Connect with us

Business

Trump signs an executive order to vet top AI models for national security risks

Published

on

Trump signs an executive order to vet top AI models for national security risks

President Trump signed an executive order Tuesday directing the federal government to establish a voluntary early review process for the country’s most advanced artificial intelligence models, following a months-long internal battle over how aggressively Washington should move to regulate the fast-growing technology.

Under the order, companies are asked to allow government agencies, including the National Security Agency and representatives of the Defense Department, to evaluate cutting-edge models up to 30 days before they are released to the public. The order stops short of mandating participation and explicitly bars the creation of any new licensing or permitting for AI models.

“The main question is whether this is the start of a continued government clamp down and response to continued AI capabilities, or whether this is a one-off, limited, and truly voluntary act,” said James Sanders, research associate at the Center for a New American Security, a Washington, D.C., think tank.

“It’s unclear how voluntary this will stay and how voluntary it will be in practice as the AI labs try to maintain good relationships with the U.S. government,” he said.

The order represents a reversal for Trump, less than two weeks after he scuttled a version of the policy that gave the government a 90-day review period — and, more broadly, for an administration that came to power promising to strip away AI guardrails, a posture that slowly created fractures within the GOP.

Advertisement

In the executive order, Trump appeared to frame a need to foster AI technologies while taking into account national security. “As these capabilities evolve, my Administration will continue to work closely with industry to ensure that the best and most secure technology is deployed rapidly to confront any and all threats to our country,” he said in the order.

The step set off immediate debate about whether Trump’s plan would be an effective approach. It formalizes an existing practice in which top AI companies share models with external evaluators and government players before deploying them publicly, but raises questions about how voluntary it will be and how the government will choose which labs to target.

David Sacks, who previously served as Trump’s AI advisor, called the 30-day window a “game changer,” arguing that the shorter timeline would allow companies to engage with the government without slowing down new model releases.

“In the AI race, every day counts,” Sacks wrote in a post on X.

Mark Carroll, director of Engineering at Amazon Web Services Annapurna Labs, places his hand on a compute sled of the new Trainium3 system at Annapurna Labs in Austin, Texas, on February 3. Tech titan Amazon is working to step out of Nvidia’s shadow with custom “Trainium” chips designed specially for machine learning as billions of dollars are poured into artificial intelligence.

Advertisement

(Mark Felix / AFP via Getty Images)

Dean W. Ball, Trump’s former AI advisor, characterized the order as a victory for the AI “safety contingent” and a loss for Sacks and others who promote a more accelerated approach. He called the order a mistake, saying it could be a first step toward a federal licensing requirement for AI models.

“All for a benefit that is barely articulable; what, exactly, is the intelligence community going to do in 30 days to make the models safer?” Ball wrote on X.

The signing of the executive order occurred amid growing tensions among Republicans over AI, job loss and data center construction, including fear among a significant portion of Trump’s supporters that artificial intelligence could eliminate jobs or become a security threat. Polling in May had shown strong support among Republicans for a framework like the one outlined in Trump’s executive order.

Advertisement

The growing split among Republicans over AI was clearly visible in Florida on Monday, where James Uthmeier, the state’s Republican attorney general, sued OpenAI over the alleged risks of ChatGPT, citing the use of the bot by a gunman in a shooting at Florida State University last year.

Meanwhile, Rep. Byron Donalds — the Trump-endorsed candidate to succeed Gov. Ron DeSantis — said Monday that he did not agree with Trump on AI policy, indicating he supported state-led regulation, a shift for a candidate who had been backed by the AI industry earlier in the year.

A poll released by Americans for Responsible Innovation, a nonprofit advocating for a federal framework for AI policy, found that the majority of Republican voters polled supported the type of plan laid out in Trump’s executive order. Seventy-one percent also said independent security testing should be required by law for advanced AI systems.

When Trump took office, his administration pivoted away from Biden-era policies requiring AI companies to test their AI models and share safety results with the government before public release, reversing the U.S. posture on regulation.

That changed after Anthropic — acting on its own initiative — brought its Claude Mythos Preview model to senior White House officials, a move that exposed vulnerabilities in its software and raised concerns about the potential need for safety-testing of AI models before broad public release.

