Connect with us

News

Airbnb removed them for having criminal records. Now, they’re speaking out against a policy they see as “antihuman.”

Published

on

Airbnb removed them for having criminal records. Now, they’re speaking out against a policy they see as “antihuman.”

When Bernard Charles created an account on Airbnb to book a stay for family members coming to town for his upcoming wedding, it did not cross his mind that two 7-year-old non-traffic summary offense convictions would get him banned from using the popular vacation rental service.

Less than an hour after joining the app and trying to use it to book a stay, Charles, a creative project manager in Pittsburgh, received an email from Airbnb stating his account was under review. Soon, he was unable to access his account.

Charles told CBS News that the 2016 convictions stemmed from defending himself during a family fight, and that he had pleaded guilty only because he was unable to attend the court hearing at the time.

Airbnb learned of Charles’ convictions because it uses a company called Inflection Risk Solutions to run a background check on guests in the U.S. and India after they have submitted “at least an accurate first name, last name and date of birth.” The company discloses on its website that it shares this information with authorized third-party service providers for processes like background checks.

Inflection Risk Solutions takes users’ information to generate a consumer report that includes any criminal charges tied to the person’s name, birth date and phone number. Charles said he believes such general background checks are unfair, failing to take into account mitigating factors.

Advertisement

Charles’ experience isn’t unique. Other users hoping to book vacation rentals through the California-based company, founded in 2008, say they have also had their accounts suspended or placed under review due to their criminal records. Now, many are speaking out and asking the company to reconsider how they handle the appeals process.

“There’s no personalization, and they never really take the time to understand your criminal history,” Charles said of the consumer report generated by Inflection Risk Solutions. “Society wants to shame you for having a background, and sometimes it was just you’re in the wrong place at the wrong time.”

Airbnb told CBS News that they have two types of appeals. If users believe there is incorrect information in their report, they appeal directly to Inflection, which then would inform Airbnb. If the Inflection report is correct, the second type of appeal would be by directly responding to Airbnb’s email for the company to then consider the appeal based on the context of the crime, and if rehabilitation has taken place.

“It was embarrassing”

Shortly after searching online for information that might explain why he had been flagged, Charles came across a tweet posted by Pittsburgh Councilwoman Bethany Hallam, who had been a long-time Airbnb user before also receiving a ban for a previous criminal conviction.

“It was embarrassing, and it just made me feel that all the work I had done over the past seven years was meaningless, at least to them,” Hallam told CBS News.

Advertisement

Following the viral tweet, Airbnb rescinded the ban on Hallam.

Hallam says her conviction was for drug possession and shared that she struggled with a 10-year battle with substance use after becoming addicted to painkillers. Hallam said she believes her status as an elected official motivated the company to reinstate her account.

Like Hallam, Charles also contacted Airbnb to request the company restore his account. But Airbnb declined, directing him instead to contact Inflection Risk Solutions if he thought the consumer reporting company’s information about his criminal record was inaccurate.

Attorney Mark Mailman, co-founder of consumer protection law firm Francis Mailman Soumilas P.C., has previously sued Inflection Risk Solutions over what a client alleged was an inaccurate background check. 

Mailman explained that companies that conduct consumer background checks must comply with the Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA), which requires accurate reporting of a user’s information. The 1970 law also gives consumers the right to know what information is contained in a background check report. 

Advertisement

Mailman told CBS News the FCRA gives consumers the right to see what’s in their report and requires companies to notify them when information inside it is being used against them, which is why Airbnb sends out an email to notify users when they are banned because of a criminal background check.

Checkr, which acquired Inflection in 2022, said in a statement to CBS News that it is “committed to the highest standards of accuracy and fairness.”

“As a consumer reporting agency regulated under the Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA), we only report criminal records that have been filed in a court of law. We take any disputed inaccuracies seriously and promptly investigate and remediate these when appropriate.”

Banned by association?

Matt, who lives in New Mexico and requested to be identified by his first name only out of concern that speaking about his experience could affect his job, told CBS News that Airbnb banned his wife from using its services simply for, in Matt’s view, being associated with him.

“My wife wasn’t there with me using [drugs], wasn’t doing any of that,” Matt said. “I met her when I was in recovery, and now she can’t use a company because she’s associated with me.”

Advertisement

Airbnb told CBS News that it’s a “necessary safety precaution,” and that it restricts the accounts of people who are likely to travel with a person who has been banned.

“We want to prevent people who have been removed from Airbnb from using the platform both as a guest and as a host via someone else’s Airbnb account,” the company told CBS News. 

Matt says he has struggled with substance abuse in the past and has several misdemeanor convictions for public intoxication and a felony conviction for possession of a controlled substance. He says he has been in recovery for nine years and now, as a clinical psychologist, researches ways to help individuals with substance use disorders.

Matt’s experience with Airbnb is not unique either. In 2018, an Airbnb user named Michael Haynes detailed his attempt to dispute his own ban in an online essay. 

Haynes said Inflection Risk Solutions’ consumer report showed three charges brought against him, but the final court finding was only a misdemeanor traffic offense. Haynes attempted to amend the report to help his case for overturning Airbnb’s ban. But he said Inflection Risk Solutions refused to accept any changes without Haynes submitting his Social Security number in order for them “to eliminate any other person with the same name and birth date.”

Advertisement

CBS News has reached out to Haynes for comment on his experience.

Airbnb has not shied away from enforcing policies that it believes are necessary for safety precautions. In 2019, the company started reviewing U.S. and Canadian reservations to weed out suspicious rentals, such as guests who booked a one-night stay close to their home.

In an effort to reduce large gatherings and damage to a host’s property, the company also limited its rental home occupancy to 16 people.

CBS News has reached out to several Airbnb hosts for comment on the company’s background check policy.

Veronica Horowitz, an assistant professor at the University at Buffalo whose research focuses on criminal punishment, says she had her own brush with Airbnb in 2022 because of two drug felony convictions, for which she served 13 months in prison. She maintains that if Airbnb had followed its own policy regarding eligibility for reinstatement, her account would have been reinstated at the time.

Advertisement

Initially, Horowitz thought the ban was placed on her account because Inflection’s first report dated one of her convictions inaccurately. But, even after she appealed Inflection’s corrected report, which cited nearly 20-year-old drug felony convictions, her account was not reinstated.

“It makes me angry is how it makes me feel. And Airbnb is just one example of a company that discriminates against people with criminal records,” Horowitz said. “There are many of them.”

Like Hallam and others, Horowitz said she does not plan to use the vacation rental service unless it changes its policy to be “less exclusionary.”

When contacted by CBS News, Airbnb reviewed the cases of Matt and his wife, Charles, and Horowitz, and reinstated their accounts on the platform. 

Airbnb said in a statement to CBS News that background checks are “not perfect.”  

Advertisement

“As part of our efforts to protect our community, Airbnb runs criminal background checks for Hosts and guests in the U.S. That said, background checks are not perfect. We have worked with criminal justice experts, academics and advocates as we have continued to evolve our policies and processes. Additionally, we offer an appeals process so that we can make case-by-case determinations,” Airbnb said. 

Horowitz said she doesn’t plan to return to the app despite her reinstatement unless Airbnb starts “implementing the ‘nuanced, personalized approach’ that they claim on their website.” 

Charles said the company fell short of offering an experience for his wedding — a time that meant the most to him.

“They robbed me of that gift because they outsourced their responsibilities,” Charles said. “Airbnb is antihuman.” 

Advertisement

News

Richemont reinstates chief executive role as it navigates luxury market downturn

Published

on

Richemont reinstates chief executive role as it navigates luxury market downturn

Unlock the Editor’s Digest for free

Richemont has re-established the role of chief executive after almost a decade as the Swiss luxury group navigates a market downturn.

The group, which is chaired by its controlling shareholder Johann Rupert, said Nicolas Bos, the head of its jewellery brand Van Cleef & Arpels, would take up the position on June 1. He will report to Rupert.

“Building on Richemont’s expanded scale and stronger focus on retail and jewellery, Nicolas will steer the group through the next phase of its evolution,” Rupert said. “The re-established CEO role will help streamline decision making and optimise operational management.”

Advertisement

The decision to reinstate the role came as Richemont reported a slowdown in fourth-quarter sales.

Continue Reading

News

Arrests at the U.S. border fall in April, bucking usual spring increase

Published

on

Arrests at the U.S. border fall in April, bucking usual spring increase

A group of people wait to be processed after crossing the border between Mexico and the United States as they seek asylum in April 2024, near Jacumba, Calif.

Gregory Bull/AP


hide caption

toggle caption

Advertisement

Gregory Bull/AP


A group of people wait to be processed after crossing the border between Mexico and the United States as they seek asylum in April 2024, near Jacumba, Calif.

Gregory Bull/AP

WASHINGTON — Arrests for illegally crossing the U.S. border from Mexico fell more than 6% in April to the fourth lowest month of the Biden administration, authorities said Wednesday, bucking the usual spring increase.

U.S. officials have largely attributed the decline to more enforcement in Mexico, including in yards where migrants are known to board freight trains. Mexico won’t allow more than 4,000 illegal crossings a day to the U.S., Alicia Barcena, Mexico’s foreign relations secretary, told reporters Tuesday, down from more than 10,000 Border Patrol arrests on some days in December.

Advertisement

Migrants were arrested 128,884 times in April, down from 137,480 in March and barely half a record-high of 249,737 in December, U.S. Customs and Border Protection said. While still historically high, the sharp decline in arrests since late December is welcome news for President Joe Biden on a key issue that has nagged him in election-year polls.

San Diego became the busiest of the Border Patrol’s nine sectors along the Mexican border for the first time since the 1990s with 37,370, replacing Tucson, Arizona.

Troy Miller, Customs and Border Protection’s acting commissioner, said more enforcement, including deportations, and cooperation with other countries resulted in lower numbers.

“As a result of this increased enforcement, southwest border encounters have not increased, bucking previous trends. We will remain vigilant to continually shifting migration patterns,” he said.

Advertisement

Authorities granted entry to 41,400 people in April at land crossings with Mexico through an online appointment app called CBP One, bringing the total to more than 591,000 since it was introduced in January 2023.

The U.S. also allows up to 30,000 Cubans, Haitians, Nicaraguans and Venezuelans if they apply online with a financial sponsor and arrive on commercial flights. About 435,000 entered the country that way through April, including 91,000 Cubans, 166,700 Haitians, 75,700 Nicaraguans and 101,200 Venezuelans.

Continue Reading

News

Read the Texas Governor’s Pardon

Published

on

Read the Texas Governor’s Pardon

PROCLAMATION
BY THE
Governor of the State of Texas
PROCLAMATION No. 2024-0001
DPS #07666731
TO ALL TO WHOM THESE PRESENTS SHALL COME:
WHEREAS, Daniel Scott Perry, TDCJ #02450686, D.O.B. April 24, 1987, was
sentenced in the 147th District Court in Travis County on May 10, 2023, to twenty-
five years in prison for the offense of Murder, Cause No. D-1-DC-21-900007; and
WHEREAS, the Texas Board of Pardons and Paroles has conducted an exhaustive
review of Daniel Scott Perry’s personal history and the facts surrounding his shooting
of Garrett Foster; and
WHEREAS, both the Second Amendment to the United States Constitution and
Article I, Section 23, of the Texas Constitution protect the right to keep and bear arms
for, among other things, self-defense; and
WHEREAS, Texas law, consistent with those constitutional guarantees, provides one of
the clearest self-defense protections in the United States; and
WHEREAS, Texas Penal Code § 9.32(a) provides that a person “is justified in using
deadly force against another” when that person “reasonably believes the deadly force
is immediately necessary” to protect a person against another’s use of unlawful deadly
force; and
WHEREAS, Texas Penal Code § 9.32(c) provides that a person who is otherwise
lawfully present at the location where deadly force is used “is not required to retreat
before using deadly force”; and
WHEREAS, on July 25, 2020, Daniel Scott Perry, while driving on a public road in
Austin, slowed his vehicle as he rounded a corner onto Congress Avenue and
encountered a group of protestors obstructing traffic; and
WHEREAS, Daniel Scott Perry’s car was immediately surrounded by aggressive
protestors who rushed to obstruct, strike, pound, smash, and kick his vehicle; and
WHEREAS, Garrett Foster then approached within 18 inches of Daniel Scott Perry’s
car, confronted him, and brandished a Kalashnikov-style rifle in the low-ready firing
position; and
WHEREAS, Daniel Scott Perry fired his handgun at Garrett Foster to eliminate a
perceived threat to his safety and called law enforcement less than one minute later to
inform them of the incident; and
WHEREAS, Daniel Scott Perry explained to law enforcement at the time that he used
his weapon because he feared losing his life and has since consistently stated that he
acted in self-defense; and
WHEREAS, Travis County District Attorney José Garza, rather than upholding the self-
defense rights of citizens, has prioritized “reducing access to guns” that citizens may
use to lawfully defend themselves; and
FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE
SECRETARY OF STATE
1:25 PM O’CLOCK
MAY 16 2024

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending