts, a separate federal agency, approved the design for the arch in May. The National Capital Planning Commission oversees construction on federal land in the city and began reviewing the arch plan in June.
Trump had said last year that the arch could be paid for with unused funds from the hundreds of millions of dollars he said he has raised from corporations, donors and other wealthy people to pay to build a new $400m ballroom at the White House.
But, as it turns out, some public money will be used for the ballroom project, as well as the arch. The White House has not released a cost estimate for the arch.
Washington
Washington Commanders are retiring Hall of Famer John Riggins’ No. 44
The Washington Commanders are retiring John Riggins’ No. 44 during the upcoming NFL season, the team announced Thursday.
The Hall of Fame running back will be honored in a ceremony at halftime of the team’s game against the Los Angeles Rams on Nov. 8.
“There are certain players whose impact goes far beyond statistics, championships and accolades: They become woven into the identity of a franchise,” controlling owner Josh Harris said in a statement. “John Riggins is one of those players. …Our fans not only admired him, they identified with him. He is authentic, unapologetically himself and deeply connected to the people around him. John has meant so much to this franchise, our fans and the game of football.”
Riggins is the organization’s all-time leading rusher with 7,472 yards and 79 touchdowns on 1,988 carries and helped the team win the Super Bowl in the 1982 season.
The fan favorite nicknamed “Riggo” was the MVP of that Super Bowl for his performance best known for his memorable 43-yard TD run in the fourth quarter that put Washington ahead of the Miami Dolphins. He was inducted into the Pro Football Hall of Fame in 1992.
Riggins is the seventh player to have his number retired by the team, joining Sammy Baugh, Bobby Mitchell, Sean Taylor, Sonny Jurgensen, Darrell Green and Art Monk. Green, Monk and Riggins have all happened since Harris’ group took over from longtime owner Dan Snyder.
Washington
Future uncertain for site of former Mount Washington church destroyed in massive fire
-
Milwaukee, WI2 minutes agoSupervisor calls for referendum on Milwaukee County courthouse revamp
-
Atlanta, GA5 minutes agoCritically missing: 11-year-old missing in Atlanta after running away
-
Minneapolis, MN10 minutes agoMarilyn Savage, St. Cloud State Educator And Media Pioneer, Remembered July 18 In Cokato
-
Indianapolis, IN17 minutes agoUnsettled Friday and Saturday, then summer heat returns early next week | July 10, 2026
-
Pittsburg, PA20 minutes agoBuying Here: Modern home with backyard pool in Lawrenceville priced at $949,900
-
Augusta, GA25 minutes agoSouth Augusta community raises concern over Family Y on Tobacco Road
-
Washington, D.C32 minutes agoAbout 120 Iowa National Guard soldiers leave today for D.C. deployment – Radio Iowa
-
Cleveland, OH35 minutes agoWanted: Sex offender on the run after crimes against a child