Connect with us

News

Australia threatens billion-dollar fines for price gouging at supermarkets

Published

on

Australia threatens billion-dollar fines for price gouging at supermarkets

Stay informed with free updates

The Australian government is tightening regulation of the country’s powerful supermarkets, with the threat of potentially billions of dollars in fines if they squeeze farmers and other suppliers on price. 

The government said it would push through legislation to enforce a mandatory code of conduct on large food retailers, including Woolworths and Coles Group, which control about 65 per cent of the market. Breaches would result in fines ranging from A$10mn (US$6.6mn) to up to 10 per cent of turnover over a year-long period.

Michael Simotas, an analyst with bank Jefferies, said the penalties for bad behaviour could be as much as A$5bn for Woolworths and A$4bn for Coles. He expected the companies would remain “front and centre of media and political commentary”.

Advertisement

Jim Chalmers, Australia’s treasurer, said: “We’re cracking down on anti-competitive behaviour in the supermarkets sector so people get fairer prices at the checkout.” 

The move to replace a voluntary code with a mandatory one comes as a cost of living crisis and persistent inflation have put many household budgets under strain.

It follows a review conducted by former cabinet minister Craig Emerson, with the retail sector finding itself in the spotlight over alleged price gouging for products including fresh fruit and vegetables over the past two years. Those price increases have not been passed on to farmers and other suppliers.

The proposed legislation would apply to companies with annual sales of more than A$5bn, including Aldi and smaller player Metcash. Companies including Costco and Amazon could be covered by the code in the future based on their growth rates and the expansion of their product lines.

Allegations of price gouging and the poor treatment of suppliers have led to increased scrutiny of supermarkets, with calls growing in recent years to break up the largest companies to improve competition.

Advertisement

Woolworths’ longtime chief executive Brad Banducci announced his retirement this year, days after a fractious interview with broadcaster ABC on price gouging. He later appeared in front of a Senate committee in Canberra and was threatened with jail for refusing to detail certain financial metrics to MPs who questioned whether a true reflection of the retail sector’s profitability was being provided.

The government has stopped short of proposing a break-up but wants to set up an anonymous whistleblower and supplier complaint mechanism within Australia’s consumer watchdog.

Woolworths said in a statement it would support a mandatory code of conduct. On ideas such as a price register to improve transparency over fresh fruit and vegetable prices, which have soared in recent years, it said it would study the proposals in detail.

“While there is broad support for greater price transparency in the sector, there isn’t yet consensus on how to deliver it,” it said.

Coles said in a statement: “Coles has worked collaboratively with Dr Emerson in his review to strengthen the Code. We will consider the final recommendations and Government’s response in detail, and we remain committed to supporting a healthy and sustainable grocery sector.”

Advertisement

Jolyon Burnett, chair of the National Farmers Federation’s Horticulture Council, said the review and government proposals had left “a clear impression of the raw deals our growers are getting with supermarkets” and that the recommendations provided a “rare opportunity to reform our markets”.

News

Video: Graham Platner Wins Maine Senate Primary

Published

on

Video: Graham Platner Wins Maine Senate Primary

new video loaded: Graham Platner Wins Maine Senate Primary

transcript

transcript

Graham Platner Wins Maine Senate Primary

Graham Platner, a progressive oyster farmer, won the Democratic nomination for Senate in Maine on Tuesday. He is set to face Senator Susan Collins, a five-term Republican, in November.

Together, we will win back this Senate seat. It is deeply humbling to stand here as your Democratic nominee. I’ve made mistakes in my life, mistakes that I regret… But every day I wake up and I try to be a little bit better and a little bit kinder than I was the day before. Thank you, Maine.

Advertisement
Graham Platner, a progressive oyster farmer, won the Democratic nomination for Senate in Maine on Tuesday. He is set to face Senator Susan Collins, a five-term Republican, in November.

By Shawn Paik

June 10, 2026

Continue Reading

News

In Nevada, Trump’s policies are making things tough for Republican Gov. Joe Lombardo

Published

on

In Nevada, Trump’s policies are making things tough for Republican Gov. Joe Lombardo

Democratic Attorney General Aaron Ford, left, will face Republican Gov. Joe Lombardo, right, in Nevada’s race for governor this November.

Charles Krupa/AP, Ethan Miller/Getty Images

hide caption

toggle caption

Advertisement

Charles Krupa/AP, Ethan Miller/Getty Images

RENO, Nev. — The stage is set for what could be one of the most closely watched gubernatorial elections in the country. According to a race call by The Associated Press, Democratic voters in Nevada have selected two-time state Attorney General Aaron Ford as their party’s nominee to challenge incumbent Republican Gov. Joe Lombardo.

Ford, who was elected as the state’s AG in 2018, defeated five other Democrats to claim the nomination. He focused his primary campaign on Lombardo, pointing to the rising cost of groceries, gas, housing and healthcare as failures of the one-term governor.

He’s also done everything he can to tie Lombardo to President Trump, who endorsed Lombardo and who has seen his popularity decline since winning the state by 3 points two years ago. That’s setting up a tough race for Lombardo. The Cook Political Report, which tracks elections, rates the race a toss-up.

Advertisement

Lombardo faced six primary challengers of his own, but sailed to victory Tuesday night. That was thanks in part to his relative success in the state legislature, despite Democratic majorities in both chambers. Among his top accomplishments are a bipartisan bill that looked to hold school districts more accountable, tightening criminal justice reforms enacted after George Floyd’s killing in 2020, and efforts to make housing more attainable. He also helped secure a public financing deal for a new stadium for Major League Baseball’s A’s, formerly of Oakland.

The governor has secured a sizeable war chest heading into the general election, but money alone isn’t enough to carry an election in the Silver State. Messaging and voter contact matter, and that’s where Ford may have an advantage. The state’s incredibly powerful Culinary Union, which represents hospitality workers across Nevada, officially endorsed Ford last month. The union, which claims as many as 60,000 members in Nevada alone, has become a voter turnout machine. It has integrated polling sites into casinos and resorts dedicated to hospitality workers.

Continue Reading

News

A warm World Cup welcome? U.S. immigration policies have chilling effect

Published

on

A warm World Cup welcome? U.S. immigration policies have chilling effect

Media members tour the locker rooms at Kansas City Stadium ahead of the FIFA World Cup 2026 on June 8 in Kansas City, Mo.

Jay Biggerstaff/Getty Images


hide caption

toggle caption

Advertisement

Jay Biggerstaff/Getty Images

President Trump’s restrictive immigration policies are already impacting this year’s 2026 FIFA World Cup.

At least one referee from Somalia and one Iraqi team staff member were denied entry at U.S. airports in recent days, and dozens of fans from countries such as Morocco have been denied travel visas, despite being ticket holders.

“I view the 2026 World Cup as a massive paradox,” said Jules Boykoff, a professor and the author of Red Card: The 2026 World Cup, Sportswashing and the FIFA Greed Machine. “On one hand, it has more teams than ever participating. On the other hand, because of the policies of the Trump administration, it looks more like a World Cup of exclusion than inclusion.”

Advertisement

Boykoff, who is also a former professional soccer player, told NPR he worries the restrictive immigration policies also will shape the experience of fans in the U.S., who might be anxious about potential tense interactions with immigration agents outside of stadiums.

Boykoff’s concerns echo those of other policy experts and soccer fans who for months have warned about the influence of President Trump’s immigration policies on the tournament.

The White House did not respond to NPR’s request for comment.

In a statement to NPR, Customs and Border Protection said “all travelers seeking entry into the United States, including athletes, coaches, and staff, are subject to CBP inspection and vetting.”

The agency said “admissibility determinations are made on a case-by-case basis using law enforcement, national security, and immigration information available at the time of inspection.”

Advertisement

Denied entry to the U.S.

There are 39 countries who are under either a full or partial U.S. travel ban. For 19 of those countries, the State Department has suspended issuing all visas. The Trump administration has said the move is to “ensure that individuals approved for a visa do not endanger national security or public safety.”

Four countries in those lists — Iran, Haiti, Côte d’Ivoire, and Senegal — are expected to play in the World Cup.

On Saturday, decorated FIFA World Cup referee Omar Abdulkadir Artan, of Somalia, was denied entry to the U.S. after landing at the Miami International Airport.

In a statement, CBP said Artan was “determined to be inadmissible due to vetting concerns and was denied entry.” CBP did not say what concerns were.

Andrew Giuliani, the executive director of the White House Task Force for the World Cup, said Tuesday the denial was “for very good reasons,” but he didn’t provide any further explanation.

Advertisement

Artan did not respond to NPR’s request for comment.

Meanwhile, a player for Team Iraq was questioned for hours at Chicago O’Hare International Airport. He was allowed into the U.S., but a photographer for the team was denied entry due to “vetting concerns,” CBP said.

David Niven, a University of Cincinnati professor who teaches a course on sports and politics, told NPR these immigration issues are a self-inflicted wound.

“When you insert politics into the competition, it’s no longer the competition it was,” Niven said. “In some ways (it’s) very tangibly when a referee is missing or a player is delayed.”

The team from Iran — a country at war with the U.S. and Israel — was forced to relocate its lodging to Mexico after the U.S. government said players and staff were banned from staying overnight.

Advertisement

Visas for team members were approved last week, but more than a dozen support staff did not get approval, including Mehdi Taj, the president of the Iranian football federation.

In response to a social media post by U.S. Ambassador to Turkey Tom Barrack, the Iranian Embassy in Turkey said the U.S.’s conduct “violates FIFA regulations and breaches the United States’ host obligations.”

The Iranians also accused the U.S. of “politically biased interference in sport.”

“The U.S. government in practice is depriving Iran’s national team of its right to play in the World Cup under normal conditions and without undue pressure and stress,” the post on X said.

Fans face travel restrictions

Fans come from all over the world to attend the World Cup and cheer on their teams. Their chants and songs add to the excitement and vibrancy of the games.

Advertisement

But some fans and policy experts worry this year’s tournament may lose some of that exuberance because of U.S. visa denials.

According to the Moroccan news website Hespress, more than 40 members of multiple Moroccan football team supporter associations have been denied visas to attend the tournament. Many had tickets to the games and hotel bookings.

Gianni Infantino, FIFA’s president, in 2025 pushed against what he called “misconceptions” and said “everyone will be welcome in Canada, Mexico and the United States for the FIFA World Cup next year,” and that the U.S. was committed to a smooth travel process, so fans from all over the world will be welcome.”

But in response to Artan being denied entry to the U.S., a spokesperson for FIFA distanced the organization from the immigration issues. “FIFA is not involved in host country immigration processes, including visa adjudications, and has been informed by authorities that Mr. Artan’s status will not be changed at present,” FIFA said in a statement to NPR. “In line with previous FIFA events, a host government ultimately determines who receives a visa and who is admitted into their country.

Niven called FIFA’s new position “striking.”

Advertisement

“FIFA has raised the surrender flag on this question,” Niven said. “They’ve taken this situation and basically deferred to the United States and said the United States can do as they see fit.”

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending