Connect with us

News

January 6 convictions bolster democracy, but McCarthy’s defense of Trump threatens it | CNN Politics

Published

on

January 6 convictions bolster democracy, but McCarthy’s defense of Trump threatens it | CNN Politics



CNN
 — 

The American custom of peaceable transfers of presidential energy buckled within the horrific violence of January 6, 2021.

Twenty-two months on, a Washington, DC, jury shored up the breaches within the nation’s democracy on Tuesday, with a monumental verdict towards right-wing insurrectionists.

However whereas the courts – and voters within the midterm elections – have reaffirmed the rule of regulation, a furor over ex-President Donald Trump’s assembly with a White supremacist Holocaust denier is underlining simply how fragile it stays. As does the refusal of Republican chief Kevin McCarthy – the person who wish to be Home speaker – to forthrightly condemn Trump on Tuesday for breaking bread with an extremist.

Advertisement

In a landmark jury verdict, Oath Keepers chief Stewart Rhodes and a subordinate, Kelly Meggs, have been discovered responsible of seditious conspiracy and different costs in what the Justice Division mentioned was a plot to maintain Trump in energy after his 2020 defeat.

The convictions for a not often prosecuted offense delivered justice over a constitutional outrage, laid down a deterrent to future coup instigators and confirmed the authorized system can implement accountability for assaults on democracy.

They usually strengthened the narrative that the US Capitol rebellion was not merely a too exuberant protest that spilled over however a pre-planned bid to overthrow the federal government, the Structure and the desire of voters. The verdicts got here as Particular Counsel Jack Smith presses forward with investigations into the ex-president, together with over January 6. On that entrance, Trump’s former shut aide Stephen Miller testified to the grand jury on the matter, CNN reported.

But a momentous day for democracy represented by the Oath Keepers convictions additionally introduced recent indicators that the forces of authoritarianism, extremism and election denialism are removed from vanquished.

McCarthy, who’s working to be speaker of the exact same Home ransacked by Trump’s supporters final yr, shielded the ex-president from criticism over his dinner with White nationalist Nick Fuentes every week in the past.

Advertisement

The California Republican did say Fuentes had no place within the GOP. However his false declare that Trump had condemned the far-right firebrand 4 occasions was constant along with his willingness to appease the ex-president’s incitement to be able to bolster energy for himself and his celebration. McCarthy possible wants the assist of Trump, and his hard-right supporters within the Home, to turn into speaker subsequent yr and if he will get the job, he’ll stay of their debt.

Fuentes is a Holocaust denier who additionally has hyperlinks with pro-Trump Home Republicans like Georgia Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene, who spoke at a White nationalist convention he organized. Excessive lawmakers like her will likely be much more influential in a narrower Home GOP majority. And bringing the occasions of the day full circle, Fuentes was on the Capitol grounds on January 6, after weeks spouting falsehoods in regards to the election at “Cease the Steal” rallies.

Tuesday’s dramas additionally unfolded amid recent indicators that though voters rejected many election deniers within the midterm elections, the virus of election denialism is but to be stamped out. A county in Arizona and one in Pennsylvania have refused to certify their outcomes from this month as misinformation swirls and far-right activists search to sow mistrust within the system based mostly on fraudulent claims.

Regardless of the US political system holding agency after the 2020 election and being strengthened by the 2022 midterms, when many pro-Trump election deniers misplaced in swing states, essentially the most fateful divide in American politics stays not between left and proper, however between the forces of democracy and people of authoritarianism. Nearly daily in Washington will be considered as a tug between these opposing dynamics, which typically cross partisan traces and are boiling to the floor once more because the twice-impeached Trump seeks to recapture the presidency.

After seven weeks of testimony, Rhodes and Meggs have been each convicted of seditious conspiracy and obstructing an official continuing. Three different defendants have been discovered responsible of a spread of different costs associated to the rebellion in a vindication of the DOJ’s response to the assault on democracy.

Advertisement

The seditious conspiracy cost is an accusation that an offender conspired to overthrow, put down or destroy by power the federal government of the US. Particularly, the jury’s verdict is a lift for the notion that the Justice Division can prosecute and procure convictions on such advanced costs and a rebuke of Trump world’s dismissal of the riot on the Capitol. The truth that the jury acquitted a few of the defendants of essentially the most critical costs additionally insulates the prosecution towards any claims that it was a partisan trial earlier than a politicized jury.

Stepping again, this courtroom case – one in all many forward concentrating on alleged perpetrators of the rebellion – represents a tangible try and restore American democracy following the trauma of the 2020 election.

“(This) is a superb day for america, for the rule of regulation, for the peaceable switch of energy and ensuring that that’s protected as a result of that was primarily what was on trial,” mentioned Juliette Kayyem, a CNN nationwide safety, intelligence and terrorism analyst. “The other would have been very unhealthy, I feel, not only for the Division of Justice however for incitement and violence – individuals would have thought that they may have gotten away with it.”

Maryland Democratic Rep. Jamie Raskin, who sits on the Home choose committee investigating the rebellion – which is predicted to unveil its ultimate report subsequent month – mentioned the verdicts would solidify the sense of what actually occurred within the traumatic weeks after the 2020 election.

“The character of January 6 is now lastly sinking in to the entire nation,” Raskin advised CNN’s Brianna Keilar. “This was a collection of occasions that was designed to overthrow a presidential election and primarily topple the constitutional order.”

Advertisement

The top of the Oath Keepers trial, mixed with different convictions of January 6 rioters, strengthened a lingering query: Will there even be accountability increased up the chain – finally for these round Trump and the previous president himself? He concocted the lie of a stolen election, which has ravaged religion in US democracy, after which advised his supporters to “struggle like hell” to save lots of their nation on the Capitol.

Any convictions in a associated case can enhance the sense of authorized publicity for these additionally concerned in a wider drama. Nevertheless it stays unclear whether or not there’s adequate proof or possibilities of a conviction to threaten Trump, at the least in a authorized discussion board.

However in an indication of the seriousness of Trump’s place, Miller testified to the grand jury Tuesday, making him the primary identified witness to take action for the reason that appointment of Smith, CNN’s Katelyn Polantz reported. Miller can be ready to grasp Trump’s way of thinking earlier than rioters invaded the Capitol. In addition to Trump’s position main as much as the rebellion, the particular counsel is investigating the ex-president’s hoarding of categorized paperwork at his Mar-a-Lago resort in Florida. Trump has not been charged in both investigation. However each elevate the extraordinary chance that an ex-president – one who’s once more an lively White Home candidate – might be indicted. That’s a situation that would supply the justice system with a fair larger take a look at than it confronted within the Capitol rebellion, particularly since Trump is claiming as a central plank of his marketing campaign that he’s the sufferer of a partisan persecution.

A lot of McCarthy’s look on the West Wing on Tuesday – after talks on the present lame duck session of the Democratic-controlled Congress with President Joe Biden and different congressional leaders – was squarely throughout the confines of standard politics.

He swaggered, per the Republican seize of the Home earlier this month, albeit with a smaller-than-expected majority. He was combative, exhibiting his rank-and-file members he was able to take the White Home to activity and wield Republican energy, setting the tone for a brand new divided Washington subsequent yr. And by stressing core Republican points just like the southern border and backing Twitter chief Elon Musk, he gave the impression to be shoring up his speakership marketing campaign with soundbites more likely to reverberate on conservative TV stations. McCarthy genuinely has a mandate to carry Biden to account – assuming he lastly will get the 218 votes he must win the speaker’s gavel in January.

Advertisement

Nonetheless, his considerably melodramatic tone may also have been designed to impress Trump if he was watching on tv. McCarthy has made a alternative to provide license to extremism in his convention and on the a part of the previous president if it paves his path to energy.

In his first on-camera response to Trump’s dinner with Fuentes – who was additionally joined by rapper Kanye West, who has modified his identify to Ye – McCarthy mentioned: “I don’t assume anyone ought to be spending any time with Nick Fuentes. He has no place on this Republican Occasion.”

McCarthy’s feedback have been a transparent repudiation of the Holocaust denier. However he wasn’t completed – and went on to blur the traces about Trump’s habits and unfold misinformation about precisely what the ex-president had mentioned and carried out.

“I feel President Trump got here out 4 occasions and condemned him, and didn’t know who he was,” McCarthy mentioned. The Republican chief’s assertion was at greatest inaccurate, if not intentionally deceptive. Trump has made at the least 4 statements about his assembly with Fuentes, however principally to say that he didn’t know something about him or his views earlier than he confirmed up at Mar-a-Lago. Provided that Fuentes was a vocal supporter of the ex-president, that’s a tricky assertion to imagine.

“I had no concept what his views have been, they usually weren’t expressed on the desk in our very fast dinner, or it wouldn’t have been accepted,” Trump mentioned in an interview with Fox Digital on Tuesday. However once more, he didn’t condemn Fuentes or his views, sending acquainted veiled alerts to far-right teams in his electoral base.

Advertisement

On the one hand, McCarthy’s dancing on the pinnacle of a pin was a troubling check in somebody who may quickly be the third-highest ranked official within the nation. However his protection of Trump and the controversy it’ll fire up within the media may rebound to his political profit, since there’s nothing hardline Republicans like greater than seeing their chief waging a struggle with institution Washington.

And his unwillingness to unequivocally condemn the previous president for assembly the Holocaust denier exhibits that the pressure of extremism that Trump stirs to cement his political energy stays a strong power within the GOP.

News

Video: Our Photographer’s Look Inside New York’s Migrant Shelters

Published

on

Video: Our Photographer’s Look Inside New York’s Migrant Shelters

Just over 225,000 migrants have entered New York City since 2022, and more than $6 billion has been spent on a hodgepodge of shelters that morphed into the largest system of emergency housing for migrants in the country. Todd Heisler, a photographer for The New York Times, gained exclusive access to shelters across the city, documenting the experience through the eyes of those living there.

Continue Reading

News

Russia aims to be global leader in nuclear power plant construction

Published

on

Russia aims to be global leader in nuclear power plant construction

Stay informed with free updates

Russia is building more than 10 nuclear units abroad as it looks to tap into rising energy demand driven by artificial intelligence and developing markets, according to an envoy of President Vladimir Putin.

Moscow is doubling down on efforts to boost its global influence by expanding its nuclear fleet, with plants under construction in countries including Bangladesh, China, Egypt, India, Iran and Turkey. Russia has enhanced its role as a major nuclear energy provider even as the oil and gas sector has faced heavy sanctions after its invasion of Ukraine.

Boris Titov, the Kremlin’s special representative for international co-operation in sustainability, said the country wanted to cement its position as “one of the biggest builders of new nuclear plants in the world”. 

Advertisement

He said Russia expected strong demand for nuclear power from developing countries eager for cleaner sources of energy, as well as from technology companies harnessing AI in data centres. The International Atomic Energy Agency forecast this year that world nuclear generating capacity would increase by 155 per cent to 950 gigawatts by 2050.

“We are building more than 10 different units around the world,” Titov told the Financial Times. “We need a lot of energy. We will not be able to provide this energy without using . . . nuclear. We know that it’s safe . . . it’s not emitting [greenhouse gas emissions], so it is very clean.”

Boris Titov, the Kremlin’s special representative for international co-operation in sustainability © Maksim Konstantinov/SOPA/LightRocket/Getty Images

Russia’s growing overseas nuclear portfolio, including reactor construction, fuel provision and other services, spans 54 countries, according to an article published last year in the journal Nature Energy by the Norwegian Institute of International Affairs. 

Titov pointed to Hungary’s Paks 2 plant as well as units in Bangladesh and Turkey. Russia is also expected to build a plant with small modular reactors in Uzbekistan, while it signed an agreement with Burkina Faso’s ruling junta in 2023. The FT reported this year that Russia was involved in more than a third of new reactors being built worldwide.

Western governments have attempted to push back against Russia’s nuclear prominence, with the US banning imports of Russian-enriched uranium this May. 

Advertisement

With the exception of Hungary, most eastern European countries have signed contracts for fuel developed to fit Soviet-era reactors by US company Westinghouse since the full-scale invasion of Ukraine. 

As part of a wider push to meet an indicative target of being free from Russian fuel imports by 2027, Dan Jørgensen, the new EU commissioner for energy, said that he wanted to examine the “full nuclear supply chain”. 

But Hungarian premier Viktor Orbán and Slovakian prime minister Robert Fico have said they would block any steps to restrict Russia’s civilian nuclear energy industry.

After meeting Putin on Sunday, Fico said in a post on Facebook that potential sanctions against Russia would be “financially damaging and endanger the production of electricity in nuclear power plants in Slovakia, which is unacceptable”.

But fears that Russia could create critical nuclear fuel shortages for the bloc, as it did for gas in 2022, are overstated, one senior EU official said.

Advertisement

“Rosatom has a vested interest to be reliable,” they added.

A more immediate problem is US sanctions on Gazprombank, a major conduit for energy payments to Russia. The measures exempted civil nuclear energy except for Hungary’s Paks 2 plant. Hungary’s foreign minister Péter Szijjártó has called the singling out of the new plant an “entirely political decision”.

Many developing countries are looking at nuclear to meet clean energy requirements, offering more potential markets for Russia.

Nik Nazmi Nik Ahmad, Malaysia’s natural resources and environmental sustainability minister, told the Financial Times that the country was “studying the introduction of nuclear”. 

He said all the “major players” were “talking to the [Malaysian] government” on potential projects, without referring to specific countries.

Advertisement

Speaking at the UN COP29 climate summit in Azerbaijan in November, Jake Levine, senior climate and energy director at the US National Security Council, said Washington was concerned about countries turning to China or Russia for nuclear power.

Global competitiveness in the industry was a “huge issue”, he added.

Additional reporting by Anastasia Stognei, Polina Ivanova and Raphael Minder

Climate Capital

Where climate change meets business, markets and politics. Explore the FT’s coverage here.

Are you curious about the FT’s environmental sustainability commitments? Find out more about our science-based targets here

Advertisement
Continue Reading

News

Why Trump's tariffs on Mexico would mean higher avocado prices at the grocery store

Published

on

Why Trump's tariffs on Mexico would mean higher avocado prices at the grocery store

Avocados grow on trees in an orchard in the municipality of Ario de Rosales, Michoacan state, Mexico, on Sept. 21, 2023. Tariffs on Mexican imports would have a big effect on avocados in the U.S.

Alfredo Estrella/AFP via Getty Images


hide caption

toggle caption

Advertisement

Alfredo Estrella/AFP via Getty Images

Of all the products that would be affected by President-elect Donald Trump’s proposed tariffs on Mexico, avocados stand out: 90% of avocados consumed in the U.S. are imported. And almost all of those imports come from Mexico.

Trump has said he plans to impose a blanket tariff of 25% on imports from Mexico and Canada, along with an additional 10% tax on goods from China.

It’s unclear whether the tariffs will be implemented or if they will serve merely as a negotiating tactic.

Advertisement

If enacted, they could have multiple effects on the avocado industry.

“Broad tariffs, like what’s being proposed, is not something that we’ve seen” before, says David Ortega, a food economist and professor at Michigan State University. “We had the trade war with China back in 2018 that affected steel and aluminum, but when it comes to food, these types of policy proposals are not something that are very common or that we’ve seen recently.”

With one of the biggest guacamole-eating events of the year — the Super Bowl — approaching in February, here’s what to know about avocados, tariffs, and why so many avocados are grown in Mexico.

Prices will rise

Avocados are displayed in a grocery store in Washington, D.C., on June 14, 2022. Experts predict avocado prices will rise in the event of tariffs on Mexican imports.

Avocados are displayed in a grocery store in Washington, D.C., on June 14, 2022. Experts predict avocado prices will rise in the event of tariffs on Mexican imports.

Stefani Reynolds/AFP via Getty Images


hide caption

Advertisement

toggle caption

Stefani Reynolds/AFP via Getty Images

First, a 25% tariff on imports from Mexico would lead to higher avocado prices at the grocery store.

Advertisement

But estimating just how much higher is hard to say. It’s possible that producers and importers will absorb some of the costs to keep prices down and stay more competitive.

Ortega says there could be “pretty significant increases in the price of avocados. Maybe not the full 25%, but pretty close, given that there’s very little substitute ability with regards to where we would source avocados.”

But he cautions that because the tariffs apply only to the product’s value at the border, and not to other costs like transportation and distribution within the U.S., prices may not go up by the full 25%.

Regardless of these potential price increases, however, people in the U.S. love their avocados and they’re willing to pay more. Avocado consumption tripled in the U.S. between 2000 and 2021.

“Given that avocado is a staple of our consumption here, I would say that the elasticity is not very high, meaning that even with a big increase in price, consumption is not going to change that much,” says Luis Ribera, a professor and extension economist in the agricultural economics department at Texas A&M University.

Advertisement

Why Mexico

A farmer works at an avocado plantation at the Los Cerritos avocado group ranch in Ciudad Guzman, state of Jalisco, Mexico, on Feb. 10, 2023. Mexico provides 90% of the avocados consumed in the U.S.

A farmer works at an avocado plantation at the Los Cerritos avocado group ranch in Ciudad Guzman, state of Jalisco, Mexico, on Feb. 10, 2023. Most of the avocados consumed in the U.S. are grown in Mexico.

Ulises Ruiz/AFP via Getty Images


hide caption

toggle caption

Ulises Ruiz/AFP via Getty Images

Advertisement

Mexico is the biggest producer of avocados in the world and exported $3.3 billion worth of avocados in 2023. A study funded by the industry estimated that avocado production supports 78,000 permanent jobs and 310,000 seasonal jobs in Mexico.

“It’s a very important business in Mexico, very lucrative,” Ribera says.

Mexico emerged as the largest foreign supplier of fruits and vegetables to the U.S. for a few reasons, he says. One: Its proximity to the U.S. market. With a perishable product, closer is better. Peru is the second-largest source of foreign avocados in the U.S., but its greater distance means avocados need to be shipped farther.

The other reasons for Mexico are favorable weather that allows for year-round production of avocados and access to cheap labor, according to Ribera.

Advertisement

Avocados are grown in the U.S. too, mostly in California and to a lesser extent Florida and Hawaii, but U.S. growers can’t meet Americans’ big appetite. Avocado production in the U.S. has declined, even as Americans grew fonder of the green fruit, according to the USDA.

California avocado growers have faced droughts and wildfires in recent years, making it difficult to offer the year-round availability that American consumers crave, Ortega says. In addition, land is expensive and water is limited.

If the goal of implementing tariffs is to force avocado production to move somewhere besides Mexico, that isn’t easy.

It takes about eight years for avocado trees to produce fruit, according to the USDA. “This is not a product that you can just simply plant more of this season and you get more of in a few months,” Ortega says.

Other countries where the U.S. sources avocados — Peru, the Dominican Republic and Chile — “just simply don’t have the production capacity to replace Mexico’s supply,” he says.

Advertisement

Tariffs could impact the organic avocado market

Tariffs could also alter the market dynamic when it comes to organic vs. conventional foods.

If prices rise across the board, consumers who typically buy organic avocados might switch to conventional ones to save money. Organic produce makes up about 15% of total fruit and vegetable sales in the U.S., according to the Organic Trade Association, which represents hundreds of organic businesses and thousands of farmers.

“My hypothesis is that the price of conventional products would increase more than the premium organic product,” Ortega says. He reasons that because people who are used to buying organic avocados would move to buy conventional ones, “that in turn increases the demand and would make prices rise more for that category.”

Matthew Dillon, co-CEO of the Organic Trade Association, says those in the organic food industry are looking at diversifying their supply chains away from Mexico, but there’s a three-year transition period required for farmers to switch from producing conventional to organic produce.

“Supply chains are not incredibly elastic in organic. It takes more time to pivot and change when there’s a supply chain disruption. And tariffs are in some ways a form of supply chain disruption for a company, because it creates unpredictable pricing,” he says.

Advertisement

Together with grocery prices that have gone up more than 26% since the start of the COVID-19 pandemic, Trump’s plans for tariffs on Mexico, along with mass deportations, could create “a perfect storm of high inflationary pressure on the organic sector,” Dillon says.

Furthermore, retaliatory tariffs from Mexico could have their own impacts.

Avocado producers face uncertainty as Trump’s return looms

Avocados in boxes are pictured at a packing plant in the municipality of Ario de Rosales, Michoacan state, Mexico, on Sept. 21, 2023.

Avocados in boxes are pictured at a packing plant in the municipality of Ario de Rosales, Michoacan state, Mexico, on Sept. 21, 2023.

Alfredo Estrella/AFP via Getty Images


hide caption

Advertisement

toggle caption

Alfredo Estrella/AFP via Getty Images

Aside from the threat of tariffs, the avocado industry has other challenges to deal with: climate change presents several problems, and avocados require a large amount of water to grow. Meanwhile, environmentalists say some avocado growers are cutting down forests to plant avocados.

Producers also face extortion from criminal gangs in Mexico.

Advertisement

And now with Trump’s tariff threats, producers are left to wonder about their next steps.

“Producers, they react to market fundamentals,” Ribera says. For example, people can foresee how bad weather in Mexico would affect avocado prices. Producers and retailers will adjust to higher and lower demand.

“The issue with a tariff is it’s not a market fundamental — it’s a policy. It’s a political move,” he says. “It could happen or it could not happen, or it could be increased or it could be decreased, you know. So it’s hard for the whole supply chain to adjust.”

Continue Reading

Trending