Connect with us

News

Ronald Reagan tried the UK’s economic plan. It didn’t work | CNN Business

Published

on

Ronald Reagan tried the UK’s economic plan. It didn’t work | CNN Business

A model of this story first appeared in CNN Enterprise’ Earlier than the Bell publication. Not a subscriber? You may enroll proper right here. You may hearken to an audio model of the publication by clicking the identical hyperlink.


New York
CNN Enterprise
 — 

The British pound hit a report low in opposition to the greenback on Monday after UK Prime Minister Liz Truss, a fan of “trickle-down economics,” introduced a sweeping spending and tax reduce plan to rescue the British financial system from recession on Friday.

What’s taking place: Buyers had been greatly surprised by the brand new authorities’s option to institute its largest tax reduce in 50 years whereas boosting authorities spending and borrowing with inflation close to 40-year highs. Citibank analysts referred to as the choice a “large, unfunded gamble for the UK financial system.” Markets dropped precipitously on the information.

Advertisement

However Truss took a cue from former US President Ronald Reagan as she defended her actions. The federal government is “incentivizing companies to take a position, and we’re additionally serving to bizarre individuals with their taxes,” she instructed CNN’s Jake Tapper final week, referencing Reagan’s trickle-down beliefs.

So is she proper? Let’s mud off our historical past books and see.

Attention-grabbing parallels: When Reagan arrived in Washington in 1981, inflation charges had been almost 10% and tight financial coverage had taken rates of interest to over 19%. However very similar to Truss, Reagan argued that huge tax cuts and deregulation would stimulate productiveness and he championed a sweeping tax reduce that was handed by Congress that yr.

Truss’ authorities factors to that as proof that reducing taxes doesn’t essentially drive up costs. Inflation fell and development surged beneath Reagan, it says.

However the coverage got here at a value. In accordance with US Treasury estimates, Reagan’s tax cuts diminished federal revenues by about 9% within the first couple of years. In the meantime, unemployment saved rising.

Advertisement

Congress concluded the sweeping tax cuts had been unsustainable. With Reagan’s approval, it raised taxes by loads in 1982, 1983, 1984 and 1987.

A lesson from historical past: “When tax cuts are actually too massive to be sustainable, they’re usually adopted by tax will increase,” wrote David Wessel, director of The Hutchins Middle on Fiscal and Financial Coverage.

And within the close to time period, for the UK, there’s additionally an enormous threat to its foreign money. The US greenback appreciated in the course of the Reagan tax cuts as a result of it advantages from international reserve foreign money standing. A powerful foreign money helps include inflation and makes imports cheaper. Britain, seeing report drops in its personal foreign money, doesn’t have that benefit.

The underside line: The British pound will probably hit backside in three months, wrote Goldman Sachs economist Kamakshya Trivedi in a notice Monday. “But when [tax] coverage doesn’t ultimately change tack, then we might count on Sterling underperformance to persist for longer,” he stated.

That’s dangerous information for markets across the globe. S&P 500 corporations which have a worldwide footprint are getting hit arduous by the robust greenback and weakening pound — about 30% of all S&P 500 corporations’ income is earned in markets outdoors the US.

Advertisement

The final time taxes in Britain had been reduce this a lot, there was rampant inflation, an enormous soar in debt and ultimately an IMF bailout. “It’s tough to see how the pound can recuperate from right here,” wrote Fiona Cincotta, senior monetary markets analyst, at Metropolis Index, in a notice. “Buyers are quickly pulling out of UK belongings, and who can blame them?”

We all know the British pound is falling in opposition to the greenback, however what does that imply precisely?

A falling pound is dire information for an financial system that will already be in recession, reviews my colleague Julia Horowitz. As the worth of sterling falls, it turns into dearer to import important items usually paid for in US {dollars} like meals and gasoline. That would fan decades-high inflation that’s stoking a cost-of-living disaster for thousands and thousands of households.

Then there’s the fast rise in borrowing prices for the federal government, companies and households. Buyers count on Britain’s central financial institution, the Financial institution of England might want to improve rates of interest way more aggressively to get inflation in verify.

A basic pressure between the central financial institution and British authorities might additionally fan volatility. Whereas the Truss authorities needs to spice up demand to take the sting off a recession this winter, the Financial institution of England is making an attempt to chill the financial system so it may well put a lid on the quickest value will increase amongst G7 nations. That friction will cut back confidence within the path ahead.

Advertisement

“If markets nonetheless don’t place confidence in the fiscal image, I’m unsure how the Financial institution of England wins this,” Mujtaba Rahman, managing director for Europe on the consultancy Eurasia Group stated.

International central banks are jacking up rates of interest ad infinitum till excessive inflation is vanquished, reviews CNN’s chief enterprise correspondent Christine Romans. Listed below are 5 teams feeling the ache consequently.

Investors: By the seems of final week’s inventory market motion, Wall Road is waking as much as the very fact the Fed will stay aggressive. Bond yields are rising, making shares look much less enticing.

Then there’s Goldman Sachs’ S&P 500 value goal downgrade, its fourth this yr, to three,600 from 4,300. That’s a whopping 16% reduce. For inventory traders, the gloom is palpable. The pathway to a tender touchdown appears harder by the day.

Homebuyers: Mortgage charges have greater than doubled from the report low final yr of two.87% to only over 6% final week. That provides greater than $700 in month-to-month curiosity funds to the identical home bought a yr in the past.

Advertisement

Final week, Fed Chair Jerome Powell instructed me that renters would additionally be feeling the ache. “Hope for the very best, plan for the worst,” he stated about rental value inflation. “You’ve simply received to imagine that it’s going to stay fairly excessive for some time.

Automotive consumers: The common rate of interest for a 60-month new automobile mortgage was 3.85% in the beginning of the yr. It’s now hovering above 5%.

The market to purchase a brand new or used automobile remains to be out of whack due to pandemic-related supply-chain issues. Greater rates of interest make financing a automobile — when you’ll find one — much more costly.

Staff: Powell and the Fed have been clear that they may tolerate, and should even need, the next jobless fee to chill inflation. The US financial system has added again 3.6 million jobs this yr and recovered all the roles misplaced within the pandemic, however the Fed’s inflation campaign might lead to a lack of 1.2 million.

The Convention Board releases September US shopper confidence information at 10:00 a.m. ET. 

Advertisement

The US Census Bureau releases new residence gross sales at 10:00 a.m. ET. 

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

News

Read the Letter to the Inspectors General

Published

on

Read the Letter to the Inspectors General

Your investigation of these allegations is consistent with the IG’s mission to prevent waste, fraud, and abuse in federal agencies, and can help determine if politically connected crypto interests are undermining our national security. As Congress considers legislation on the market structure for digital assets, we must ensure that cryptocurrencies like USD1 are not providing the President and senior officials with the ability to line their pockets at the expense of the public interest.

The following facts have been reported in multiple outlets regarding Mr. Witkoff:

• Mr. Witkoff’s son Zach Witkoff is the CEO of World Liberty Financial (WLF), which the President’s family owns a majority stake in.³
• Beginning in January, one of Sheikh Tahnoon’s employees, Fiacc Larkin, joined WLF as the “chief strategic advisor” while continuing to work at G42, an AI investment firm owned by Sheikh Tahnoon that, according to the U.S. intelligence community, works closely with Chinese military companies.4



On May 1, 2025, Zach Witkoff announced that MGX, a state-owned investment firm controlled by Sheikh Tahnoon, had agreed to use a WLF-issued stablecoin, USD1, to make a $2 billion investment in Binance. As a result of this deal, WLF stands to reap hundreds of millions of dollars in transaction fees from MGX, and more from the returns on any investments it makes with the $2 billion deposit.³
As of August, Mr. Witkoff maintained a financial interest in WLF and thus stands to personally benefit from his son’s business dealings with the UAE.6 Nevertheless, he did not recuse himself from deliberations regarding the UAE, which may violate federal ethics law.

The following facts have been reported about Mr. Sacks:







He is a special government employee who continues to serve as a “general partner” at his venture capital fund, Craft Ventures.

8

The Abu Dhabi Investment Authority, an Emirati sovereign wealth fund controlled by Sheikh Tahnoon, was an early investor in Craft Ventures and continues to hold an investment in the fund.
In addition, Craft Ventures is invested in BitGo, which has partnered with WLF to provide the technical infrastructure for USD1. If BitGo’s valuation grows, based on the UAE’s investment into USD1, Mr. Sacks and his firm stand to benefit.

3 Yahoo Finance, “Trump family reportedly has a 60% stake in the World Liberty Financial,” Anand Sinha, March 31, 2025,
https://finance.yahoo.com/news/trump-family-reportedly-60-stake-172742661.html.
4 New York Times, “Inside U.S. Efforts to Untangle an A.I. Giant’s Ties to China,” Mark Mazzetti and Edward
Wong, Nov. 27, 2023, www.nytimes.com/2023/11/27/us/politics/ai-us-uae-china-security-g42.html.
5 New York Times, “At a Dubai Conference, Trump’s Conflicts Take Center Stage,” David Yaffe-Bellany, May 1, 2025, https://www.nytimes.com/2025/05/01/us/politics/trump-cryptocurrency-usd1-dubai-conference-

announcement.html.

6U.S Office of Government Ethics, Form 278e for Steven C. Witkoff, August 13, 2025, p. 23, https://static01.nyt.com/newsgraphics/documenttools/090d0de07e1d2fdf/bbf02867-full.pdf.

18 U.S.C. § 208.

8 White House, “Limited Waiver Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 208(b)(1) Regarding A.I. Assets,” June 2025,
https://www.whitehouse.gov/wp-content/uploads/2025/06/David-Sacks.pdf.

2

Continue Reading

News

Farage refuses to criticise Trump over paracetamol despite health experts dismissing autism claims

Published

on

Farage refuses to criticise Trump over paracetamol despite health experts dismissing autism claims

Nigel Farage has refused to criticise Donald Trump’s claims that paracetamol, sold in the US as Tylenol, could cause autism, insisting “science is never settled” and he would never “side with” medical experts.

The Reform UK leader said he had “no idea” if the US president was right to tell pregnant women to avoid taking acetaminophen, also known as Tylenol and paracetamol, and suggesting that those who could not “tough it out” should limit their intake.

Scientists and global health agencies including the World Health Organization have strongly dismissed Trump’s false claims, calling them misguided and saying the evidence linking paracetamol use in pregnancy and autism was “inconsistent”.

The UK’s health secretary, Wes Streeting, told the British public they should not “pay any attention whatsoever to what Donald Trump says about medicine”, adding: “I trust doctors over President Trump frankly, on this.”

But in a wide-ranging interview with LBC’s Nick Ferrari, Farage was asked directly if Trump was right to share those unproven claims. He said: “I have no idea, I’ve no idea. You know we were told thalidomide was a very safe drug and it wasn’t. Who knows Nick, I don’t know.

Advertisement

“He [Trump] has a particular thing about autism. I think because there’s been some in his family, he feels it very personally. I’ve no idea.”

When Farage was asked if he would side with medical experts who say it is dangerous to make the link, he added: “I wouldn’t. I wouldn’t. When it comes to science, I don’t side with anybody, right? You know? I don’t side with anybody, because science is never settled. We should remember that.”

Yet when challenged over whether it was irresponsible for Trump to make such an unproven claim, Farage said: “That’s an opinion he’s [Trump’s] got. It’s not one that I necessarily share.”

Farage’s refusal to condemn Trump’s claims comes weeks after a controversial doctor, Aseem Malhotra, was given top billing at Reform UK’s party conference and used his main-stage speech to claim the Covid vaccine caused cancer in the royal family. Malhotra is an adviser to Trump’s health secretary, Robert F Kennedy.

In the same interview, Farage said Trump was “right to say” that sharia law “is an issue in London”.

Advertisement

“Never take what he [Trump] says literally, ever on anything. But always take everything he says seriously,” Farage said, adding: Trump “has a point.”

“So is he right to say that sharia is an issue in London? Yes. Is it an overwhelming issue at this stage? No. Has the mayor of London directly linked himself to it? No.”

Labour MPs have urged Keir Starmer to reprimand Trump’s administration after the US president falsely claimed in a speech to the United Nations: “I look at London, where you have a terrible mayor, terrible, terrible mayor, and it’s been changed, it’s been so changed.

skip past newsletter promotion

“Now they want to go to sharia law. But you are in a different country, you can’t do that.”

Trump has been publicly attacking the London mayor, Sadiq Khan, since 2015 when the Labour politician criticised Trump, the then presidential candidate, for suggesting that Muslims should be banned from travelling to the US.

A spokesperson for Khan said: “We are not going to dignify his appalling and bigoted comments with a response. London is the greatest city in the world, safer than major US cities and we’re delighted to welcome the record number of US citizens moving here.”

During the LBC phone-in, Farage also said Reform’s plan to ban anyone who was not a UK citizen from claiming benefits would not apply to Ukrainians and Hongkongers.

Advertisement

“No, because they come for different reasons,” Farage said, adding those who had lived in the UK on indefinite leave to remain and had not worked or paid into the system would be told their benefits would be cut.

Continue Reading

News

Alphabet market value exceeds $3tn

Published

on

Alphabet market value exceeds tn

Unlock the Editor’s Digest for free

Alphabet’s market capitalisation surged above $3tn for the first time on Monday on the back of a sharp rally for the search giant’s shares over the past few weeks.

Shares in Google’s parent company have climbed more than 30 per cent to a record high of $252 since the group posted double-digit growth in revenue and profit in quarterly results out in late July.

The rally means Alphabet joins Nvidia, Microsoft and Apple as the only US companies valued above $3tn. Chipmaker Nvidia in July became the first company to hit a $4tn market value.

Advertisement

This is a developing story

Continue Reading

Trending