Connect with us

News

Investors bet global central banks will be forced to delay rate cuts

Published

on

Investors bet global central banks will be forced to delay rate cuts

Investors are pushing back their expectations of interest rate cuts around the world, as the US Federal Reserve’s battle with price pressures complicates other central banks’ loosening plans.

As the US reported the latest in a string of poor inflation figures, markets reined in their forecasts for rate cuts by the European Central Bank and the Bank of England, as well as by the Fed itself.

“The Fed’s inflation problems have a global dimension and other central banks cannot ignore them,” said James Knightley, chief international economist at ING in New York. “In particular, if the Fed can’t cut rates soon it could stoke up dollar strength, which causes stress for the European economy and constrains other central banks’ ability to cut rates.”

He added: “Plus there is a worry that what is happening on inflation in the US could surface in Europe as well.” 

Senior officials at the ECB and BoE argue they are not confronting the same inflation problems as the US, implying they have more scope to cut rates earlier.

Advertisement

But shifts in the futures market indicate the global impact of the persistent US inflation problem.

Traders now expect the ECB to cut rates by an average of about 0.7 percentage points this year starting at its next policy meeting on June 6, while two weeks ago they expected cumulative cuts of 0.88 points.

At the beginning of the year, when US inflation appeared on a firmer downward path, they expected cuts of 1.63 points.

Markets now anticipate BoE cuts of 0.44 percentage points this year compared with 0.56 points two weeks ago and 1.72 points at the start of the year.

The backdrop for the shift has been the market’s reduced expectations for the Fed, which is set to keep rates at their 23-year-high at its meeting next week. While at the start of the year investors had expected as many as six quarter-point cuts, this year, they now expect one or two.

Advertisement
Line chart of Rate expectations in 2024 (%) showing Markets expect one or two rate cuts from the Fed and BoE this year, and three from the ECB

The US and its European counterparts have diverged in the past. But if other regions cut rates more aggressively than the Fed, they risk harming their own economies because of the impact on exchange rates, import costs and inflation.

“There’s a good macro case for divergence, but ultimately there’s a limit on how far it can go,” said Nathan Sheets, chief economist at US lender Citi. He added that it was “more challenging” for the ECB to “cut aggressively in an environment where the Fed is waiting”.

Fed chair Jay Powell conceded this month that US inflation was “taking longer than expected” to hit its target, signalling that borrowing costs would need to stay high for longer than previously thought.

In figures on Friday, the Fed’s preferred inflation metric came in higher than expected at 2.7 per cent for the year to March, and a minority of traders are now even betting on Fed rate rises in the next 12 months.

Marcelo Carvalho, global head of economics at BNP Paribas, said the ECB was neither “Fed-dependent” nor “Fed-insensitive”.

Despite the market’s expectations that high US borrowing costs will limit their freedom of manoeuvre, top European central bankers insist their less serious inflation problem requires a different response.

Advertisement
Line chart of Inflation rates (annual % change) showing Price pressures have fallen sharply across advanced economies

“It is a different kind of animal we are trying to tame,” ECB president Christine Lagarde said this month in Washington.

She said the “roots and drivers” of the two regions’ price surges were different — with Europe affected more by energy costs and the US by big fiscal deficits.

BoE governor Andrew Bailey has also argued that European inflation dynamics were “somewhat different” from the US.

Top officials from the ECB and BoE have signalled rates will still be cut this summer, despite the inflation data that has led investors to price in the first Fed rate reduction in November.

The shift is a marked contrast to earlier this year when the Fed was seen as leading the way down.

“The ECB and BoE are operating in a much weaker growth environment, so I suspect they will have no compunctions about cutting rates earlier,” said Mahmood Pradhan, head of global macroeconomics at Amundi Asset Management.

Advertisement

But ECB policymakers have given divergent indications on how big a rate gap with the Fed they can tolerate.

Banque de France governor François Villeroy de Galhau told Les Echos that he expects continued cutting “at a pragmatic pace” after June. However, Austria’s central bank head Robert Holzmann warned: “I would find it difficult if we move too far away from the Fed.”

The euro has fallen 3 per cent against the dollar since the start of the year to just above $1.07, but investors have increased bets it could drop to parity with the US currency.

Such a fall would add about 0.3 percentage points to eurozone inflation over the next year, according to recent ECB research. The bank’s vice-president, Luis de Guindos, said this week it would “need to take the impact of exchange rate movements into account”.

The far-reaching impact of US policy is already highly visible in Japan, where investors are increasing bets that the Bank of Japan will need to keep raising borrowing costs as a weaker yen fuels inflation. The yen has dropped to 34-year lows against the dollar, pushing up the price of imported goods.

Advertisement

But some EU policymakers argue that if a more hawkish Fed leads to tighter global financial conditions, it could bolster the case for easing in the eurozone and elsewhere.

“A tightening in the US has a negative impact on inflation and output in the eurozone,” Italy’s central bank boss Fabio Panetta said on Thursday, adding that this was “likely to reinforce the case for a rate cut rather than weakening it”.

Tighter US policy also affects global bond markets, with Germany’s 10-year Bunds often mirroring movements by the 10-year US Treasury.

BNP Paribas estimates that if European bond yields were driven half a percentage point higher by the fallout from US markets, it would require an extra 0.2 percentage points of rate cuts by the ECB to offset the impact of tighter financial conditions. Similarly, it would require 0.13 points of extra cuts by the BoE.

Tomasz Wieladek at T Rowe Price in London argued that the ECB and BoE “need to actively lean against this tightening in global financial conditions to bring their domestic financial conditions more in line with the fundamentals in their own economies”.

Advertisement

Additional reporting by George Steer in London

News

National Park Service will void passes with stickers over Trump’s face

Published

on

National Park Service will void passes with stickers over Trump’s face

The Interior Department’s new “America the Beautiful” annual pass for U.S. national parks.

Department of Interior


hide caption

toggle caption

Advertisement

Department of Interior

The National Park Service has updated its policy to discourage visitors from defacing a picture of President Trump on this year’s pass.

The use of an image of Trump on the 2026 pass — rather than the usual picture of nature — has sparked a backlash, sticker protests, and a lawsuit from a conservation group.

The $80 annual America the Beautiful pass gives visitors access to more than 2,000 federal recreation sites. Since 2004, the pass has typically showcased sweeping landscapes or iconic wildlife, selected through a public photo contest. Past winners have featured places like Arches National Park in Utah and images of bison roaming the plains.

Advertisement

Instead, of a picture of nature, this year’s design shows side-by-side portraits of Presidents George Washington and Trump. The new design has drawn criticism from parkgoers and ignited a wave of “do-it-yourself” resistance.

Photos circulating online show that many national park cardholders have covered the image of Trump’s face with stickers of wildlife, landscapes, and yellow smiley faces, while some have completely blocked out the whole card. The backlash has also inspired a growing sticker campaign.

Jenny McCarty, a longtime park volunteer and graphic designer, began selling custom stickers meant to fit directly over Trump’s face — with 100% of proceeds going to conservation nonprofits. “We made our first donation of $16,000 in December,” McCarty said. “The power of community is incredible.”

McCarty says the sticker movement is less about politics and more about preserving the neutrality of public lands. “The Interior’s new guidance only shows they continue to disregard how strongly people feel about keeping politics out of national parks,” she said.

Advertisement

The National Park Service card policy was updated this week to say that passes may no longer be valid if they’ve been “defaced or altered.” The change, which was revealed in an internal email to National Park Service staff obtained by SFGATE, comes just as the sticker movement has gained traction across social media.

In a statement to NPR, the Interior Department said there was no new policy. Interagency passes have always been void if altered, as stated on the card itself. The agency said the recent update was meant to clarify that rule and help staff deal with confusion from visitors.

The Park Service has long said passes can be voided if the signature strip is altered, but the updated guidance now explicitly includes stickers or markings on the front of the card.

It will be left to the discretion of park service officials to determine whether a pass has been “defaced” or not. The update means park officials now have the leeway to reject a pass if a sticker leaves behind residue, even if the image underneath is intact.

In December, conservation group the Center for Biological Diversity filed a lawsuit in Washington, D.C., opposing the new pass design.

Advertisement

The group argues that the image violates a federal requirement that the annual America the Beautiful pass display a winning photograph from a national parks photo contest. The 2026 winning image was a picture of Glacier National Park.

“This is part of a larger pattern of Trump branding government materials with his name and image,” Kierán Suckling, the executive director of the Center for Biological Diversity, told NPR. “But this kind of cartoonish authoritarianism won’t fly in the United States.”

The lawsuit asks a federal court to pull the current pass design and replace it with the original contest winner — the Glacier National Park image. It also seeks to block the government from featuring a president’s face on future passes.

The America the Beautiful National Parks Annual Pass for 2025, showing one of the natural images which used to adorn the pass. Its picture, of a Roseate Spoonbill taken at Everglades National Park, was taken by Michael Zheng.

The America the Beautiful National Parks Annual Pass for 2025, showing one of the natural images which used to adorn the pass. Its picture, of a Roseate Spoonbill taken at Everglades National Park, was taken by Michael Zheng.

Department of Interior


hide caption

Advertisement

toggle caption

Department of Interior

Not everyone sees a problem with the new design. Vince Vanata, the GOP chairman of Park County, Wyoming, told the Cowboy State Daily that Trump detractors should “suck it up” and accept the park passes, saying they are a fitting tribute to America’s 250th birthday this July 4.

Advertisement

“The 250th anniversary of our country only comes once. This pass is showing the first president of the United States and the current president of the United States,” Vanata said.

But for many longtime visitors, the backlash goes beyond design.

Erin Quinn Gery, who buys an annual pass each year, compared the image to “a mug shot slapped onto natural beauty.”

She also likened the decision to self-glorification: “It’s akin to throwing yourself a parade or putting yourself on currency,” she said. “Let someone else tell you you’re great — or worth celebrating and commemorating.”

When asked if she plans to remove her protest sticker, Gery replied: “I’ll take the sticker off my pass after Trump takes his name off the Kennedy Center.”

Advertisement
Continue Reading

News

Federal immigration agents shoot 2 people in Portland, Oregon, police say

Published

on

Federal immigration agents shoot 2 people in Portland, Oregon, police say

PORTLAND, Ore. (AP) — Federal immigration officers shot and wounded two people in a vehicle outside a hospital in Portland, Oregon, on Thursday, a day after an officer shot and killed a driver in Minnesota, authorities said.

The Department of Homeland Security described the vehicle’s passenger as “a Venezuelan illegal alien affiliated with the transnational Tren de Aragua prostitution ring” who had been involved in a recent shooting in Portland. When agents identified themselves to the vehicle occupants Thursday afternoon, the driver tried to run them over, the department said in a written statement.

“Fearing for his life and safety, an agent fired a defensive shot,” the statement said. “The driver drove off with the passenger, fleeing the scene.”

There was no immediate independent corroboration of those events or of any gang affiliation of the vehicle’s occupants. During prior shootings involving agents involved in President Donald Trump’s surge of immigration enforcement in U.S. cities, including Wednesday’s shooting by an Immigration and Customs Enforcement officer in Minneapolis, video evidence cast doubt on the administration’s initial descriptions of what prompted the shootings.

READ MORE: What we know so far about the ICE shooting in Minneapolis

Advertisement

According to the the Portland Police bureau, officers initially responded to a report of a shooting near a hospital at about 2:18 p.m.

A few minutes later, police received information that a man who had been shot was asking for help in a residential area a couple of miles away. Officers then responded there and found the two people with apparent gunshot wounds. Officers determined they were injured in the shooting with federal agents, police said.

Their conditions were not immediately known. Council President Elana Pirtle-Guiney said during a Portland city council meeting that Thursday’s shooting took place in the eastern part of the city and that two Portlanders were wounded.

“As far as we know both of these individuals are still alive and we are hoping for more positive updates throughout the afternoon,” she said.

The shooting escalates tensions in an city that has long had a contentious relationship with President Donald Trump, including Trump’s recent, failed effort to deploy National Guard troops in the city.

Advertisement

Portland police secured both the scene of the shooting and the area where the wounded people were found pending investigation.

“We are still in the early stages of this incident,” said Chief Bob Day. “We understand the heightened emotion and tension many are feeling in the wake of the shooting in Minneapolis, but I am asking the community to remain calm as we work to learn more.”

Portland Mayor Keith Wilson and the city council called on U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement to end all operations in Oregon’s largest city until a full investigation is completed.

“We stand united as elected officials in saying that we cannot sit by while constitutional protections erode and bloodshed mounts,” a joint statement said. “Portland is not a ‘training ground’ for militarized agents, and the ‘full force’ threatened by the administration has deadly consequences.”

The city officials said “federal militarization undermines effective, community‑based public safety, and it runs counter to the values that define our region. We’ll use every legal and legislative tool available to protect our residents’ civil and human rights.”

Advertisement

They urged residents to show up with “calm and purpose during this difficult time.”

“We respond with clarity, unity, and a commitment to justice,” the statement said. “We must stand together to protect Portland.”

U.S. Sen. Jeff Merkley, an Oregon Democrat, urged any protesters to remain peaceful.

“Trump wants to generate riots,” he said in a post on the X social media platform. “Don’t take the bait.”

A free press is a cornerstone of a healthy democracy.

Advertisement

Support trusted journalism and civil dialogue.


Advertisement
Continue Reading

News

Video: What Trump Told Us About the ICE Shooting

Published

on

Video: What Trump Told Us About the ICE Shooting

new video loaded: What Trump Told Us About the ICE Shooting

The New York Times sat down with President Trump in the Oval Office for an exclusive interview just hours after an Immigration and Customs Enforcement agent shot a 37-year-old woman in Minneapolis. Our White House correspondent Zolan Kanno-Youngs explains how the president reacted to the shooting.

By Zolan Kanno-Youngs, Alexandra Ostasiewicz, Nikolay Nikolov and Coleman Lowndes

January 8, 2026

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending