Connect with us

News

India’s Narendra Modi visits Vladimir Putin to strengthen ties in hedge against China

Published

on

India’s Narendra Modi visits Vladimir Putin to strengthen ties in hedge against China

Unlock the Editor’s Digest for free

Narendra Modi will hold formal talks with President Vladimir Putin in Russia on Tuesday as India’s prime minister seeks to shore up relations and stem concerns about Moscow’s drift towards China.

Putin welcomed Modi on Monday to his suburban residence at Novo-Ogaryovo outside Moscow, where the pair held informal talks over tea and took a walk in the park. Further formal negotiations are expected on Tuesday.

Modi hailed the two-day visit as a “wonderful opportunity to deepen ties” in a post on social media platform X, adding that it would “surely go a long way in further cementing the bonds of friendship between India and Russia”.

Advertisement

Ukraine’s president Volodymyr Zelenskyy criticised Modi for the visit trip, calling it “a huge disappointment”.

“It is a huge disappointment and a devastating blow to peace efforts to see the leader of the world’s largest democracy hug the world’s most bloody criminal in Moscow,” Zelenskyy wrote on X. A Russian barrage on Monday that struck a children’s hospital in Kyiv and civilian and critical infrastructure elsewhere killed at least 38 people, including four children, and injured 190 others, he said Tuesday morning.

© AP

The trip is Modi’s first since Russia’s invasion of Ukraine in 2022. Russia has sought to rally countries such as India behind Putin’s vision of a Moscow-led “global majority” to challenge US hegemony.

India, meanwhile, has avoided taking sides in the war in an effort to protect a decades-long relationship with Russia, its largest arms supplier and — since the conflict began — a significant source of cheap oil.

Kremlin spokesperson Dmitry Peskov said western countries were “jealous . . . and with good reason” that Modi had chosen Russia for his first bilateral visit after India’s election, in which Modi won a third five-year term last month.

Advertisement

India’s ties to Russia have become particularly important Delhi as western sanctions designed to isolate Russia have pushed Moscow closer to China. Beijing has provided Moscow with an economic lifeline, increasing bilateral trade to record levels and becoming a critical supplier to Russia of western-manufactured components with potential battlefield uses.

“India wants to give Russia room for manoeuvre,” said Alexander Gabuev, director of the Carnegie Russia Eurasia Center in Berlin. “They might not have the levers to pull Russia away from China, but they want to give it as many opportunities as they can to stop them from putting all their eggs in the Chinese basket.”

India is also engaged with China in a stand-off along their disputed Himalayan border, and sees Russia’s neutrality as vital to national security, officials said. “China is the primary challenge,” said Pankaj Saran, a former Indian ambassador to Russia. “We really cannot afford to do anything which converts a friend into an adversary.”

Trade between India and Russia has soared to more than $65bn since Moscow’s full-scale invasion, largely due to a sharp increase in purchases of discounted oil. Russian crude accounted for 43 per cent of India’s oil imports in June, according to data provider Vortexa, making it the second-biggest buyer after China.

This has led to a sharp trade imbalance. Indian foreign secretary Vinay Mohan Kwatra told reporters ahead of Modi’s trip that New Delhi wanted to increase agricultural and pharmaceutical exports to Russia.

Advertisement

The sanctions have also complicated Moscow’s ability to repatriate oil revenue due to the rupee’s low convertibility. A US crackdown has driven banks to sharply cut back on Russian counterparties, limiting their access to certain currencies and forcing traders to conduct transactions in roubles or even bartering for goods, according to financiers involved in the trade.

The US and EU have also stepped up efforts targeting the fleet shipping Russia’s oil, leaving buyers such as India vulnerable to possible future sanctions.

“Global banks will be hesitant to touch any transactions that may expose them to enforcement action by the US,” said Benjamin Hilgenstock at the Kyiv School of Economics Institute. “An expanded tanker designation campaign could become a problem for Indian buyers.”

India and Russia are attempting to promote domestic payment systems for trade, but doing so at scale will be difficult because of limited capacity, as well as the challenge of exchanging roubles and rupees for dollars and euros, he added.

Some analysts said Modi’s visit obscured the fact that India was increasingly staking its future on economic and military co-operation with the west.

Advertisement

Russia’s share of Indian arms imports fell to a near 60-year low between 2019 and 2023, according to data from the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute, as India sought more sophisticated military technology from countries including the US and Israel.

Kwatra said that Modi would also raise concerns about dozens of its citizens unwittingly conscripted into the Russian army to fight in Ukraine.

Moscow’s growing dependence on Chinese supplies for its arms industry created another concern for India, the Carnegie Center’s Gabuev said, because of concerns that Moscow cannot service weapons systems or sell new arms without components supplies from China.

“The substantial part of the relationship is on a very fragile basis,” said Pramit Pal Chaudhuri, South Asia head at the Eurasia Group consultancy. “I would argue that this is a managed decline.”

Additional reporting by Christopher Miller in Lviv and Isobel Koshiw in Kyiv

Advertisement

News

Lawmakers threaten Attorney General Bondi with contempt over incomplete Epstein files

Published

on

Lawmakers threaten Attorney General Bondi with contempt over incomplete Epstein files

Attorney General Pam Bondi, accompanied by Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche (L) and FBI Director Kash Patel (R), speaks during a news conference at the Justice Department on Nov. 19. Some lawmakers said the department’s release of files relating to Jeffrey Epstein had too many redactions as well as missing information.

Andrew Harnik/Getty Images


hide caption

toggle caption

Advertisement

Andrew Harnik/Getty Images

Two lawmakers are threatening a seldom-used congressional sanction against the Department of Justice over what they say is a failure to release all of its files on convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein by a deadline set in law.

Reps. Ro Khanna and Thomas Massie spearheaded the effort to force the Epstein files’ release by co-sponsoring the Epstein Files Transparency Act, but both have said the release had too many redactions as well as missing information.

“I think the most expeditious way to get justice for these victims is to bring inherent contempt against Pam Bondi,” Massie, a Republican from Kentucky, told CBS’s Face the Nation on Sunday. “Basically Ro Khanna and I are talking about and drafting that right now.”

Advertisement

Inherent contempt refers to Congress’ authority to fine or arrest and then bring to trial officers who are obstructing legislative functions. It was last successfully used in the 1930s, according to the American Bar Association.

Khanna, a California Democrat, noted that the House would not need the Senate’s approval to take such action, which he said would result in a fine for Attorney General Pam Bondi.

“I believe we’re going to get bipartisan support in holding her accountable,” he told Face the Nation.

Justice Department defends partial release

The Justice Department on Sunday defended its initial, partial release of documents, some of which were heavily redacted.

“The material that we released on Friday, or the material that we’re going to release over the next a couple of weeks, is exactly what the statute requires us to release,” said Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche on NBC’s Meet the Press, referring to the Epstein Files Transparency Act.

Advertisement

Blanche said the administration has hundreds of lawyers going through the remaining documents to ensure that victims’ information is protected. Still, lawmakers from both parties remain unsatisfied.

“Any evidence or any kind of indication that there’s not a full reveal on this, this will just plague them for months and months more,” said Republican Sen. Rand Paul of Kentucky on ABC’s This Week. “My suggestion would be — give up all the information, release it.”

Blanche told NBC he was not taking the threats of contempt seriously.

“Not even a little bit. Bring it on,” he said, adding that lawmakers who have spoken negatively about Bondi and FBI Director Kash Patel “have no idea what they’re talking about.”

Back and forth over Trump photo

The trove of documents released Friday contained little new information about Epstein, prompting accusations that the department wasn’t complying with the law. There was a photograph included in Friday’s release that showed a desk full of photos, including at least one of President Trump. It was among more than a dozen photographs no longer available in the Justice Department’s “Epstein Library” by Saturday, NPR found.

Advertisement

On Sunday, the Justice Department re-uploaded the photo of the desk, and provided an explanation on X.

“The Southern District of New York flagged an image of President Trump for potential further action to protect victims,” the post read. “Out of an abundance of caution, the Department of Justice temporarily removed the image for further review. After the review, it was determined there is no evidence that any Epstein victims are depicted in the photograph, and it has been reposted without any alteration or redaction.”

The Justice Department did not offer an explanation for the other photos whose access had been removed.

Blanche told NBC the Justice Department was not redacting information around Trump or any other individual involved with Epstein. He said the Justice Department had removed photos from the public files “because a judge in New York has ordered us to listen to any victim or victim rights group, if they have any concerns about the material that we’re putting up.

“And so when we hear concerns, whether it’s photographs of women that we do not believe are victims, or we didn’t have information to show that they were victims, but we learned that there are concerns, of course, we’re taking that photograph down and we’re going to address it,” he said.

Advertisement

Earlier Sunday, the Justice Department also posted to X a new version of the 119-page transcript of grand jury proceedings in the case of Epstein associate Ghislaine Maxwell. The original version had been entirely redacted.

“Here is the document now with minimal redactions. Documents and photos will continue to be reviewed consistent with the law and with an abundance of caution for victims and their families,” the Justice Department wrote in its post.

Continue Reading

News

Russia says talks on US peace plan for Ukraine ‘are proceeding constructively’

Published

on

Russia says talks on US peace plan for Ukraine ‘are proceeding constructively’

FILE – Russian Presidential foreign policy adviser Yuri Ushakov, left, U.S. President Donald Trump’s son-in-law Jared Kushner, center, U.S. special envoy Steve Witkoff, foreground right, and Russian Direct Investment Fund CEO Special Presidential Representative for Investment and Economic Cooperation with Foreign Countries Kirill Dmitriev, behind Witkoff, arrive to attend talks with Russian President Vladimir Putin at the Senate Palace of the Kremlin in Moscow, Russia, Dec. 2, 2025. (Alexander Kazakov, Sputnik, Kremlin Pool Photo via AP, File)

The Associated Press

Continue Reading

News

Video: First Batch of Epstein Files Provides Few Revelations

Published

on

Video: First Batch of Epstein Files Provides Few Revelations

new video loaded: First Batch of Epstein Files Provides Few Revelations

transcript

transcript

First Batch of Epstein Files Provides Few Revelations

The Justice Department, under pressure from Congress to comply with a law signed by President Trump, released more than 13,000 files on Friday arising from investigations into Jeffrey Epstein.

Put out the files and stop redacting names that don’t need to be redacted. It’s just — who are we trying to protect? Are we protecting the survivors? Or are we protecting these elite men that need to be put out there?

Advertisement
The Justice Department, under pressure from Congress to comply with a law signed by President Trump, released more than 13,000 files on Friday arising from investigations into Jeffrey Epstein.

By McKinnon de Kuyper

December 20, 2025

Continue Reading

Trending