Connect with us

News

Trump’s attack on the enemy within will delight America’s real foes

Published

on

Trump’s attack on the enemy within will delight America’s real foes

Unlock the White House Watch newsletter for free

We all know the slogan. But Donald Trump will not make America great again by waging war on his domestic enemies. Instead Trump’s vengeance campaign threatens the real foundations of American greatness.

The American military, the country’s leading universities, the Federal Reserve, the justice system, the free press, the scientific establishment, even the health of American citizens are all at risk. The president-elect has nominated vengeful crackpots to key positions and promised to let people like Robert F Kennedy Jr “go wild”.

The damage that Trump’s policies could inflict on America will delight the country’s real enemies in Moscow and Beijing. They know from their own histories that when a nation turns on itself, its international power can collapse.

Advertisement

Trump’s Maga shock troops believe that they can only make their country great again by first destroying their internal enemies. Trump has said the “enemy from within” is “more dangerous” than Russia and China. His appointees are willing to turn America’s institutions upside down in the pursuit of vengeance.

Pete Hegseth, Trump’s nominee as defence secretary, has written that “sometimes the fight must begin with a struggle against domestic enemies”. In a podcast, he demanded: “Any general, any admiral . . . that was involved in diversity, equity and inclusion programmes or woke shit has got to go.”

Reports are already circulating that Trump plans to establish a “warrior board” empowered to force out senior military officers, replacing them with loyalists. His team are also reportedly considering court-martialling some military leaders for their roles in the chaotic US withdrawal from Afghanistan.

In his first term, Trump was enraged when “his” generals insisted that their loyalty was to the constitution, not to him personally. Senior officers resisted Trump’s demands for the deployment of troops on American streets in the Black Lives Matter protests.

This time Trump will want absolute obedience from his newly promoted corporals and colonels, particularly if he intends to deploy the military to carry out the mass deportation of illegal immigrants. But purging your most senior generals can leave a country vulnerable and its military confused.

Advertisement

America’s intelligence services are also at risk. Trump’s nominee for the job of director of national intelligence, Tulsi Gabbard, is noted for her sympathy for Syria’s Bashar al-Assad and Vladimir Putin in Russia. She has consistently echoed Russian propaganda, suggesting that Nato expansion was responsible for Russia’s invasion of Ukraine and that the US was running secret bio-labs inside Ukraine. Her appointment will cause consternation among American allies, Britain foremost among them, which routinely share intelligence with the US.

American science and medicine lead the world. But Trump proposes to put a conspiracy theorist in charge of the health and human services department. Even the Trump-supporting New York Post concluded, after meeting Robert F Kennedy Jr, that he was “nuts on a lot of fronts”. If RFK imposes his vaccine hostility on the US as a whole, he will sow the seeds of future epidemics.

Seven of the world’s top 10 universities are in the US. But America’s institutes of learning are also on Trump’s enemies list. His allies claim that the universities are bastions of “wokeness” and antisemitism. Bill Ackman, a Trump-supporting financier, recently opined that Yale was “no different than Hamas”. The attack on wokeness can be used as a battering ram to try to cow the universities into submission on a wider range of issues. Over time, America could see a threat to the intellectual liberty on which great universities depend.

Press freedom, something that truly distinguishes America from its autocratic rivals, is also menaced. Trump has filed a series of lawsuits against media outlets that have displeased him — a favourite tactic of authoritarian regimes.

Trump regards independent institutions of any sort as a threat. There is widespread speculation that his administration will attempt to sack Jay Powell, head of the Federal Reserve. Powell has reminded journalists that Trump is “not permitted under law” to force him out.

Advertisement

But Trump has his own ideas about the rule of law. Matt Gaetz, his nominee for attorney-general, was under investigation by his Republican colleagues for alleged ethics violations that include having sex with a minor. Gaetz, who has denied the allegations, claims to believe that he, like Trump is the victim of a politicised justice system. Other close confidants of Trump, like Steve Bannon and Peter Navarro, have recently emerged from prison.

These are angry men, who may be intent on revenge. They could use the justice system to go after their enemies. That will be bad news not just for the individuals who get caught up in the witch hunt, but for the whole country.

American greatness is founded on the rule of law. That is a fundamental reason why foreigners trust American assets and the dollar as the world’s reserve currency. If Trump uses the justice system to go after his enemies — and to reward his billionaire cronies — then investors could rightly take fright.

Rather than making America great again, Trump’s assault on US institutions will make America more like Russia and China. Putin and Xi Jinping will benefit. Americans and America’s allies will suffer the consequences.

gideon.rachman@ft.com

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

News

They disagree about a lot, but these singers figure out how to stay in harmony

Published

on

They disagree about a lot, but these singers figure out how to stay in harmony

The North Fork Community Choir practices at the North Fork Baptist Church in Paonia, Colo., on Nov. 6 — the day after Election Day.

Luna Anna Archey for NPR


hide caption

toggle caption

Advertisement

Luna Anna Archey for NPR

Over the last few years and through this year’s contentious campaign season, which was rooted in America’s deep divisions, there has been a coarsening in the way people talk to each other. We wanted to explore how some are trying to bridge divides. We asked our reporters across the NPR Network to look for examples of people working through their differences. We’re sharing those stories in our series Seeking Common Ground.

PAONIA, Colo. — On a Wednesday night at a spacious, contemporary-looking church on the edge of Paonia, a small town in western Colorado, the 40 or so members of the North Fork Community Choir ran through their regular warmups.

“Really pay attention to that ‘E’ vowel,” said music director Stephanie Helleckson, as she guided the singers through various scales and arpeggios from behind a music stand. “See if you can make that a little bit rounder as a group.”

Advertisement

Helleckson listened carefully to how the singers’ voices blend; the details matter in an art form that’s all about achieving harmony.

Helleckson, who comes from a musical family and has spent most of her life in Paonia, said harmony is important — not just musically, but also socially.

“Because we’re all coming from different backgrounds and different perspectives, and we’re coming together to do something together, we have to learn how to not agree with somebody, but still work with them,” said the vivacious and businesslike music director.

A view of Paonia, Colo., and the surrounding West Elk Mountains.

A view of Paonia, Colo., and the surrounding West Elk Mountains.

Luna Anna Archey for NPR


hide caption

Advertisement

toggle caption

Luna Anna Archey for NPR

The North Fork Community Choir is based in a part of the country where the politics are all over the map.

The North Fork Community Choir is based in a part of the country where the politics are all over the map.

Luna Anna Archey for NPR

Advertisement


hide caption

toggle caption

Luna Anna Archey for NPR

Advertisement
Paonia has farming and ranching families, artists, winemakers, remote workers — and a mix of political views, one choir member says.

Paonia has farming and ranching families, artists, winemakers, remote workers — and a mix of political views, one choir member says.

Luna Anna Archey for NPR


hide caption

toggle caption

Luna Anna Archey for NPR

Advertisement

The North Fork is an ideologically diverse community

Cooperation is not a given, since the North Fork Community Choir is based in a part of the country where the politics are all over the map. The singers have had to come up with creative ways to continue to sing in harmony.

We’ve got people from pretty far right to pretty far left in the chorus,” said choir member Jan Tuin.

Tuin has been living in the area since 1964. He said his dad, an auto body repairman, moved the family from near Denver in search of a slower pace of life. Over coffee at Paonia Books, a hip, newish bookstore and cafe in downtown Paonia, Tuin said the mining, farming and ranching families who’ve been around for generations have in recent decades been joined by an influx of artists, winemakers and remote workers in fields like tech.

Choir member Jan Tuin, who helped found the first community singing group in the area, at his home in Hotchkiss, Colo.

Choir member Jan Tuin, who helped found the first community singing group in the area, at his home in Hotchkiss, Colo.

Luna Anna Archey for NPR

Advertisement


hide caption

toggle caption

Luna Anna Archey for NPR

Advertisement

“And so the people here now are much more diverse, I would say,” Tuin said.

Nearly everyone in the choir is white, reflecting the area’s racial demographics. But the members range in age from 11 to 87. Some of the singers believe in God; others do not. Some own guns; others do not. When the choir required masks and/or vaccines for rehearsals at various points during the COVID-19 pandemic in accordance with federal recommendations, some were happy to comply. But at least one member quit.

Tuin said people avoid bringing up potentially controversial topics during rehearsal. “We talk about our gardens a lot,” he said, laughing.

No matter their politics and values, all of the 20 or so singers NPR spoke with for this story said they focus on music-making as a uniting force and as a way to at least temporarily forget differences. This includes choir members Mary Bachran, the recently retired mayor of blue-leaning Paonia (“We make harmonies together. It’s just so wonderful.”) and Chris Johnson, the recently appointed mayor of red-leaning Crawford, a nearby ranching community. (“We’re just all there to sing.”)

Advertisement
Mary Bachran, community choir member and former mayor, in downtown Paonia, Colo.

Mary Bachran, community choir member and former mayor, in downtown Paonia, Colo.

Luna Anna Archey for NPR


hide caption

toggle caption

Luna Anna Archey for NPR

Advertisement

Everything’s not good in “America”

Yet the music itself sometimes draws the differences out.

The choir’s Broadway program back in the spring is a case in point. It involved medleys from well-known musicals such as My Fair Lady, Rent, Pippin, Dear Evan Hansen — and West Side Story.

The song “America” from the latter, which premiered in 1957, might be one of the most famous in the American musical canon. But some of the lyrics describing Puerto Rico as an “ugly island” rife with disease and poverty did not sit well with singers like Ellie Roberts.

“I really struggled with that because it sort of implies that Puerto Rico stinks and why wouldn’t they leave?” Roberts said. “And it just sort of encouraged some of those stereotypes.”

Advertisement

Roberts, a local schoolteacher, said the chorus discussed the issue at rehearsal. “What are we celebrating and what do we not want to celebrate?” she said.

They thought about changing the lyrics, but ended up doing the song with a disclaimer that music director Helleckson made from the stage.

“You have to think about context for this piece,” Helleckson said in a video of the performance captured in May. “This piece has some things that are maybe not as acceptable in today’s day and age as they were when it first came out.”

The North Fork Community Choir practices at the North Fork Baptist Church in Paonia, Colo.

The North Fork Community Choir practices at the North Fork Baptist Church in Paonia, Colo.

Luna Anna Archey for NPR


hide caption

Advertisement

toggle caption

Luna Anna Archey for NPR

Music director Stephanie Helleckson, who has spent most of her life in Paonia, leads community choir practice at the church.

Music director Stephanie Helleckson, who has spent most of her life in Paonia, leads community choir practice at the church.

Luna Anna Archey for NPR

Advertisement


hide caption

toggle caption

Luna Anna Archey for NPR

Advertisement
During community choir practice at the North Fork Baptist Church in Paonia.

During community choir practice at the North Fork Baptist Church in Paonia.

Luna Anna Archey for NPR


hide caption

toggle caption

Luna Anna Archey for NPR

Advertisement

“Master of the House” an issue too

Meanwhile, other members of the ensemble brought up a different concern to do with the raucous showstopper from Les Misérables, “Master of the House.”

In the song, a seedy innkeeper and his entourage of petty criminals invoke Jesus as they fleece their customers.

“It bothered me, because I did not want to use the Lord’s name that way,” said singer Kim Johnson, a Christian counselor. Johnson said she and some others from the group discussed the matter with Helleckson and came up with alternatives to singing “Jesus.”

“I sang ‘cheeses’ instead of ‘Jesus,’” said Johnson. “It worked.”

Advertisement

Pushing boundaries to launch conversations

Helleckson said she knew the Broadway program would be a little bit provocative.

“It’s pushing boundaries that some people are not comfortable with in our little rural pocket of America,” Helleckson said. “And so part of programming some of this music is to actually have those conversations. So we don’t just assume that everybody’s the same as us and everybody believes the same things and acts the same way.”

According to a Chorus America report assessing the impact of group singing, choir members are more adaptable and tolerant of others than the general population. “Almost two-thirds of singers (63%) believe participating in a chorus has made them more open to and accepting of people who are different from them or hold different views,” the study noted.

New York University sociology professor Eric Klinenberg said the mere act of coming together to undertake a regular, shared activity with others, such as choral singing, can promote bridge-building. But it’s possible for such groups to go further.

“If your objective is to just get a group of people together to sing well, forget about everything else in the world, maybe you don’t need to encourage those other conversations about politics,” said Klinenberg, who studies how people gather and connect both within and across ideological lines. 

Advertisement

But, he said, if the objective is also to create a more decent society and bridge differences by using the relationships that you build while making music together as a foundation of trust to advance a conversation about something like politics, “that could be an amazing thing.”

Choir member Chris Johnson, the recently appointed mayor of Crawford, Colo., says:

Choir member Chris Johnson, the recently appointed mayor of Crawford, Colo., says: “We’re just all there to sing.”

Luna Anna Archey for NPR


hide caption

toggle caption

Advertisement

Luna Anna Archey for NPR

Choir members hug at practice the day after Election Day.

Choir members hug at practice the day after Election Day.

Luna Anna Archey for NPR


hide caption

Advertisement

toggle caption

Luna Anna Archey for NPR

Small steps toward greater understanding

In a small way, the issues that arose with the Broadway concert point toward this aspiration. Choir member Chris Johnson, for example, said he didn’t have a problem with West Side Story. But he doesn’t fault those who pushed for the disclaimer.

“I don’t think that explanation was necessary, but it’s OK,” he said.

Advertisement

And singer Linda Talbott said her mind has been expanded as a result of the faith-based objections other singers in the group had to Les Mis.

“I think I’m much more aware now of what could be objectionable to certain people,” she said. “I don’t think I thought about it. There it was in front of me, I wanted to sing it, and I did.” 

Helleckson said she would like to continue to program more material that inspires these types of conversations.

The North Fork Community Choir has been prepping for upcoming holiday performances.

The North Fork Community Choir has been prepping for upcoming holiday performances.

Luna Anna Archey for NPR


hide caption

Advertisement

toggle caption

Luna Anna Archey for NPR

In the meantime, the ensemble is prepping for a pair of holiday performances of Handel’s Messiah. The singers said the music is challenging. But so far it’s not been too controversial.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

News

Trump expands search for Treasury secretary

Published

on

Trump expands search for Treasury secretary

Unlock the White House Watch newsletter for free

Donald Trump has expanded his search for a Treasury secretary to serve in his second-term cabinet, throwing the contest for top economic official into confusion as he struggles to settle on a choice.

The Republican president-elect had been weighing whether to offer the job to Scott Bessent, a hedge fund manager, or Howard Lutnick, the co-chair of his transition effort and chief executive of Cantor Fitzgerald, the financial firm. But at the weekend, Trump moved to widen the net of possible alternatives.

People close to the process say Kevin Warsh, a former Federal Reserve Governor, Marc Rowan, the chief executive of Apollo Global Management, and Bill Hagerty, the Tennessee senator, are now also in the running, along with Robert Lighthizer, the former US trade representative under Trump.

Advertisement

Trump has announced a string of potential appointments over the past week in the areas of national security, justice, health and energy but has held back on making any decisions on the top economic positions so far.

Trump’s advisers are seeking assurances from the top candidates to be Treasury secretary that they are committed to his sweeping plans to raise tariffs, people close to the discussions said.

Elon Musk, the billionaire investor who has emerged as one of Trump’s top allies, weighed in over the weekend in favour of Lutnick over Bessent. Musk, who sat next to Trump at a UFC championship fight in New York on Saturday night, wrote on X that “Bessent is a business-as-usual choice, whereas @howardlutnick will actually enact change”. 

Since Trump was elected, Bessent has been on the defensive about his commitment to enacting the president’s economic vision. In an opinion piece for Fox News last week, he described tariffs are “a means to finally stand up for Americans”.

But his critics have seized on comments to the Financial Times — that the agenda represented ‘maximalist’ positions that were negotiating tools — as a sign he would be soft on the issue.

Advertisement

Trump’s aides are reluctant to repeat the tensions over trade in his first administration, in which Steven Mnuchin, then Treasury secretary, frequently sought to moderate the tariff plans for fear of disrupting markets.

Several people familiar with the discussions inside Trump’s team said Lighthizer, who served as US trade representative in the first administration, had previously expressed interest in becoming Treasury secretary. 

On Sunday, the Coalition for a Prosperous America, a pro-tariff think-tank, backed Lighthizer publicly for Treasury secretary. 

“The next Treasury secretary must be 100 per cent aligned with President-elect Trump’s policy on tariffs,” it said in a post on X. “Former USTR Robert Lighthizer is a steadfast champion for the US economy and the best choice to carry out President Trump’s trade agenda,” it added. 

Tariffs have long been central to Trump’s plans to boost US manufacturing, create jobs and lower prices.

Advertisement

He has described it as the “most beautiful word in the dictionary” and the “greatest thing ever invented”. He has also billed such levies as an effective way to cover the costs of other pillars of his economic agenda, including large tax cuts for Americans. 

In addition to 60 per cent tariffs on all Chinese imports, Trump has floated a universal tariff of up to 20 per cent on all goods coming into the US. 

Whoever Trump selects as his Treasury secretary will be instrumental — along with the top US trade official — in both putting these policies into action as well as managing the economic ramifications.

Reporting by James Politi, Colby Smith, Demetri Sevastopulo and Stefania Palma in Washington and Antoine Gara and James Fontanella-Khan in New York

Advertisement
Continue Reading

News

Gaetz-gate: Navigating the President-elect's most baffling Cabinet pick

Published

on

Gaetz-gate: Navigating the President-elect's most baffling Cabinet pick

Former Rep. Matt Gaetz, R-Fla., may be done with Congress. But Congress is not done with him. And as President-elect Trump’s pick to serve as Attorney General, Gaetz is apparently not done with Congress, either.

Gaetz negotiated with Mr. Trump to become Attorney General on a flight to Florida – just hours after the incoming President spoke to House Republicans in Washington last week. Mr. Trump then made Gaetz his pick and the Florida Republican resigned.

What wasn’t known at the time was that the House Ethics Committee was on the precipice of releasing a report investigating allegations of “sexual misconduct” and “illicit drug use” by Gaetz. Gaetz stopped cooperating with the House investigation over the summer. The FBI probed Gaetz for years – but dropped its inquiry in February.

The Ethics Committee dashed a planned meeting where it likely would have published information about its inquest regarding Gaetz on Friday. But since Gaetz is no longer a Member of Congress, the committee supposedly is powerless to act.

THE HITCHHIKER’S GUIDE TO POTENTIALLY RELEASING THE ETHICS COMMITTEE REPORT ON GAETZ

Advertisement

With Rep. Matt Gaetz, R-Fla., named President-elect Trump’s unlikely pick for Attorney General, a glaring question looms ahead: what will become of the Ethics Committee’s report on alleged improprieties by the congressman? (Mario Tama/Getty Images)

House Ethics Committee Chairman Michael Guest, R-Miss., said the following on Wednesday when asked about the Gaetz probe – but before the Florida Republican resigned.

“Once the investigation is complete, then a report will be issued – assuming that at that time, that Mr. Gaetz is still a Member of Congress. If Mr. Gaetz were to resign because he is taking a position with the administration as the Attorney General then the Ethics Committee loses jurisdiction at that point. Once we lose jurisdiction, there would not be a report that would be issued. That’s not unique to this case,” said Guest.

Other Ethics Committee members tried to sidestep discussion of Gaetz.

“I’m not making any comments on that. I’m on the Ethics Committee so I’m staying clear of that,” said Rep. John Rutherford, R-Fla.

Advertisement

“Can you still release the report?” asked Rachel Scott of ABC.

“Nope. Sure can’t,” replied Rutherford, turning toward Scott.

A NARROW MARGIN: TRUMP TAPS HOUSE REPUBLICANS FOR HIS SECOND ADMINISTRATION

That is generally how the House Ethics Committee rolls when it comes to outstanding investigations involving former Members.

But it is not a hard and fast rule.

Advertisement

Fox has found that the Ethics Committee released the information on its probe into potential influence peddling by the late Rep. John Murtha, D-Penn., after his death in 2010.

John Murtha and Bill Boner

The House Ethics Committee has reportedly released its findings on former Reps. John Murtha, D-Penn., and Bill Boner, D-Tenn., after their departures from office. (Scott J. Ferrell/Congressional Quarterly/Getty Images | CQ Roll Call via Getty Images)

The Ethics Committee also released a 699-page report on former Rep. Bill Boner, D-Tenn., after he left office in 1987. The committee found that Boner used campaign funds to travel to Hong Kong and may have used his office to influence a defense contractor.

The Ethics Committee investigated former Rep. Mark Foley, R-Fla., after he was caught sending inappropriate messages to House pages in 2006. Foley abruptly resigned from the House. But the ethics panel hauled in a host of bipartisan Congressional leaders for closed door depositions to determine what they may have known about Foley’s activities.

That said, there is a way on the floor to dislodge an Ethics Committee report.

WHAT HAPPENS TO THE GAETZ HOUSE ETHICS REPORT?

Advertisement

There is a mechanism called “question of privileges of the House.” A lawmaker could take the floor under this procedure, making the argument that keeping the Gaetz ethics report under wraps impugns the dignity and integrity of the House. The House would be required to vote on such a motion. If successful on the floor, the ethics panel could be compelled to release the report.

Yours truly asked House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries, D-N.Y., if Democrats might try to dislodge the Gaetz report from the Ethics Committee.

Pergram: “Could you envision a scenario where Democrats try to somehow dislodge this ethics report through a parliamentary maneuver?”

Hakeem Jeffries speaking

I asked House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries, D-N.Y., if his party planned on finding a way to dislodge the Gaetz report from the Ethics Committee. (Drew Angerer/Getty Images)

Jeffries: “The Ethics Committee is an incredibly bipartisan committee. It’s the only committee in the Congress that is evenly divided. And it has a long history of having principled individuals on it. And I defer at this moment to whatever course they decide to take. And I hope they take a course that is bipartisan.”

The Senate Judiciary Committee will study the credentials of Gaetz, run background checks and ultimately hold a confirmation hearing before voting the nomination to the floor for a vote. It could also block the nomination as well.

Advertisement

Senate Majority Whip and Judiciary Committee Chairman Dick Durbin, D-Ill., formally asked the House Ethics Committee to send over the report as it reviews the fitness of Gaetz for the job.

MATT GAETZ’S NOMINATION ROCKS CAPITOL HILL

“The sequence and timing of Mr. Gaetz’s resignation from the House raises serious questions about the contents of the House Ethics Committee report,” said Durbin. “This information could be relevant to the question of Mr. Gaetz’s confirmation as the next Attorney General of the United States and our Constitutional responsibility to advise and consent.”

Democrats weren’t the only ones trying to pry loose the report.

“I think there should not be any limitation on the Senate Judiciary Committee’s investigation, including, whatever the House Ethics Committee generated,” said Sen. John Cornyn, R-Texas.

Advertisement
John Cornyn pointing

Sen. John Cornyn, R-Texas, seems keen to unearth the Gaetz report’s findings, saying there should “not be any limitation” on what the Senate Judiciary Committee can investigate. (Reuters)

Rep. Glenn Ivey, D-Md., serves on the Ethics Committee. He hinted that the panel should consider dispatching the report to the Senate.

“I think the Senate certainly had a right to request it. I can’t talk about our internal deliberations. But the information that they’ve requested, I think it’s totally reasonable,” said Ivey. “In fact, I think it’s essential for them to get that kind of information before they make a decision.”

On Friday, Johnson noted that he “doesn’t control the Ethics Committee.”

THE HITCHHIKER’S GUIDE TO THE MEANING OF A REPUBLICAN SENATE – AND WHAT’S AHEAD FOR THE HOUSE

But Johnson went further than he had before about his views on releasing the report.

Advertisement

“We should stick to the tradition of not releasing a report on a former Member of the House because it would open a dangerous Pandora’s box,” said Johnson.

Johnson reaffirmed that during an appearance on Fox News Sunday when asked about releasing the report.

Mike Johnson wearing glasses

House Speaker Mike Johnson, R-La., cautioned against releasing the Ethics Committee’s findings, citing precedent and the potential opening of a “dangerous Pandora’s Box.” (Getty Images)

“I think this would be a breach of protocol that could be dangerous for us going forward in the future,” said the Speaker.

It’s possible the Senate Judiciary Committee could subpoena the report from the Ethics Committee. And as suggested earlier, there is a way to dislodge the report from the panel via a vote on the House floor. Such a scenario would put a lot of Republicans in a tough spot. They may fear that voting to release the report could put them on the wrong side of incoming President Trump. That’s to say nothing of the prospective Attorney General.

But Gaetz isn’t liked by his former House colleagues. In fact, some Republicans may have more disdain for the former Florida Congressman than Democrats. That’s partly because it was Gaetz who single-handedly triggered a vote last year to remove former House Speaker Kevin McCarthy, R-Calif. That maneuver pitched the House into three weeks of chaos.

Advertisement

CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP

Gaetz is no longer a Member of the House. But that doesn’t matter. The fight over the ethics report is just getting started. And that’s spurring just as much pandemonium as if Gaetz were still a Member.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending