Connect with us

News

Opinion: The lucky stroke that helped investigators solve the Lockerbie bombing | CNN

Published

on

Opinion: The lucky stroke that helped investigators solve the Lockerbie bombing | CNN

Editor’s Observe: Peter Bergen is CNN’s nationwide safety analyst, a vice chairman at New America and a professor of apply at Arizona State College. Bergen is the creator of “The Price of Chaos: The Trump Administration and the World.” The views expressed on this commentary are his personal. View extra opinion on CNN.



CNN
 — 

Simply days earlier than Christmas in 1988, Pan Am Flight 103 flying from London to New York blew up over Lockerbie, Scotland, killing 270 folks – together with 190 People. Thirty-five victims have been Syracuse College college students going house for the vacations after learning overseas. It was essentially the most deadly terrorist assault in opposition to American civilians till the September 11 assaults of 2001.

On Sunday, the US Division of Justice introduced it had taken custody of a Libyan man, Abu Agila Mohammad Mas’ud Kheir Al-Marimi, who’s alleged to have been concerned in making the bomb that blew up the passenger jet. The DOJ described him as a former senior intelligence officer within the regime of Libyan dictator Moammar Gadhafi.

Advertisement

Al-Marimi hasn’t entered a plea within the case. One other Libyan intelligence officer working for Gadhafi, Abdelbaset al-Megrahi, was convicted in 2001 of the bombing of Pan Am 103. Megrahi died in 2012.

Virtually three and a half many years have handed since Pan Am 103 was introduced down, and lots of could also be questioning why Gadhafi and his intelligence officers carried out this bombing and why they thought they could get away with it.

The context for the bombing of Pan Am 103 was that the administration of former President Ronald Reagan and Gadhafi have been at conflict – not a declared typical conflict, however a conflict nonetheless – fought with terrorist bombs by the Libyans and with airstrikes by the Reagan administration.

Gadhafi was a Soviet navy shopper who espoused an obscure revolutionary philosophy, which made him anathema to the Reagan administration.

Early in his first time period in Might 1981, Reagan ordered the closure of the Libyan embassy in Washington, DC, and the expulsion of Libyan diplomats in america due to “Libyan provocations and misconduct, together with assist for worldwide terrorism.”

Advertisement

On April 5, 1986, a bomb went off within the La Belle discotheque in Berlin that off-duty US servicemen frequented. The bombing killed two US troopers and a Turkish girl, and injured greater than 200 others.

The Reagan administration shortly decided that Libyan intelligence brokers more than likely carried out the assault. In response, Reagan ordered the bombing of a number of targets in Libya, telling the American folks in an handle from the Oval Workplace on April 14, 1986, “At 7 this night Japanese time, air and naval forces of america launched a sequence of strikes in opposition to the headquarters, terrorist amenities and navy belongings that assist Moammar Gadhafi’s subversive actions.”

Gadhafi claimed that his toddler daughter was killed in these strikes (though, lately, this declare about his daughter has been questioned). Different Gadhafi relations have been reported to have been wounded within the strikes, one in every of which hit one of many dictator’s residences.

It took greater than two years for Gadhafi to actual his revenge on the US. Throughout that point, Libyan intelligence brokers assembled a complicated bomb secreted in a radio cassette participant.

The bomb labored on a timer and was hidden in a suitcase. Within the days earlier than rigorous airport safety, the bomb-filled suitcase was positioned by a Libyan agent on a flight from Malta to Frankfurt, and the suitcase was then “routed to a feeder flight in Frankfurt sure for London’s Heathrow Airport, the place it was finally loaded onto the doomed jet,” in line with the FBI.

Advertisement

The terrorist plot labored, sadly, very nicely for the Libyans however for one essential element: The bomb was on a timer, and when it blew up, Pan Am 103 was nonetheless flying over land relatively than over the Atlantic. If the aircraft had blown up barely later the jet would have been flying over the ocean, which might have made a forensic investigation of the crash website almost unattainable.

As an alternative, Scottish authorities painstakingly reassembled each piece of the aircraft and its contents that they may get well on their soil. That led investigators to the suitcase that had contained the bomb and, in an astonishing piece of detective work, finally led them to the Libyan intelligence brokers that had overseen the bombing.

On Sunday, the US Division of Justice introduced that Al-Marimi, the alleged bomb maker, was now in American custody. He’ll make an preliminary look at a courtroom in Washington, DC, virtually precisely 34 years after Pan Am 103 blew up over Lockerbie, Scotland, killing all on board and eleven others on the bottom.

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

News

PwC accused of interfering in Australian tax leaks probe

Published

on

PwC accused of interfering in Australian tax leaks probe

Unlock the Editor’s Digest for free

PwC has been accused of interfering in Australia’s political and regulatory affairs after documents revealed the Big Four accounting group warned its local firm against co-operating with investigations into a damaging tax leaks scandal without permission.

The Australian Senate published documents on Friday that included a letter from Diana Weiss, PwC’s global counsel, sent to PwC Australia last year. She wrote that the local firm needed to comply with a set of remedial actions or face suspension, or expulsion, from the global network.

A drastic move by PwC International to take control of PwC Australia last year followed the publication of internal PwC emails by the Senate in May. They revealed a partner in its tax practice had used confidential information from government meetings to assist his colleagues in winning new business from multinational technology companies.

Advertisement

The Weiss letter, sent in May two weeks after PwC launched a review of its Australian firm, stipulated that PwC Australia should not provide “any regulator or other governmental or legal authority any formal, significant or substantive submissions or responses” without approval from Weiss and a representative of PwC International’s leadership team.

The letter said Weiss and the network’s representative also had to sign off any decisions related to the accountability of individuals regarding the tax leaks scandal.

Deborah O’Neill, chair of the Senate committee conducting the inquiry into the consulting industry, said on Friday that the Weiss letter demonstrated, “in crystal-clear detail, the lengths to which PwC International went in its attempt to inhibit transparency and accountability in the wake of the tax leaks scandal”.

“The full implications of PwC International’s clear intent to interfere with Australian parliamentary, regulatory and legal authorities must be determined,” she said, adding that the Australian public deserved to know how PwC International had acted to “firewall itself from the Australian firm” to protect its global reputation.

The Weiss letter was also sent to the firm’s global chair Bob Moritz and partner Kevin Burrowes, who was named as chief executive of PwC Australia in June last year, a month after it was sent. It said the tax leaks scandal had caused “ongoing reputational and global brand damage” to PwC.

Advertisement

PwC Australia declined to comment on the senator’s statement, and PwC International was not immediately available for comment.

The scandal provoked an ongoing investigation into the actions and culture of PwC Australia — and the wider consulting industry — and led to repeated calls for the global unit to release details of its own investigation detailing which international partners used the confidential information.

Despite the release of the Weiss letter, the Senate documents revealed that two subsequent letters related to the remediation process were not provided to the Senate, as they contained “commercially sensitive” and “personal sensitive” information.

PwC this week said Asia-Pacific profits declined nearly 13 per cent in the year to June, as it lost market share as a result of scandals in Australia and China.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

News

Boeing cleaned up on Air Force parts, including soap dispensers marked up 8,000%

Published

on

Boeing cleaned up on Air Force parts, including soap dispensers marked up 8,000%

A United States Air Force C-17 cargo plane loaded with humanitarian aid lands at Camilo Daza airport in Cucuta, Colombia, on Feb. 16, 2019.

Fernando Vergara/AP


hide caption

toggle caption

Advertisement

Fernando Vergara/AP

WASHINGTON — Boeing overcharged the Air Force nearly $1 million for spare parts on C-17 cargo planes, including an 8,000% markup for simple lavatory soap dispensers, according to the Pentagon’s inspector general.

The Defense Department’s auditor reviewed prices paid for 46 spare parts on the C-17 from 2018 to 2022 and found that 12 were overpriced and nine seemed reasonably priced. It couldn’t determine the fairness of prices on the other 25 items.

The Office of the Inspector General said it reviewed the soap dispenser prices after getting a hotline tip.

Advertisement

Boeing disputed the findings.

“We are reviewing the report, which appears to be based on an inapt comparison of the prices paid for parts that meet aircraft and contract specifications and designs versus basic commercial items that would not be qualified or approved for use on the C-17,” Boeing said in a statement. “We will continue to work with the OIG and the U.S. Air Force to provide a detailed written response to the report in the coming days.”

The C-17 Globemaster is one of the military’s largest cargo aircraft. It can carry multiple military vehicles, large pallets of humanitarian supplies or, in extreme circumstances, hundreds of people. The Air Force flew C-17s nonstop for two weeks during the hectic August 2021 withdrawal from Afghanistan, evacuating more than 120,000 civilians fleeing the Taliban.

Since 2011, the U.S. government has awarded Boeing more than $30 billion in contracts to purchase needed spare parts for the C-17 and be reimbursed by the Air Force.

Boeing is still trying to recover from financial and reputational damage caused by two deadly crashes in 2018 and 2019 of its bestselling airline jet, the 737 Max.

Advertisement

This has been a particularly volatile year for the aerospace giant. It came under renewed scrutiny and federal investigations after a door plug flew off a 737 Max during an Alaska Airlines flight in January. Federal regulators limited Boeing production of the plane.

In July, Boeing agreed to plead guilty to a felony count of conspiracy to defraud the government for misleading regulators who approved pilot training rules for the Max. That plea deal is pending before a federal judge in Texas.

Boeing is on its third chief executive in five years, having hired an outsider who joined the company in August. Last week, Boeing reported a third-quarter loss of more than $6 billion because of charges for several commercial, defense and space programs.

A strike by 33,000 union machinists is now seven weeks old and has crippled production of 737s, 777s and 767 freighters, cutting off much-need cash. New CEO Kelly Ortberg has announced roughly 17,000 layoffs, and the company will issue new stock to raise up to $19 billion to shore up its debt-laden balance sheet.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

News

Revolutionary Guard commanders vow response to Israel attack on Iran

Published

on

Revolutionary Guard commanders vow response to Israel attack on Iran

Unlock the Editor’s Digest for free

The top commander of Iran’s elite Revolutionary Guards issued a stark warning to Israel on Thursday, vowing that Tehran would deliver a harsh response to last week’s Israeli strikes on the Islamic republic.

Major General Hossein Salami, the head of the guards corps, warned in a speech that Iran’s retaliation would be “unimaginable” as Iranian officials stepped up their rhetoric against Israel.

“Israelis think they can launch a couple of missiles and change history,” he said. “You have not forgotten . . . how Iranian missiles opened up the sky . . . and made you sleepless.”

Advertisement

Separately his deputy, Brigadier General Ali Fadavi, told Al Mayadeen, a Lebanese television channel close to Iran, that a response would be “inevitable”. In more than 40 years, “we have not left any aggression without a response”, he said.

The belligerent comments came as the Islamic regime weighs its options following Israel’s attack on Saturday, during which Israeli war planes launched three waves of strikes at Iranian military installations. The targets included missile factories and air defence systems in three provinces, including Tehran.

Regime insiders told the Financial Times that the options being considered include a possible strike before next week’s US presidential election, or Iran’s leaders could decide to hold off for now.

“The winner of the US election could take an Iranian attack personally and act against Iran. So, if Iran wants to respond to Israel, the best time is before the US election,” one insider said. “The only thing that could change this would be a fair breakthrough in ceasefire talks between [Hizbollah in] Lebanon and Israel which does not seem very likely.”

The US has this week stepped up efforts to broker a deal to end the conflict that has lasted more than a year between Israel and Hizbollah, Iran’s most important proxy.

Advertisement

But there was little optimism of a breakthrough as Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu insisted Israel retain the right to unilaterally enforce any agreement that would lead to Hizbollah withdrawing from southern Lebanon.

Another Iranian insider indicated Tehran might opt to maintain psychological pressure on Israel rather than launch a direct assault.

“With Hizbollah launching tens of rockets into Israel daily in a legitimate war, a direct response may not be necessary right now,” the insider said. “What benefits us is not a direct war with Israel. We need to keep the level of people’s stress low so that they can live their lives. This is the top priority.”

But an Iranian analyst said the dilemma for Tehran was “that Israel would take any delay in Iran’s response as a sign of weakness and would feel emboldened”.

Iran’s initial reaction to Israel’s strikes — which were in retaliation for an Iranian missile barrage fired at the Jewish state on October 1 — suggested that Tehran’s response would be measured and not immediate, Iranian analysts said.

Advertisement

Speaking on Sunday, a day after Israel’s attack, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, the country’s supreme leader and ultimate decision maker, refrained from vowing to retaliate.

Instead, he said the strikes should neither be “overestimated or underestimated”. Iranian state media played down the impact of the attack, which killed four soldiers and a civilian, saying the damage was limited.

But Tehran has shown a willingness to risk an escalation with Israel as regional hostilities triggered by Hamas’s October 7 2023 attack have spread across the Middle East, thrusting Iran’s years-long shadow war with its regional enemy into the open.

In April, it fired more than 300 drones and missiles at Israel in a clearly telegraphed retaliation for an Israeli strike on the republic’s embassy compound in Syria, which killed several senior guards commanders.

It gave little notice before launching 180 ballistic missiles at Israel on October 1, a more severe attack that was in response to the Israeli assassination of Hassan Nasrallah, Hizbollah’s leader and a close confidant of Khamenei.

Advertisement

“Only a shock can stop Israel from its aggressions and free the region from the current stalemate,” the first regime insider said. “Iran might even go for a big bang and do something totally outside Israelis’ calculations as there is no other way to stop it.”

The US, which has pledged an “ironclad” commitment to the defence of Israel, has warned Iran not to retaliate as western nations have sought to contain the crisis amid heightened fears of all-out war.

“We will not hesitate to act in self defence. Let there be no confusion. The United States does not want to see further escalation,” Linda Thomas-Greenfield, the US ambassador to the UN, said this week.

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending