Connect with us

News

‘Not for the faint of heart’: Private equity’s last retail barbarian

Published

on

‘Not for the faint of heart’: Private equity’s last retail barbarian

Ailing retailers like Walgreens Boots Alliance have scared off even the most daring Wall Street financiers. But that fear has repeatedly proven an opportunity for Sycamore Partners’ Stefan Kaluzny.

The intensely secretive co-founder of the private equity firm has been able to make big bets that Americans are not done with malls and in-person shopping, with few rivals daring to circle.

This week Sycamore, which has sucked up waning brands such as Staples, Talbots and Ann Taylor despite managing only about $10bn, announced its biggest deal yet: a $23.7bn transaction to take Walgreens private.

The buyout firm now has to revive a business ravaged by declining prescription drug reimbursements and ecommerce, with 12,500 outlets spanning the US, Europe and Latin America, under brands including Walgreens, Boots, Duane Reade and Benavides. Many peers see the stores as unsalvageable.

“It’s not for the faint of heart,” one lawyer who has worked with Sycamore said of leveraged buyouts in the retail sector. “Oftentimes these deals have less competition because [they’re] going where other people won’t touch with a 10-foot pole.”

Advertisement
Sycamore co-founder Stefan Kaluzny has refined his technique over 14 years of buyouts © Slaven Vlasic/Getty Images/AAFA American Image Awards

Kaluzny’s well-worn playbook starts with the intricate dossiers Sycamore maintains on hundreds of US retail chains, one Wall Street veteran recalled.

The next step is achieving a modest purchase price. Sycamore has developed a reputation for bargaining hard right up until signing. In some cases — the $6.9bn deal for office supplies chain Staples, for example — Sycamore has even pulled off price chips after reaching a handshake on the terms, according to securities filings and deal insiders.

After landing a deal, Sycamore makes aggressive plans to get its equity investment back quickly by breaking up a target or selling off real estate to generate immediate cash proceeds.

With Staples, Kaluzny rapidly separated the consumer chain that had been battered by Amazon from the business-to-business segment, and sold the company’s headquarters to itself so that it could then collect lease payments. The result: a $1bn dividend within a few years.

“Sycamore is willing . . . to get their hands dirty,” one person involved in the Walgreens buyout said.

Advertisement

The firm’s success had less to do with “brilliant operational moves” than the fact they were “not sentimental” and were willing to shut down or liquidate business lines quickly, the person said. “They’re willing to play hardball.”

Sycamore and Kaluzny declined to comment.

Such high-stakes gambits are typical of an investor seen by peers as a brutally tough negotiator with a stomach for some of the most complex turnarounds on Wall Street.

Kaluzny honed his craft at buyout group Golden Gate Capital, before setting up Sycamore in 2011. It was a rich time to buy brick-and-mortar retailers: shopping centres were still full of foot traffic and the 2008 financial crisis had knocked many of their businesses off track, creating cheap opportunities for pugnacious investors such as Apollo Global Management and KKR.

Yet since then, the approach has sometimes struggled.

Advertisement

Investing in retail companies with hulking real estate footprints and thousands of employees can be treacherous, and when retailers fail, they do not collapse quietly.

Previous Sycamore deals involved the owner of shoe Stuart Weitzman and Kurt Geiger © Chris Ratcliffe/Bloomberg
The buyout firm’s latest acquisition is for a different type of troubled retailer, Walgreens Boots Alliance © Bridget Bennett/Bloomberg

“Private equity firms have lost so much money in retail,” said one banker that has worked with Sycamore. “Retail and leverage don’t usually work well. If you get the timing wrong, if you get the fashion wrong, you get your head handed to you.”

One of Sycamore’s thornier situations was its 2014 investment in retail conglomerate Jones Group, where the buyout firm sold two of the company’s most valuable brands — Stuart Weitzman and Kurt Geiger — to another entity it controlled.

It renamed the rump of the business Nine West, which filed for bankruptcy in 2018, and sparked a legal brawl.

Creditors accused the private equity group of stripping Nine West of valuable assets, leaving it unable to pay off its debt and ultimately insolvent. Sycamore settled the dispute in court by paying junior bondholders; in exchange, the group received releases from future liabilities related to the buyout.

Three years after Nine West’s bankruptcy filing, another Sycamore portfolio company, private department store chain Belk, filed for bankruptcy under the weight of more than $1bn in debt after six years under the firm’s ownership. Sycamore ultimately ceded control of the company to lenders in a restructuring last year.

Advertisement

Sycamore’s first fund had returned 24 per cent as of the third quarter of last year, while its third fund from 2018 had brought in 18 per cent, according to a person familiar with the returns and public filings. However, its second one from 2014 has only returned 5 per cent.

The private equity group launched a fourth fundraise during the second half of last year which has yet to close, according to a person familiar with the matter.

While private equity titans like Blackstone and KKR have generally walked away from retail buyouts, Sycamore — and Kaluzny — has stuck around.

Kaluzny has run the firm on his own since 2022, when his co-founder Peter Morrow departed. “Stefan’s smart about it,” said the lawyer. “They really scrutinise the assets and figure out ways they can capture value, in a way other people couldn’t.”

