Connect with us

News

Celebrities may have helped shape anti-vaccine opinions during Covid-19 pandemic, study finds | CNN

Published

on

Celebrities may have helped shape anti-vaccine opinions during Covid-19 pandemic, study finds | CNN



CNN
 — 

Covid-19 vaccines are identified to be protected and efficient, and so they’re accessible without spending a dime, however many People within the US refuse to get them – and a latest research means that celebrities could share a number of the blame for folks’s distrust.

Celebrities have lengthy tried to positively affect public well being, research present, however throughout the Covid-19 pandemic, additionally they appeared to have a big affect on spreading misinformation.

A long time in the past, within the Fifties, folks might see stars like Elvis Presley, Dick Van Dyke and Ella Fitzgerald in TV adverts that inspired polio vaccination. This movie star affect boosted the nation’s normal vaccination efforts, and vaccination almost eradicated the lethal illness.

Advertisement

In 2021, US officers used celebrities in TV adverts to encourage extra folks to get vaccinated in opposition to Covid-19. Large names like way of life guru Martha Stewart, singer Charlie Puth and even Senate Minority Chief Mitchell McConnell confirmed up in spots that had billions of advert impressions.

The world isn’t restricted to solely three TV networks any extra, so celebrities like actress Hilary Duff, actor Dwayne “The Rock” Johnson, singer Dolly Parton and even Large Hen additionally used their huge presence on Instagram and Twitter to advertise a professional Covid-19 vaccine message.

However social media additionally grew to become a car for celebrities to forged doubt concerning the security and effectiveness of the vaccine and even to unfold disinformation about Covid.

Their unfavourable messages appeared to search out an viewers.

For his or her research, revealed within the journal BMJ Well being & Care Informatics, researchers examined almost 13 million tweets between January 2020 and March 2022 about Covid-19 and vaccines. They designed a pure language mannequin to find out the sentiment of every tweet and in contrast them with tweets that additionally talked about folks within the public eye.

Advertisement

The celebs they picked to research included individuals who had shared skepticism concerning the vaccines, who had Covid-related tweets that had been recognized as misinformation or who retweeted misinformation about Covid.

They included rapper Nicki Minaj, soccer participant Aaron Rodgers, tennis participant Novak Djokovic, singer Eric Clapton, Sen. Rand Paul, former President Donald Trump, Sen. Ted Cruz, Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis, TV host Tucker Carlson and commentator Joe Rogan.

The researchers discovered 45,255 tweets from 34,407 distinctive authors speaking about Covid-19 vaccine-related points. These tweets generated a complete of 16.32 million likes. The tweets from these influencers, total, had been extra unfavourable concerning the vaccine than optimistic, the research discovered. These tweets had been particularly extra associated to antivaccine controversy, moderately than information about vaccine growth, the research mentioned.

The best variety of unfavourable feedback was related to Rodgers and Minaj. Clapton had “only a few” optimistic tweets, the research mentioned, and that will have had an affect, however he additionally caught flak for it from the general public.

Probably the most-liked tweet that talked about Clapton and the vaccine mentioned, “Strongly disagree with [EC] … tackle Covid and the vaccine and disgusted by his earlier white supremacist feedback. However when you reference the loss of life of his son to criticize him, you’re an ignorant scumbag.”

Advertisement

Trump and Cruz had been discovered to have essentially the most substantial affect inside this group, with mixed likes totaling greater than 122,000.

They too got here in for criticism on the subject, with many customers questioning whether or not these politicians had been certified to have opinions concerning the vaccines. The research mentioned the most-liked tweet mentioning Cruz was, “I referred to as Ted Cruz’s workplace asking to make an appointment to speak with the Senator about my blood stress. They instructed me that the Senator was not certified to provide medical recommendation and that I ought to name my physician. So I requested them to cease advising about vaccines.”

Probably the most-liked tweet related to Rogan was an antivaxx assertion: “I really like how the identical individuals who don’t need us to hearken to Joe Rogan, Aaron Rodgers concerning the covid vaccine, need us to hearken to Large Hen & Elmo.”

Posts shared by information anchors and politicians appeared to have essentially the most affect when it comes to essentially the most tweets and retweets, the research discovered.

“Our findings recommend that the presence of constant patterns of emotional content material co-occurring with messaging shared by these individuals within the public eye that we’ve talked about, influenced public opinion and largely stimulated on-line public discourse, for the not less than over the course of the primary two years of the Covid pandemic,” mentioned research co-author Brianna White, a analysis coordinator within the Inhabitants Well being Intelligence lab on the College of Tennessee Well being Science Middle – Oak Ridge Nationwide Laboratory Middle for Biomedical Informatics.

Advertisement

“We additionally argue that clearly as the chance of extreme unfavourable well being outcomes improve with the failure to adjust to well being protecting conduct suggestions, that our findings recommend that polarized messages from societal elite could downplay these extreme unfavourable well being consequence dangers.”

The research doesn’t get into precisely why movie star tweets would have such an affect on folks’s attitudes concerning the vaccine. Dr. Ellen Selkie, who has carried out analysis on affect on the intersection of social media, movie star and public well being outcomes, mentioned celebrities are influential as a result of they entice loads of consideration.

“I believe a part of the affect that media have on conduct has to do with the quantity of publicity. Simply on the whole, the amount of content material that’s targeted on a particular subject or on a particular kind of interpretation of that subject – on this case misinformation – the repeated publicity to any given factor goes to extend the chance that it’s going to have an impact,” mentioned Selkie, who was not concerned within the new analysis. She is an adolescent well being pediatrician and researcher with UW Well being Youngsters and an assistant professor of pediatrics on the College of Wisconsin College of Medication and Public Well being.

Simply as folks hearken to a good friend’s ideas, they’ll hearken to a star whom they have a tendency to love or establish with as a result of they belief their opinion.

“With fandoms, when it comes to the connection between musical artists and actors and their followers, there’s this kind of mutual love that followers and artists have for one another, which kind of can approximate that sense that they’re looking for one another,” Selkie mentioned.

Advertisement

She mentioned she would have an interest to see analysis on the affect of celebrities who tweeted optimistic messages concerning the Covid-19 vaccine.

The authors of the research hope public well being leaders will use the findings instantly.

“We argue this risk to inhabitants well being ought to create a way of urgency and warrants public well being response to establish, develop and implement revolutionary mitigation methods,” the research says.

Publicity to massive quantities of this misinformation can have a long-lasting affect and work in opposition to the general public’s finest curiosity with regards to their well being.

“As populations develop to belief the influential nature of movie star exercise on social platforms, followers are disarmed and open to persuasion when confronted with false info, creating alternatives for dissemination and fast unfold of misinformation and disinformation,” the research says.

Advertisement

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

News

Ukraine’s bonds jump as investors bet Trump will end war

Published

on

Ukraine’s bonds jump as investors bet Trump will end war

Unlock the Editor’s Digest for free

Ukraine’s sovereign bonds have surged in price as investors bet that the incoming US administration will push for a quick end to the war with Russia.

The dollar-denominated bonds have risen 12 per cent in the past month, in expectation that the re-election of Donald Trump will lead to a ceasefire and boost Ukraine’s capacity to repay creditors.

The jump in the price of Ukrainian bonds, which one investor in the country called “the unlikeliest Trump trade ever”, comes as bets relating to the new administration have swept global financial markets in recent weeks.

Advertisement

Trump has said he will end the war in Ukraine “within a day” of returning to the White House, though he has not offered specifics on how this would be achieved.

The rally has come just over two months after Kyiv completed a restructuring of more than $20bn of debt in one of the fastest and biggest sovereign debt workouts in modern history.

Bond investors are betting that the country will be prepared to accept a peace deal that involves permanently giving up territory it has lost in the war, and that its economy will recover quickly in the years ahead.

“The main part of the trade has really been based on the war ending, or at least the possibility of Trump pushing through the start of negotiations,” said Thys Louw, portfolio manager at Ninety One, which owns some Ukrainian bonds.

Among investors to own significant holdings of Ukrainian debt is fund manager BlackRock, which was a member of the bondholder committee that led the restructuring talks. BlackRock declined to comment.

Advertisement

Ukrainian debt has outperformed emerging market indices since mid-October, when markets began to price in a Trump election victory.

Ukraine’s bond maturing in 2036 has risen from 44 to 49 cents on the dollar over the past month. So-called “GDP warrants” — debt securities issued under an older debt restructuring that will benefit from the country’s return of growth — having climbed even more sharply.

A bond owed by Ukrenergo, Ukraine’s state grid operator, has rallied more than 160 per cent this year to 67 cents on the dollar, despite renewed Russian attacks on infrastructure.

London-based hedge fund firm Shiprock Capital has profited from the jump in the warrants and Ukrainian corporate debt and is up 31 per cent this year to the end of October, according to an investor letter seen by the Financial Times.

Shiprock did not respond to a request for comment.

Advertisement

During the early stages of the war, bondholders agreed to a halt on Kyiv’s interest payments. The September restructuring, which is designed to pave the way for Ukraine’s return to bond markets, ended the two-year freeze.

Under the September deal, investors agreed to take losses of more than a third on their bonds to help Ukraine control its surging wartime deficits — years before official creditors such as the UK, the US, Germany and Japan are set to restructure their own debts.

In return for agreeing to accept upfront losses, bondholders were also given the chance to receive higher payouts if Ukraine’s war-ravaged economy beats growth targets in the years ahead.

Some investors have cautioned that the outlook for Ukraine’s bonds is far from clear.

Mohammed Elmi, a portfolio manager at Federated Hermes, said he was sceptical of the market’s belief in Trump’s ability to secure a rapid peace deal.

Advertisement

“I don’t fully subscribe to that kind of bullish view,” he said. “There is still a significant amount of unanswered questions” about where a settlement would leave Ukraine’s postwar economy and whether it would be a priority for the new US administration.

“Trump has a lot to do, with a big policy agenda to go through. These negotiations could also be quite prolonged,” he said.

Continue Reading

News

'I was shocked': Lawmakers react to Gaetz pick to be Trump's attorney general

Published

on

'I was shocked': Lawmakers react to Gaetz pick to be Trump's attorney general

Rep. Matt Gaetz (R-FL) questions Attorney General Merrick Garland during a hearing by the House Judiciary Committee, on June 4. President-elect Trump announced his intent to nominate Gaetz to head up the Department of Justice Wednesday.

Allison Bailey/AFP via Getty Images


hide caption

toggle caption

Advertisement

Allison Bailey/AFP via Getty Images

Lawmakers on Capitol Hill reacted to the news that President-elect Trump intends to nominate Rep. Matt Gaetz, R-Fl., to be attorney general with a mix of support, disbelief and silence Wednesday.

Sen. Susan Collins, R-Maine, said she was “shocked” to hear Gaetz was tapped to lead the Department of Justice.

“Obviously the president has the right to nominate whomever he wishes,” Collins said. “But this is why the Senate’s advise and consent process is so important.”

Advertisement

“I’m sure that there will be many, many questions raised at Mr. Gaetz’s hearing, if in fact the nomination goes forward,” she added.

The confusion deepened after House Speaker Mike Johnson, R-La., told reporters that Gaetz had resigned his seat in Congress, effective immediately. It is uncommon for lawmakers to resign after being nominated, typically they wait to step down until after they are confirmed.

“I think out of deference to us, he issued his resignation letter effective immediately,” Johnson said, adding that the early resignation would speed up the process of holding a special election to replace him.

If confirmed, Gaetz, 42, would take the helm of a department that as recently as last year was investigating him for possible sex trafficking offenses. Ultimately, prosecutors recommended against bringing charges against him after a long-running probe.

Gaetz also faced an House Ethics Committee investigation related to sex trafficking and drug allegations that ended when he resigned his position on Wednesday.

Advertisement

When asked about the GOP concerns about the nomination, incoming Senate GOP Leader John Thune, R-S.D., said “that’s probably a good question for the chairman of the Judiciary Committee.”

Alaska Sen. Lisa Murkowski is among those raising questions. She told reporters in the Capitol that she is concerned about the number of open investigations surrounding Gaetz.

“I’m surprised by this particular nomination and perhaps some of the others, which, again, were not names that most of us would have have thought to be out there,” Murkowski said. “But President Trump, if he is not one thing, He is his own person and and advancing his ideas.”

Republican Sen. Joni Ernst, R-Iowa, did not indicate her thoughts on the nominee but said “he’ll have his work cut out for him.”

Republicans will hold 53 seats in the upcoming Congress after last week’s elections, meaning Gaetz can only lose three votes from his own party if he hopes to be confirmed.

Advertisement

A rank and file Republican in the House of Representatives, speculated on his odds bluntly: “It’s an obvious throwaway nomination that has no chance in the Senate.”

But the skepticism is also nuanced. Fellow Trump ally, Sen. Lindsey Graham, R-S.C., said he is “inclined to support” Trump’s cabinet picks, but admitted some “surprise” at Gaetz’s nomination.

“Confirmation hearings will be important. [Gaetz] will have some tough questions to answer,” Graham predicted.

Florida Sen. Marco Rubio, who Trump has tapped to serve as secretary of state, said he has “known Matt a long time,” and thinks he “would do a good job.” Rubio added he expects Gaetz would be confirmed.

“Presidents deserve great deference, as president [he has] a mandate and he has a right to surround himself with people he trusts, especially in a position that important,” he sai

Advertisement
Continue Reading

News

Republicans win majority in US House, giving Trump control of Congress

Published

on

Republicans win majority in US House, giving Trump control of Congress

Unlock the White House Watch newsletter for free

Republicans have won a majority in the House of Representatives, giving Donald Trump’s party full control of both chambers of the US Congress and wide latitude to push a radical agenda through the legislature.

Democratic House leader Hakeem Jeffries congratulated Republican Speaker of the House Mike Johnson late on Wednesday, after several TV networks projected Trump’s party would retain control of the House.

“House Democrats gave it our all, running aggressive, forward-looking and people-centred campaigns,” Jeffries said. “While we will not regain control of the Congress in January, falling just a few seats short, House Democrats will hold Republicans to a razor-thin majority.”

Advertisement

The House verdict comes more than a week after Trump won a convincing election victory over Kamala Harris in the presidential race and means that when he is inaugurated in January his party will control the House and Senate.

The unified government will hand Trump considerable freedom to push through his legislative agenda, including plans to renew and expand sweeping tax cuts.

The House result, which came after more than a week of counting in California and other states, is a blow to Democrats, who will be minorities in both the Senate and House and unable to lead powerful congressional committees to oversee investigations into the Trump administration’s actions.

Eleven House races have still yet to be called, and the margin of the Republican majority has yet to be confirmed. But TV networks declared Trump’s party would keep control of the House because Republicans had secured the 218 seats necessary to have a majority in the 435-member body. The Financial Times’ tally of House results, which is based on race calls by the Associated Press, showed Republicans still one shy of the majority at 6.45pm on Wednesday.

Republicans will also have a firm grip on the Senate — where Democrats have held a slim majority in the current Congress — after picking up four seats in Pennsylvania, Ohio, West Virginia and Montana.

Advertisement

Republican senators on Wednesday elected John Thune to replace Mitch McConnell as the party’s leader in the upper chamber. McConnell, 82, remains a senator but said last year he would step down from leadership following a series of health issues.

Johnson, the Republican congressman from Louisiana and close ally of Trump who became Speaker last year, has said he intends to remain in the role.

Trump also presided over a unified government in the initial two years of his first administration, in 2017 and 2018, before Democrats won back control of the House in the 2018 midterm elections.

But many in Washington expect Trump to exert a tighter grip on Congress this time around, given the unwavering loyalty he commands from many top lawmakers, including the leaders of both chambers. In his first administration, he often faced opposition from McConnell and then-Speaker Paul Ryan.

Still, Trump will not have unchecked power over Congress, and Democrats may be able to exert leverage over his administration in narrow but meaningful ways.

Advertisement

Although budget and tax changes require only a simple majority of both chambers, and the president’s appointments can also be confirmed with the backing of 50 senators, most other legislation will need to break the Senate filibuster — a 60-vote threshold — to become law.

That means Senate Democrats could block other Trump legislative priorities — including laws to crack down on immigration at the US-Mexico border, or repeal the Affordable Care Act, commonly known as Obamacare — unless Senate Republicans take the drastic step of scrapping the filibuster altogether. Thune on Wednesday said the filibuster would be “unchanged” so long as he was Senate majority leader.

Continue Reading

Trending