Connect with us

News

How Rishi Sunak shocked Westminster with a snap general election

Published

on

How Rishi Sunak shocked Westminster with a snap general election

When Rishi Sunak told his cabinet, after weeks of agonising, that he would hold a surprise July 4 general election, he immediately won the effusive support of his housing minister, Michael Gove.

“Who dares wins,” Gove said on Wednesday afternoon, quoting the SAS regiment’s motto. “You dared — and you will win.”

Gove would have received odds of 25-1 at Ladbrokes if he was prepared to back his assertion about a Sunak election victory with hard cash; the prime minister has embarked on a six-week campaign with his Conservatives trailing the opposition Labour party by more than 20 percentage points in opinion polls.

Not every minister backed his decision to call a snap election: Esther McVey said he should have waited longer to let the fruits of economic recovery feed through to voters. Ominously, McVey is the “minister for common sense”.

But Sunak received an enthusiastic show of ministerial support — loud banging on the cabinet table — as he prepared to venture out into the Downing Street rain to announce the July 4 election to the nation shortly after 5pm.

Advertisement

“We’d been checking the weather forecast for days,” said one Number 10 staffer, after the prime minister was drenched giving his statement. “But Rishi was only ever going to announce the election in the street. It was very British.”

Michael Gove arrives at Downing Street for the meeting at which Rishi Sunak let his cabinet know about the election date © Getty Images

Sunak’s decision to hold a summer election sparked an angry backlash from some despairing Tory MPs bemused by his move to go to the country when the party is so far behind in the polls.

One former minister branded the decision “insane”, while another Conservative MP said they felt “resigned” to losing their seat.

Lashing out at Sunak and his ability to jet off to California if he is defeated at the election, one arch Tory critic fearful of losing their seat said bitterly and with some exaggeration: “I don’t own a ranch in California.” (Sunak owns an apartment in Santa Monica.)

Other Conservatives insisted they did support Sunak’s decision. The mood among cabinet ministers was “up for it”, said one, who described the reaction to Sunak’s move as “a mixture of surprise and excitement”.

Advertisement

His allies said he had been increasingly minded to call a summer election over the past six weeks, with the decision crystallising in his mind over the past fortnight.

Crucially Sunak consulted chancellor Jeremy Hunt and they agreed that waiting until the autumn would bring little additional economic cheer, not least because the public finances could not withstand further tax cuts.

There were fierce debates inside Sunak’s inner circle about the timing of polling day; campaign chief Isaac Levido had long favoured the autumn, while chief of staff Liam Booth-Smith was thought to back an early election.

“In the end, they all agreed that it was Rishi’s decision and they would back whatever he wanted to do,” said an ally of the prime minister. “It was finely balanced, but this showed strength and courage — that’s what the public want from their politicians.”

Some backbench Tory MPs agreed. One said the decision showed “boldness”, while another said they were prepared to take the argument to voters. Positive sentiments were also aired on Conservative WhatsApp groups.

Advertisement

Speaking at a rally held at the ExCel Centre in London on Wednesday evening, Sunak told supporters that the past few years had been tough but he had delivered on his first priority. “To drive back inflation to normal.”

UK Prime Minister Rishi Sunak speaks to delegates and party members, as he launches the Conservative Party general election campaign at the ExCel Centre on May 22, 2024 in London, England
Rishi Sunak speaks to delegates and party members at the ExCel Centre in London: ‘We Conservatives have got a clear plan with bold action to secure a better future’ © Getty Images

Ministers lined up around Sunak — who was still wearing rain soaked trousers — as he said that the “penny had dropped” around Europe that the government’s Rwanda asylum scheme was the way to tackle illegal immigration.

“We Conservatives have got a clear plan with bold action to secure a better future,” he said.

What Tory MPs admitted they could agree on was that the snap election had caught them by surprise. Sunak’s decision was so tightly held that even his closest cabinet allies were kept in the dark until the eleventh hour.

It was only at the unusually timed cabinet meeting on Wednesday afternoon that Sunak revealed his plan — less than an hour before he announced it to the country.

While ministers are normally permitted to miss the weekly cabinet meeting to attend to other pressing business, on this occasion Number 10 issued the instruction that all must be present.

Advertisement

That forced Lord David Cameron, the foreign secretary, to cut short a visit to Tirana where he had travelled to discuss immigration with Albanian Prime Minister Edi Rama.

Grant Shapps, the defence secretary, was meanwhile forced to delay a planned visit to the Baltics.

These moves and others — including chancellor Hunt’s decision to pull out of a television interview — fuelled speculation at Westminster on Wednesday morning that Sunak was about to call a summer election.

MPs, advisers and journalists frantically appealed to each other — both in the corridors of the Palace of Westminster and on WhatsApp — for concrete details about what Sunak planned, as the rumours reached fever pitch.

Just after midday, Sunak was challenged at prime minister’s questions in the House of Commons about the speculation by Stephen Flynn, the Scottish National party leader at Westminster. Sunak failed to rule out a snap poll, and his press secretary also declined to stamp out the possibility.

Advertisement

By early afternoon, most MPs believed a general election was likely. “It looks like it’s on,” said one Labour MP, who claimed the party was ready.

A despondent Tory MP said they believed that any Conservative colleagues with a majority below 15,000 were at risk.

The first clue that Sunak was considering cutting and running emerged last week, when Conservative bosses convened to discuss money and fundraising for a potential July poll.

Senior Tory figures were instructed to reach out discreetly to megadonors to see if large-scale donations could be elicited at short notice.

The crunch talks were first reported by the Financial Times, though Conservative officials dismissed the significance of the conversations at the time.

Advertisement

Shortly after cabinet ministers traipsed into Downing Street at about 4pm, senior Conservative figures confirmed the prime minister would announce the general election would take place on July 4.

Storm clouds hovered over Number 10 as journalists crammed into the press area waiting for Sunak to make his statement. The prime minister will hope the climate for the Conservatives improves in the next six weeks.

News

Rep. Ilhan Omar rushed by man on stage and sprayed with liquid at town hall event

Published

on

Rep. Ilhan Omar rushed by man on stage and sprayed with liquid at town hall event

A man is tackled after spraying an unknown substance at US Representative Ilhan Omar (D-MN) (L) during a town hall she was hosting in Minneapolis, Minnesota, on January 27, 2026. (Photo by Octavio JONES / AFP via Getty Images)

OCTAVIO JONES/AFP via Getty Images/AFP


hide caption

toggle caption

Advertisement

OCTAVIO JONES/AFP via Getty Images/AFP

Rep. Ilhan Omar, D-Minn., was rushed by a man during a town hall event Tuesday night and sprayed with a liquid via a syringe.

Footage from the event shows a man approaching Omar at her lectern as she is delivering remarks and spraying an unknown substance in her direction, before swiftly being tackled by security. Omar called on Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem to resign or face impeachment immediately before the assault.

Noem has faced criticism from lawmakers on both sides of the aisle in the aftermath of the fatal shooting of 37-year-old intensive care nurse Alex Pretti by federal officers in Minneapolis Saturday.

Advertisement

Omar’s staff can be heard urging her to step away and get “checked out,” with others nearby saying the substance smelled bad.

“We will continue,” Omar responded. “These f******* a**holes are not going to get away with it.”

A statement from Omar’s office released after the event said the individual who approached and sprayed the congresswoman is now in custody.

“The Congresswoman is okay,” the statement read. “She continued with her town hall because she doesn’t let bullies win.”

A syringe lays on the ground after a man, left, approached Representative Ilhan Omar, a Democrat from Minnesota, during a town hall event in Minneapolis, Minnesota, US, on Tuesday, Jan. 27, 2026. The man was apprehended after spraying unknown substance according the to Associated Press. Photographer: Angelina Katsanis/Bloomberg via Getty Images

A syringe lays on the ground after a man, left, approached Representative Ilhan Omar, a Democrat from Minnesota, during a town hall event in Minneapolis, Minnesota, US, on Tuesday, Jan. 27, 2026. The man was apprehended after spraying an unknown substance according to the Associated Press. Photographer: Angelina Katsanis/Bloomberg via Getty Images

Bloomberg/Bloomberg via Getty Images/Bloomberg

Advertisement


hide caption

toggle caption

Bloomberg/Bloomberg via Getty Images/Bloomberg

Advertisement

Omar followed up with a statement on social media saying she will not be intimidated.

Advertisement

As Omar continued her remarks at the town hall, she said: “We are Minnesota strong and we will stay resilient in the face of whatever they might throw at us.”

Just three days ago, fellow Democrat Rep. Maxwell Frost of Florida said he was assaulted at the Sundance Festival by a man “who told me that Trump was going to deport me before he punched me in the face.”

Threats against Congressional lawmakers have been rising. Last year, there was an increase in security funding in the wake of growing concerns about political violence in the country.

According to the U.S. Capitol Police, the number of threat assessment cases has increased for the third year in a row. In 2025, the USCP investigated 14,938 “concerning statements, behaviors, and communications” directed towards congressional lawmakers, their families and staff. That figure represents a nearly 58% increase from 2024.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

News

Video: F.A.A. Ignored Safety Concerns Prior to Collision Over Potomac, N.T.S.B. Says

Published

on

Video: F.A.A. Ignored Safety Concerns Prior to Collision Over Potomac, N.T.S.B. Says

new video loaded: F.A.A. Ignored Safety Concerns Prior to Collision Over Potomac, N.T.S.B. Says

transcript

transcript

F.A.A. Ignored Safety Concerns Prior to Collision Over Potomac, N.T.S.B. Says

The National Transportation Safety Board said that a “multitude of errors” led to the collision between a military helicopter and a commercial jet, killing 67 people last January.

“I imagine there will be some difficult moments today for all of us as we try to provide answers to how a multitude of errors led to this tragedy.” “We have an entire tower who took it upon themselves to try to raise concerns over and over and over and over again, only to get squashed by management and everybody above them within F.A.A. Were they set up for failure?” “They were not adequately prepared to do the jobs they were assigned to do.”

Advertisement
The National Transportation Safety Board said that a “multitude of errors” led to the collision between a military helicopter and a commercial jet, killing 67 people last January.

By Meg Felling

January 27, 2026

Continue Reading

News

Families of killed men file first U.S. federal lawsuit over drug boat strikes

Published

on

Families of killed men file first U.S. federal lawsuit over drug boat strikes

President Trump speaks as U.S. Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth looks on during a meeting of his Cabinet at the White House in December 2025.

Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images


hide caption

toggle caption

Advertisement

Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images

Relatives of two Trinidadian men killed in an airstrike last October are suing the U.S. government for wrongful death and for carrying out extrajudicial killings.

The case, filed in Massachusetts, is the first lawsuit over the strikes to land in a U.S. federal court since the Trump administration launched a campaign to target vessels off the coast of Venezuela. The American government has carried out three dozen such strikes since September, killing more than 100 people.

Among them are Chad Joseph, 26, and Rishi Samaroo, 41, who relatives say died in what President Trump described as “a lethal kinetic strike” on Oct. 14, 2025. The president posted a short video that day on social media that shows a missile targeting a ship, which erupts in flame.

Advertisement

“This is killing for sport, it’s killing for theater and it’s utterly lawless,” said Baher Azmy, legal director of the Center for Constitutional Rights. “We need a court of law to rein in this administration and provide some accountability to the families.”

The White House and Pentagon justify the strikes as part of a broader push to stop the flow of illegal drugs into the U.S. The Pentagon declined to comment on the lawsuit, saying it doesn’t comment on ongoing litigation.

But the new lawsuit described Joseph and Samaroo as fishermen doing farm work in Venezuela, with no ties to the drug trade. Court papers said they were headed home to family members when the strike occurred and now are presumed dead.

Neither man “presented a concrete, specific, and imminent threat of death or serious physical injury to the United States or anyone at all, and means other than lethal force could have reasonably been employed to neutralize any lesser threat,” according to the lawsuit.

Advertisement

Lenore Burnley, the mother of Chad Joseph, and Sallycar Korasingh, the sister of Rishi Samaroo, are the plaintiffs in the case.

Their court papers allege violations of the Death on the High Seas Act, a 1920 law that makes the U.S. government liable if its agents engage in negligence that results in wrongful death more than 3 miles off American shores. A second claim alleges violations of the Alien Tort Statute, which allows foreign citizens to sue over human rights violations such as deaths that occurred outside an armed conflict, with no judicial process.

The American Civil Liberties Union, the Center for Constitutional Rights, and Jonathan Hafetz at Seton Hall University School of Law are representing the plaintiffs.

“In seeking justice for the senseless killing of their loved ones, our clients are bravely demanding accountability for their devastating losses and standing up against the administration’s assault on the rule of law,” said Brett Max Kaufman, senior counsel at the ACLU.

U.S. lawmakers have raised questions about the legal basis for the strikes for months but the administration has persisted.

Advertisement

—NPR’s Quil Lawrence contributed to this report.

Continue Reading

Trending