Connect with us

News

For European carmakers, EVs are a Catch-22

Published

on

For European carmakers, EVs are a Catch-22

Unlock the Editor’s Digest for free

That European carmakers were going to struggle with the transition to electric vehicles was a given. New, native EV entrants such as Tesla and BYD were always likely to make inroads, leading to share losses for traditional incumbents. The bad news is that a delayed transition is not proving any easier to navigate. 

That was the message emerging from the industry this week. Take Volvo Cars’ decision to water down its 2030 target to go full plug-in electric. This highlights how expectations on the speed of EV take-off have changed. More expensive cars, plus a dearth of charging infrastructure have conspired to slow global growth rates. In Europe, where subsidies have been cut, sales have actually gone into reverse in the past few months.  

But this delay offers no respite for traditional automakers. Their plight is epitomised by Volkswagen, which is considering shutting factories in Germany for the first time in its 87-year history. This comes after the announcement of the potential closure of a Belgian plant over the summer. 

Advertisement

The group’s problem is that people are not just eschewing EVs in favour of traditional cars. They are buying fewer cars overall. Indeed, European unit sales (including the UK and EFTA countries) were 12.8mn in 2023 — far below the pre-Covid peak of 15.8mn in 2019 — and growth in the first seven months of 2024 was an anaemic 3.9 per cent, according to Bernstein. How much of the lost volume is cyclical and how much is structural is anyone’s guess. (VW itself is not optimistic.) But at this rate, it will not be regained any time soon. 

Ordinarily, carmakers in a slump would rush to launch new, cheaper cars — even at lower margins — to entice consumers and keep factories ticking over. But the uncertain trajectory towards electrification makes it hard to invest in new internal combustion models.

Cheap European EVs, meanwhile, remain a far-off dream. This limbo affects consumers, too, who may be putting off buying a new car until the fog clears. That helps explain Volkswagen’s decision to focus on cutting costs and capacity instead. Already, Harald Hendrikse at Citigroup forecasts, the group will miss its margin target for the year. 

It is hard to see how European carmakers can thrive while the market is in a muddle. And when EVs do finally resume their growth path — as seems inevitable — they will have to grapple with margin dilutive sales and fierce competition. The sector’s path looks anything but smooth.

camilla.palladino@ft.com

Advertisement

News

Video: F.A.A. Ignored Safety Concerns Prior to Collision Over Potomac, N.T.S.B. Says

Published

on

Video: F.A.A. Ignored Safety Concerns Prior to Collision Over Potomac, N.T.S.B. Says

new video loaded: F.A.A. Ignored Safety Concerns Prior to Collision Over Potomac, N.T.S.B. Says

transcript

transcript

F.A.A. Ignored Safety Concerns Prior to Collision Over Potomac, N.T.S.B. Says

The National Transportation Safety Board said that a “multitude of errors” led to the collision between a military helicopter and a commercial jet, killing 67 people last January.

“I imagine there will be some difficult moments today for all of us as we try to provide answers to how a multitude of errors led to this tragedy.” “We have an entire tower who took it upon themselves to try to raise concerns over and over and over and over again, only to get squashed by management and everybody above them within F.A.A. Were they set up for failure?” “They were not adequately prepared to do the jobs they were assigned to do.”

Advertisement
The National Transportation Safety Board said that a “multitude of errors” led to the collision between a military helicopter and a commercial jet, killing 67 people last January.

By Meg Felling

January 27, 2026

Continue Reading

News

Families of killed men file first U.S. federal lawsuit over drug boat strikes

Published

on

Families of killed men file first U.S. federal lawsuit over drug boat strikes

President Trump speaks as U.S. Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth looks on during a meeting of his Cabinet at the White House in December 2025.

Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images


hide caption

toggle caption

Advertisement

Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images

Relatives of two Trinidadian men killed in an airstrike last October are suing the U.S. government for wrongful death and for carrying out extrajudicial killings.

The case, filed in Massachusetts, is the first lawsuit over the strikes to land in a U.S. federal court since the Trump administration launched a campaign to target vessels off the coast of Venezuela. The American government has carried out three dozen such strikes since September, killing more than 100 people.

Among them are Chad Joseph, 26, and Rishi Samaroo, 41, who relatives say died in what President Trump described as “a lethal kinetic strike” on Oct. 14, 2025. The president posted a short video that day on social media that shows a missile targeting a ship, which erupts in flame.

Advertisement

“This is killing for sport, it’s killing for theater and it’s utterly lawless,” said Baher Azmy, legal director of the Center for Constitutional Rights. “We need a court of law to rein in this administration and provide some accountability to the families.”

The White House and Pentagon justify the strikes as part of a broader push to stop the flow of illegal drugs into the U.S. The Pentagon declined to comment on the lawsuit, saying it doesn’t comment on ongoing litigation.

But the new lawsuit described Joseph and Samaroo as fishermen doing farm work in Venezuela, with no ties to the drug trade. Court papers said they were headed home to family members when the strike occurred and now are presumed dead.

Neither man “presented a concrete, specific, and imminent threat of death or serious physical injury to the United States or anyone at all, and means other than lethal force could have reasonably been employed to neutralize any lesser threat,” according to the lawsuit.

Advertisement

Lenore Burnley, the mother of Chad Joseph, and Sallycar Korasingh, the sister of Rishi Samaroo, are the plaintiffs in the case.

Their court papers allege violations of the Death on the High Seas Act, a 1920 law that makes the U.S. government liable if its agents engage in negligence that results in wrongful death more than 3 miles off American shores. A second claim alleges violations of the Alien Tort Statute, which allows foreign citizens to sue over human rights violations such as deaths that occurred outside an armed conflict, with no judicial process.

The American Civil Liberties Union, the Center for Constitutional Rights, and Jonathan Hafetz at Seton Hall University School of Law are representing the plaintiffs.

“In seeking justice for the senseless killing of their loved ones, our clients are bravely demanding accountability for their devastating losses and standing up against the administration’s assault on the rule of law,” said Brett Max Kaufman, senior counsel at the ACLU.

U.S. lawmakers have raised questions about the legal basis for the strikes for months but the administration has persisted.

Advertisement

—NPR’s Quil Lawrence contributed to this report.

Continue Reading

News

Video: New Video Analysis Reveals Flawed and Fatal Decisions in Shooting of Pretti

Published

on

Video: New Video Analysis Reveals Flawed and Fatal Decisions in Shooting of Pretti

new video loaded: New Video Analysis Reveals Flawed and Fatal Decisions in Shooting of Pretti

A frame-by-frame assessment of actions by Alex Pretti and the two officers who fired 10 times shows how lethal force came to be used against a target who didn’t pose a threat.

By Devon Lum, Haley Willis, Alexander Cardia, Dmitriy Khavin and Ainara Tiefenthäler

January 26, 2026

Continue Reading

Trending