Connect with us

News

Compass Direct LLC’s 2024 Registration in North Carolina

Published

on

Compass Direct LLC’s 2024 Registration in North Carolina

North Carolina Department of the Secretary of State
Charitable Solicitation Licensing Division
P.O. Box 29622
Raleigh, NC 27626-0622
Telephone: 919-814-5400
1. Application Type: ☐ Initial ☑ Renewal
2. Applicant’s Full Business Legal Name:
Compass Direct LLC
CAROLINA
4. Applicant’s Principal Street Address: 300 Independence Ave SE
City: Washington
State: DC
Fund-Raising Consultant
License Application
Form Issue Date: 10/21/2003 Revised 2/16/18
Page 1 of 2
3. Applicant’s Principal Telephone Number:
(202) 318-5050
5. Applicant’s Mailing Address: c/o Charles H. Nave, P.C., 316 Mountain Avenue SW
City: Roanoke
6. Applicant’s Internet Site Address:
N/A
Zip Code: 20003
State: VA
Zip Code: 24016
7. Applicant’s Contact Person Email Address:
secretary@compassprofessional.com
8. Legal Form of Applicant’s Business:
☐ Sole Proprietor/Individual
☑ Limited Liability Corporation
☐ Corporation
Limited Liability Partnership
☐ General Partnership
☐ Other
9. Applicant’s State of Establishment:
Delaware
10. Applicant’s Date of Establishment:
7/24/2023
11. For non-NC corporations: Provide either of the following to verify the applicant’s current legal existence:
1. Certificate of Existence or Certificate of Good Standing from state of incorporation dated no more than six months prior to
date of signing of application, or
2. Actual webpage screenshot found on a publicly accessible regulatory authority website dated no more than thirty (30) days prior to
the date the license application was signed that includes the following elements:

Exact name of the entity as it appears on the license application; and

Language clearly verifying its status as a corporation in good standing in the state of incorporation (i.e. “current” or “active”); and
• Date the information was printed on the face of the document.
For un-incorporated NC applicants: Provide a copy of your assumed name certificate filed with the register of deeds, showing the register of deeds’
stamp.
12. If Applicant’s principal place of business is located outside North Carolina, ATTACH list of street addresses of any applicant offices located in
North Carolina.
ATTACHMENT 12 included? ☐ Yes ☑ No NC office
☐ Yes
13. Are ANY of applicant’s’ owners, directors, officers, or employees RELATED as parent, spouse, child, or sibling to ANY of applicant’s other
directors, officers, owners, or employees?
☐ Yes ☑ No
If answer is YES, attach a brief written explanation. ATTACHMENT 13 included? ☐ Yes
14. Are ANY of applicant’s’ owners, directors, officers, or employees RELATED as parent, spouse, child, or sibling to ANY officer, director,
trustee, or employee of any charitable organization or sponsor under contract with applicant?
☐ Yes ☑ No
If answer is YES, attach a brief written explanation, ATTACHMENT 14 included?
15. Are ANY of applicant’s’ owners, directors, officers, or employees RELATED as parent, spouse, child, or sibling to ANY supplier or vendor
providing goods or services to any charitable organization or sponsor under contract with the applicant?
☐ Yes ☑ No
If answer is YES, attach a brief written explanation. ATTACHMENT 15 included? ☐ Yes
16. Within the last five (5) years, has the applicant, or any of the applicant’s directors, officers, employees, agents, or persons with a controlling
interest in the applicant been convicted of ANY felony?
☐ Yes ☑ No
ATTACHMENT 16 included? ☐ Yes
If answer is YES, attach a brief written explanation.
17. Within the last five (5) years, has the applicant, or any of the applicant’s directors, officers, employees, agents, or persons with a controlling
interest in the applicant been convicted of ANY misdemeanor arising from the conduct of a solicitation for ANY charitable organization or sponsor
OR charitable or sponsor purpose?
If answer is YES, attach a brief written explanation.
☐ Yes ☑ No
ATTACHMENT 17 included? ☐ Yes
18. Within the last five (5) years, has the applicant, or any of the applicant’s directors, officers, employees, agents, or persons with a controlling
interest in the applicant been enjoined from violating ANY charitable solicitation law in this or ANY other state?
☐ Yes ☑ No
ATTACHMENT 18 included?
If answer is YES, attach a brief written explanation.
Yes
\DISKSTATIONshareHotDocs TemplatesHotDocs AnswersFundraisersCD230905 CD 2023 Answers.anx

News

Rep. Ilhan Omar rushed by man on stage and sprayed with liquid at town hall event

Published

on

Rep. Ilhan Omar rushed by man on stage and sprayed with liquid at town hall event

A man is tackled after spraying an unknown substance at US Representative Ilhan Omar (D-MN) (L) during a town hall she was hosting in Minneapolis, Minnesota, on January 27, 2026. (Photo by Octavio JONES / AFP via Getty Images)

OCTAVIO JONES/AFP via Getty Images/AFP


hide caption

toggle caption

Advertisement

OCTAVIO JONES/AFP via Getty Images/AFP

Rep. Ilhan Omar, D-Minn., was rushed by a man during a town hall event Tuesday night and sprayed with a liquid via a syringe.

Footage from the event shows a man approaching Omar at her lectern as she is delivering remarks and spraying an unknown substance in her direction, before swiftly being tackled by security. Omar called on Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem to resign or face impeachment immediately before the assault.

Noem has faced criticism from lawmakers on both sides of the aisle in the aftermath of the fatal shooting of 37-year-old intensive care nurse Alex Pretti by federal officers in Minneapolis Saturday.

Advertisement

Omar’s staff can be heard urging her to step away and get “checked out,” with others nearby saying the substance smelled bad.

“We will continue,” Omar responded. “These f******* a**holes are not going to get away with it.”

A statement from Omar’s office released after the event said the individual who approached and sprayed the congresswoman is now in custody.

“The Congresswoman is okay,” the statement read. “She continued with her town hall because she doesn’t let bullies win.”

A syringe lays on the ground after a man, left, approached Representative Ilhan Omar, a Democrat from Minnesota, during a town hall event in Minneapolis, Minnesota, US, on Tuesday, Jan. 27, 2026. The man was apprehended after spraying unknown substance according the to Associated Press. Photographer: Angelina Katsanis/Bloomberg via Getty Images

A syringe lays on the ground after a man, left, approached Representative Ilhan Omar, a Democrat from Minnesota, during a town hall event in Minneapolis, Minnesota, US, on Tuesday, Jan. 27, 2026. The man was apprehended after spraying an unknown substance according to the Associated Press. Photographer: Angelina Katsanis/Bloomberg via Getty Images

Bloomberg/Bloomberg via Getty Images/Bloomberg

Advertisement


hide caption

toggle caption

Bloomberg/Bloomberg via Getty Images/Bloomberg

Advertisement

Omar followed up with a statement on social media saying she will not be intimidated.

Advertisement

As Omar continued her remarks at the town hall, she said: “We are Minnesota strong and we will stay resilient in the face of whatever they might throw at us.”

Just three days ago, fellow Democrat Rep. Maxwell Frost of Florida said he was assaulted at the Sundance Festival by a man “who told me that Trump was going to deport me before he punched me in the face.”

Threats against Congressional lawmakers have been rising. Last year, there was an increase in security funding in the wake of growing concerns about political violence in the country.

According to the U.S. Capitol Police, the number of threat assessment cases has increased for the third year in a row. In 2025, the USCP investigated 14,938 “concerning statements, behaviors, and communications” directed towards congressional lawmakers, their families and staff. That figure represents a nearly 58% increase from 2024.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

News

Video: F.A.A. Ignored Safety Concerns Prior to Collision Over Potomac, N.T.S.B. Says

Published

on

Video: F.A.A. Ignored Safety Concerns Prior to Collision Over Potomac, N.T.S.B. Says

new video loaded: F.A.A. Ignored Safety Concerns Prior to Collision Over Potomac, N.T.S.B. Says

transcript

transcript

F.A.A. Ignored Safety Concerns Prior to Collision Over Potomac, N.T.S.B. Says

The National Transportation Safety Board said that a “multitude of errors” led to the collision between a military helicopter and a commercial jet, killing 67 people last January.

“I imagine there will be some difficult moments today for all of us as we try to provide answers to how a multitude of errors led to this tragedy.” “We have an entire tower who took it upon themselves to try to raise concerns over and over and over and over again, only to get squashed by management and everybody above them within F.A.A. Were they set up for failure?” “They were not adequately prepared to do the jobs they were assigned to do.”

Advertisement
The National Transportation Safety Board said that a “multitude of errors” led to the collision between a military helicopter and a commercial jet, killing 67 people last January.

By Meg Felling

January 27, 2026

Continue Reading

News

Families of killed men file first U.S. federal lawsuit over drug boat strikes

Published

on

Families of killed men file first U.S. federal lawsuit over drug boat strikes

President Trump speaks as U.S. Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth looks on during a meeting of his Cabinet at the White House in December 2025.

Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images


hide caption

toggle caption

Advertisement

Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images

Relatives of two Trinidadian men killed in an airstrike last October are suing the U.S. government for wrongful death and for carrying out extrajudicial killings.

The case, filed in Massachusetts, is the first lawsuit over the strikes to land in a U.S. federal court since the Trump administration launched a campaign to target vessels off the coast of Venezuela. The American government has carried out three dozen such strikes since September, killing more than 100 people.

Among them are Chad Joseph, 26, and Rishi Samaroo, 41, who relatives say died in what President Trump described as “a lethal kinetic strike” on Oct. 14, 2025. The president posted a short video that day on social media that shows a missile targeting a ship, which erupts in flame.

Advertisement

“This is killing for sport, it’s killing for theater and it’s utterly lawless,” said Baher Azmy, legal director of the Center for Constitutional Rights. “We need a court of law to rein in this administration and provide some accountability to the families.”

The White House and Pentagon justify the strikes as part of a broader push to stop the flow of illegal drugs into the U.S. The Pentagon declined to comment on the lawsuit, saying it doesn’t comment on ongoing litigation.

But the new lawsuit described Joseph and Samaroo as fishermen doing farm work in Venezuela, with no ties to the drug trade. Court papers said they were headed home to family members when the strike occurred and now are presumed dead.

Neither man “presented a concrete, specific, and imminent threat of death or serious physical injury to the United States or anyone at all, and means other than lethal force could have reasonably been employed to neutralize any lesser threat,” according to the lawsuit.

Advertisement

Lenore Burnley, the mother of Chad Joseph, and Sallycar Korasingh, the sister of Rishi Samaroo, are the plaintiffs in the case.

Their court papers allege violations of the Death on the High Seas Act, a 1920 law that makes the U.S. government liable if its agents engage in negligence that results in wrongful death more than 3 miles off American shores. A second claim alleges violations of the Alien Tort Statute, which allows foreign citizens to sue over human rights violations such as deaths that occurred outside an armed conflict, with no judicial process.

The American Civil Liberties Union, the Center for Constitutional Rights, and Jonathan Hafetz at Seton Hall University School of Law are representing the plaintiffs.

“In seeking justice for the senseless killing of their loved ones, our clients are bravely demanding accountability for their devastating losses and standing up against the administration’s assault on the rule of law,” said Brett Max Kaufman, senior counsel at the ACLU.

U.S. lawmakers have raised questions about the legal basis for the strikes for months but the administration has persisted.

Advertisement

—NPR’s Quil Lawrence contributed to this report.

Continue Reading

Trending