Connect with us

News

DOJ appeals federal ruling on transportation mask mandate

Published

on

DOJ appeals federal ruling on transportation mask mandate

“It’s CDC’s persevering with evaluation that at the moment an order requiring masking within the indoor transportation hall stays vital for the general public well being,” the CDC mentioned in a press release. “CDC will proceed to observe public well being circumstances to find out whether or not such an order stays vital. CDC believes this can be a lawful order, nicely inside CDC’s authorized authority to guard public well being.”

Within the wake of Monday’s ruling, the Justice Division had thought of whether or not to battle a courtroom choice that caught a lot of the administration, airline trade, native public transit departments and on a regular basis People off-guard. The enchantment signifies that the administration will head to the next courtroom to increase the mandate — although many airways and public transit methods have already determined to make masks optionally available following the courtroom ruling.

The enchantment is a dangerous transfer that might restrict the federal government’s capability to make comparable mandates sooner or later. If the eleventh Circuit — which oversees appellate challenges from Florida, the place the federal choose who struck down the mandate sits — upholds the ruling hanging down the mandate, it could be precedent for all the opposite federal courts in that circuit, which covers the Southeast. A Supreme Courtroom ruling upholding the choice to strike down the mandate would make the choose’s conclusions about CDC authority binding nationwide.

White Home press secretary Jen Psaki, talking to CNN+’s Chris Wallace Wednesday night time, mentioned the enchantment was essential for preserving the CDC’s future public well being authority.

Advertisement

“That is essential for 2 causes: One as a result of we predict it is completely cheap, as does the Division of Justice, for the CDC, the well being and knowledge consultants — well being consultants most significantly in our administration — to have the ability to have that point to judge. But additionally as a result of they need to battle to make sure the CDC’s authority and skill to place in mandates sooner or later stays intact,” Psaki mentioned.

She added: “We all know there’s going to be ups and downs on this pandemic, we’re all prepared for it to be over. However we need to be certain that our public well being consultants are in a position to take steps, if wanted, sooner or later.”

White Home emphasised ‘selection’ on masks earlier Wednesday

Earlier Wednesday, Psaki mentioned People have a “selection” as as to if they’ll put on a masks on an airplane following a courtroom ruling banning the federal masks mandate on planes, trains and different public transportation.

“Individuals are not legally sure to put on masks. So, it’s a cut-off date the place it’s as much as individuals, it’s their selection,” Psaki informed reporters, later including that the administration continues to suggest “everybody put on masks on a aircraft” per steering from the US Facilities for Illness Management and Prevention.

When requested about President Joe Biden’s feedback Tuesday that individuals ought to resolve for themselves whether or not to put on masks on an airplane, Psaki mentioned that Biden “was answering the query fairly actually,” reiterating that the White Home disagrees with the choose’s choice and that Biden and others touring with him would proceed to put on a masks in flight.

Advertisement

“We’re not implementing the masks mandate due to the courtroom order, which we disagree with, whereas he’s nonetheless abiding by CDC steering. So, we suggest People try this throughout the nation. They’re nonetheless recommending individuals put on masks on airplanes,” Psaki mentioned, noting that vacationers aboard Air Drive One Tuesday on a visit to New Hampshire all wore masks.

Psaki mentioned that public polling “doesn’t truly present that there’s a common view of individuals eliminating masks,” however that that “does not matter” to the White Home because it makes its selections “primarily based on public well being and knowledge.”

The Biden Justice Division mentioned on Tuesday it could enchantment the courtroom ruling that struck down the federal masks mandate for vacationers — however provided that the CDC decided the mandate remains to be vital to guard public well being.

Earlier than the Florida choose’s ruling, the Biden administration had prolonged the requirement for masks on planes, trains, and inside airports by Could 3. The CDC was set to evaluate whether or not the mandate was nonetheless wanted, and Psaki later steered that evaluation could possibly be completed earlier than Could 3.

“I might count on you will hear from the CDC very quickly. And I do not suppose it is on the finish of 15 days, when it comes to their expectation and ask for an enchantment,” Psaki mentioned.

Pressed on why the Justice Division did not instantly enchantment the ruling or searching for an emergency keep, Psaki pointed to the CDC’s want to assemble extra knowledge on the BA.2 subvariant of Covid-19, the unique motive for the extension of the mandate final week.

Advertisement

This story has been up to date with extra developments on Wednesday.

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

News

Year in a word: Greenlash

Published

on

Year in a word: Greenlash

Unlock the Editor’s Digest for free

(portmanteau noun) the backlash against environmental policies. Not to be confused with greenwashing, green hushing or green wishing

It seems it was only yesterday that green policies were on the march. If it wasn’t the US passing the biggest climate law in the country’s history, it was the EU legislating for the world’s first major carbon border tax or the UK pledging to end sales of new petrol and diesel cars by 2030. 

Green progress was especially notable in Europe. By 2022, the EU’s renewable power generation had boomed so much that solar and wind overtook gas for the first time. EU emissions plunged 8 per cent in 2023, the steepest annual fall in decades outside of 2020.

Advertisement

But as climate promises were becoming a reality, inflation was spurring cost of living anxieties. Net zero-sceptic populist parties seized on these to denounce green policies as a costly elitist plot against working people. 

As 2023 turned into 2024, the green march began to stumble. Companies backed away from green targets. Germany watered down a contentious heat pump law that had helped to push the far-right AFD party’s poll numbers above 20 per cent. Brussels scrapped a plan to halve pesticide use. Green parties were hammered in June’s European parliament elections.  

In the UK, the former Conservative government pushed back the ban on new petrol and diesel cars to 2035. 

Yet the Conservatives still suffered a crushing election loss to the Labour party, which pledged to restore the 2030 target and is still committed to an ambitious decarbonisation agenda. 

That’s a reminder that the greenlash has limits, as does China’s remorseless charge towards green energy supremacy. But with an incoming Trump administration expected to reverse climate policies, and populism showing no sign of easing in Europe, it is clear that fraught green politics are by no means at an end.

Advertisement

pilita.clark@ft.com

Continue Reading

News

Musk Vs MAGA War: Trump Camp In Bitter Fight Over Immigration, Foreign Worker Visas

Published

on

Musk Vs MAGA War: Trump Camp In Bitter Fight Over Immigration, Foreign Worker Visas

Putin Aide Suggests Punishing Europe Over Its ‘Bloodthirsty Policies’ Against Russia | Ukraine War

Former Russian President Dmitry Medvedev has called for decisive action against Europe, accusing it of “anti-Russian” policies and advocating political, economic, and hybrid measures to punish European nations aligned with the U.S. His remarks came after a Norwegian ship allegedly refused to rescue Russian sailors following the sinking of a Russian freighter, exacerbating tensions. Medvedev also suggested fostering internal instability within Europe and labeled its policies as deceitful, brainless, and bloodthirsty.

253 views | 13 hours ago

Continue Reading

News

Tech pullback drags Wall Street stocks lower

Published

on

Tech pullback drags Wall Street stocks lower

Unlock the Editor’s Digest for free

US tech stocks slipped on Friday as investors pivoted away from companies that had led markets higher for much of this year.

The S&P 500, Wall Street’s main equity benchmark, fell 1.1 per cent on Friday, while the tech-heavy Nasdaq Composite dropped 1.5 per cent. Elon Musk’s electric-car maker Tesla was among the biggest laggards, falling 5 per cent, while chipmaker Nvidia dropped 2.1 per cent.

“I watch probably 30 different [market indicators] and they’re all down today,” said Jack Ablin, chief investment officer at Cresset Capital. “This was just widespread selling without much enthusiasm.”

Advertisement

Tech stocks have rallied strongly this year, as investors bet artificial intelligence would drive demand for everything from servers to microchips. The gains accelerated after Donald Trump’s election victory in November on bets that the president-elect would usher in more business-friendly policies when his term begins next month.

However, the sector has been choppier in recent weeks as investors reassess their best-performing holdings at the end of the year. The Federal Reserve also sparked ructions last week when it forecast only two quarter-point rate cuts next year, compared with its September forecast of four, as officials fretted about growing risks that inflation becomes lodged well above the central bank’s 2 per cent target.

The hawkish projections have pushed up US long-term borrowing costs, with the 10-year Treasury yield rising to 4.63 per cent on Friday, compared with lows in September of about 3.6 per cent. Higher yields typically tarnish the appeal of holding shares in fast-growing companies.

Citigroup analysts on Friday said that while they still forecast the S&P 500 will rise about 10 per cent from current levels by the end of next year, they expect a “more volatile leg of the bull market ahead”.

The US bank noted this year’s gains in stock prices compared with corporate profits were “setting a high bar for fundamentals in the year ahead, and even the year after”. The S&P 500 trades at about 22.2 times expected earnings over the next year, compared with the average over the past decade of 18.1, according to FactSet data.

Advertisement

Greg McBride, chief financial analyst at Bankrate.com, said that, “even with that volatile Friday, the market’s still higher than it was on Monday”.

He said: “Markets don’t go straight up, and a pullback often serves as a foundation for the next market advance.”

The S&P 500 is still up 25 per cent year-to-date even after Friday’s pullback, roughly on a par with the previous year’s gains.

The so-called Magnificent 7 Big Tech stocks — Apple, Microsoft, Meta, Amazon, Alphabet, Nvidia and Tesla — have been responsible for roughly half of the S&P 500’s total returns, including dividends, this year, said Howard Silverblatt at S&P Dow Jones Indices.

All of the Magnificent 7 shares declined modestly on Friday, however.

Advertisement

Trading activity is typically lighter than usual during the holiday period, something that can exacerbate volatility.

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending