Connect with us

News

Trump Halts Billions in Grants for Democratic Districts During Shutdown

Published

on

Trump Halts Billions in Grants for Democratic Districts During Shutdown

Two weeks into the government shutdown, the Trump administration has frozen or canceled nearly $28 billion that had been reserved for more than 200 projects primarily located in Democratic-led cities, congressional districts and states, according to an analysis by The New York Times.

Advertisement

Total amount of affected funding

By congressional district of grant recipient

Each of these infrastructure projects had received federal aid, sometimes after officials spent years pleading in Washington — only to see that money halted as President Trump has looked to punish Democrats over the course of the fiscal stalemate.

Advertisement

The Times conducted its analysis by examining federal funding records, which include details about the city and state where each grant recipient is based. The projects include new investments in clean energy, upgrades to the electric grid and fixes to the nation’s transportation infrastructure, primarily in Democratic strongholds, such as New York and California.

Advertisement

Total affected funding, by congressional district

Advertisement

Ala.

Advertisement

Ariz.

Ark.

Calif.

Advertisement

Colo.

Del.

Advertisement

Fla.

Ga.

Idaho

Advertisement

Ill.

Ind.

Advertisement

Iowa

Kan.

Ky.

Advertisement

La.

Maine

Advertisement

Md.

Mass.

Mich.

Advertisement

Minn.

Miss.

Advertisement

Mo.

Mont.

Neb.

Advertisement

Nev.

N.H.

Advertisement

N.J.

N.M.

N.Y.

Advertisement

N.C.

N.D.

Advertisement

Ohio

Okla.

Ore.

Advertisement

Pa.

S.C.

Advertisement

S.D.

Tenn.

Texas

Advertisement

Utah

Vt.

Advertisement

Va.

Wash.

W.Va.

Advertisement

Wis.

Wyo.

Advertisement

Circles sized by total amount of affected grant funding

In some cases, recipients had started to receive portions of the federal aid, only to become casualties in a funding battle that has no end in sight.

Mr. Trump’s aides have offered a series of explanations for the administration’s decision to pause or terminate grants, claiming in some cases that the spending would have been wasteful or in conflict with the president’s priorities. Since returning to office, Mr. Trump has been particularly aggressive in cutting federal investments to combat climate change.

Advertisement

But the budgetary moves coincide with the president’s public pledges to use the shutdown to slash spending favored by Democrats. He has described the federal stoppage as an “unprecedented opportunity” to make some cuts permanent.

Many Democrats said that the announcements fit a broader pattern at the White House, where Mr. Trump has claimed vast authority to reprogram the nation’s budget, even though the Constitution gives that power to Congress.

Advertisement

In doing so, Democratic lawmakers said the result could harm their cities and states, upending work that would have helped residents regardless of their political party.

The White House did not respond to requests for comment.

Advertisement

Total affected funding, by congressional district

Advertisement

N.Y. 10th

Advertisement

Dan Goldman

12 $17.84 bil.

Ill. 7th

Danny Davis

9 $2.37 bil.

Calif. 12th

Lateefah Simon

10 $1.40 bil.

Wash. 10th

Marilyn Strickland

1 $995.1 mil.

Calif. 7th

Doris Matsui

4 $655.3 mil.

Calif. 32th

Advertisement

Brad Sherman

1 $499.5 mil.

Minn. 4th

Betty McCollum

2 $465.9 mil.

Ill. 3rd

Delia Ramirez

14 $365.4 mil.

Colo. 2nd

Joe Neguse

15 $352.5 mil.

Mass. 2nd

James McGovern

3 $114.6 mil.

Ore. 2nd

Advertisement

Cliff Bentz

5 $294.3 mil.

Mass. 7th

Ayanna Pressley

9 $207.6 mil.

Mass. 5th

Katherine Clark

9 $180.3 mil.

Mo. 2nd

Ann Wagner

1 $189.2 mil.

N.Y. 20th

Paul Tonko

25 $129.3 mil.

Md. 7th

Advertisement

Kweisi Mfume

3 $158.9 mil.

Calif. 2nd

Jared Huffman

4 $129.1 mil.

Calif. 16th

Sam Liccardo

16 $75.2 mil.

Colo. 7th

Brittany Pettersen

13 $74.2 mil.

Calif. 17th

Ro Khanna

6 $25.9 mil.

Minn. 5th

Advertisement

Ilhan Omar

5 $76.5 mil.

Calif. 5th

Tom McClintock

2 $79 mil.

Ore. 1st

Suzanne Bonamici

11 $73.6 mil.

Wash. 2nd

Rick Larsen

3 $47.8 mil.

Calif. 28th

Judy Chu

5 $53 mil.

N.M. 3rd

Advertisement

Teresa Leger Fernandez

2 $65.4 mil.

Calif. 34th

Jimmy Gomez

3 $60.3 mil.

Colo. 1st

Diana DeGette

4 $57.6 mil.

N.M. 2nd

Gabe Vasquez

4 $56.1 mil.

N.M. 1st

Melanie Stansbury

3 $52.3 mil.

Minn. 8th

Advertisement

Pete Stauber

1 $49.8 mil.

Calif. 6th

Ami Bera

1 $50 mil.

Wash. 3rd

Marie Gluesenkamp Perez

1 $46 mil.

Calif. 47th

Dave Min

3 $41.7 mil.

Calif. 19th

Jimmy Panetta

3 $30.8 mil.

Mass. 3rd

Advertisement

Lori Trahan

3 $39.7 mil.

Calif. 15th

Kevin Mullin

5 $31.6 mil.

Colo. 8th

Gabe Evans

2 $32.9 mil.

Ill. 13th

Nikki Budzinski

7 $27.6 mil.

Mich. 6th

Debbie Dingell

1 $30.7 mil.

Ore. 3rd

Advertisement

Maxine Dexter

2 $15 mil.

Hawaii 1st

Ed Case

5 $24.5 mil.

N.Y. 23th

Nicholas Langworthy

2 $27.4 mil.

N.Y. 17th

Michael Lawler

2 $26.2 mil.

Conn. 5th

Jahana Hayes

3 $20.1 mil.

Mass. 6th

Advertisement

Seth Moulton

3 $17.5 mil.

N.Y. 16th

George Latimer

1 $20.4 mil.

Minn. 7th

Michelle Fischbach

1 $19.6 mil.

Calif. 25th

Raul Ruiz

1 $18.4 mil.

Calif. 4th

Mike Thompson

2 $16.6 mil.

Del.

Advertisement

Sarah McBride

3 $15.3 mil.

Mass. 9th

Bill Keating

3 $6.4 mil.

Conn. 1st

John Larson

4 $8.2 mil.

N.Y. 19th

Josh Riley

5 $10.4 mil.

Md. 4th

Glenn Ivey

4 $11 mil.

R.I. 1st

Advertisement

Gabe Amo

2 $11.5 mil.

N.Y. 3rd

Thomas Suozzi

1 $11.2 mil.

Calif. 49th

Mike Levin

2 $10.5 mil.

Mass. 8th

Stephen Lynch

2 $8.8 mil.

Calif. 42th

Robert Garcia

1 $9.7 mil.

Wash. 5th

Advertisement

Michael Baumgartner

4 $8 mil.

Md. 3rd

Sarah Elfreth

4 $6.8 mil.

Conn. 2nd

Joe Courtney

3 $7.8 mil.

Calif. 50th

Scott Peters

1 $6.3 mil.

S.C. 4th

William Timmons

1 $1.7 mil.

Calif. 43th

Advertisement

Maxine Waters

1 $6.3 mil.

Calif. 39th

Mark Takano

1 $6 mil.

Wash. 7th

Pramila Jayapal

1 $2.9 mil.

Vt.

Becca Balint

2 $2.8 mil.

N.Y. 22th

John Mannion

1 $5 mil.

Calif. 37th

Advertisement

Sydney Kamlager-Dove

1 $3.4 mil.

N.H. 1st

Chris Pappas

1 $4.7 mil.

N.Y. 25th

Joseph Morelle

1 $4.8 mil.

Conn. 3rd

Rosa DeLauro

1 $4.4 mil.

Md. 1st

Andy Harris

1 $4.5 mil.

N.J. 6th

Advertisement

Frank Pallone

2 $4.7 mil.

Calif. 14th

Eric Swalwell

2 $3 mil.

Calif. 9th

Josh Harder

2 $4.2 mil.

N.Y. 12th

Jerrold Nadler

2 $3.8 mil.

Ill. 16th

Darin LaHood

1 $2.9 mil.

Conn. 4th

Advertisement

Jim Himes

1 $3 mil.

Ill. 10th

Bradley Schneider

1 $2.9 mil.

Ill. 5th

Mike Quigley

1 $2.7 mil.

Calif. 20th

Vince Fong

1 $2.1 mil.

Calif. 36th

Ted Lieu

2 $2.4 mil.

Md. 5th

Advertisement

Steny Hoyer

1 $2.5 mil.

Ill. 9th

Janice Schakowsky

1 $2.5 mil.

Ore. 4th

Valerie Hoyle

1 $1.7 mil.

R.I. 2nd

Seth Magaziner

1 $1.9 mil.

Calif. 10th

Mark DeSaulnier

1 $2.1 mil.

N.Y. 26th

Advertisement

Timothy Kennedy

1 $1.8 mil.

Ill. 17th

Eric Sorensen

1 $1.8 mil.

Calif. 24th

Salud Carbajal

1 $1.3 mil.

Calif. 11th

Nancy Pelosi

1 $1.9 mil.

N.J. 12th

Bonnie Watson Coleman

1 $2 mil.

N.Y. 13th

Advertisement

Adriano Espaillat

1 $1.2 mil.

N.Y. 9th

Yvette Clarke

1 $1.1 mil.

N.Y. 6th

Grace Meng

1 $1.5 mil.

Ga. 5th

Nikema Williams

1 $1.1 mil.

Ill. 11th

Bill Foster

1 $1.1 mil.

Calif. 22th

Advertisement

David Valadao

1 $1 mil.

New delays in transportation aid

So far, the administration has targeted essentially two broad tranches of federal aid. First, the White House has held up billions of dollars in previously approved transportation funding for New York and Chicago.

Advertisement

In New York, the administration stopped the delivery of about $18 billion in pledged investments for two major projects: the Second Avenue subway, which traverses the east side of Manhattan, and the Hudson River tunnel, which serves as the primary rail route through New York City and along the northeast corridor. Funding for the tunnel, in particular, came only after years of wrangling, as New York officials and their counterparts in New Jersey looked to repair a roughly 115-year-old passage from damage wrought by Hurricane Sandy while improving rail capacity.

In Chicago, the Trump administration said it paused about $2.1 billion in money pledged for the city’s own transit upgrades, including an extension of its rail system into the South Side. Groundbreaking was expected to begin in 2026 after years of work to shore up federal funding for the expansion.

In both cases, the White House said it was pausing the delivery of federal dollars so that it could review the cities’ contracting policies. The administration sought to determine if leaders had made construction-related decisions on the basis of race, diversity or inclusion.

Advertisement

The moves came at a moment when the president was at war with key leaders from those states. Mr. Trump has frequently attacked Representative Hakeem Jeffries and Senator Chuck Schumer, two New York Democrats who lead their party in the House and Senate, for refusing to bow to his demands on spending. The Transportation Department claimed that the two men were to blame for the slowdown in aid, since the agency could not complete its review quickly during the shutdown.

Separately, federal officials have repeatedly tried to withhold security and counterterrorism funding from New York, though the state won back some of the money.

Advertisement

Mr. Trump has similarly gone after Chicago and its Democratic mayor, Brandon Johnson, along with the Democratic governor of Illinois, JB Pritzker, saying this month that both should be jailed.

Deep cuts to energy funding

The Trump administration also moved to terminate another tranche of money outright. Two days into the shutdown, it announced it would end roughly $7.6 billion in previously approved grants for 223 energy-related projects in 16 states, 14 of which are led by Democrats. Those cuts were later expanded.

Advertisement

The cancellations were the latest attempt by Mr. Trump and his top aides to revoke climate- and infrastructure-related funding adopted under President Joseph R. Biden Jr., a series of actions that have been challenged in court. The Energy Department said that it made its decision because the projects were “not economically viable” or did not advance Mr. Trump’s energy policy agenda.

Many of the projects are located in Democratic-led congressional districts, prompting lawmakers to question in recent days if there might be political motivations behind the administration’s actions.

Advertisement

The cuts targeted a vast range of projects, including efforts to prevent power outages and modernize energy grids — a bipartisan goal — as well as investments in newer energy sources, like hydrogen. The Trump administration revoked its plan to provide up to $1.2 billion for the Alliance for Renewable Clean Hydrogen Energy Systems, known as ARCHES, which aimed to help develop a clean-burning power source for heavy-duty trucks, port operators and other major drivers of harmful emissions.

The Biden administration announced the award in 2023, nearly two years after Democrats and Republicans adopted a bipartisan package to improve the nation’s infrastructure.

More cuts to come

Advertisement

As the shutdown enters its third week, Mr. Trump and his aides have threatened additional cuts. The president in recent days has described the closure as an opportunity “handed to us on a silver platter” to lay off federal workers, slash federal agencies and reduce other funding, perhaps in permanent ways.

One potential target is Portland, Ore. Karoline Leavitt, the White House press secretary, signaled this month that the Trump administration could block some unspecified federal aid to the city, which is led by a Democrat, because of ongoing protests of the president’s immigration crackdown.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Methodology

To analyze the impact of cancelled and paused grants, The Times began by compiling a list of affected grants. The list was then cross-referenced against data from USAspending.gov, where detailed information about each grant was collected. The figures shown on the page reflect the total amount of known funding that has not yet been outlaid.

To determine the impact by congressional district, each grant was grouped into the district where the grantee is located. In some cases, the work being funded by the grant may not occur in the same district, or could occur across multiple districts and states. The exact monetary allocation across those work sites is not known. Grants where the recipient could not be matched to a congressional district are not shown.

Advertisement

For some large projects, government data only shows currently allocated funds, instead of the entire cost of the project. In cases where this is known, the grant data was supplemented by additional reporting to better reflect the amount of affected funding.

News

Video: Will ICE Change Under Its New Leader?

Published

on

Video: Will ICE Change Under Its New Leader?
Markwayne Mullin, the new homeland security secretary, has promised a different approach, but how much change is likely? Our reporter Hamed Aleaziz describes what we know.

By Hamed Aleaziz, Sutton Raphael, Thomas Vollkommer, Gilad Thaler, Whitney Shefte and Alexandra Ostasiewicz

March 27, 2026

Continue Reading

News

A surprise resignation could open the door for an independent to win a Montana Senate seat

Published

on

A surprise resignation could open the door for an independent to win a Montana Senate seat

Seth Bodnar, the former president of the University of Montana, is now running for Senate as an independent

Kirk Siegler/NPR


hide caption

toggle caption

Advertisement

Kirk Siegler/NPR

BUTTE, Mont. – It’s long been an adage in Montana politics that if you’re running for office, you’d better have a float in the Butte St. Paddy’s Day Parade, which draws thousands to the mining city’s historic uptown, soaking up the nostalgia – and the Guiness. 

Here, you’re just steps from the towering old mining headframes and the one mile long and half mile wide Berkeley Pit. Now shuttered, it was  once one of the world’s largest copper deposits. 

Larry Carden, in a Notre Dame sweatshirt, never misses the parade.

Advertisement

“You’ll see a lot more boos for the Republicans than you will the Democrats, I can guarantee you that,” he says. 

That’s a nod to Butte’s long history of Democratic politics and a strong labor movement going back to around 1900, when the “Copper King” mine owners ruled Montana business and media, and bribed their way into political office. Today, Carden, who’s retired, is worried that the mega rich are again influencing politics here, and how expensive life is in his home state.

“Between health care and gas and food, and you go to the store the other day, there’s rib steaks $19.99 a pound, you know,” Carden says.  

A political group marches in the St. Patrick's Day parade in Butte, Montana, March 17 2026

A political group marches in the St. Patrick’s Day parade in Butte, Montana, March 17 2026

Kirk Siegler/NPR


hide caption

Advertisement

toggle caption

Kirk Siegler/NPR

This year’s parade followed an unusually turbulent few days in Montana’s political scene – half of its congressional delegation abruptly retired. Despite the state’s recent tilt from purple to deep red, the races for their seats could be more in play now because of the way Senator Steve Daines and Congressman Ryan Zinke, both Republicans, gave up them up and chose their successors. In Daines’ case, he withdrew his candidacy just minutes before the filing deadline. 

Advertisement

Like a lot of people in Butte, Carden is a longtime Democrat. But he says he’s grown disillusioned with party politics.

“I would rather everything be independent where there is no party designation and then you have to pay more attention to who the person actually is,” Carden says.   

New Candidate opts to go independent

That’s exactly what Seth Bodnar, a former Green Beret running for U.S. Senate, is trying to capitalize on. He joined other candidates mixed in with Irish dancing troupes and fire department floats, as he walked the parade route along Park Street shaking the occasional hand and tossing candy. 

In an interview with NPR earlier in Missoula, Bodnar, who recently resigned his post as University of Montana president, pitched what he says would be his bi-partisan appeal.

“I’m an independent,” Bondar says. “When I raised my right hand at the age of 18 and I swore an oath to this Constitution when I joined the military, not to a political party.”.

Advertisement

Person over party used to be the playbook in Montana, which some call just one long Main Street. It’s how former Senator Jon Tester used to win despite being a Democrat as the state got redder.

The day after Bodnar formally announced he was gathering signatures to get on the ballot, his long shot bid got taken a lot more seriously. 

Sen. Steve Daines, who was elected to the Senate in 2014, sent shockwaves through the state’s political scene when he announced in a video posted to X that he’d decided not to seek reelection.  

Sen. Steve Daines, R-Mont., speaks at the Senate Finance Committee confirmation hearing for Scott Bessent, President-elect Donald Trump's choice to be Secretary of the Treasury, at the Capitol in Washington, Thursday, Jan. 16, 2025.

Sen. Steve Daines, R-Mont., speaks at the Senate Finance Committee confirmation hearing for Scott Bessent, President-elect Donald Trump’s choice to be Secretary of the Treasury, at the Capitol in Washington, Thursday, Jan. 16, 2025.

Ben Curtis/AP/AP


hide caption

Advertisement

toggle caption

Ben Curtis/AP/AP

“I’m also very thankful to have served alongside President Trump and my colleagues in the Senate,” Daines said in the video. “Together we built a conservative majority on the Supreme Court, we delivered the largest tax cut in U.S. history, we unleashed American energy dominance and secured our southern border.” 
 
Daines’ late hour withdrawal presumably clears the way for his chosen successor, Kurt Alme, the U.S. Attorney for Montana until he declared his candidacy for Daines’ seat. Daines later said withdrawing earlier could have enticed a prominent Democrat like Tester to enter the race. 

Advertisement

Independent Seth Bodnar says it reminds him of the Montana of old. 

“We have direct election of senators in the United States in part because of political corruption in this state 125 years ago, Copper Kings trying to buy U.S. Senate seats,” Bodnar says. “That didn’t work back then and it’s not going to work right now.”

But Democrats say Bodnar’s entry as an independent will just split the liberal vote. 

The GOP base is angry too

“Montanans are getting very indignant about what they see as out and out dishonesty,” says Roger Koopman, a former Republican legislator and Montana Public Service commissioner from Bozeman.  

Koopman says the party establishment’s backroom dealing is a gift to Democrats and especially Seth Bodnar, who he says is a liberal running as an independent.

Advertisement

“They’re going to say, ‘hey, I’m over these Republicans playing games with me, you can’t do that and expect me to vote for you, I’m not going to vote Democrat, but here’s this guy out here who says he’s independent, let me give him a try,’” Koopman says. 

Alme has been keeping a low profile. Political pundits say that might be by design. A campaign spokesperson sent NPR this statement: “Anyone could run for this seat. Kurt is running on his record as the Trump-endorsed candidate of common sense who knows how to be tough on violent crime, dismantle drug cartels, and deliver historic tax relief. Voters will decide, and Kurt is confident in his work serving Montana and helping President Trump put America First.”

At Montana State University, political science department chair Eric Austin says he expects party tensions will cool and Republicans will rally around their nominee by November. 

“I think in part that speaks to the changes in the electorate in the state,” Austin says. “As the state has become more red, people have more strongly affiliated themselves with the Republican Party and less as independents.” 

However, Austin says the midterms will be a referendum on President Trump and there’s growing economic anxiety in Montana. Farmers are getting hurt by Trump’s tariffs. His Iran War has sent fertilizer prices soaring, raised interest rates and the cost of gas. 

Advertisement

Back in Butte, at the St. Paddy’s Day parade, longtime Democratic activist Evan Barrett says there’s a resurgence in populist resentment in Montana. 

Longtime Montana Democratic party activist Evan Barrett at the St. Patrick's Day parade in Butte, Montana, March 17 2026

Longtime Montana Democratic party activist Evan Barrett at the St. Patrick’s Day parade in Butte, Montana, March 17 2026

Kirk Siegler/NPR


hide caption

toggle caption

Advertisement

Kirk Siegler/NPR

“It’s almost like a repetition of the past,” says Barrett, a one time economic aide to former Governor Brian Schweitzer.  

Ducking into an old storefront to take a break from the spectacle of the parade, Barrett told NPR there’s a feeling in the electorate that a lot of outside money is coming into influence politics, but not staying in Montana and being invested into things like schools. 

“So this is a really wild and different year,” Barrett says. “Anybody that tells you they know what’s gonna happen, well, be a bit skeptical.” 

Advertisement

President Trump has endorsed last minute Senate candidate Kurt Alme but it’s not clear what kind of effect that might have on voters in November. 

Continue Reading

News

Video: Savannah Guthrie Says She Believes Her Mother Was Taken for Ransom

Published

on

Video: Savannah Guthrie Says She Believes Her Mother Was Taken for Ransom

new video loaded: Savannah Guthrie Says She Believes Her Mother Was Taken for Ransom

transcript

transcript

Savannah Guthrie Says She Believes Her Mother Was Taken for Ransom

Savannah Guthrie spoke on the “Today” show in her first interview since her mother, Nancy Guthrie, was abducted from her home near Tuscon, Ariz.

“The ransom note, notes for ransom requests came. Did you believe those to be real?” “The two notes that we received that we responded to — I tend to believe those are real.” “Really?” “We still don’t know. Honestly, we don’t know anything. We don’t know anything. So I don’t know that it’s because she’s my mom. But yeah, that’s probably — which is too much to bear to think that I brought this to her bedside, that it’s because of me. And I just say, I’m so sorry, Mommy. I’m so sorry. We need answers. We cannot be at peace without knowing. And someone can do the right thing. And it is never too late to do the right thing.”

Advertisement
Savannah Guthrie spoke on the “Today” show in her first interview since her mother, Nancy Guthrie, was abducted from her home near Tuscon, Ariz.

By Christina Kelso

March 26, 2026

Continue Reading

Trending