News
Trump Halts Billions in Grants for Democratic Districts During Shutdown
Two weeks into the government shutdown, the Trump administration has frozen or canceled nearly $28 billion that had been reserved for more than 200 projects primarily located in Democratic-led cities, congressional districts and states, according to an analysis by The New York Times.
By congressional district of grant recipient
Total amount of affected funding
Each of these infrastructure projects had received federal aid, sometimes after officials spent years pleading in Washington — only to see that money halted as President Trump has looked to punish Democrats over the course of the fiscal stalemate.
The Times conducted its analysis by examining federal funding records, which include details about the city and state where each grant recipient is based. The projects include new investments in clean energy, upgrades to the electric grid and fixes to the nation’s transportation infrastructure, primarily in Democratic strongholds, such as New York and California.
Ala.
Ariz.
Ark.
Calif.
Colo.
Del.
Fla.
Ga.
Idaho
Ill.
Ind.
Iowa
Kan.
Ky.
La.
Maine
Md.
Mass.
Mich.
Minn.
Miss.
Mo.
Mont.
Neb.
Nev.
N.H.
N.J.
N.M.
N.Y.
N.C.
N.D.
Ohio
Okla.
Ore.
Pa.
S.C.
S.D.
Tenn.
Texas
Utah
Vt.
Va.
Wash.
W.Va.
Wis.
Wyo.
Circles sized by total amount of affected grant funding
Total affected funding, by congressional district
In some cases, recipients had started to receive portions of the federal aid, only to become casualties in a funding battle that has no end in sight.
Mr. Trump’s aides have offered a series of explanations for the administration’s decision to pause or terminate grants, claiming in some cases that the spending would have been wasteful or in conflict with the president’s priorities. Since returning to office, Mr. Trump has been particularly aggressive in cutting federal investments to combat climate change.
But the budgetary moves coincide with the president’s public pledges to use the shutdown to slash spending favored by Democrats. He has described the federal stoppage as an “unprecedented opportunity” to make some cuts permanent.
Many Democrats said that the announcements fit a broader pattern at the White House, where Mr. Trump has claimed vast authority to reprogram the nation’s budget, even though the Constitution gives that power to Congress.
In doing so, Democratic lawmakers said the result could harm their cities and states, upending work that would have helped residents regardless of their political party.
The White House did not respond to requests for comment.
N.Y. 10th Dan Goldman Ill. 7th
Danny Davis Calif. 12th
Lateefah Simon Wash. 10th
Marilyn Strickland Calif. 7th
Doris Matsui Calif. 32th Brad Sherman Minn. 4th
Betty McCollum Ill. 3rd
Delia Ramirez Colo. 2nd
Joe Neguse Mass. 2nd
James McGovern Ore. 2nd Cliff Bentz Mass. 7th
Ayanna Pressley Mass. 5th
Katherine Clark Mo. 2nd
Ann Wagner N.Y. 20th
Paul Tonko Md. 7th Kweisi Mfume Calif. 2nd
Jared Huffman Calif. 16th
Sam Liccardo Colo. 7th
Brittany Pettersen Calif. 17th
Ro Khanna Minn. 5th Ilhan Omar Calif. 5th
Tom McClintock Ore. 1st
Suzanne Bonamici Wash. 2nd
Rick Larsen Calif. 28th
Judy Chu N.M. 3rd Teresa Leger Fernandez Calif. 34th
Jimmy Gomez Colo. 1st
Diana DeGette N.M. 2nd
Gabe Vasquez N.M. 1st
Melanie Stansbury Minn. 8th Pete Stauber Calif. 6th
Ami Bera Wash. 3rd
Marie Gluesenkamp Perez Calif. 47th
Dave Min Calif. 19th
Jimmy Panetta Mass. 3rd Lori Trahan Calif. 15th
Kevin Mullin Colo. 8th
Gabe Evans Ill. 13th
Nikki Budzinski Mich. 6th
Debbie Dingell Ore. 3rd Maxine Dexter Hawaii 1st
Ed Case N.Y. 23th
Nicholas Langworthy N.Y. 17th
Michael Lawler Conn. 5th
Jahana Hayes Mass. 6th Seth Moulton N.Y. 16th
George Latimer Minn. 7th
Michelle Fischbach Calif. 25th
Raul Ruiz Calif. 4th
Mike Thompson Del. Sarah McBride Mass. 9th
Bill Keating Conn. 1st
John Larson N.Y. 19th
Josh Riley Md. 4th
Glenn Ivey R.I. 1st Gabe Amo N.Y. 3rd
Thomas Suozzi Calif. 49th
Mike Levin Mass. 8th
Stephen Lynch Calif. 42th
Robert Garcia Wash. 5th Michael Baumgartner Md. 3rd
Sarah Elfreth Conn. 2nd
Joe Courtney Calif. 50th
Scott Peters S.C. 4th
William Timmons Calif. 43th Maxine Waters Calif. 39th
Mark Takano Wash. 7th
Pramila Jayapal Vt.
Becca Balint N.Y. 22th
John Mannion Calif. 37th Sydney Kamlager-Dove N.H. 1st
Chris Pappas N.Y. 25th
Joseph Morelle Conn. 3rd
Rosa DeLauro Md. 1st
Andy Harris N.J. 6th Frank Pallone Calif. 14th
Eric Swalwell Calif. 9th
Josh Harder N.Y. 12th
Jerrold Nadler Ill. 16th
Darin LaHood Conn. 4th Jim Himes Ill. 10th
Bradley Schneider Ill. 5th
Mike Quigley Calif. 20th
Vince Fong Calif. 36th
Ted Lieu Md. 5th Steny Hoyer Ill. 9th
Janice Schakowsky Ore. 4th
Valerie Hoyle R.I. 2nd
Seth Magaziner Calif. 10th
Mark DeSaulnier N.Y. 26th Timothy Kennedy Ill. 17th
Eric Sorensen Calif. 24th
Salud Carbajal Calif. 11th
Nancy Pelosi N.J. 12th
Bonnie Watson Coleman N.Y. 13th Adriano Espaillat N.Y. 9th
Yvette Clarke N.Y. 6th
Grace Meng Ga. 5th
Nikema Williams Ill. 11th
Bill Foster Calif. 22th David Valadao Total affected funding, by congressional district
12
$17.84 bil.
9
$2.37 bil.
10
$1.40 bil.
1
$995.1 mil.
4
$655.3 mil.
1
$499.5 mil.
2
$465.9 mil.
14
$365.4 mil.
15
$352.5 mil.
3
$114.6 mil.
5
$294.3 mil.
9
$207.6 mil.
9
$180.3 mil.
1
$189.2 mil.
25
$129.3 mil.
3
$158.9 mil.
4
$129.1 mil.
16
$75.2 mil.
13
$74.2 mil.
6
$25.9 mil.
5
$76.5 mil.
2
$79 mil.
11
$73.6 mil.
3
$47.8 mil.
5
$53 mil.
2
$65.4 mil.
3
$60.3 mil.
4
$57.6 mil.
4
$56.1 mil.
3
$52.3 mil.
1
$49.8 mil.
1
$50 mil.
1
$46 mil.
3
$41.7 mil.
3
$30.8 mil.
3
$39.7 mil.
5
$31.6 mil.
2
$32.9 mil.
7
$27.6 mil.
1
$30.7 mil.
2
$15 mil.
5
$24.5 mil.
2
$27.4 mil.
2
$26.2 mil.
3
$20.1 mil.
3
$17.5 mil.
1
$20.4 mil.
1
$19.6 mil.
1
$18.4 mil.
2
$16.6 mil.
3
$15.3 mil.
3
$6.4 mil.
4
$8.2 mil.
5
$10.4 mil.
4
$11 mil.
2
$11.5 mil.
1
$11.2 mil.
2
$10.5 mil.
2
$8.8 mil.
1
$9.7 mil.
4
$8 mil.
4
$6.8 mil.
3
$7.8 mil.
1
$6.3 mil.
1
$1.7 mil.
1
$6.3 mil.
1
$6 mil.
1
$2.9 mil.
2
$2.8 mil.
1
$5 mil.
1
$3.4 mil.
1
$4.7 mil.
1
$4.8 mil.
1
$4.4 mil.
1
$4.5 mil.
2
$4.7 mil.
2
$3 mil.
2
$4.2 mil.
2
$3.8 mil.
1
$2.9 mil.
1
$3 mil.
1
$2.9 mil.
1
$2.7 mil.
1
$2.1 mil.
2
$2.4 mil.
1
$2.5 mil.
1
$2.5 mil.
1
$1.7 mil.
1
$1.9 mil.
1
$2.1 mil.
1
$1.8 mil.
1
$1.8 mil.
1
$1.3 mil.
1
$1.9 mil.
1
$2 mil.
1
$1.2 mil.
1
$1.1 mil.
1
$1.5 mil.
1
$1.1 mil.
1
$1.1 mil.
1
$1 mil.
New delays in transportation aid
So far, the administration has targeted essentially two broad tranches of federal aid. First, the White House has held up billions of dollars in previously approved transportation funding for New York and Chicago.
In New York, the administration stopped the delivery of about $18 billion in pledged investments for two major projects: the Second Avenue subway, which traverses the east side of Manhattan, and the Hudson River tunnel, which serves as the primary rail route through New York City and along the northeast corridor. Funding for the tunnel, in particular, came only after years of wrangling, as New York officials and their counterparts in New Jersey looked to repair a roughly 115-year-old passage from damage wrought by Hurricane Sandy while improving rail capacity.
In Chicago, the Trump administration said it paused about $2.1 billion in money pledged for the city’s own transit upgrades, including an extension of its rail system into the South Side. Groundbreaking was expected to begin in 2026 after years of work to shore up federal funding for the expansion.
In both cases, the White House said it was pausing the delivery of federal dollars so that it could review the cities’ contracting policies. The administration sought to determine if leaders had made construction-related decisions on the basis of race, diversity or inclusion.
The moves came at a moment when the president was at war with key leaders from those states. Mr. Trump has frequently attacked Representative Hakeem Jeffries and Senator Chuck Schumer, two New York Democrats who lead their party in the House and Senate, for refusing to bow to his demands on spending. The Transportation Department claimed that the two men were to blame for the slowdown in aid, since the agency could not complete its review quickly during the shutdown.
Separately, federal officials have repeatedly tried to withhold security and counterterrorism funding from New York, though the state won back some of the money.
Mr. Trump has similarly gone after Chicago and its Democratic mayor, Brandon Johnson, along with the Democratic governor of Illinois, JB Pritzker, saying this month that both should be jailed.
Deep cuts to energy funding
The Trump administration also moved to terminate another tranche of money outright. Two days into the shutdown, it announced it would end roughly $7.6 billion in previously approved grants for 223 energy-related projects in 16 states, 14 of which are led by Democrats. Those cuts were later expanded.
The cancellations were the latest attempt by Mr. Trump and his top aides to revoke climate- and infrastructure-related funding adopted under President Joseph R. Biden Jr., a series of actions that have been challenged in court. The Energy Department said that it made its decision because the projects were “not economically viable” or did not advance Mr. Trump’s energy policy agenda.
Many of the projects are located in Democratic-led congressional districts, prompting lawmakers to question in recent days if there might be political motivations behind the administration’s actions.
The cuts targeted a vast range of projects, including efforts to prevent power outages and modernize energy grids — a bipartisan goal — as well as investments in newer energy sources, like hydrogen. The Trump administration revoked its plan to provide up to $1.2 billion for the Alliance for Renewable Clean Hydrogen Energy Systems, known as ARCHES, which aimed to help develop a clean-burning power source for heavy-duty trucks, port operators and other major drivers of harmful emissions.
The Biden administration announced the award in 2023, nearly two years after Democrats and Republicans adopted a bipartisan package to improve the nation’s infrastructure.
More cuts to come
As the shutdown enters its third week, Mr. Trump and his aides have threatened additional cuts. The president in recent days has described the closure as an opportunity “handed to us on a silver platter” to lay off federal workers, slash federal agencies and reduce other funding, perhaps in permanent ways.
One potential target is Portland, Ore. Karoline Leavitt, the White House press secretary, signaled this month that the Trump administration could block some unspecified federal aid to the city, which is led by a Democrat, because of ongoing protests of the president’s immigration crackdown.
Methodology
To analyze the impact of cancelled and paused grants, The Times began by compiling a list of affected grants. The list was then cross-referenced against data from USAspending.gov, where detailed information about each grant was collected. The figures shown on the page reflect the total amount of known funding that has not yet been outlaid.
To determine the impact by congressional district, each grant was grouped into the district where the grantee is located. In some cases, the work being funded by the grant may not occur in the same district, or could occur across multiple districts and states. The exact monetary allocation across those work sites is not known. Grants where the recipient could not be matched to a congressional district are not shown.
For some large projects, government data only shows currently allocated funds, instead of the entire cost of the project. In cases where this is known, the grant data was supplemented by additional reporting to better reflect the amount of affected funding.
News
Ilhan Omar says Trump’s anti-Somali tirade ‘completely disgusting’
US House member Ilhan Omar on Sunday defended the Somali community in her Minnesota congressional district, saying it was “completely disgusting” when Donald Trump recently referred to them as garbage.
“These are Americans that he is calling ‘garbage,’” Omar, a Somalia-born Democrat, said while responding to the president’s remarks on CBS’s Face the Nation. “I think it is also really important for us to remember that this kind of hateful rhetoric – and this level of dehumanizing – can lead to dangerous actions by people who listen to the president.”
Those comments from Omar – who also spent some of her CBS interview discussing fraud cases involving Minnesota Somalis in recent years – served as replies to insults from Trump during a cabinet meeting. Beside calling them “garbage”, the president said Minnesota’s Somali community should be sent back to Somalia.
“Look at their nation,” Trump also said. “Look how bad their nation is. It’s not even a nation. It’s just people walking around killing each other.
“Look, these Somalians have taken billions of dollars out of our country – billions and billions.”
The Trump administration restricted all immigration cases for Somalis already in the US, along with people from 18 other countries. Community members expected the Minneapolis-St Paul metro area, where most Somalis in the state reside, to see increased immigration enforcement operations. And, as a consequence, Minneapolis mayor Jacob Frey recently signed an executive order prohibiting federal, state and local officials from using city-owned parking lots, ramps, garages and lots for immigration enforcement operations.
On Thursday, Omar penned an op-ed in the New York Times claiming that Trump was resorting to racist attacks because various campaign promises – including a better US economy – have been failing.
“While the president wastes his time attacking my community … the promises of economic prosperity he made in his run for president [in 2024] have not come to fruition,” Omar wrote in the Times. “The president knows he is failing, and so he is reverting to what he knows best: trying to divert attention by stoking bigotry.”
Attention on Minnesota’s Somali community ramped up in recent weeks as the right wing has seized on fraud cases in the state. Dozens of Somali residents were convicted in a scheme that involved lying to the state to receive reimbursements for meal disbursements, medical care and other services. The investigations into the series of fraud schemes spanned years – one of the most significant cases had charges filed three years ago.
One of the cases revolves around an organization called Feeding Our Future, which partnered with state agencies to distribute meals to kids. Federal prosecutors alleged that during the Covid-19 pandemic, the organization submitted fake documents to trick government officials into thinking they served food to thousands of children. The group’s founder was convicted in March. US House Republicans have since launched an investigation aimed at how fraud cases were handled by Tim Walz, Minnesota’s Democratic governor who was his party’s vice-presidential candidate in the 2024 presidential election won by Trump.
Omar on Sunday said she was among the first members of Congress who called on the fraud in question to be investigated. She also said the fraud was “reprehensible”.
Furthermore, Omar denied Trump administration allegations that taxpayer money involved in fraud investigations in Minnesota was siphoned to a terrorist organization in Somalia.
The treasury secretary, Scott Bessent, said his department was investigating whether the taxpayer money was going to al-Shabaab, a terrorist organization in Somalia. House Republicans have also echoed those claims.
“There are people who have been prosecuted and who have been sentenced,” Omar said. “If there was a linkage in that – the money that they had stolen going to terrorism – then that is a failure of the FBI and our court system in not figuring that out and basically charging them with these charges.”
Bessent also said those involved in the fraud donated to Omar’s campaign. Omar said Sunday: “We sent that money back a couple years ago.”
News
National parks fee-free calendar drops MLK Day, Juneteenth and adds Trump’s birthday
Grand Canyon Park Services Ranger Jill Staurowsky looks out from the South Rim while giving a tour to visitors on February 22, 2025 in Grand Canyon, Ariz.
Brandon Bell/Getty Images
hide caption
toggle caption
Brandon Bell/Getty Images
The Trump administration has removed Martin Luther King Jr. Day and Juneteenth from next year’s calendar of entrance fee-free days for national parks and added President Trump’s birthday to the list, according to the National Park Service, as the administration continues to push back against a reckoning of the country’s racist history on federal lands.
In addition to Trump’s birthday — which coincides with Flag Day (June 14) — the updated calendar of fee-free dates includes the 110th anniversary of the NPS (August 25), Constitution Day (September 17) and President Teddy Roosevelt’s birthday (October 27). The changes will take effect starting January 1.
Non-U.S. residents will still be required to pay entrance fees on those dates under the new “America-first pricing” policy. At 11 of some of the country’s most popular national parks, international visitors will be charged an extra $100, on top of the standard entrance fee, and the annual pass for non-residents will go up to $250. The annual pass for residents will be $80.
The move follows a July executive order from the White House that called to increase fees applied to non-American visitors to national parks and grant citizens and residents “preferential treatment with respect to any remaining recreational access rules, including permitting or lottery rules.”
The Department of the Interior, which oversees NPS, called the new fee-exempted dates “patriotic fee-free days,” in an announcement that lauded the changes as “Trump’s commitment to making national parks more accessible, more affordable and more efficient for the American people.”
The Interior Department did not immediately respond to NPR’s request for comment.
Secretary of the Interior Doug Burgum said in a statement: “These policies ensure that U.S. taxpayers, who already support the National Park System, continue to enjoy affordable access, while international visitors contribute their fair share to maintaining and improving our parks for future generations.”
The new calendar follows the Trump administration’s previous moves to reshape U.S. history by asking patrons of national parks to flag any signs at sites deemed to cast a negative light on past or living Americans.
News
Map: 7.0-Magnitude Earthquake Shakes Alaska
Note: Map shows the area with a shake intensity of 4 or greater, which U.S.G.S. defines as “light,” though the earthquake may be felt outside the areas shown. The New York Times
A major, 7.0-magnitude earthquake struck near the Alaska-Canada border on Saturday, according to the United States Geological Survey.
The temblor happened at 11:41 a.m. Alaska time about 56 miles north of Yakutat, Alaska, data from the agency shows.
U.S.G.S. data earlier reported that the magnitude was 6.7.
As seismologists review available data, they may revise the earthquake’s reported magnitude. Additional information collected about the earthquake may also prompt U.S.G.S. scientists to update the shake-severity map.
Aftershocks in the region
An aftershock is usually a smaller earthquake that follows a larger one in the same general area. Aftershocks are typically minor adjustments along the portion of a fault that slipped at the time of the initial earthquake.
Quakes and aftershocks within 100 miles
Aftershocks can occur days, weeks or even years after the first earthquake. These events can be of equal or larger magnitude to the initial earthquake, and they can continue to affect already damaged locations.
When quakes and aftershocks occurred
Source: United States Geological Survey | Notes: Shaking categories are based on the Modified Mercalli Intensity scale. When aftershock data is available, the corresponding maps and charts include earthquakes within 100 miles and seven days of the initial quake. All times above are Alaska time. Shake data is as of Saturday, Dec. 6 at 3:57 p.m. Eastern. Aftershocks data is as of Saturday, Dec. 6 at 7:26 p.m. Eastern.
Maps: Daylight (urban areas); MapLibre (map rendering); Natural Earth (roads, labels, terrain); Protomaps (map tiles)
-
Politics5 days agoTrump rips Somali community as federal agents reportedly eye Minnesota enforcement sweep
-
Ohio3 days ago
Who do the Ohio State Buckeyes hire as the next offensive coordinator?
-
News5 days agoTrump threatens strikes on any country he claims makes drugs for US
-
World5 days agoHonduras election council member accuses colleague of ‘intimidation’
-
Alaska1 day agoHowling Mat-Su winds leave thousands without power
-
Texas1 day agoTexas Tech football vs BYU live updates, start time, TV channel for Big 12 title
-
Politics6 days agoTrump highlights comments by ‘Obama sycophant’ Eric Holder, continues pressing Senate GOP to nix filibuster
-
Politics7 days agoWar Sec Pete Hegseth shares meme of children’s book character firing on narco terrorist drug boat