With Walgreens Boots, the 90 per cent drop in the company’s market capitalisation in the past decade spells opportunity.

Advertisement

US pharmacy chains have suffered from a punishing combination of flagging sales and steeper costs, and Walgreens has been no exception.

The buyout group will attempt to turn the business around by using the same game plan it has applied to other targets in its 14 years of buying brands, according to people familiar with the group’s business strategy.

Sycamore ultimately plans to split the pharmacy chain into at least three businesses, the Financial Times previously reported. The company’s US pharmacy retailer Walgreens, its British retail arm Boots, and the speciality pharma unit Shields Health Solutions are among the units that could ultimately become independent companies.

Pulling that off means putting in place precise financing arrangements for the deal to reflect the differing prospects of the businesses, one of the reasons the buyout took months to negotiate.

Lenders to the US retail business, for example, required Sycamore to secure the debt with inventory, including prescription drugs, according to a person involved in the deal.

Advertisement

Such a structure gives lenders — which include private credit firm Ares — a claim on the assets if the unit defaults on its debt or ultimately files for bankruptcy.

Cleaving a company into parts can help buyout firms unlock conglomerate discounts and secure a higher overall payout, and Sycamore is well practised in the art. But there is still considerable work to be done whipping parts of Walgreens’ core business into shape for potential future buyers.

“Presumably Sycamore’s going to be focused on cost-cutting and cost-reduction to improve cash flow,” said James Goldstein, the head of US retail at CreditSights.

“I’m sure they’ll push hard, but do they have better ideas of how to fix the pharmacy business than the existing management team or anyone else? I don’t know.”

Additional reporting by Sujeet Indap, Antoine Gara and Eric Platt in New York

Advertisement

News

National Park Service will void passes with stickers over Trump’s face

Published

on

National Park Service will void passes with stickers over Trump’s face

The Interior Department’s new “America the Beautiful” annual pass for U.S. national parks.

Department of Interior


hide caption

toggle caption

Advertisement

Department of Interior

The National Park Service has updated its policy to discourage visitors from defacing a picture of President Trump on this year’s pass.

The use of an image of Trump on the 2026 pass — rather than the usual picture of nature — has sparked a backlash, sticker protests, and a lawsuit from a conservation group.

The $80 annual America the Beautiful pass gives visitors access to more than 2,000 federal recreation sites. Since 2004, the pass has typically showcased sweeping landscapes or iconic wildlife, selected through a public photo contest. Past winners have featured places like Arches National Park in Utah and images of bison roaming the plains.

Advertisement

Instead, of a picture of nature, this year’s design shows side-by-side portraits of Presidents George Washington and Trump. The new design has drawn criticism from parkgoers and ignited a wave of “do-it-yourself” resistance.

Photos circulating online show that many national park cardholders have covered the image of Trump’s face with stickers of wildlife, landscapes, and yellow smiley faces, while some have completely blocked out the whole card. The backlash has also inspired a growing sticker campaign.

Jenny McCarty, a longtime park volunteer and graphic designer, began selling custom stickers meant to fit directly over Trump’s face — with 100% of proceeds going to conservation nonprofits. “We made our first donation of $16,000 in December,” McCarty said. “The power of community is incredible.”

McCarty says the sticker movement is less about politics and more about preserving the neutrality of public lands. “The Interior’s new guidance only shows they continue to disregard how strongly people feel about keeping politics out of national parks,” she said.

Advertisement

The National Park Service card policy was updated this week to say that passes may no longer be valid if they’ve been “defaced or altered.” The change, which was revealed in an internal email to National Park Service staff obtained by SFGATE, comes just as the sticker movement has gained traction across social media.

In a statement to NPR, the Interior Department said there was no new policy. Interagency passes have always been void if altered, as stated on the card itself. The agency said the recent update was meant to clarify that rule and help staff deal with confusion from visitors.

The Park Service has long said passes can be voided if the signature strip is altered, but the updated guidance now explicitly includes stickers or markings on the front of the card.

It will be left to the discretion of park service officials to determine whether a pass has been “defaced” or not. The update means park officials now have the leeway to reject a pass if a sticker leaves behind residue, even if the image underneath is intact.

In December, conservation group the Center for Biological Diversity filed a lawsuit in Washington, D.C., opposing the new pass design.

Advertisement

The group argues that the image violates a federal requirement that the annual America the Beautiful pass display a winning photograph from a national parks photo contest. The 2026 winning image was a picture of Glacier National Park.

“This is part of a larger pattern of Trump branding government materials with his name and image,” Kierán Suckling, the executive director of the Center for Biological Diversity, told NPR. “But this kind of cartoonish authoritarianism won’t fly in the United States.”

The lawsuit asks a federal court to pull the current pass design and replace it with the original contest winner — the Glacier National Park image. It also seeks to block the government from featuring a president’s face on future passes.

The America the Beautiful National Parks Annual Pass for 2025, showing one of the natural images which used to adorn the pass. Its picture, of a Roseate Spoonbill taken at Everglades National Park, was taken by Michael Zheng.

The America the Beautiful National Parks Annual Pass for 2025, showing one of the natural images which used to adorn the pass. Its picture, of a Roseate Spoonbill taken at Everglades National Park, was taken by Michael Zheng.

Department of Interior


hide caption

Advertisement

toggle caption

Department of Interior

Not everyone sees a problem with the new design. Vince Vanata, the GOP chairman of Park County, Wyoming, told the Cowboy State Daily that Trump detractors should “suck it up” and accept the park passes, saying they are a fitting tribute to America’s 250th birthday this July 4.

Advertisement

“The 250th anniversary of our country only comes once. This pass is showing the first president of the United States and the current president of the United States,” Vanata said.

But for many longtime visitors, the backlash goes beyond design.

Erin Quinn Gery, who buys an annual pass each year, compared the image to “a mug shot slapped onto natural beauty.”

She also likened the decision to self-glorification: “It’s akin to throwing yourself a parade or putting yourself on currency,” she said. “Let someone else tell you you’re great — or worth celebrating and commemorating.”

When asked if she plans to remove her protest sticker, Gery replied: “I’ll take the sticker off my pass after Trump takes his name off the Kennedy Center.”

Advertisement
Continue Reading

News

Federal immigration agents shoot 2 people in Portland, Oregon, police say

Published

on

Federal immigration agents shoot 2 people in Portland, Oregon, police say

PORTLAND, Ore. (AP) — Federal immigration officers shot and wounded two people in a vehicle outside a hospital in Portland, Oregon, on Thursday, a day after an officer shot and killed a driver in Minnesota, authorities said.

The Department of Homeland Security described the vehicle’s passenger as “a Venezuelan illegal alien affiliated with the transnational Tren de Aragua prostitution ring” who had been involved in a recent shooting in Portland. When agents identified themselves to the vehicle occupants Thursday afternoon, the driver tried to run them over, the department said in a written statement.

“Fearing for his life and safety, an agent fired a defensive shot,” the statement said. “The driver drove off with the passenger, fleeing the scene.”

There was no immediate independent corroboration of those events or of any gang affiliation of the vehicle’s occupants. During prior shootings involving agents involved in President Donald Trump’s surge of immigration enforcement in U.S. cities, including Wednesday’s shooting by an Immigration and Customs Enforcement officer in Minneapolis, video evidence cast doubt on the administration’s initial descriptions of what prompted the shootings.

READ MORE: What we know so far about the ICE shooting in Minneapolis

Advertisement

According to the the Portland Police bureau, officers initially responded to a report of a shooting near a hospital at about 2:18 p.m.

A few minutes later, police received information that a man who had been shot was asking for help in a residential area a couple of miles away. Officers then responded there and found the two people with apparent gunshot wounds. Officers determined they were injured in the shooting with federal agents, police said.

Their conditions were not immediately known. Council President Elana Pirtle-Guiney said during a Portland city council meeting that Thursday’s shooting took place in the eastern part of the city and that two Portlanders were wounded.

“As far as we know both of these individuals are still alive and we are hoping for more positive updates throughout the afternoon,” she said.

The shooting escalates tensions in an city that has long had a contentious relationship with President Donald Trump, including Trump’s recent, failed effort to deploy National Guard troops in the city.

Advertisement

Portland police secured both the scene of the shooting and the area where the wounded people were found pending investigation.

“We are still in the early stages of this incident,” said Chief Bob Day. “We understand the heightened emotion and tension many are feeling in the wake of the shooting in Minneapolis, but I am asking the community to remain calm as we work to learn more.”

Portland Mayor Keith Wilson and the city council called on U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement to end all operations in Oregon’s largest city until a full investigation is completed.

“We stand united as elected officials in saying that we cannot sit by while constitutional protections erode and bloodshed mounts,” a joint statement said. “Portland is not a ‘training ground’ for militarized agents, and the ‘full force’ threatened by the administration has deadly consequences.”

The city officials said “federal militarization undermines effective, community‑based public safety, and it runs counter to the values that define our region. We’ll use every legal and legislative tool available to protect our residents’ civil and human rights.”

Advertisement

They urged residents to show up with “calm and purpose during this difficult time.”

“We respond with clarity, unity, and a commitment to justice,” the statement said. “We must stand together to protect Portland.”

U.S. Sen. Jeff Merkley, an Oregon Democrat, urged any protesters to remain peaceful.

“Trump wants to generate riots,” he said in a post on the X social media platform. “Don’t take the bait.”

A free press is a cornerstone of a healthy democracy.

Advertisement

Support trusted journalism and civil dialogue.


Advertisement
Continue Reading

News

Video: What Trump Told Us About the ICE Shooting

Published

on

Video: What Trump Told Us About the ICE Shooting

new video loaded: What Trump Told Us About the ICE Shooting

The New York Times sat down with President Trump in the Oval Office for an exclusive interview just hours after an Immigration and Customs Enforcement agent shot a 37-year-old woman in Minneapolis. Our White House correspondent Zolan Kanno-Youngs explains how the president reacted to the shooting.

By Zolan Kanno-Youngs, Alexandra Ostasiewicz, Nikolay Nikolov and Coleman Lowndes

January 8, 2026

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending