Connect with us

News

What to know about the big law firms in Donald Trump’s crosshairs

Published

on

What to know about the big law firms in Donald Trump’s crosshairs

Several large law firms have found themselves in President Donald Trump’s crosshairs since his return to the White House in January.

Newsweek reached out to each of these firms for comment via email.

Why It Matters

Trump is facing two new legal challenges from Jenner & Block and WilmerHale on Friday over executive orders aiming to suspend security clearances of their attorneys and prohibit their employees from accessing federal buildings. He has issued orders against several major law firms that have previously been critical of his actions.

What to Know

Jenner & Block and WilmerHale filed separate complaints in federal court asking judges to block these orders on Friday, raising concerns that they are an unconstitutional attempt to punish them for their past advocacy.

President Donald Trump appears in the White House on January 30, 2025.

Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images

He previously targeted two other law firms, Perkins Coie, and Paul, Weiss with similar orders.

Advertisement

Here is an overview of each of these cases.

Jenner & Block

Jenner & Block, a law firm with offices across the United States that has faced scrutiny from the Trump administration for hiring Andrew Weissmann, a lawyer who served on special counsel Robert Mueller’s team that probed Trump during his first term.

Mueller investigated alleged Russian influence on the 2016 presidential election. Trump has denied any wrongdoing and has described the case as politically motivated.

“Andrew Weissmann’s career has been rooted in weaponized government and abuse of power, including devastating tens of thousands of American families who worked for the now defunct Arthur Andersen LLP, only to have his unlawfully aggressive prosecution overturned by the Supreme Court,” Trump wrote in his executive order.

The firm slammed the order as an “an unconstitutional abuse of power against lawyers, their clients, and the legal system.”

Advertisement

“It is intended to hamper the ability of individuals and businesses to have the lawyers of their choice zealously represent them,” the firm wrote in their lawsuit against the president. “And it is intended to coerce law firms and lawyers into renouncing the Administration’s critics and ceasing certain representations adverse to the government.”

WilmerHale

The order against WilmerHale accused the firm of engaging in “obvious partisan representations to achieve political ends,” efforts to discriminate based on race and its alleged stance on immigration policies. It also raised concerns about its hiring of Mueller and some of his aides.

Mueller, like Wiessmann, rejoined the firm in 2021 after the investigation, but he has since retired.

“While most litigation requires discovery to unearth retaliatory motive, the Order makes no secret of its intent to punish WilmerHale for its past and current representations of clients before the Nation’s courts and for its perceived connection to the views that Mr. Mueller expressed as Special Counsel,” the firm’s case says, according to The Associated Press.

Perkins Coie

Trump’s executive order against Perkins Coie was released earlier this year, and court proceedings are ongoing. Judge Beryll Howell has blocked the administration from enforcing the order, and Trump’s attorneys are trying to have her removed from the case.

Advertisement

Similar to other cases, Trump raised concerns about its ties to investigations into his alleged ties to Russia in his executive order. Perkins Coie has said it’s suffering financial fallout from the order after clients with government contracts ended their legal arrangements with the firm.

“This executive order takes a wrecking ball to the rule of law, to the principles that promote democracy, Dane Butswinkas, an attorney representing Perkins Coie, previously said of the case.

Paul, Weiss

Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison LLP a firm with more than 2,000 attorneys, earlier in March capitulated to Trump, agreeing too give $40 million in free legal aid to charities he supports and end diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI) programs to continue winning government contracts.

He has since lifted the ban on the firm receiving federal contracts.

Trump’s case against the firm pointed to its employment of Mark Pomerantz, who was previously involved in parts of Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg’s investigation into hush money payments allegedly made to adult film actor Stormy Daniels. Trump was found guilty in the case last year but is appealing the ruling. He pleaded not guilty to the charges and said the case was politically motivated.

Advertisement

What People Are Saying

Harrison Fields, the White House deputy press secretary, to Newsweek on Friday: “Democrats and their law firms weaponized the legal process to try to punish and jail their political opponents. The President’s executive orders are lawful directives to ensure that the President’s agenda is implemented and that law firms comply with the law.”

Former federal prosecutor Joyce White Vance in a Substack post Friday: “Expect more from the law firms. The increasing swiftness of the responses show that they now anticipate and understand that they are under attack from a previously unthinkable place, the White House. The Wilmer Hale firm filed their lawsuit less than a full day after Trump took action against them. These firms are prepared to fight it out in the one place where Trump can be forced to listen: The courts.”

What Happens Next

These legal cases are set to continue in the coming weeks and months.

Advertisement

News

Algae clouded Trump’s vision for the Reflecting Pool. But scientists aren’t surprised

Published

on

Algae clouded Trump’s vision for the Reflecting Pool. But scientists aren’t surprised

Algae turns the newly repainted Lincoln Memorial Reflecting Pool green on the National Mall on Tuesday in Washington, DC.

Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images


hide caption

toggle caption

Advertisement

Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images

WASHINGTON — The Lincoln Memorial reflecting pool is once again making headlines, this week for turning green.

The Washington, D.C. landmark was refilled with water earlier this month after President Trump had its neutral grey bottom repainted “American flag blue.” The multi-million dollar project produced subtle results in the eyes of many observers, even as Trump and Secretary of the Interior Doug Burgum — whose agency managed the renovation — touted its success.

In recent days, however, the pool has taken on a verdant hue — the result of algae blooms that experts say are to be expected in these conditions.

Advertisement

“It’s called ‘New Pond Syndrome,’” says Steve Goodale, a Canadian swimming pool specialist known online as “Swimming Pool Steve.” “It’s a known thing that happens when you take a natural, clear body of water like this that sits in an open air environment and you try to start it up, very often you end up with green water almost immediately.”

Goodale says the process took longer — a matter of days — to unfold in this case likely due to the sheer size of the pool, which measures 2,030 feet long and has a surface area of approximately 338,000 square feet.

“Excellent conditions” for algae growth

Rosalina Stancheva Christova, a professor of aquatic ecology at George Mason University in Virginia, took water samples from the pool on Tuesday. She confirmed the algae belongs to the genus Desmodesmus, which she said is “growing in excessive amounts” but is not toxic or harmful.

Christova says this kind of common green algae is found all over the region, especially this time of year. The reflecting pool in particular provides “excellent conditions” for algae growth, she said: shallow, stagnant water, strong sunlight and no shade.

“It could happen every single summer,” she added. “But it seems that the disturbance of the pond during the renovations [is] accelerating this process.”

Advertisement

Christova said last month’s renovations may have affected the balance of nutrients in the pool, potentially accelerating the algae blooms. Goodale similarly views the resurfacing as one of several contributing factors.

“The new, darker interior surface is going to absorb more sunlight,” Goodale says. “It is going to result in water that’s warmer, and that ultimately is going to lead to more prolific algae growth.”

A microscopic slide shows the Desmodesmus algae that quickly turned the Reflecting Pool's water green. The new dark blue paint of the pool's lining makes the water warmer and friendlier to the algae growth.

A microscopic slide shows the Desmodesmus algae that quickly turned the Reflecting Pool’s water green. The new dark blue paint of the pool’s lining makes the water warmer and friendlier to the algae growth.

Rosalina Stancheva Christova, PhD.


hide caption

Advertisement

toggle caption

Rosalina Stancheva Christova, PhD.

The Trump administration has said the algae came from residual material in supply lines that had lain dormant for weeks. Their growth was likely exacerbated by the extreme temperatures that hit D.C. last week, bringing heat index values to 95 degrees and above.

Continue Reading

News

San Francisco Film Patrons Are Found Dead on Side of Highway

Published

on

San Francisco Film Patrons Are Found Dead on Side of Highway

Three San Francisco couples set out Monday for their annual road trip to Ashland, Ore., for the town’s famous Shakespeare festival. They drove separately and planned to meet at 6:30 p.m. on the terrace of their favorite Japanese restaurant there.

They had booked a table for six, but only four showed up for dinner.

Judith and Wylie Sheldon were found dead in their running car on the side of the road to Oregon, shocking their friends and family and leaving a hole in San Francisco’s arts and film world.

Ms. Sheldon, 84, was the daughter of William Wyler — who won three Oscars for best director — and chaired the board of the San Francisco Silent Film Festival. Mr. Sheldon, 86, was a prominent lawyer.

David Smith, who had befriended the couple more than 40 years ago, said in an interview that he and the others at the dinner table had grown nervous as time ticked on and their friends did not answer repeated calls to their cellphones. They learned they had not checked into their hotel either.

Advertisement

The friends eventually learned from one of the couple’s sons that the California Highway Patrol had found the couple at 5:46 p.m., both dead inside their running Jeep Compass. It was parked on the side of Interstate 5, north of Redding, Calif., more than 100 miles from their destination, the authorities said. Ms. Sheldon was driving, while Mr. Sheldon was in the passenger seat, according to the authorities.

The Redding area on Monday was under an extreme heat warning issued by the National Weather Service. Temperatures reached 109 degrees, according to the Weather Service.

Mr. Smith said he learned from the son that the couple had been found without any water or other liquids in the car. The fan was on high, but the air conditioning was not working, meaning they might have been blasted with hot air, Mr. Smith said. The windows were rolled down. The car had plenty of gas, and there were no signs of mechanical failure or foul play, Mr. Smith said the son told him.

“They didn’t crash. They stopped. They both just died there,” Mr. Smith said. “The entire thing is so bizarre. We’re still in a state of shock.”

The circumstances and cause of the couple’s death is under investigation but “appears to be medically related,” the Highway Patrol said in a statement.

Advertisement

Whether the heat contributed to the couple’s death “may be determined” by an autopsy, a spokesman for the Shasta County Sheriff’s Office said, adding that one had not been scheduled yet and could take several weeks to complete.

“We’ll just have to see,” the spokesman, Tim Mapes, said.

The Sheldons met at Stanford University and had two sons. They lived in a large home in San Francisco’s upscale Pacific Heights neighborhood that had views of the bay from the front and a garden out back.

They hosted many parties there on behalf of the San Francisco Silent Film Festival and sometimes let revelers pose for photos with Mr. Wyler’s Oscar statuettes. Ms. Sheldon fell in love with silent movies after first seeing those created by her father — before his better known blockbusters like “Ben-Hur” and “Roman Holiday” — only about 30 years ago, said Anita Monga, artistic director of the festival.

Stacey Wisnia, the festival’s executive director, said the couple was generous, delightful and unassuming.

Advertisement

Back in Ashland, Ore., Mr. Smith said the four remaining friends had distracted themselves from their grief by attending plays, including “A Midsummer Night’s Dream” and “Come From Away.” They were able to give away their friends’ tickets.

Ms. Monga had last seen Ms. Sheldon just last month at the film festival, which was held at the newly remade Castro Theater.

“This is such a shock,” Ms. Monga said of the deaths. “Also because it’s still a mystery.”

Continue Reading

News

Luigi Mangione’s lawyers withdraw plans for psychiatric defense

Published

on

Luigi Mangione’s lawyers withdraw plans for psychiatric defense

Luigi Mangione appears for a pretrial hearing at Manhattan Criminal Court in New York, June 17, 2026.

Angelina Katsanis/AP


hide caption

toggle caption

Advertisement

Angelina Katsanis/AP

New York — In a dramatic reversal, Luigi Mangione’s legal team on Thursday backed away from a plan to use a psychiatric defense when his case goes to trial in state court in September. Mangione has pleaded not guilty to murdering health insurance CEO Brian Thompson in 2024 on a Manhattan street.

At a hearing only a day earlier before state Judge Gregory Carro, Mangione’s attorneys confirmed that Mangione had been undergoing psychiatric evaluation. They signaled that his defense would be based at least in part on the argument that Mangione was experiencing “extreme emotional disturbance.”

But in a one-line letter sent to Carro on Thursday, Mangione’s team said that “at this time” they no longer intend to introduce psychiatric evidence during the trial. It’s unclear what sparked the shift. Mangione’s team didn’t respond to NPR’s request for comment.

Advertisement

Former Manhattan prosecutor and legal analyst Gary Galperin told NPR it was a “stunning reversal” for Mangione to withdraw from the psychiatric defense. “One can only speculate at this point as to the reasons,” he said.

“What remains, of course, at this point is the question of what defense they will pursue at trial,” he added.

This maneuver came after Carro ordered Mangione’s attorneys to quickly share psychiatric information with prosecutors.

“They need to know what the malady is that this defendant suffers and how that triggered extreme emotional distress,” he said, during Wednesday’s hearing. “I’m not going to let you surprise people on the eve of trial. Get it done.”

Assistant Manhattan District Attorney Joel Seidemann repeatedly complained that Mangione’s team was “stonewalling” the prosecution by withholding medical information about his psychiatric state. “We have gotten nothing,” Seidemann said.

Advertisement

Mangione’s lead attorney Karen Friedman Agnifilo denied her team was delaying the court process or improperly withholding information.

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending