Connect with us

News

Who is Wesley Hawkins? Republicans zero in on Jackson’s sentencing of a teen in a child sex abuse case.

Published

on

Who is Wesley Hawkins? Republicans zero in on Jackson’s sentencing of a teen in a child sex abuse case.

Republican senators who’ve criticized Decide Ketanji Jackson for her method to sentencing youngster sexual abuse defendants have centered on a single case from 2013 during which they argue she was inappropriately lenient on an adolescent who pleaded responsible.

Right here’s what occurred in that case, United States v. Hawkins:

In 2012 Wesley Hawkins, an 18-year-old who was then in highschool, began downloading pornographic photographs from the web and, in accordance with his lawyer, felt “confusion and shock slightly than arousal.”

A homosexual boy from a non secular household that strongly disapproved of homosexuality, Mr. Hawkins was pushed by a sort of curiosity concerning the photographs and his connection to the individuals in them appeared, his lawyer mentioned, to be “one among figuring out” slightly than of “exploiting them sexually.”

A lot of photographs have been, nevertheless, extraordinarily disturbing, exhibiting younger boys engaged in a wide range of intercourse acts, a few of them violent. When Mr. Hawkins reposted a few of the photographs onto YouTube, legislation enforcement officers obtained a “cyber-tip” about him and shortly a police detective posing as a fellow youngster pornography collector reached out to him by electronic mail and recommended they commerce photographs.

Advertisement

Prosecutors say that Mr. Hawkins finally swapped photographs with the undercover detective, sending some information and asking for others that he believed have been of the detective’s 12-year-old daughter.

Mr. Hawkins was arrested in June 2013, and prosecutors mentioned he was instantly cooperative and “took full accountability for his actions.”

That September, Mr. Hawkins pleaded responsible to downloading and buying and selling scores of photographs and films containing youngster pornography, a number of exhibiting boys who have been beneath the age of 13.

After the plea, the case moved towards sentencing. In papers submitted to Decide Jackson, Mr. Hawkins’s lawyer, Jonathan Jeffress, argued that his consumer had indicated “no curiosity in any respect” within the undercover detective’s repeated ideas of a real-life sexual encounter.

Mr. Jeffress additionally submitted an analysis by a psychologist asserting that Mr. Hawkins didn’t “show sexual deviation” however was as a substitute pushed to observe the pornographic photographs as “a method for him to discover his curiosity about gay exercise and join together with his emotional friends.”

Advertisement

Prosecutors, in their very own submitting to Decide Jackson, mentioned they thought-about the psychologist’s report and whereas they didn’t agree with all the pieces in it, believed it offered “helpful insights” about Mr. Hawkins’s “private circumstances, household state of affairs, and stage of growth.”

Mr. Hawkins wrote Decide Jackson a quick letter saying how a lot he regretted what he had finished.

“I’ve dissatisfied everybody in my household and everybody who has ever cared about me,” he wrote. “I hope that I could make up my errors and that this won’t finish my life earlier than it begins. I swear that I’ll by no means do that once more or any crime ever in my life.”

The sentencing was in November 2013.

The prosecution requested Decide Jackson to condemn Mr. Hawkins to 2 years in jail, arguing that his possession of the fabric was “extraordinarily troubling and deserving of punishment.”

Advertisement

Mr. Hawkins’s lawyer requested for a single day in jail. He claimed that his consumer was younger, remorseful and suffered from “rising psychological sickness.”

Each side advised Decide Jackson that prior instances supported their arguments, and everybody agreed that the case was difficult and marked by what the prosecutor referred to as “very distinctive circumstances.”

The prosecution talked about instances during which not less than two males who obtained youngster pornography from on-line chat rooms or from an undercover officer have been sentenced to a full 12 months in jail. The protection pointed to instances of males who had bigger collections of illicit materials than Mr. Hawkins did however didn’t serve jail time in any respect.

Ultimately, Decide Jackson — then in her first 12 months on the federal bench in Washington — gave Mr. Hawkins three months in jail adopted by greater than six years of supervised launch.

In making her resolution — “a really tough state of affairs,” as she put it on the time — Decide Jackson issued a sentence decrease than those really useful by each the probation division and the nonbinding federal pointers.

Advertisement

She additionally credited the protection’s declare that Mr. Hawkins shouldn’t be regarded as a pedophile as a result of he was pretty shut in age to the kids depicted within the photographs he had.

Whereas she acknowledged that Mr. Hawkins’s crimes have been “severe” and “heinous,” she additionally mentioned his case was not as troubling as others she had seen.

“I don’t consider that you’re related in intent or as culpable as a few of the wicked older adults,” she mentioned.

The comparatively lenient sentence was common for youngster pornography instances — particularly for these of defendants who possess such materials, however should not concerned in making it. Nor was the choice out of protecting with comparable instances within the Federal District Courtroom in Washington the place older defendants with bigger youngster pornography collections haven’t served jail time in any respect.

Decide Jackson advised Mr. Hawkins that the kids within the footage he possessed had been pressured to commit “unspeakable acts” for “the gratification of sick individuals all over the place.” A few of them, she added, would by no means have a “regular grownup relationship” whereas others may flip to medication or vices “to deal emotionally with the ache.”

Advertisement

However Decide Jackson famous that Mr. Hawkins by no means produced any pornographic materials himself and that he had solely watched such materials for lower than a 12 months. He was additionally younger, remorseful and had the remainder of his life forward him.

“It’s tragic that you simply permitted your curiosity to jeopardize all of that,” she mentioned.

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

News

Joe Biden says ‘oligarchy’ emerging in US in final White House address

Published

on

Joe Biden says ‘oligarchy’ emerging in US in final White House address

Unlock the White House Watch newsletter for free

US President Joe Biden has warned that an “oligarchy is taking shape in America” that risks damaging democracy, as he blasted an emerging “tech industrial complex” for delivering a dangerous concentration of wealth and power in the country.

Biden’s comments during a farewell address to Americans from the Oval Office on Wednesday night amount to a veiled attack on Donald Trump’s closest allies in corporate America, including tech billionaire Elon Musk, just five days before he transfers power to the Republican.

Biden said he wanted to warn the country of the “dangerous concentration of power in the hands of a very few ultra-wealthy people” and the danger that their “abuse of power is left unchecked”.

Advertisement

He cited late president Dwight Eisenhower’s warning in his 1961 farewell address of a military-industrial complex and said the interaction between government and technology risked being similarly pernicious.

“I’m equally concerned about the potential rise of a tech-industrial complex that could pose real dangers for our country as well. Americans are being buried under an avalanche of misinformation and disinformation, enabling the abuse of power. The free press is crumbling. Editors are disappearing. Social media is giving up on fact checking,” Biden said.

Biden’s words were a reference to the world’s richest man, Musk, the owner of social media platform X and the founder of electric-vehicle maker Tesla, who gave massive financial backing to Trump’s campaign and has become one of his closest allies during the transition to Trump’s new administration.

Some of Silicon Valley’s top executives, from Jeff Bezos of Amazon to Mark Zuckerberg of Meta, have also embraced Trump since his electoral victory and are expected to have prime spots at the inauguration ceremony in Washington on Monday.

Biden also used his remarks to cast a positive light on his one-term presidency, which ended with the big political failure of him dropping his re-election bid belatedly in late July, passing the torch of the campaign against Trump to vice-president Kamala Harris — an effort that ended in a bitter defeat.

Advertisement

Biden’s approval ratings have hit new lows as he bows out from the presidency and a political career in Washington that has spanned more than five decades. Just 36.7 per cent of Americans approve of his performance on the job, and 55.8 per cent disapprove, according to the FiveThirtyEight polling average.

Biden said he hoped his accomplishments would be judged more favourably in the future.

“It will take time to feel the full impact of all we’ve done together, but the seeds are planted, and they’ll grow and they’ll bloom for decades to come,” he said.

Biden has not only faced seething criticism from Republicans, but also rebukes from Democrats who blame him for seeking re-election despite his advanced age. He is now 82.

Biden’s presidency was defined by a record-breaking jobs market and a robust recovery from the Covid-19 pandemic, as well as a series of legislative accomplishments on the economy. But the pain of high inflation became a massive political vulnerability for him.

Advertisement

In foreign affairs, he took credit for western support for Ukraine after Russia’s full-scale invasion of the country in 2022, but his response to conflict in the Middle East, including staunch support for Israel’s war in Gaza, drew a strong backlash from progressive Democrats, undermining the unity of his political coalition.

It was not until Wednesday, with five days to go before he left office, that Biden — with help from Trump aides — was able to broker a ceasefire deal to free hostages held by Hamas. 

“This plan was developed and negotiated by my team and will be largely implemented by the incoming administration. That’s why I told my team to keep the incoming administration fully informed, because that’s how it should be, working together as Americans,” he said at the start of his address.

Continue Reading

News

Biden touts major wins in farewell address

Published

on

Biden touts major wins in farewell address
Biden touts major wins in farewell address – CBS Texas

Watch CBS News


In his farewell address, President Biden warned an “oligarch” of “ultrarich” threatens America’s future.

Advertisement

Be the first to know

Get browser notifications for breaking news, live events, and exclusive reporting.


Advertisement
Continue Reading

News

Takeaways From Marco Rubio’s Senate Hearing

Published

on

Takeaways From Marco Rubio’s Senate Hearing

Marco Rubio, the Republican senator from Florida named by Donald J. Trump to be the next secretary of state, was warmly welcomed by senators from both parties at his confirmation hearing on Wednesday. He has served for years on the Foreign Relations and Intelligence Committees in the Senate, and is known as a lawmaker devoted to the details of foreign policy.

“I believe you have the skills and are well qualified to serve as secretary of state,” Senator Jeanne Shaheen, Democrat of Hampshire, said in her opening remarks.

The notable lack of tension at the hearing indicated that Mr. Rubio would almost certainly be confirmed quickly.

From the lines of questioning, it was clear what senators want Mr. Rubio and the Trump administration to focus on: China, Russia, North Korea and Iran. Mr. Rubio himself pointed to those four powers — what some call an “axis” — in his opening remarks.

They “sow chaos and instability and align with and fund radical terror groups, then hide behind their veto power at the United Nations and the threat of nuclear war,” he said. As permanent members of the U.N. Security Council, China and Russia have veto power over U.N. resolutions.

Advertisement

Mr. Rubio repeatedly singled out the Chinese Communist Party for criticism, and, unlike Mr. Trump, he had no praise for any of the autocrats running those nations.

He did say the administration’s official policy on Ukraine would be to try to end the war that President Vladimir V. Putin of Russia started, and that leaders in both Kyiv and Moscow would need to make concessions. U.S. officials say Russia has drawn its allies and partners into the war, relying on North Korea for troops and arms, Iran for weapons and training, and China for a rebuilding of the Russian defense industrial base.

Mr. Rubio defended Israel’s conduct in the war in Gaza, blaming Hamas for using civilians as human shields and calling the deaths of tens of thousands of Palestinians in Gaza, most of them non-combatants, “one of the terrible things about war.”

He expressed concern about threats to Israel’s security. “You cannot coexist with armed elements at your border who seek your destruction and evisceration, as a state. You just can’t,” he said.

When asked whether he believed Israel’s annexing Palestinian territory would be contrary to peace and security in the Middle East, Mr. Rubio did not give a direct answer, calling it “a very complex issue.”

Advertisement

Mr. Rubio’s hearing was about two hours in when the committee’s chairman announced that Israel and Hamas had sealed an agreement to begin a temporary cease-fire and partial hostage release in Gaza. An initial hostage and cease-fire agreement, reached in November 2023, fell apart after a week.

Mr. Rubio called the North Atlantic Treaty Organization, which Mr. Trump has repeatedly criticized, “a very important alliance” and insisted that Mr. Trump was a NATO supporter. But he also backed Mr. Trump’s argument that a strong NATO requires Europe to spend more money on its collective defense.

The United States, he said, must choose whether it will serve “a primary defense role or a backstop” to a self-reliant Europe.

Some prominent Trump supporters remain distrustful of Mr. Rubio. They recall his vote to certify the 2020 election results despite Mr. Trump’s false claims of election fraud. And they consider Mr. Rubio’s foreign policy record dangerously interventionist.

Mr. Rubio has long been a hawkish voice on national security issues, often in ways that clash with Mr. Trump’s views, even if the ideas are conventional ones among centrist Republican and Democratic politicians.

Advertisement

In the past, Senator Rand Paul, Republican of Kentucky, has criticized Mr. Rubio for advocating aggressive American intervention overseas. Mr. Paul has been outspoken in pushing for less use of U.S. troops abroad and is skeptical about whether economic sanctions can lead to positive outcomes.

On Wednesday, Mr. Paul pointedly asked Mr. Rubio whether he saw any way to work with China rather then persisting in attacks on Beijing, and he also questioned the wisdom of many American and European policymakers who insisted that Ukraine must be admitted to NATO.

Continue Reading

Trending