Advertisement

The White House attempted to downplay the executive order as a regulatory move, emphasizing in a post Tuesday that the federal government would not conduct sweeping oversight and the process outlined in the executive order would be voluntary.

“We are NOT conducting oversight of all new models, as that level of government overreach would have chilling effects on free speech and innovation,” the White House Office of Science and Technology Policy posted on X.

Trump’s signing of the order prompted calls from those who support stricter AI regulation for Congress to take steps beyond Trump’s plan. Thus far, Congress has not passed any major legislation to regulate artificial intelligence.

“Congress should take the structure this order creates, make participation mandatory, and extend it beyond cyber threats to the full range of risks the most capable models present,” Riki Parikh, policy director of the Alliance for Secure AI, a nonprofit that promotes safeguards for AI, said on X, saying the order’s voluntary framework “isn’t enough.”

Progressives, including Gov. Gavin Newsom and Vermont Sen. Bernie Sanders, said the executive order was too weak and slammed Trump for flip-flopping on regulation.

Advertisement

Some experts suggested the distinction between voluntary and mandatory sharing of their cutting-edge technology may be crucial.

“No company is formally required to participate, but if a developer wants to sell frontier AI systems to the federal government, participation may soon become the price of entry,” Jessica Tillipman, a professor who studies contracting law at George Washington University, wrote in a post on X.

The administration’s approach was welcomed by industry leaders, including Microsoft President Brad Smith, who said the order was “an important step toward advancing innovation while protecting the security of the American public.”

Anthropic endorsed the order and called it “an important step in strengthening America’s leadership in AI.” The company said it was looking forward to supporting the implementation of the program.

Ceballos and McDaniel reported from Washington, Christopher from Los Angeles. Times staff writer Michael Wilner contributed to this report.

Advertisement

Business

Meta discontinues Instagram feature on new AI image generation tool after Hollywood backlash

Published

on

Meta discontinues Instagram feature on new AI image generation tool after Hollywood backlash

A new tool that let people take publicly posted Instagram photos and use AI to generate new images from them drew such a big backlash in Hollywood that Meta has discontinued one of the features.

Instagram’s parent company, Meta, on Tuesday rolled out the new AI tool, called Muse Image, which makes it easy to “turn your ideas into high-quality visuals you can download and share anywhere.”

In a promotional video, Meta showed examples like adding a friend into a band photo.

But the tool came under fire from talent agencies, managers and union officials. They noted that many Instagram accounts were opted in by default, allowing users to manipulate the image and likeness of celebrities without their consent.

“I just think it’s wrong again to expect people to opt themselves out of something that literally has been proven to be able to create harm,” said Kyle Hjelmeseth, chief executive of Los Angeles-based influencer talent management firm G&B.

Advertisement

By Friday, Meta said a feature on Muse Image that helps pull photos from public Instagram accounts was no longer available.

“Earlier this week, we announced that one way for people to generate images in Meta AI is by @-mentioning public Instagram accounts that they want to reference,” Meta said in a blog post. “Our intent was to provide a useful creative tool and to give people control over whether their public content could be referenced in this way. We’ve heard the feedback that this feature missed the mark, so it’s no longer available.”

Creative Artists Agency, which raised concerns to Meta on behalf of its clients, commended the tech company for its swift decision.

“Putting individual rights and consent at the forefront is essential to building responsible technology,” the Century City-based talent agency said in a statement. “We look forward to ongoing conversations to ensure creators stay protected as technology evolves.”

Hollywood has long been wary of AI, after a string of deepfakes — videos or images depicting celebrities doing or saying things they never authorized. Jamie Lee Curtis and others have appeared in ads for products they never endorsed. Last year, OpenAI’s Sora 2 video tool drew outrage in Hollywood after users conjured up dead celebrities without their estates’ consent. OpenAI later said it would give rights holders more granular controls.

Advertisement

After Meta rolled out its new tool, there was immediate backlash from Hollywood.

“Anything other than a clear and conspicuous OPT-IN for these types of uses of Instagram users’ images is unacceptable, and an utter miscalculation of public sentiment regarding the obvious dangers and harms inherent in such use,” performers union SAG-AFTRA said in a statement.

United Talent Agency was also critical of Meta, saying it demands opt-in for the use of likeness, image and intellectual property of its clients on any platform.

“The use of such property without OPT-IN consent, credit and compensation is exploitation, not innovation,” the Beverly Hills-based talent agency said.

Meta’s initial response on Wednesday was that users can choose to opt out of having their photos used by Muse Image by changing their settings.

Advertisement

“We built Muse Image with strong controls and safety guardrails from day one,” Meta said in a statement. “Private accounts and those belonging to users under 18 are automatically excluded and adult users with public accounts can opt out with just a couple clicks. We will take action against any content that violates our Community Standards.”

Two days later, Meta removed a key feature from Muse Image, saying it received feedback that it “missed the mark.”

The launch fits a familiar Silicon Valley pattern — ship products first, ask for forgiveness later.

“They leverage their scale to make it easy to use the tools as well as to scale out the content that is available,” said Mickey Maher, chief business officer at Vermillio, which tracks people’s digital likenesses and intellectual property. “It’s not unique to this Meta product.”

Others said opt-out should be the default.

Advertisement

“This dark pattern of AI overreach, where essentially it’s a free-for-all when it comes to your content, information, is something that nobody actually wants,” said Lori Fena, former chair and executive director of the Electronic Frontier Foundation and co-founder of New York-based Personal Digital Spaces. “What we need in this new AI ecosystem is the ability to create trust and to have some sort of understanding and authenticity, and this does exactly the opposite.”

Continue Reading

Business

Legendary Television City may be be sold in further blow to Hollywood

Published

on

Legendary Television City may be be sold in further blow to Hollywood

Television City, one of the most famous studios in the entertainment industry where generations of TV shows have been created, is expected to hit the market again as its owner grapples with debt.

It’s the latest sign of distress in Hollywood as the film and TV industry struggles from a sharp falloff in production activity across Southern California.

Television City’s owner, Hackman Capital Partners, is already in the process of selling the historic Radford Studio Center, which gave L.A.’s Studio City neighborhood its name. Hackman defaulted on a $1.1-billion mortgage in January and investment bank Goldman Sachs took over the property, which is now escrow for a sale to Netflix.

The sprawling Television City property is one of the most desirable locations in Los Angeles, sharing fences with the Original Farmers Market and the luxury Grove outdoor shopping center, each of which attracts millions of visitors every year.

Advertisement

If the studio at Beverly Boulevard and Fairfax Avenue where “American Idol,” “All in the Family” and scores of other shows were filmed becomes available as expected, the owners of the Grove and the Farmers Market would be among the likely contenders for the property for potential expansion of their businesses, said sources familiar with the matter who were not authorized to comment.

Grove owner Rick Caruso was among the bidders for Television City, formerly known as CBS Television City, last time it was on the market and could emerge as a possible bidder.

The highest bid when broadcaster CBS sold the studio in 2019 came from Hackman Capital Partners, an international movie studio operator and commercial property landlord that paid $750 million for the 25-acre site that is near Hollywood, Beverly Hills and and the Sunset Strip.

Hackman Capital’s plan to recoup its investment included continuing to operate Television City as a studio for rent while adding new revenue-generating features.

Last year the city approved Hackman Capital’s $1-billion plan to add 980,000 square feet of offices, sound stages, production facilities and retail space.

Advertisement

The original studio designed by famed Los Angeles architect William Pereira erected in 1952 has city landmark protections, but newer structures on the property do not and there are acres of surface parking that could be converted to other uses.

Both Caruso and Farmers Market owners A.F. Gilmore have sued to limit the planned expansion of the studio, calling it a “massively scaled” development that “would overwhelm, disrupt, and forever transform the community.”

The debate over the development has played out amid a serious downturn in the region’s entertainment industry, with studios shifting film and television production to Georgia, New Mexico and other out-of-state locations.

L.A.’s entertainment industry also suffered a series of blows including the COVID-19 shutdown, strikes by writers and directors in 2023 and cutbacks at studios that reduced demand for sound stages.

A group of Hackman Capital’s lenders led by Deutsche Bank filed a notice of default last month, saying they’re owed more than $357 million. Hackman Capital is still trying to renegotiate its debt.

Advertisement

“The studio market is evolving, and the financing environment for studio assets remains complex,” Chief Executive Michael Hackman said in a statement. “We are engaged in active discussions with our lending partners and are carefully evaluating all of the alternatives.”

A person familiar with the process but not authorized to speak about it publicly said Hackman Capital will be hard-pressed to pay its debt in light of challenges facing the industry. The notice of default is “the baby step to put Television City in play” for new buyers, the source said, “and it is in play.”

Already in play is Manhattan Beach Studios, another Hackman Capital property encumbered by a $240-million loan from Deutsche Bank that the lender is in the process of selling. A buyer could foreclose on the property and potentially change its use to advanced manufacturing such as aerospace or defense, which is in high demand in Southern California.

Brokerage Cushman & Wakefield, which is managing the sale, emphasized in marketing materials that the 22-acre site has “significant available power capacity” and “offers flexible uses” on “some of the most irreplaceable underlying land in the South Bay.”

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Business

Los Angeles hotels saved by last-minute surge in World Cup bookings

Published

on

Los Angeles hotels saved by last-minute surge in World Cup bookings

After showing worryingly weak early interest, World Cup fans showed up at the last minute to boost Los Angeles hotel occupancy and room rates.

Ahead of the last tournament game in Los Angeles is on Friday, hotels popular with soccer fans said they were full and charging higher rates.

In early May, the American Hotel and Lodging Assn. reported a lack of hotel bookings just a month shy of the games.

About 80% of respondents said hotel bookings were below initial expectations, and more than 65% of L.A. respondents said bookings were lower than a typical summer. In the report, half of the L.A. hotel respondents said they assumed that visa barriers and distance from venues were contributing to the low early bookings.

Advertisement

The turnout that many were concerned had also been hurt by high ticket prices ended up being better than those first projections.

The Pierside in Santa Monica has been exceptionally busy during the World Cup, with many tourists opting to stay near the beach despite the longer trek to SoFi Stadium where the games are held. The Pierside has no rooms for this weekend.

“We’ll have a day or two gap, but other than that we’ve been full,” said a Pierside manager. “I think beach-side hotels have been busier, because tourists are more interested in going to the beach while here.”

In the so-called Stadium District, the Anthem Hotel saw even greater numbers of tourists than they had initially expected for the tournament, including both domestic and international guests.

Its few remaining rooms were going for more than $500 per night late in the week.

Advertisement

“Many guests are planning longer stays, using match days as the centerpiece of a broader Los Angeles itinerary,” said Ruben Flores, general manager at the hotel. “Being in the heart of the Stadium District puts us in a unique position to welcome fans who want the energy of the tournament to extend beyond the stadium.”

Downtown L.A.‘s Hotel Indigo got a surge in bookings the days leading up to the July 2 knockout game between Spain and Austria. Previously, FIFA had reserved thousands of rooms downtown for staff, media, and other stakeholders, but later canceled the reservation.

The American Hotel and Lodging Assn. attributed the delayed booking boom to young international travelers waiting until right before the game to book hotels in search of last-minute deals.

“Demand has picked up, consistent with a recent trend toward shorter booking windows for events of this caliber,” Rosanna Maietta, the association’s chief executive, said in a statement. “Unlike typical leisure travel, many travelers finalized plans and secured tickets closer to the start of the games.”

Not all hotels have seen the last-minute boom in bookings. Hotel June next to Los Angeles International Airport said its bookings were lower than expected.

Advertisement

“We were expecting more reservations, but I think it’s because the rates have gone up,” said Kira Moreno from Hotel June. “We have still been steady but not been too full or too busy, pretty similar to any other day.”

Airbnb proved to be a popular alternative to traditional hotels, with offers like the World Cup bundle, which included free World Cup tickets with select Airbnb stays at an average price of $365 per night.

In recent years, L.A. has struggled to bring tourists into the city. Last year, the number of international tourists went down by 5.5% from the year before, marking the first time tourism had fallen since the 2020 COVID-19 pandemic.

Immigration raids and wildfires dissuaded tourists from visiting, and even Canadian tourists who typically make up the largest number of foreign visitors to California dropped 21%.

Increased flight costs also discouraged many tourists. With the U.S.-Iran conflict continuing and the Strait of Hormuz closed, jet fuel prices skyrocketed, making international travel unrealistic for many tourists. International air travel to L.A. County had already fallen 30% from August to November 2025.

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending