Connect with us

News

ICC issues war crimes arrest warrant for Putin for alleged deportation of Ukrainian children | CNN

Published

on

ICC issues war crimes arrest warrant for Putin for alleged deportation of Ukrainian children | CNN



CNN
 — 

The Worldwide Legal Courtroom (ICC) on Friday issued an arrest warrant for Russian President Vladimir Putin and Russian official Maria Lvova-Belova for an alleged scheme to deport Ukrainian youngsters to Russia.

The courtroom mentioned there “are cheap grounds to imagine that Mr Putin bears particular person prison duty” for the alleged crimes, for having dedicated them immediately alongside others, and for “his failure to train management correctly over civilian and army subordinates who dedicated the acts.”

The ICC expenses, which relate to an alleged apply that CNN and others have reported on, are the primary to be formally lodged in opposition to officers in Moscow because it started its unprovoked assault on Ukraine final 12 months.

The Kremlin has labeled the ICC’s actions as “outrageous and unacceptable.”

Advertisement

“We contemplate the very posing of the query outrageous and unacceptable. Russia, like a lot of states, doesn’t acknowledge the jurisdiction of this courtroom and, accordingly, any selections of this type are null and void for the Russian Federation from the standpoint of regulation,” Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov tweeted on Friday.

However Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky thanked the ICC for its “historic” determination, saying in his nightly deal with on Friday that Ukraine’s investigations additionally recommend the Kremlin had direct involvement within the pressured deportation of kids into Russia.

“Within the prison proceedings being investigated by our regulation enforcement officers, greater than 16,000 pressured deportations of Ukrainian youngsters by the occupier have already been recorded. However the actual, full variety of deportees could also be a lot greater,” he mentioned. “Such a prison operation would have been unattainable with out the order of the best chief of the terrorist state.”

The message from Friday’s warrants “should be that primary rules of humanity bind all people,” Chief Prosecutor Karim Khan mentioned in an unique interview with CNN afterward Friday.

“No person ought to really feel they’ve a free move. No person ought to really feel they will enact with abandon. And undoubtedly no one ought to really feel they will act and commit genocide or crimes in opposition to humanity or warfare crimes with impunity,” he advised CNN chief worldwide correspondent Clarissa Ward on the Hague.

Advertisement

Requested if he believed that sooner or later Putin can be within the dock, Khan pointed to historic trials of Nazi warfare criminals, former Yugoslavian President Slobodan Milošević, and former Liberian chief Charles Taylor, amongst others.

“All of them have been mighty, highly effective people and but they discovered themselves in courtrooms,” he mentioned.

Russia – just like the US, Ukraine and China – isn’t a member of the ICC. Because the courtroom doesn’t conduct trials in absentia, any Russian officers charged would both need to be handed over by Moscow or arrested exterior of Russia.

One senior Ukrainian official advised CNN on Monday that Kyiv has been pushing the ICC for a while to hunt arrest warrants in opposition to Russian people in relation to the warfare in Ukraine.

The Russian authorities doesn’t deny taking Ukrainian youngsters and has made their adoption by Russian households a centerpiece of propaganda.

Advertisement

In April, the workplace of Lvova-Belova, the Russian Commissioner for Youngsters’s Rights, mentioned that round 600 youngsters from Ukraine had been positioned in orphanages in Kursk and Nizhny Novgorod earlier than being despatched to dwell with households within the Moscow area.

As of mid-October, 800 youngsters from Ukraine’s japanese Donbas space have been residing within the Moscow area, many with households, in line with the Moscow regional governor.

A few of the youngsters have ended up hundreds of miles and a number of other time zones away from Ukraine. In response to Lvova-Belova’s workplace, Ukrainian youngsters have been despatched to dwell in establishments and with foster households in 19 completely different Russian areas, together with Novosibirsk, Omsk and Tyumen areas in Siberia and Murmansk within the Arctic.

Lvova-Belova dismissed the ICC’s arrest warrant in opposition to her, saying it was “nice” that the worldwide neighborhood appreciated her work for kids, in line with Russian state information company TASS on Friday.

“It’s nice that the worldwide neighborhood has appreciated the work to assist the youngsters of our nation, that we don’t depart them within the warfare zones, that we take them out, that we create good situations for them, that we encompass them with loving, caring individuals,” she mentioned to reporters, in line with TASS. “There have been sanctions in opposition to all international locations, even Japan, in relation to me, now there’s an arrest warrant, I’m wondering what’s going to occur subsequent. And we proceed to work.”

Advertisement

Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky’s Chief of Workers, Andry Yermak, mentioned on Telegram on Friday that the arrest warrant issued for Putin was “only the start.”

“The world has obtained a sign that the Russian regime is prison and that its management and accomplices will likely be delivered to justice,” Ukrainian Basic Prosecutor, Andriy Kostin, added in a publish on Fb on Friday.

“Which means Putin should be arrested exterior of Russia and delivered to trial. And world leaders will assume twice earlier than shaking his hand or sitting down with him on the negotiating desk.”

Human Rights Watch known as the ICC determination a “wakeup name to others committing abuses or overlaying them up.”

“It is a huge day for the various victims of crimes dedicated by Russian forces in Ukraine since 2014. With these arrest warrants, the ICC has made Putin a wished man and brought its first step to finish the impunity that has emboldened perpetrators in Russia’s warfare in opposition to Ukraine for much too lengthy,” Balkees Jarrah, the NGO’s Affiliate Worldwide Justice Director, mentioned in a press release Friday.

Advertisement

“The warrants ship a transparent message that giving orders to commit or tolerating severe crimes in opposition to civilians could result in a jail cell in The Hague. The courtroom’s warrants are a wakeup name to others committing abuses or overlaying them up that their day in courtroom could also be coming, no matter their rank or place,” Jarrah mentioned.

Moscow rejected the warrant on Friday. Maria Zakharova, a spokeswoman for the ministry of international affairs, mentioned the courtroom has “no which means” for the nation, “together with from a “authorized standpoint.” Russia withdrew from the ICC treaty underneath a directive signed by Putin in 2016.

“Russia isn’t a member of the Rome Statute of the Worldwide Legal Courtroom and bears no obligations underneath it. Russia doesn’t cooperate with this physique, and doable [pretences] for arrest coming from the Worldwide Courtroom of Justice will likely be legally null and void for us,” she mentioned.

Dmitry Medvedev, former Russian president and Deputy Chair of the Safety Council of Russia, wrote on Twitter: “The Worldwide Legal Courtroom has issued an arrest warrant in opposition to Vladimir Putin. No want to clarify WHERE this paper must be used” together with a rest room paper emoji.

Advertisement

Ukraine’s Minister of Overseas Affairs, Dmytro Kuleba, praised the ICC in a publish on Twitter, writing that the “wheels of Justice are turning.”

“I applaud the ICC determination to challenge arrest warrants for Vladimir Putin and Maria Lvova-Belova over forcible switch of Ukrainian youngsters. Worldwide criminals will likely be held accountable for stealing youngsters and different worldwide crimes,” Kuleba added.

Information of the warrants was welcomed on the streets of the Ukrainian capital of Kyiv on Friday however some expressed doubts over whether or not it could lead to motion.

Victoria Tkachenko, a 64-year-old museum employee, advised CNN the warrants have been “nice information” however was practical about how lengthy authorized proceedings might take.

“I help and welcome the information as a result of Ukraine is preventing an aggressor. The 12 months of warfare has proven that even with all the assistance, this battle is a troublesome one,” Tkachenko mentioned. “All authorized proceedings are lengthy and detailed work. Even when it takes a very long time, I’m nonetheless optimistic in regards to the consequence.”

Advertisement

Twenty-year-old pupil and trainer Olexandra Zahubynoga praised the ICC for elevating consciousness of the difficulty, telling CNN: “The truth that that is being delivered to the general public is sweet and I help it. I want to imagine (that the arrest warrant will convey sensible outcomes), however to be sincere, I’ve my doubts, as a result of most worldwide organizations are very involved, they are saying a whole lot of issues, however I personally don’t see any apparent motion.”

In the meantime, Serhii Voloshenyuk, a 44-year-old businessman, mentioned that whereas he believes the arrest warrants are “significant and vital,” he doesn’t assume they are going to be seen that method in Moscow.

“Russia is a prison nation itself and it behaves by its personal guidelines,” he mentioned.

He added: “I would really like Putin to be jailed and serve time in jail, similar to the Yugoslavian warfare criminals are jailed in Hague.”

Exterior view of the International Criminal Court in The Hague, Netherlands.

ICC President Choose Piotr Hofmanski advised CNN on Friday that the ICC’s arrest warrants have been “not magic wands” however that he believed of their “deterrence” results amid Russia’s ongoing invasion of Ukraine as they act as a kind of “sanction” on the people.

Advertisement

“Effectively clearly the arrest warrants are usually not magic wands, this isn’t the case that the violence will cease now,” Hofmanski advised CNN’s Newsroom program. “However we imagine for the deterrence impact of the arrest warrants in our proceedings, and we imagine that it’s a vital factor for the world, that we’re doing our jobs, that the victims are usually not left alone, they don’t seem to be forgotten, and we simply are doing what’s anticipated from us.”

Requested whether or not the ICC is asking signatory international locations to arrest Putin if he travels to them, Hofmanski referred to ICC statute, saying: “All state events have the authorized obligation to cooperate totally with the courtroom, which signifies that they’re obliged to execute arrest warrants issued by the courtroom. And it’s certainly one of the vital vital results of the arrest warrants, that may be a type of sanction, as a result of the individual can not depart the nation.”

“There are 123 states, two-thirds of the states of the world by which he won’t be saved,” Hofmanski continued.

Hofmanski mentioned the contents of the arrest warrants have been secret however that the ICC had agreed to publish the knowledge of the existence of the arrest warrants and the crimes allegedly dedicated by Putin and Lvova-Belova.

Positioned in The Hague, Netherlands, and created by a treaty known as the Rome Statute first introduced earlier than the United Nations, the ICC operates independently. Most international locations on Earth – 123 of them – are events to the treaty, however there are very massive and notable exceptions, together with Russia.

Advertisement

The ICC is supposed to be a courtroom of “final resort” and isn’t meant to switch a rustic’s justice system. The courtroom, which has 18 judges serving nine-year phrases, tries 4 sorts of crimes: genocide, crimes in opposition to humanity, crimes of aggression and warfare crimes.

The UN on Thursday present in a report that Russia has “dedicated a variety of violations of worldwide human rights regulation and worldwide humanitarian regulation” in Ukraine.

The report claims that the warfare crimes perpetrated by the Russians included “assaults on civilians and energy-related infrastructure, wilful killings, illegal confinement, torture, rape and different sexual violence, in addition to illegal transfers and deportations of kids.”

Its findings additionally documented a small variety of violations perpetrated by the Ukrainian forces, “together with possible indiscriminate assaults and two incidents qualifying as warfare crimes, the place Russian prisoners of warfare have been shot, wounded and tortured,” the United Nations Human Rights assertion mentioned.

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

News

'We all are going to die': Sen. Ernst offers bleak response to grilling over Medicaid

Published

on

'We all are going to die': Sen. Ernst offers bleak response to grilling over Medicaid

U.S. Sen. Joni Ernst, R-Iowa, speaks to reporters as she walks to a Senate luncheons at the U.S. Capitol on Nov. 19, 2024.

Kevin Dietsch/Getty Images


hide caption

toggle caption

Advertisement

Kevin Dietsch/Getty Images

Iowa Republican Sen. Joni Ernst faced intense questioning from her constituents during a Friday town hall, eliciting shouts and boos from community members over her support for President Trump’s contentious One Big Beautiful Bill Act.

The first speaker offered Ernst a softball question, telling the National Guard veteran that his sole request was for her to be the guest speaker at the American Legion for Memorial Day next year.

But just minutes into the hour-long session in Butler County, Iowa, the tenor quickly shifted. The crowd grew tense and Ernst appeared flip and defensive.

Advertisement

Ernst was repeatedly peppered with questions about the thousand-page bill, with many attendees focusing on proposed cuts to safety net programs like Medicaid and SNAP. Ernst defended the bill, arguing that those eliminated from these programs would be people who were not eligible to benefit from them in the first place.

“When you’re arguing about illegals that are receiving Medicaid benefits, 1.4 million (people) … they are not eligible so they will be coming off,” Ernst said.

Someone in the crowd shouted in response: “People are going to die.”

“Well, we all are going to die,” Ernst responded. “For heaven’s sakes, folks,” she continued with a smile.

The crowd, which had already grown hostile to Ernst’s tone, erupted in roars of disapproval.

Advertisement

The GOP budget package is a sweeping piece of legislation that would provide massive tax cuts to the wealthy and slash funding for social programs including Medicaid and food assistance.

A version of the bill narrowly passed in the House earlier this month — eking by with a final vote of 215-214.

But the act faces pushback in the Senate over concerns regarding some of the more consequential aspects of the legislation, which include: extending Trump’s 2017 tax cuts — with about $3.8 trillion in cuts overall, largely for the nation’s top earners; raising the national debt ceiling by $4 trillion; and costly fees on asylum seekers and those who sponsor unaccompanied minors.

As written, the bill is projected to add trillions to the nation’s debt over the next decade.

The bill is now going through the process of reconciliation — a complicated Senate process that would allow Republicans to avoid a filibuster by Democratic legislators and pass the bill on a simple majority.

Advertisement

Back at the Iowa town hall, Ernst continued to spar with voters over her support for these changes.

In another heated exchange, a man — who identified himself as a Navy veteran and retired school superintendent — grilled Ernst about Trump’s authoritarian style of governing.

“Are you afraid of Trump? Are you corrupt like Trump? Or are you just at the point that you don’t care anymore and that’s why you don’t do anything?,” the man asked to cheers.

Her response set off another round of dissenting yells.

“Obviously I don’t agree because I don’t think our country is being destroyed,” she said as the crowd offered shouts in protest.

Advertisement

After the event, Ernst posted a message to social media, appearing unbothered by the turn of events at the town hall.

Thanks folks for coming out to my town hall in Parkersburg today,” she wrote. “I always enjoy hearing from constituents and sharing my work to cut government red tape for you.”

Advertisement
Continue Reading

News

Chinese students shaken by US visa crackdown look for Plan B

Published

on

Chinese students shaken by US visa crackdown look for Plan B

Justin, a Chinese PhD student at an Ivy League university, had always planned to settle in the US but the 25-year-old is abandoning the idea after a crackdown on immigrants and academia and is considering studying elsewhere.

This week, Washington told US embassies to suspend the visa approval process for foreign students pending additional screening of their social media activities.

Marco Rubio, secretary of state, then pledged to “aggressively revoke” Chinese student visas, especially those studying in “critical fields” or linked to the Communist party.

Rubio’s comments are part of measures against foreign academia and students, particularly those from China, that analysts say is eroding America’s reputation there as a safe destination for overseas study and leading many to consider backup plans in other countries.

“If the government sets such a precedent . . . allowing xenophobic sentiments to go unchecked, there will inevitably come a time when large-scale anti-Chinese incidents occur,” said Justin, who requested that only his first name be used.

Advertisement

He added he was considering applying to Oxford and Cambridge universities in the UK as a “Plan B”. “The US is no longer an ideal place for scientific research,” he said.

The number of Chinese students at US universities has fallen sharply since the Covid-19 pandemic, in part because of initiatives including the now-defunct “China Initiative” that targeted alleged espionage in academia during the first Trump administration.

Last year, the Chinese student intake in the US totalled more than 277,000, down 4 per cent from a year earlier and 26 per cent from nearly 373,000 in 2019-20. The total number of international students in the US hit an all-time high last year of 1.1mn. 

The industry is facing structural challenges, said Julian Fisher, co-founder of Venture Education, a Beijing-based market intelligence consultancy.

Not only are mainland Chinese parents becoming more discerning, increasingly opting only for the top-ranked institutions, there is more competition from institutions in Hong Kong and Singapore. China’s demographic decline also meant that the pool of customers was set to fall, he said.

Advertisement

“Perhaps the bigger existential question here is if we have already passed the apex of Chinese students studying overseas,” Fisher said, adding that the Trump administration’s policies could speed up the trend.

Since the latest measures were announced, interest for “study abroad in the US” on Chinese search engine Baidu has dropped to 65 per cent of what it was a year earlier, according to analysis by Venture Education using data from Baidu Index.

Australia appears to be the most popular followed by Singapore and the UK, the analysis suggested.

Frida Cai, head of business development at Ivyray Edu, an education consultancy, said some clients were considering alternatives such as the UK, Hong Kong or Australia. Ivyray Edu advises those applying for a US visa to be cautious about what they post online.

President Donald Trump’s policies have led to a “lack of confidence among parents” in Hong Kong, said Will Kwong, managing director of AAS Education, a consultancy.

Advertisement

“Unless the students have family links in the US, the overall market appetite has dropped significantly,” he said. Kwong was helping students come up with “Plan Bs” that include the UK and Australia.

Interest among Hong Kong students in the US had in any case plummeted in recent months to about one-quarter of pre-pandemic levels, he said, with those interested in technology, AI, aerospace and engineering often avoiding the US.

Beijing has described the US policies as evidence of the “hypocrisy” underlying Washington’s “long-touted claims of freedom and openness”.

“It will only further damage the United States’ international image and national credibility,” the foreign ministry said of Rubio’s threat. 

These comments highlight President Xi Jinping’s efforts to tout China’s authoritarian system as a viable development model for other countries as Beijing seeks to attract more overseas students from the developing world. 

Advertisement

On Chinese social media, students have voiced their anger and confusion.

One student set to begin a masters in design at Harvard this year described how her study visa was initially approved by the US embassy in Beijing last week. The following day she received an email saying it had been refused because Harvard had lost its Student and Exchange Visitor Program certification. When a judge blocked the ban, it was later issued.

“Am I worried?” the student, who did not want to be identified, told the Financial Times. “Yes of course. There’s a new policy every other day; it’s quite unpredictable.” For those looking to study overseas next year, she said: “I’d suggest to them to have backup plans.”

Still, at the US embassy in Beijing this week, some students, whose visa interviews had been scheduled before the latest suspension, were cautiously optimistic about going to the US.

One Chinese student who identified himself only as Austin said he was returning to New York University to complete a masters programme in computer engineering. “The resources and the teachers are great at NYU,” Austin said. 

Advertisement

He said, however, that, while in the US, he always carried his passport with him in case immigration officers stopped him on the street. Deportation or visa revocations were always a risk, he said.

“I think more of these things definitely will happen under Trump,” he said.

Continue Reading

News

Department of Homeland Security lists sanctuary jurisdictions in Northern California

Published

on

Department of Homeland Security lists sanctuary jurisdictions in Northern California
The Department of Homeland Security has unveiled a list of states, cities and counties it claims are defying federal immigration laws. The list, which includes sanctuary jurisdictions across the country, identifies several locations in Northern California as part of this initiative.
Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending