Connect with us

News

Nasa turns to Elon Musk’s SpaceX to bring stuck astronauts back to Earth

Published

on

Nasa turns to Elon Musk’s SpaceX to bring stuck astronauts back to Earth

Unlock the Editor’s Digest for free

Nasa said on Saturday that it would use a spacecraft from billionaire Elon Musk’s SpaceX rather than Boeing to bring home two astronauts stuck at the International Space Station.

Astronauts Sunita Williams and Barry Wilmore, who were supposed to return to Earth two months ago, will now come back in February aboard a SpaceX Crew Dragon rather than the Boeing CST-100 Starliner they travelled to the space station with that subsequently suffered technical difficulties.

“Space flight is risky,” said Nasa administrator Bill Nelson. “A test flight, by nature, is neither safe nor routine, and so the decision to keep Butch and Suni aboard the International Space Station and bring the Boeing Starliner home uncrewed is the result of a commitment to safety.”

Advertisement

Nasa and Boeing engineers are now reconfiguring the Starliner in order for it to return to Earth in September without a crew. While Nasa officials said they still expected to use the spacecraft on crewed missions, it is another blow to the reputation of a company that has been heavily scrutinised in recent years for engineering and manufacturing failures.

Mark Nappi, the manager at Boeing overseeing Starliner, said in a message to employees on Saturday that he knew this was “not the decision we had hoped for, but we stand ready to carry out the action’s necessary to support Nasa’s decision. The focus remains first and foremost on ensuring the safety of the crew and spacecraft.”

Barry Wilmore, left, and Sunita Williams inspect safety hardware aboard the International Space Station © AP

Boeing said it was continuing to focus “on the safety of the crew and spacecraft . . . and we are preparing the spacecraft for a safe and successful uncrewed return”.

Boeing and SpaceX are part of Nasa’s commercial crew programme, which was developed to encourage private sector suppliers to compete to ferry astronauts to the space station. SpaceX launched its first successful crewed mission in 2020.

When Williams and Wilmore blasted off aboard the Starliner on June 5, the capsule already was billions of dollars over budget and had experienced delays on earlier planned launches.

Advertisement

The mission to test the capabilities of the new spacecraft was scheduled to last eight days. But helium leaked from the spacecraft, and five of its thrusters functioned improperly, causing engineers and scientists at Nasa and Boeing to run tests to determine whether Starliner was the safest option to shuttle the astronauts back to Earth.

There was ultimately “too much uncertainty” around thrusters potentially failing during a tight piloting sequence, said Steve Stich, manager for Nasa’s commercial crew programme.

“It was just too much risk,” he said.

The decision was made in the context of past disasters, Nelson said. The explosions of the Challenger and Columbia space shuttles killed a total of 14 astronauts, partly because the agency’s climate prevented engineers from raising “obvious mistakes” with top officials.

Boeing and Nasa viewed the uncertainty of the data differently, said Nasa associate administrator Jim Free. Fellow Nasa colleague Ken Bowersox said there were “tense discussions because the call was close”, adding that the agency was “committed to continuing to work with Boeing”.

Advertisement
Video: Moon rush: the launch of a lunar economy | FT Film
Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

News

Video: Fires Continue to Burn One Week Later in California

Published

on

Video: Fires Continue to Burn One Week Later in California

new video loaded: Fires Continue to Burn One Week Later in California

transcript

transcript

Fires Continue to Burn One Week Later in California

The Palisades and Eaton fires, ravaging Los Angeles for more than a week, remain mostly uncontained by firefighters.

“We just had — just had Christmas morning right over here, right in front of that chimney. And this is what’s left.” “I urge, and everybody here urges, you to remain alert as danger has not yet passed. Please follow all evacuation warnings and orders without delay and prioritize your safety.”

Advertisement

Recent episodes in Wildfires

Continue Reading

News

South Korea’s President Yoon Suk Yeol arrested after stand-off with police

Published

on

South Korea’s President Yoon Suk Yeol arrested after stand-off with police

Unlock the Editor’s Digest for free

South Korea’s suspended President Yoon Suk Yeol was arrested on Wednesday morning following a predawn raid by police and investigators on his fortified hilltop compound.

Yoon’s detention followed a six-hour stand-off between law enforcement officials and members of the president’s security detail. It is the first time in South Korea’s history that a sitting president has been arrested.

The development marks the latest twist in a political crisis that was triggered by his failed attempt to impose martial law last month, and which has shaken confidence in the democratic integrity of Asia’s fourth-largest economy.

Advertisement

Yoon was suspended from his duties after he was impeached by parliament in December following his attempt to impose martial law. The country is currently being led by finance minister Choi Sang-mok as acting president.

The operation on Wednesday, which began shortly after 4am, was the second attempt this month by the CIO to detain Yoon for questioning on insurrection and abuse of office charges.

An initial effort earlier this month was foiled by Yoon’s protection officers following a tense hours-long stand-off at the presidential residence. Yoon had previously refused to comply with investigators and had challenged their authority to bring him in for questioning.

“The rule of law has completely collapsed in this country,” Yoon said in a video statement recorded before his transfer to the headquarters of the country’s Corruption Investigation Office for questioning. “I’ve decided to appear for CIO questioning in order to prevent any bloodshed.”

According to South Korea’s state-owned news agency Yonhap, police and officials from the CIO arrived at the compound early on Wednesday and presented a warrant for Yoon’s arrest but were again initially prevented from entering by the Presidential Security Service.

Advertisement

Yonhap also reported that about 30 lawmakers from Yoon’s conservative People Power party were at the compound and attempting to prevent officials from entering it.

But with hundreds of police gathered outside, some of them equipped with ladders and wire cutters to overcome barricades erected by Yoon’s protection officers, CIO officials were eventually allowed to enter the residence.

Yoon’s lawyers initially attempted to broker a deal whereby he would surrender voluntarily for questioning. But this was not accepted by CIO officials, and he was eventually arrested just after 10.30am and transferred to the investigative agency’s headquarters.

“Yoon’s arrest is the first step towards restoring our constitutional order,” said Park Chan-dae, floor leader of the leftwing opposition Democratic Party of Korea. “It underlines that justice is still alive.”

While Yoon’s powers have been transferred to Choi as acting president, he remains South Korea’s head of state while the country’s Constitutional Court deliberates on whether to approve his impeachment or reinstate him in office.

Advertisement

The court held its first formal hearing into Yoon’s impeachment on Tuesday, but the session was adjourned after four minutes because the suspended president declined to attend, citing concerns for his personal safety.

The efforts by the CIO and police to detain Yoon for questioning relates to a separate, criminal process connected to his failed imposition of martial law. Yoon’s lawyers insist the CIO has no standing to pursue criminal insurrection charges against him.

Continue Reading

News

SEC sues Elon Musk, says he didn't disclose Twitter ownership on time before purchase

Published

on

SEC sues Elon Musk, says he didn't disclose Twitter ownership on time before purchase

Elon Musk speaks as part of a campaign town hall in support of Donald Trump in Folsom, Pa., on Oct. 17, 2024.

Matt Rourke/AP


hide caption

toggle caption

Advertisement

Matt Rourke/AP

The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission has sued billionaire Elon Musk, saying he failed to disclose his ownership of Twitter stock in a timely manner in early 2022, before buying the social media site.

As a result, the SEC alleges, Musk was able to underpay “by at least $150 million” for shares he bought after he should have disclosed his ownership of more than 5% of Twitter’s shares. Musk bought Twitter in October 2022 and later renamed it X.

Musk started amassing Twitter shares in early 2022, and by March of that year, he owned more than 5%. At this point, the complaint says, he was required by law to disclose his ownership, but he failed to do so until April 4, 11 days after the report was due.

Advertisement

Representatives for X and Musk did not immediately return a message for comment.

After Musk signed a deal to acquire Twitter in April 2022, he tried to back out of it, leading the company to sue him to force him to go through with the acquisition.

The has SEC said that starting in April 2022, it authorized an investigation into whether any securities laws were broken in connection with Musk’s purchases of Twitter stock and his statements and SEC filings related to the company.

Before it filed the lawsuit, the SEC went to court in an attempt to compel Musk to testify as part of an investigation into his purchase of Twitter.

The SEC’s current chair, Gary Gensler, plans to step down from his post on Jan. 20 and it is not clear if the new administration will continue the lawsuit.

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending