Connect with us

News

Who’s who in the Michael Sussmann trial

Published

on

Who’s who in the Michael Sussmann trial

Sussmann was indicted final 12 months by particular counsel John Durham, the Trump-era prosecutor who has spent the final three years reviewing the FBI’s Trump-Russia investigation.

This is a breakdown of the important thing figures that will likely be featured prominently at Sussmann’s trial.

He had a status as an apolitical fact-finder who took on robust circumstances. However some authorized consultants have criticized his dealing with of the present investigation, which has turn into a trigger célèbre in right-wing circles. Former President Donald Trump has repeatedly overrated the Durham probe, suggesting with out proof that it might result in indictments of high Democrats, even Clinton herself.

Michael Sussmann

Sussmann is a lawyer who has targeted on cybersecurity and privateness issues. Through the 2016 marketing campaign, he labored for the regulation agency Perkins Coie and represented the Clinton marketing campaign and the Democratic Nationwide Committee. He helped the DNC after Russian hackers breached its servers, stole 1000’s of inner emails, and launched the fabric by WikiLeaks.
The case revolves round a gathering Sussmann had with a high FBI official in September 2016. Throughout that assembly, Sussmann handed alongside a tip about unusual cyber exercise between the Trump Group and Moscow-based Alfa Financial institution. Durham says Sussmann broke the regulation by falsely telling the FBI official that he wasn’t there on behalf of any consumer. He pleaded not responsible.

Alfa Financial institution

Alfa Financial institution is the most important personal financial institution in Russia. In 2016, knowledge scientists uncovered info that they believed recommended a communications backchannel between the Trump Group and Alfa Financial institution. The researchers handed the info to Sussmann, who gave it to the FBI throughout his September 2016 assembly. The FBI in the end concluded that there weren’t improper cyber hyperlinks.
Each corporations denied that there was any backchannel. The Senate Intelligence Committee regarded into the matter as a part of its bipartisan inquiry into potential Trump-Russia collusion. The ultimate report accepted the FBI’s conclusions but in addition famous that the reasons that Alfa Financial institution and the Trump Group offered concerning the bizarre cyberactivity “weren’t constant.”

James Baker

Advertisement
James Baker was the FBI’s basic counsel from 2014 to 2017. He’s the FBI official that met with Sussmann in September 2016 the place Sussmann handed alongside the Trump-Alfa Financial institution info.

He will likely be a serious witness for the prosecution, as a result of he was the one different individual within the room when Sussmann allegedly lied about his purchasers. Sussmann’s legal professionals have attacked Baker’s credibility as a result of he has given differing accounts of their assembly over time.

Fusion GPS

Fusion GPS is an opposition analysis firm that was not directly paid by the Clinton marketing campaign to dig up filth about Trump’s connections to Russia. The corporate had beforehand been employed by anti-Trump Republicans, however the Clinton marketing campaign picked up the tab after the GOP primaries.
The corporate employed retired British spy Christopher Steele to research Trump’s dealings in Russia, and his work led to the notorious Steele file. Fusion GPS’ founders prodded journalists to publish tales tying Trump to Russia in the course of the 2016 marketing campaign, primarily based on their opposition analysis, in keeping with emails that have been made public as a part of the Sussmann case.

Perkins Coie

Perkins Coie is the regulation agency the place Sussmann labored in 2016. It was the first agency retained by Clinton’s marketing campaign and the Democratic Nationwide Committee to deal with election issues.
The regulation agency has pushed again in opposition to Durham’s makes an attempt to acquire inner emails about its dealings with Fusion GPS in the course of the 2016 marketing campaign. The decide in Sussmann’s case has privately examined the emails and can resolve if they’re protected by attorney-client privilege.
CNN beforehand reported that Durham subpoenaed Perkins Coie after Sussmann’s indictment, which is a sign that the particular counsel may very well be attempting to construct a broader prison case.

Marc Elias

Marc Elias is a distinguished Democratic legal professional who labored for Perkins Coie in 2016. He has labored as a high lawyer for each Democratic presidential nominee since not less than 2004. In recent times, he began his personal agency and has been a number one determine pushing for expanded voting rights.
He was a key middleman between the Clinton marketing campaign and Fusion GPS in the course of the 2016 election, and the marketing campaign’s funds to Fusion have been routed by Elias’ agency on the time.
As a part of the Sussmann case, Elias submitted a sworn assertion to the courtroom saying that he employed Fusion GPS to assist with authorized issues and to vet the accuracy of potential marketing campaign statements about Trump’s ties to Russia. The dispute over whether or not Fusion GPS was a authorized guide or analysis store lately led to the Clinton marketing campaign paying a small federal tremendous.

Rodney Joffe

Advertisement

Rodney Joffe is a cybersecurity knowledgeable who lately retired as a high govt at a expertise firm referred to as Neustar. He was one in all Sussmann’s purchasers in 2016, and Durham has accused Sussmann of illegally hiding this relationship whereas passing alongside the Trump-Alfa tip to the FBI.

In keeping with the Sussmann indictment, Joffe directed knowledge scientists to search for potential hyperlinks between Trump and Russia, which led to the invention of the unusual cyberactivity between the Trump Group and Alfa Financial institution. The indictment additionally quoted emails the place Joffe claimed to have been provided a high cybersecurity place in a possible Clinton administration, if she gained.
Particular counsel prosecutors have mentioned there may be an lively prison investigation into Joffe and whether or not he defrauded the US authorities by misusing web knowledge concerned in authorities contracts to search for derogatory details about Trump. Prosecutors beforehand mentioned Joffe’s conduct “falls throughout the scope of an investigation,” and that he’s a topic, not goal, of the inquiry. Joffe denies wrongdoing and his legal professionals claimed Durham is pushing an “unfounded political narrative by false innuendo.”

Christopher Steele

Steele is the retired British spy who wrote a file containing unverified and explosive claims about Trump in 2016. Since then, a collection of presidency investigations and personal lawsuits discredited lots of Steele’s central allegations about Trump’s supposed collusion with Russia.
Trump has denied all allegations and says the Steele file was a shoddy political smear.
Durham’s crew has beforehand indicated that they will convey up the Steele file at trial — which inserts with the sample of Durham utilizing his courtroom circumstances to relitigate the 2016 election. The decide has mentioned he’ll police how a lot of this materials is related to the cost in opposition to Sussmann.

News

G7 leaders are tying themselves in knots over Ukraine loan

Published

on

G7 leaders are tying themselves in knots over Ukraine loan

Stay informed with free updates

Ukraine has won itself some breathing room — on the battlefield with its Kursk offensive, and financially through a debt restructuring deal with private investors. But now, the amount of financial resources Kyiv can count on to ensure the country’s survival hinges on a strangely contorted discussion between western allies.

It concerns how to financially engineer a $50bn advance on money relating to Russian central bank reserves that western jurisdictions have blocked Moscow’s access to. In June, G7 leaders committed to “extraordinary revenue acceleration loans”. After earlier unedifying hold-ups of funding packages on both sides of the Atlantic, this was presented as proof that the west could still stand up for Ukraine and make Russia pay for the country’s destruction.

Don’t be too impressed. The very need for a financially engineered loan betrays both an unseemly quest for alternatives to western taxpayer funding and the continued refusal to enforce Russia’s obligation to compensate Ukraine by transferring its immobilised assets outright. In this sense, the commitment at the Puglia summit was a sign of timidity not confidence, even if $50bn from whatever source is a whole lot better than nothing.

Advertisement

But even that remains far from a done deal, with technical difficulties reflecting deeper political challenges.

The idea is for a syndicate of Ukraine’s friends to take up a loan, then channel it through a trustee institution such as the World Bank. Kyiv’s resulting debt-service costs would be covered by the extraordinary profits that Euroclear, the Belgian securities custodian, is making on nearly €200bn of cash balances it is prohibited from paying out to Russia’s central bank.

These war profits (which is what they are, through no fault of Euroclear’s) ought morally to go to Ukraine anyway, which is why the EU recently decided to channel much of them to military aid. The new G7 plan is essentially to repurpose and “accelerate” this profit stream into a big upfront cheque.

That is enough to show the G7 is granting no additional money beyond what Ukraine was already rightly set to receive, let alone any belonging to Moscow. The scheme is already being used to argue that less needs to be spent by western governments themselves — witness Berlin’s shameful plan to cut aid for Ukraine.

G7 leaders left it to technocrats to make good on the political promise, such as it is. But important technical hurdles are far from cleared. The main function of securing the loan with future profits from holding Russian state assets is to make the loan as risk-free as possible for western Treasuries — at least risk-free enough not to have to get lawmakers’ approval, especially in the US Congress. It is also politically opportune to make more western countries take part than just the EU, where the money for debt service is generated. The flip side is that Kyiv’s indebtedness will increase, even if securitisation supposedly means it never has to pay anything.

Advertisement

But the EU only renews its sanctions for six months at a time, so that profit stream could cease as soon as a single member state vetoes renewal. That brings risk not just for non-EU members in the scheme but also Kyiv: a contingent fiscal liability could complicate the IMF’s debt sustainability judgments. To address this, Brussels has presented EU governments with options that include longer renewal periods or tying the end of the asset block to Moscow compensating Kyiv.

The former would require Hungary to relinquish its twice-yearly veto power. The latter would be tantamount to the confiscation so strongly feared by Paris, Berlin and the European Central Bank. Neither option seems likely to gain unanimity. In any case, it is hard to see how the loan documents can avoid recourse to something more than the profit stream in case Russia miraculously returns to international good standing sooner than expected — and regains access to its reserves.

In a nutshell, the problem is that western leaders have tried to get something for nothing: new funding for Kyiv, but with no new taxpayer commitments, no financial risk and no seizure of the assets even of a criminal state. These political contradictions cannot be solved, at most they can be camouflaged, by technocratic solutions.

Only a political choice to set a new legal precedent would cut through this Gordian knot: a transparent decision to jointly confiscate Russia’s assets outright for Ukraine’s benefit. It may still come to that as political contradictions become unsustainable. But the longer it takes, the more is lost in waiting. In the meantime, making good on the Puglia promise would be welcome — but no one should imagine that will close the issue for more than a few months.

martin.sandbu@ft.com

Advertisement
Continue Reading

News

2 years and counting. Inmate says medical delays still plague federal prison in Oregon

Published

on

2 years and counting. Inmate says medical delays still plague federal prison in Oregon

Luke Thornhill and his mother, Nancy Richardson, in an undated photo.

Nancy Richardson


hide caption

toggle caption

Advertisement

Nancy Richardson

Luke Thornhill is scheduled to be released from an Oregon prison in four years.

He’s terrified he might die before then.

He has family waiting for him in Idaho, “And I’m scared I’m never gonna see them again,” Thornhill said during multiple calls with NPR from prison.

Advertisement

He’s scared because he’s been suffering from serious medical issues — including severe abdominal pains, bloody bowel movements and a swollen abdomen — since at least 2022, when he was incarcerated in a different facility. And he says he has not been able to get the treatment that he needs.

“If you looked at my stomach, it bulges out on the right side, like the size of a grapefruit. And it just hurts all the time,” Thornhill says.

Now, he feels worse than ever, he says. Constant pain makes it difficult even to sleep through the night.

“If I’m not careful with what I eat or drink or careful of how I move then I’m in worse pain and bleeding even worse.”

Thornhill was sentenced to 80 months in federal prison on drug charges in March 2023.

Advertisement

In 2022, while incarcerated in Idaho, he underwent a colonoscopy, during which two polyps were removed.

After Idaho, Thornhill was moved to SeaTac, the federal prison in Seattle, and earlier this year was moved to the federal facility in Sheridan, Ore.

Since he left Idaho, Thornhill says, he hasn’t reviewed the biopsy results with any doctors at either SeaTac or Sheridan — and nothing about his situation has changed.

“We’re talking about something that I’ve been dealing with for a year now. I’ve been literally suffering for the last year. And I’ve been begging them to give me treatment for this,” he says. “Nobody can tell me there isn’t something wrong with me.”

The federal Bureau of Prisons said in response to specific questions about Thornhill’s complaints that “For privacy, safety, and security reasons, we do not discuss any individuals’ conditions of confinement, to include health status or medical treatment plans.”

Advertisement

Problems with prison health care are well documented

Delays or substandard health care for prisoners in the U.S. carceral system are not uncommon. In 2023, NPR published a report showing that nearly 5,000 federal prisoners died over the past decade from treatable conditions after not getting timely diagnoses or treatment while incarcerated.

Lawmakers have begun to put the U.S. federal prison system under more scrutiny. In late July, President Biden signed the Federal Prison Oversight Act into law, which mandates routine inspections of all federal Bureau of Prison’s facilities and the creation of an ombudsman to investigate the welfare and safety of inmates and staff.

The prison at Sheridan, in particular, has been criticized recently for medical delays, and at the end of 2023, investigators with the Justice Department launched an unannounced inspection of the facility.

In May 2024, the Justice Department’s Office of the Inspector General released a report that concluded staffing issues at Sheridan contributed to more than 100 missed inmate medical appointments between January and November 2023 and a backlog of hundreds of lab tests and pending X-ray orders — leading to medical conditions potentially going undiagnosed.

Advertisement

In response, the federal Bureau of Prisons said it made several changes since the inspection — including hiring more staff and making a substantial dent in the number of missed appointments and the testing backlog.

As of May 2024, the backlog of laboratory orders dropped to 44 from 725 and the backlog of pending X-ray orders was 84, down from 274, according to the inspection report. The BOP reported that 89 of 101 appointments had been completed since the OIG inspection.

But Thornhill and at least two other Sheridan inmates that reached out to NPR say they are still in dire need of medical care. Their repeated requests to see a doctor are not being addressed, they say. Thornhill says Sheridan’s claims that officials addressed the major backlog of lab tests and X-rays is flat-out wrong.

“The BOP is definitely broken,” Thornhill says.

An outside view of the federal prison in Sheridan, Ore., from 2018. In May, the Department of Justice's Office of the Inspector General issued a report criticizing the prison's backlog of medical requests.

An outside view of the federal prison in Sheridan, Ore., from 2018. In May, the Department of Justice’s Office of the Inspector General issued a report criticizing the prison’s backlog of medical requests.

Andrew Selsky/AP

Advertisement


hide caption

toggle caption

Andrew Selsky/AP

Advertisement

During the reporting of this story, NPR reviewed medical records and several requests for medical care that Thornhill sent to prison officials in Idaho and Seattle.

He said that for months he wasn’t able to make copies of documents or access his medical file and requests at Sheridan. Late this month, he reported finally getting copies of those records.

And, he told NPR, that despite submitting numerous requests for medical care at Sheridan, he discovered recently that officials there only have one of his requests for medical help on file.

Regarding Thornhill’s complaints about access to his medical records, the Bureau of Prisons said inmate medical records are “available for review upon request by any incarcerated person” who uses the proper request procedures. The requests should be processed within 30 days, the BOP said.

“All requests and the issuance of records are documented in the individual’s medical record. Currently, FCI Sheridan has no request for medical records older than 10 days, before fulfilment,” the BOP told NPR in a statement.

Advertisement

But Thornhill says that in the past, he has made multiple requests that were not honored.

BOP says it’s made changes

The OIG and the federal Bureau of Prisons have pointed to severe staffing shortages as a significant contributing factor to ongoing problems with the federally run prison system.

The BOP “has been transparent that staffing across the agency remains a challenge, as the FBOP is faced with the same worker shortage experienced by employers throughout the country,” the agency said in a statement to NPR. “The work to address these challenges is ongoing and includes a robust national recruitment strategy with the assistance of an external contract consultant.”

The agency told NPR in July that approximately 70% of positions in Sheridan’s Health Services Department are filled. Correctional services positions, such as guards, are approximately 87% filled.

Advertisement

Competing claims on test backlogs

One of the procedures Thornhill wanted to have done was an X-ray.

After the OIG report, Sheridan said X-ray order backlogs were being addressed. But Thornhill says that isn’t the case.

After the Sheridan report was published, Thornhill says he and about 100 other inmates were called to be taken to receive X-rays. Instead, he alleges that corrections staff repeatedly pressured him and other inmates — even some with broken bones — to sign forms refusing those X-rays.

Thornhill claims that officers at the prison made the experience as uncomfortable as possible — handcuffing each prisoner tightly around the wrists, putting them in cramped rooms and buses, serving them frozen meals without warming them up — to discourage them from wanting to undergo the process again. Thornhill believes the reason was to get the official number of X-ray requests down. He says he never signed the forms, but after a couple of months, still has not received an X-ray.

He says that of the couple dozen men who remained to get X-rays, only six or so were able to get the procedure done before staff said the machine was broken.

Advertisement

In response to these claims, the BOP said, “For privacy, safety, and security reasons, we do not discuss any individuals’ conditions of confinement, but as noted above, policy requires medical treatment which meets community standards and staff misconduct is not tolerated.”

It’s rare for prisoners to see an actual doctor, Thornhill says

Thornhill’s attempts to see a doctor for his medical issues go back to his time at SeaTac. Incarcerated there in 2023, he says he submitted several requests for follow-up medical treatment after his 2022 colonoscopy and as his symptoms appeared to worsen.

While at SeaTac, he was part of a group of inmates who spoke to the Seattle Times in an article published in February of this year about serious delays in medical care at that prison.

It was after this story published that Thornhill was moved to Sheridan.

He says he believes the move was punishment for speaking out about conditions at SeaTac.

Advertisement

In response to questions on Thornhill’s claims, the BOP said, “We cannot speak to this particular case, but FBOP does not tolerate staff misconduct, including retaliation. Consistent with national policy, all allegations of employee misconduct are referred to the FBOP’s Office of Internal Affairs” that are also reviewed by the Office of the Inspector General.

“Allegations of misconduct are thoroughly investigated, and appropriate action is taken if such allegations are sustained, including the possibility of referral for criminal prosecution when appropriate,” the BOP said.

Thornhill says his symptoms have continued to worsen while at Sheridan, and that nothing has happened after his numerous requests to see a doctor and have other tests done.

Requests to be seen by a nurse, doctor or dentist are a multistep process. In order to see medical staff at Sheridan, Thornhill says, inmates submit requests through the prison computer system. Inmates also submit a paper “cop out” or a physical request to be seen by medical staff.

After putting in the requests, inmates go down for sick-call, held four days a week

Advertisement

The Sheridan Admission and Orientation Handbook states this is “the most efficient way to obtain an examination by a physician or an outside specialist.” Inmates explain the “problem to the P.A. or nurse, and they will refer you to a physician, if your condition warrants it.”

For months, Thornhill says, “No matter how many times I put in to see a doctor, they call me down there and I end up seeing another nurse and she basically tells me she doesn’t know what’s going on with me and that she’ll put me in to see the doctor.” He adds that it’s not just him, it’s rare for anyone to see an actual doctor and when they do “it’s for basic stuff” like an ingrown nail.

It’s such a problem that Thornhill alleges inmates are turning to each other to get basic drugs for blood pressure or antibiotics — a not uncommon practice in prison.

In response, a BOP spokesman said the agency “does not comment on the conditions of confinement for any individual or group of individuals in our custody. Nor do we comment on anecdotal allegations.”

The BOP said it “takes pride in protecting and securing individuals entrusted in our custody” and makes “every effort to ensure the physical, medical, and mental safety” of those individuals.

Advertisement

Sheridan employs two medical doctors and one mid-level provider in the prison’s Health Services Department for its 1,539 inmates, according to the agency.

The BOP said in its statement to NPR that “Sheridan provides onsite medical provider coverage 14-hours per day, including weekends and holidays. The FBOP and FCI Sheridan provides essential medical, dental, and mental health services in a manner consistent with accepted community standards for a correctional environment.”

“All incarcerated individuals have daily access to medical care and appointments, and medical staff conduct daily rounds throughout each facility,” the agency continued.

“Each patient is independently treated on a case-by-case basis, and treatment is provided as clinically indicated.”

Only after NPR contacted representatives of Sheridan and the Bureau of Prisons about Thornhill’s situation did Thornhill report to us in mid-July that he finally saw a doctor and a cardiologist, who both agreed “something was wrong and ordered more tests,” he wrote in a letter to his mother shared with NPR.

Advertisement

This development gives Thornhill little confidence.

“I’m trying to be optimistic about it but it’s hard when I’m still in the same position I was. Hopefully they actually get me to the hospital to do these tests! I am going to pray about it and hope for the best,” he wrote to NPR in July.

Luke Thornhill in an old, undated photo. Thornhill is currently incarcerated in a federal prison in Sheridan, Ore., where he says prison officials are not addressing his and other inmates' dire medical needs.

Luke Thornhill in an old, undated photo. Thornhill is currently incarcerated in a federal prison in Sheridan, Ore., where he says prison officials are not addressing his and other inmates’ dire medical needs.

Nancy Richardson


hide caption

Advertisement

toggle caption

Nancy Richardson

Thornhill is under lockdown

In late July, Thornhill told NPR that Sheridan was under lockdown. The BOP confirmed that the prison was on “modified operations” but declined to provide specific details “for safety and security reasons.”

As of this week, the BOP confirmed to NPR that, aside from one unit, the prison has returned to normal operations.

Advertisement

For weeks, prison officials seriously curtailed communications and kept inmates in their cells most of the day. Though the lockdown has since been adjusted, Thornhill reports inmates are still only allowed to leave their cells for about 40 minutes a day.

Thornhill’s mother, Nancy Richardson, contacted NPR and lawmakers on his behalf as he’s struggled with medical issues since being incarcerated. She says she was only able to speak with him for five minutes every few days during the lockdown.

She’s 69 and lives in Idaho and hasn’t been able to visit her son since he’s been in federal custody. The lockdown made her more fearful for her son and his health.

“He’s sick and he’s needing medical care, and it’s just disheartening to not be able to do one thing about it,” she says. “I think people need to know what’s going on here.”

At the beginning of August, Thornhill was taken to an emergency room outside the prison via ambulance due to extremely high blood pressure. He has since returned to Sheridan, he and his mother confirmed.

Advertisement

There, he says, he finally received an X-ray of his chest.

Continue Reading

News

Space engine start-up in talks for new capital after funding crunch

Published

on

Space engine start-up in talks for new capital after funding crunch

A British technology start-up which had promised to build the world’s first space plane is in last-ditch talks to secure new financing after two of its backers wrote down the value of their investment.

Reaction Engines, which was founded in 1989, is in detailed talks with the UAE-backed Strategic Development Fund (SDF), one of its existing shareholders, about a new injection of capital, according to two people familiar with the situation. The SDF led a £40mn funding round in January last year. 

The British start-up is also backed by several aerospace giants, including BAE Systems and Rolls-Royce, as well as financial investors Artemis and Schroders.

Reaction has previously raised more than £150mn and grew its commercial revenues by more than 400 per cent last year. The company, however, warned earlier this year that it would need to raise additional financing. It has this weekend lined up PwC, the accountancy firm, to act as administrator if the funding talks collapse.

Sky News first reported that PwC had been put on standby. The accountancy firm, which has not yet been formally appointed, declined to comment on Saturday. Reaction also declined to comment. 

Advertisement

Other existing investors are monitoring the situation, said one of the people close to the talks. 

Artemis and Schroders both announced last week that they had significantly written down the value of their stakes in Reaction. Artemis cut the value of its 2.3 per cent holding by 75 per cent. Artemis Alpha Trust, the fund that manages the London-based fund manager’s stake, now values it at £1.2mn, compared with £6.4mn in April. 

Reaction has in recent years focused on developing a hybrid jet and rocket engine, known as Sabre. The innovative engine was originally planned to power Skylon, a space aircraft also designed by Reaction.

Key to Sabre’s development is Reaction’s groundbreaking pre-cooling technology which prevents engines from overheating and could lead to hypersonic space planes. The company is part of a UK-led military project aiming to make hypersonic flight a reality. At hypersonic speeds, the temperature generated inside a conventional gas turbine would start to melt components unless they were cooled in some way.

More recently the company has focused its attention on developing nearer-term aerospace and commercial applications for its pre-cooling technology. It signed an agreement with US industrial group Honeywell to collaborate on the development of thermal management technologies to help reduce aircraft emissions. 

Advertisement

Reaction is chaired by Philip Dunne, a former UK defence minister. It has been led by Mark Thomas, who was previously at Rolls-Royce. 

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending