Connect with us

News

‘The enemy is always looking for us’: Hidden in the forest, Ukraine’s drone operators are crucial to the eastern battle | CNN

Published

on

‘The enemy is always looking for us’: Hidden in the forest, Ukraine’s drone operators are crucial to the eastern battle | CNN


Close to Kreminna, Ukraine
CNN
 — 

The pine forests close to the town of Kreminna have turn into one of many hottest fight zones within the struggle in jap Ukraine. Virtually each weapon appears to be at work right here, artillery, howitzers, tanks and mortars. However maybe a very powerful is the smallest: The reconnaissance drone.

Ukrainian and Russian forces have been preventing right here for practically two months. If the Ukrainians can break by Russian strains and attain Kreminna, they will disrupt Russian provide routes.

Nevertheless it’s a a lot harder proposition than it was on the finish of final 12 months. Russia’s defensive strains have been strengthened with heavy weapons and long-range artillery.

CNN accompanied two Ukrainian drone operators from the Dnipro-1 battalion deep into the forest to see how they function. The journey was alongside tracks of sentimental sand amid a skinny cover of pine timber, by an eerie panorama dotted with streams and bogs.

Advertisement

A 12 months in the past, one of many drone operators, who gave his identify solely as Ruslan, was a snowboard and kayak teacher. Now he’s watching the motion of Russian armor alongside the forest tracks, expertly skimming his drone throughout the treetops.

Arriving at a foxhole, the drone operators’ autos are rigorously maneuvered beneath tree cowl. The Russians have reconnaissance drones too, and Ukrainian drone operators are considered high-value targets.

Ruslan factors to the east and north: the Russians had been 7 kilometers (4 miles) away in a single course and three kilometers within the different.

A Mavic-3 drone – the workhorse of Ukrainian reconnaissance, even when it weighs lower than a kilogram and has a span of simply 35 centimeters (14 inches) – ascends with a whir from a close-by clearing. It might probably stay aloft for about 45 minutes and journey as much as 30 kilometers in complete, feeding high-definition video again to the operators.

Their job is to supply real-time intelligence on Russian positions and actions, and in addition to assist Ukrainian artillery repair targets. Hidden among the many woods are emplacements of 120mm and 82mm artillery, and someplace close by a large Krab 155 mm howitzer, one among about 50 donated by Poland. The Ukrainians just like the Krab for its accuracy and energy, however it’s demanding to keep up.

Advertisement

“That is artillery battle all day,” Ruslan says.

He’s not exaggerating. There are few moments of silence throughout the hour CNN is with Ruslan and his colleague. Artillery shells launched from a close-by Ukrainian emplacement make a deafening roar. The crump of Russian shelling echoes within the distance.

“The final month, the Russian military are right here an increasing number of,” Ruslan says. “The general line is static however on a regular basis the positions change. Generally the Russians go (ahead) and typically our military goes.”

Meaning firefights within the thick of the forest. Nevertheless it additionally signifies that Ukraine is getting by its artillery munitions quick. Vans rumble by the close by village of Yampil with contemporary provides, however Ruslan says Ukraine wants way more artillery ammunition right here.

Advertisement

Within the close by village of Zarichne, simply past the forest fringe, Russian artillery targets a rickety bridge daily. There’s not a lot of the village left standing: These remaining listed below are primarily the aged and the destitute. They both can’t or received’t depart.

Shelling has caused serious damage to the village of Zarichne, near Kreminna.

Considered one of them – a 69-year-old who provides her identify as Valentina – tells CNN the Russians shell the village on a regular basis.

“It’s harmful however what can we do? We endure. Generally we conceal. However now it’s too chilly within the basement, you possibly can freeze to demise there,” she says.

“Have a look at my home windows, there isn’t any glass remaining. Simply wooden and plastic we used to cowl them. And it’s chilly.”

She appears to be like down the road wistfully, as if remembering higher instances.

Advertisement

Valentina’s daughter is way away in Dnipro, central Ukraine, however she received’t give up her residence to affix her. In spite of everything, she has planted potatoes. “I received’t abandon them,” she says with a drained smile.

Zarichne – like giant swathes of this area – was occupied by the Russians for a lot of final 12 months earlier than being liberated by Ukrainian forces within the fall. However liberation got here in identify solely. The slopes and forests past echo to the affect of rockets and shells. Ukrainian items are dug in among the many pines and sand close by, the place unexploded ordnance litters the forest flooring.

A woman wheels a bicycle through the devastated village of Zarichne, eastern Ukraine.

A couple of miles away, the Dnipro-1 battalion has its personal drone workshop, the place NATO-issue grenades are rigorously sawn in half to be reconstituted as small, free-fall munitions. Underneath a desk sits a slab of C-4 plastic explosive. It’s a painstaking and demanding course of, churning out one a hand-crafted munition each 20 minutes.

Among the unit’s drone munitions are basically fragment grenades dropped on infantry – and particularly fighters from the Russian personal navy contractor Wagner fighters round Bakhmut. Heavier variations can harm or disable a tank.

The commander of Dnipro-1’s drone unit goes by the identify of Graf. He says that drones have turn into “probably the most essential components of this struggle – each for us and the enemy. Nothing will be executed with out drones.”

Advertisement

And that makes his males targets. “In the meanwhile the drone operator is among the most harmful jobs. The enemy is aware of we’re the eyes of our military. As quickly as they find a drone operator, they use every kind of weaponry: barrel artillery, MLRS, tanks,” Graf says.

“We’ve got excessive charge of casualties among the many pilots, the enemy is all the time on the lookout for us.” Graf says.

No Ukrainian soldier on this entrance is beneath the phantasm that this battle can be received quickly. Throughout the jap Donbas area, brutal, attritional battles are unfolding: Good points and losses are measured in a whole bunch of meters.

Graf echoes what each Ukrainian soldier says appears to say. “Now we’re receiving tanks – so we’d like extra tanks. And we’d like aviation and long-range missiles. We’ve got to destroy the enemy on its method to Ukraine. That’s the one option to win.”

And for his unit, Graf goals of getting US Predator assault drones. That’s not into account in Washington, DC.

Advertisement

Within the meantime, Ruslan and his colleagues maintain the road – and in Zarichne, Valentina prays for them.

“God rattling these Russians coming to different folks’s land!” she says. “I stand for Ukraine, I used to be born right here, my ancestors are from right here, I all the time was pro-Ukraine and all the time can be.”

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

News

Donald Trump says US-China trade truce has been ‘signed’

Published

on

Donald Trump says US-China trade truce has been ‘signed’

Unlock the White House Watch newsletter for free

Donald Trump said on Thursday the US and China had signed a trade deal, two weeks after saying they had reached an understanding in London about how to implement a truce in the countries’ dispute.

“We just signed with China yesterday,” the US president said at the White House on Thursday, without providing any details.

A White House official said the US and China had “agreed to an additional understanding for a framework to implement the Geneva agreement”, in a reference to the trade talks that the nations held in May, when they first negotiated a truce.

Advertisement

Two people familiar with the situation said on Thursday that Washington and Beijing appeared to have put in writing what had previously been negotiated but not included in a formal document. Ahead of the London talks, US officials had said they wanted to reach a handshake deal with the Chinese, but some experts said it was naive not to have a document.

The agreement in Geneva involved significantly reducing tariffs on each other for 90 days while they tried to hammer out a comprehensive trade accord. The deal had faltered, however, over disagreements about Chinese rare earth exports and US export controls.

Earlier this month, Treasury secretary Scott Bessent led a team that included commerce secretary Howard Lutnick and US trade representative Jamieson Greer for talks in London with Chinese vice-premier He Lifeng to resolve the impasse. After two days, the sides said they had reached a deal but provided no details.

On Thursday, Lutnick said they had completed the deal that was originally reached in Geneva. “That deal was signed and sealed two days ago,” he told Bloomberg television.

“While we need to look at the details, if the deal brings more certainty, predictability and fairness into US-China trade it will be a great victory for the people of both countries,” said Sean Stein, president of the US-China Business Council. 

Advertisement

China’s commerce ministry on Friday said the two sides had “further confirmed” the details of the framework agreement reached in London. 

It added that approvals of export applications for controlled items would be issued “in accordance with the law’, and that the US side would also lift “restrictive measures” taken against China, without giving further details.

The purported deal comes as the Trump administration works to reach broad agreements on trade with multiple partners ahead of a July 9 deadline when “reciprocal” tariffs the president announced in April would be reapplied. Those levies, of up to 50 per cent on most US trading partners, had been temporarily lowered to 10 per cent for 90 days to allow foreign countries to negotiate.

US officials have since been holding intensive talks with countries including India, Vietnam, South Korea, Japan and the EU to reach permanent settlements. 

Only the UK has reached a trade agreement with the US, while China has secured lower “reciprocal” tariffs of 10 per cent following a period of tit-for-tat tariff increases. Trump has also left in place additional tariffs of 20 per cent on all Chinese imports, citing Beijing’s failure to slow the flow of precursors of the drug fentanyl from China.

Advertisement

The administration is also looking at applying global tariffs to imports in sectors including semiconductors and consumer electronics, aerospace parts, lumber, copper, pharmaceuticals and critical minerals.

Additional reporting by Wenjie Ding in Beijing and Wang Xueqiao in Shanghai

Continue Reading

News

Solar manufacturing is booming. Advocates say it could go bust without incentives

Published

on

Solar manufacturing is booming. Advocates say it could go bust without incentives

An employee works on a solar panel inside a Qcells factory in Dalton, Ga.

Mike Stewart/AP/AP


hide caption

toggle caption

Advertisement

Mike Stewart/AP/AP

A couple of years ago, Mick McDaniel started a company in Indianapolis to make solar panels in the United States. Then-President Joe Biden had just signed the Inflation Reduction Act, a law packed with tax incentives for clean energy. America’s solar market was about to take off.

Since then, tens of billions of dollars have poured into solar factories that are operating or under development, according to the Solar Energy Industries Association, or SEIA, which advocates on behalf of the field. Once those factories are all finished, the facilities could create close to 60,000 manufacturing jobs, the trade group has said.

But those investments are now at risk.

Advertisement

Congressional Republicans are on the verge of rolling back clean-energy tax credits as part of a huge tax-and-spending bill that’s a cornerstone of President Trump’s second-term agenda. On the chopping block are incentives that encourage solar developers to buy American-made products, like solar panels and components.

Abruptly unwinding the incentives would threaten a decade-long push to onshore solar manufacturing and challenge China’s dominance of the sector, according to industry executives and analysts.

“What I see two years out is low-cost will once again drive demand in this market,” says McDaniel, general manager of Bila Solar. He adds, “That’s going to be a hard road for some of us who have [higher costs] than panels made over in China or Southeast Asia.”

President Trump said in a recent post on Truth Social, "I HATE 'GREEN TAX CREDITS'" in the tax-and-spending bill Congress is negotiating.

President Trump said in a recent post on Truth Social, “I HATE ‘GREEN TAX CREDITS’” in the tax-and-spending bill Congress is negotiating.

Mark Schiefelbein/AP/AP


hide caption

Advertisement

toggle caption

Mark Schiefelbein/AP/AP

President Trump supported solar manufacturing in his first term

Since 2022, when Biden signed the Inflation Reduction Act into law, companies have invested $9.1 billion in U.S. solar factories that are operating and another $36.7 billion in facilities that are under construction or in development, according to SEIA.

Advertisement

This year, U.S. factories will be able to make enough solar panels to meet most of the country’s demand, the trade group said.

Asked about the potential impacts of ending clean-energy tax credits that help domestic solar factories, a White House spokesperson, Taylor Rogers, said in a statement to NPR that the “radical climate initiatives” of the Biden administration are costing Americans billions of dollars. “Rather than using taxpayer dollars to subsidize uneconomic energy sources to meet vague climate change goals, President Trump is unleashing energy sources that are economical and will drive down bills for everyday families,” Rogers said.

But Trump himself tried to boost U.S. solar manufacturing during his first term. In 2018, Trump approved tariffs on imported solar cells and panels after the U.S. International Trade Commission found that a flood of imports hurt American companies. In a recent post on Truth Social, Trump complained that China dominates renewable energy supply chains.

Renewables are cost competitive with fossil-fueled energy — even without subsidies, according to the financial firm Lazard. But manufacturers and industry analysts say U.S. solar developers still need incentives to use American-made products.

If the tax credits disappear too soon, companies building solar plants will “buy the cheaper foreign panels to get that cost down as much as you possibly can,” says Doug Lewin, an energy consultant in Texas. “And that leaves the American manufacturer of solar modules [and components] just stranded.”

Advertisement

Trump’s 2018 tariffs helped protect domestic manufacturers, says Scott Moskowitz, vice president of market strategy and industry affairs at Qcells, which announced it was building a Georgia solar factory in 2018 shortly after Trump set the import tariffs. However, Moskowitz says the tax incentives passed under the Biden administration were key to creating demand for solar panels and components that are produced in the U.S.

“It’s not a question of whether or not the country is going to install solar if these provisions are removed or phased out too quickly,” Moskowitz says. “It’s just a matter of where [project developers] are going to get the product from.”

The stakes go beyond who supplies America’s solar market. With more time, Moskowitz says U.S. manufacturers could scale up the size of their operations to compete globally.

“You want to set up that counterweight to China,” Lewin says. “You want to be able to tell Pakistan and Latin America and everywhere else, ‘No, you can go through the United States for this vital resource for the 21st century. You don’t have to go to China.’”

An aerial view of a solar plant in Kayenta, Arizona, in 2024.

An aerial view of a solar plant in Kayenta, Arizona, in 2024.

Brandon Bell/Getty Images/Getty Images North America

Advertisement


hide caption

toggle caption

Brandon Bell/Getty Images/Getty Images North America

Advertisement

Presidents have tried for years to make America a solar manufacturer 

Every president since Barack Obama has used tariffs to try to nurture domestic solar manufacturing by raising costs on imported panels and components — first from China and later from Southeast Asia, as well.

However, tariffs on their own weren’t enough to build a manufacturing sector big enough to meet U.S. solar demand. That’s why the incentives in the Inflation Reduction Act were hailed as a breakthrough by advocates of the domestic solar industry.

“We were already seeing an increase in manufacturing before that, but the IRA was like throwing gas on that fire,” says Lewin, the Texas energy consultant.

But just as American manufacturing is taking off, the outlook for the country’s solar market has now been thrown into doubt by Congress.

Legislative text released by the Senate Finance Committee earlier this month calls for phasing out tax credits for solar plants starting next year. Under current law, those credits, which encourage companies to use American-made products, are scheduled to start phasing out in 2032 or when greenhouse gas emissions from the electricity sector are 25% of 2022 levels, whichever comes later.

Advertisement

“I expect to see a couple of painful years in the U.S. solar industry, period,” says Craig Lawrence, a partner at the investment firm Energy Transition Ventures. “But I ultimately think it bounces back.”

High voltage power lines in Pembroke Pines, Florida.

High voltage power lines in Pembroke Pines, Florida.

Joe Raedle/Getty Images/Getty Images North America


hide caption

toggle caption

Advertisement

Joe Raedle/Getty Images/Getty Images North America

Supporters push for slow tax-credit phaseout

The broader impact of rolling back incentives will depend on the details of whatever lawmakers ultimately agree to.

Without tax credits, America would build fewer clean-energy projects and use more natural gas to generate electricity, according to a study this winter commissioned by the Clean Energy Buyers Association, whose members range from Amazon to ExxonMobil to Walmart.

“There will be some companies that go under if they do this. But we will still see solar built. We’ll just see less of it, and it’ll be more expensive,” Lewin says.

Advertisement

Those costs are expected to be passed on to homeowners, renters and businesses through higher electricity bills, according to the Clean Energy Buyers Association’s study.

Limiting renewable energy development also raises concerns about electric reliability, says Heather Reams, president of Citizens for Responsible Energy Solutions, a right-of-center advocacy group.

“You’re looking at the lights going out and the air conditioning going off in the hot summer,” Reams says. “And then not meeting the [electricity] demands of tomorrow, leaving the U.S. behind competitively.”

Industry executives and analysts say clean energy projects are crucial to meet rising power demand from things like data centers and factories, because the plants can be constructed quickly and produce electricity that is relatively cheap.

Reams’ group has called for lawmakers to delay phasing out the tax credits at least until after 2027. “I don’t think anyone’s arguing they need to be here until the end of time,” she says. “But market certainty is something that all business owners understand.”

Advertisement

Manufacturers are already struggling with the looming policy changes.

“If my market is smaller, what kind of decisions do I have to make about investment, hiring and growth on my side to right size my business for that future that will be smaller?” says McDaniel, the Indianapolis solar manufacturer. “We don’t know how much that demand side will get impacted and how much smaller that market will be.”

With Congress under pressure to deliver Trump a tax-and-spending bill by July 4, solar manufacturers and their supporters are running out of time to sway Republican lawmakers.

“They’re getting ready to walk off the field,” Lewin says, “and cede the 21st century to the Chinese.”

Advertisement
Continue Reading

News

Early intelligence suggests Iran’s uranium largely intact, European officials say

Published

on

Early intelligence suggests Iran’s uranium largely intact, European officials say

Unlock the Editor’s Digest for free

Preliminary intelligence assessments provided to European governments indicate that Iran’s highly enriched uranium stockpile remains largely intact following US strikes on its main nuclear sites, two officials have said.

The people said the intelligence suggested that Iran’s stockpile of 408kg of uranium enriched close to weapons-grade levels was not concentrated in Fordow, one of its two main enrichment sites, at the time of last weekend’s attack.

It had been distributed to various other locations, the assessments found.

Advertisement

The findings call into question US President Donald Trump’s assertion that the bombing had “obliterated” Iran’s nuclear programme.

In an apparent reference to Fordow, Trump wrote on his Truth Social platform on Thursday: “Nothing was taken out of [the] facility. Would take too long, too dangerous, and very heavy and hard to move!”

The people said EU governments were still awaiting a full intelligence report on the extent of the damage to Fordow, which was built deep beneath a mountain near the holy city of Qom, and that one initial report suggested “extensive damages, but not full structural destruction”.

Iranian officials have suggested the enriched uranium stockpile was moved before the US bombing of the plant, which came after days of Israeli strikes on the country.

At a Pentagon press briefing on Thursday, US defence secretary Pete Hegseth sidestepped questions about whether Iran had taken the uranium out of Fordow before the strikes.

Advertisement

When pressed by reporters, Hegseth said: “I’m not aware of any intelligence that I’ve reviewed that says things were not where they were supposed to be, moved or otherwise.”

The US used bunker-buster bombs to attack Fordow and Natanz, Iran’s other main uranium enrichment facility, on Sunday. It fired cruise missiles at a third site, Isfahan, which was used in the fuel conversion cycle and for storage.

Trump has dismissed a provisional American intelligence assessment, leaked to US media, that said Iran’s nuclear programme had been set back by only a matter of months.

Hegseth lambasted the media on Thursday for focusing on the report, which the US Defense Intelligence Agency had later stressed was a “preliminary, low-confidence assessment”.

The Israel Atomic Energy Commission said this week that it had assessed that US and Israeli strikes had “set back Iran’s ability to develop nuclear weapons by many years”.

Advertisement

But experts have warned that if Tehran has retained its stockpile of enriched uranium and set up advance centrifuges at hidden sites, it could still have the capacity to produce the fissile material required for a weapon.

Rafael Grossi, director-general of the International Atomic Energy Agency, told French Radio on Thursday that Iran’s nuclear programme had “suffered enormous damage”, though he said claims of its complete destruction were overblown.

Iran insists its programme is for peaceful civilian purposes.

Fordow was the main site for enriching uranium up to 60 per cent purity, a small step away from weapons grade. Experts said the 408kg stockpile of uranium enriched to 60 per cent had been stored at Fordow, Natanz and Isfahan before Israel launched its war against Iran on June 13.

Iran’s total stockpile of enriched uranium was more than 8,400kg, but most of that was enriched to low levels.

Advertisement

Satellite images of Fordow after Sunday’s bombing show tunnel entrances apparently sealed with earth and holes that may be the entry points of the US’s 30,000lb precision-guided bunker busters. Access roads also appear damaged.

Grossi said this week that Iranian foreign minister Abbas Araghchi had sent a letter to the IAEA on June 13 warning that Iran would “adopt special measures to protect our nuclear equipment and materials”.

Grossi said the UN nuclear watchdog’s inspectors, who have been unable to visit the plants since Israel launched its assault on Iran, should be allowed to return to the sites to “account for the stockpiles of uranium, including, most importantly, the 408kg enriched to 60 per cent”.

The US had not provided definitive intelligence to EU allies on Iran’s remaining nuclear capabilities following the strikes, and was withholding clear guidance on how it plans future relations with Tehran, said three officials briefed on the discussions.

EU policy towards Tehran was “on hold” pending a new initiative from Washington on seeking a diplomatic solution to the nuclear crisis, the people said, adding that conversations between Trump and EU leaders this week had failed to provide a clear message.

Advertisement

The Trump administration had been holding indirect negotiations with Tehran before the war in the hopes of a deal to curb its nuclear activities.

Trump said on Wednesday that Washington would talk to Tehran next week, but he also suggested a deal might not be needed following the strikes on Iran’s nuclear plants.

“It is completely erratic,” said one of the people. “For now, we are doing nothing.”

Continue Reading

Trending