Connect with us

News

Activists hoped Egypt’s COP27 would bring a focus on Africa. They were disappointed | CNN

Published

on

Activists hoped Egypt’s COP27 would bring a focus on Africa. They were disappointed | CNN


Sharm el-Sheikh, Egypt
CNN
 — 

The gang was loving what Bhekumuzi Bhebhe needed to say, cheering loudly as he yelled “don’t gasoline Africa!” into the megaphone.

Standing underneath the baking Egyptian solar on the COP27 UN local weather summit in Sharm el-Sheikh on Tuesday, Bhebhe, a South Africa-based local weather campaigner, was protesting towards what he says is an try by wealthy nations to bribe Africa into investing in planet-warming fossil fuels.

In his thoughts, it’s yet one more instance of the hypocrisy western nations have confirmed towards the continent – which has barely contributed to the local weather disaster however is experiencing a few of its most devastating results.

“Is that this justice?!” he requested his fellow protesters. “No!” the group yelled again.

Advertisement

The Egyptian authorities, which is internet hosting and presiding over the UN-sponsored local weather talks, had promised this yr’s summit would lastly be the “African COP” that might put the wants of the continent entrance and heart.

However based on many representatives of nations throughout Africa, that promise stays largely unfulfilled.

Mohamed Adow, the director and founding father of Energy Shift Africa, a non-governmental group centered on accelerating renewable power there, mentioned at an occasion on Sunday that the developments to this point present the convention was “African within the identify solely.”

Any hopes that the summit would actually deal with Africa have been dashed early, when the convention individuals denied a request by a gaggle of African governments to incorporate a dialogue in regards to the continent’s “particular wants and circumstances” on the official agenda.

Advertisement

Philip Osano, the director of the Africa Heart on the Stockholm Surroundings Institute, informed CNN that the popularity of the particular circumstances was one of many prime three priorities for a lot of African governments, together with local weather finance and the clear power transition.

“Africa contributes lower than 4.8% of emissions, however the impacts have now change into very severe, that’s why it is a precedence merchandise,” he mentioned.

“The unhealthy information is, it’s off the agenda. But it surely’s very sophisticated, as a result of different components of the world – particularly small island states, growing nations – all people is form of having a particular circumstance relating to local weather.”

Mithika Mwenda, the Kenyan co-founder of the Pan African Local weather Justice Alliance, mentioned he was “outraged” by the choice to not embody the dialogue on the agenda. Talking after the merchandise was struck, Mwenda mentioned the event “set the stage for an additional COP that can fail hundreds of thousands of Africans dying unjustly” from local weather change.

This year's climate conference was widely billed as

A few of the leaders of nations which might be most weak to the local weather disaster – lots of that are in Africa – have come to Sharm el Sheikh with excessive hopes that developed nations would lastly comply with pay for the loss and harm already attributable to local weather change.

Advertisement

The concept is straightforward: nations that bought wealthy utilizing fossil fuels which have brought on the disaster ought to assist these which might be most affected by it take care of the devastating penalties.

Going into the summit, leaders of climate-vulnerable nations mentioned this was their primary precedence, and there was hope {that a} new funding facility may very well be established this yr. However negotiations have confirmed robust. A few of the richest nations are united in pushing towards the thought of organising a brand new fund.

The USA, the European Union and the UK have all been attempting to kick the can down the street, saying they need to set up a “course of” that might result in an “consequence” by 2024.

However for nations which might be seeing their coasts disappear and their folks drown in devastating floods or starve due to droughts, that isn’t adequate.

“We had pledges, statements and commitments. However we’d like complete proposals. We have already got idea notes, we have already got proposals, we have already got our [emission cutting plans], we have to transfer into implementations,” Edward Bendu, the chief environmental officer at Sierra Leone’s Ministry of Lands, Nation Planning and the Surroundings, informed CNN in an interview on the summit.

Advertisement

Bendu, who’s representing a rustic that’s among the many most impacted by the local weather disaster, mentioned that entry to current local weather finance is tough and that the present financing choices should not match for objective.

“It takes about three 4 years to entry funds,” he mentioned. “That’s too late for us, we will’t tackle the loss and harm points that manner.”

There have been some constructive actions coming from the summit. Germany has been spearheading a brand new loss and harm program referred to as the World Protect that it hopes would generate income obtainable quicker for nations affected by climate disasters.

The EU and several other of its member states introduced Wednesday they “will present over €1 billion ($1.04 billion) for local weather adaptation in Africa.” The bloc additionally mentioned it might add €60 million ($62.2 million) to the loss and harm pot.

However as is usually the case with local weather finance bulletins, the satan is within the element.

Advertisement

Delving into the figures, it emerged that of the €345 million ($357 million) the European Fee would contribute to the package deal, solely €220 million ($228 million) is a “new dedication,” based on an announcement launched Wednesday.

The remainder of the €345m was already pledged elsewhere up to now. And as for the €60 million for loss and harm, that cash is included within the €220 million reasonably than being a further sum. The EU didn’t give a breakdown on the contributions from particular person states. CNN has contacted the bloc for remark and extra particulars on the announcement.

For the growing world, the underside line stays that the promise of funding stays unfulfilled. Below the Paris Settlement, wealthy nations pledged to supply $100 billion a yr in local weather financing to growing world by 2020. Two years after the deadline, the goal has nonetheless not been met.

The battle over Africa’s future power infrastructure has emerged as one of many key points on the summit.

Round 600 million Africans don’t have entry to electrical energy and virtually a billion don’t have clear cooking amenities, relying as a substitute on burning stable biomass, kerosene or coal as their main cooking gas, based on the Worldwide Vitality Company.

Advertisement

Consultants and activists are stressing that many African nations are getting locked in fossil gas investments which might be polluting and can doubtless show uneconomical in a number of years.

It’s not a hypothetical subject. Most of the world’s richest nations are pushing for extra fossil gas investments in a number of African nations as they attempt to wean themselves of Russian gasoline due to the battle in Ukraine.

The German Chancellor Olaf Scholz flew to Dakar earlier this yr and held talks with the Senegalese president Macky Sall – the chair of the African Union – in regards to the growth of a brand new offshore pure gasoline discipline. And earlier this month, the Italian power large ENI began exporting pure gasoline from a brand new deep sea gasoline discipline in Mozambique.

These developments are making activists significantly livid.

“It’s a hypocrisy and we’re calling it out,” mentioned Omar Elmaawi, a Kenyan activist who has spent years campaigning towards the deliberate East African Crude Oil Pipeline, which is supposed to move oil from Uganda to Tanzania, the place it may very well be bought on worldwide markets.

Advertisement

“Africa has contributed little or no to the local weather downside, however the fossil gas corporations are utilizing that to their benefit. They are saying Africa has been left behind and due to this fact they need to discover the potential in order that they may also help us develop,” Elmaawi informed CNN.

“However that narrative doesn’t maintain up as a result of though they’re calling it ‘growth’ they need to exploit these assets and ship them into the World North,” he added.

Kenyan climate activist Omar Elmaawi poses for a picture at the COP27 summit in Egypt.

Elmaawi mentioned he understood the cash massive fossil gas corporations are providing might appear to be a profitable choice to some African governments. However he and his fellow activist say they need their governments to consider the long run.

“My evaluation has all the time been both our authorities leaders are actually ignorant and silly, or, a few of them have been compromised and they don’t seem to be working in the most effective curiosity of their folks,” he mentioned.

What Elmaawi, Adow and different activists need is for the COP27 convention to assist African nations foster extra funding into renewable power.

Advertisement

In keeping with the IEA, Africa has round 60% of the world’s greatest solar-energy assets, however only one% of put in photovoltaic capability.

Adow mentioned Africa might simply change into a renewable power superpower.

However as a substitute, he mentioned, “European nations need to flip Africa into their gasoline station.”

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

News

Compass Direct LLC’s 2024 Registration in North Carolina

Published

on

Compass Direct LLC’s 2024 Registration in North Carolina

North Carolina Department of the Secretary of State
Charitable Solicitation Licensing Division
P.O. Box 29622
Raleigh, NC 27626-0622
Telephone: 919-814-5400
1. Application Type: ☐ Initial ☑ Renewal
2. Applicant’s Full Business Legal Name:
Compass Direct LLC
CAROLINA
4. Applicant’s Principal Street Address: 300 Independence Ave SE
City: Washington
State: DC
Fund-Raising Consultant
License Application
Form Issue Date: 10/21/2003 Revised 2/16/18
Page 1 of 2
3. Applicant’s Principal Telephone Number:
(202) 318-5050
5. Applicant’s Mailing Address: c/o Charles H. Nave, P.C., 316 Mountain Avenue SW
City: Roanoke
6. Applicant’s Internet Site Address:
N/A
Zip Code: 20003
State: VA
Zip Code: 24016
7. Applicant’s Contact Person Email Address:
secretary@compassprofessional.com
8. Legal Form of Applicant’s Business:
☐ Sole Proprietor/Individual
☑ Limited Liability Corporation
☐ Corporation
Limited Liability Partnership
☐ General Partnership
☐ Other
9. Applicant’s State of Establishment:
Delaware
10. Applicant’s Date of Establishment:
7/24/2023
11. For non-NC corporations: Provide either of the following to verify the applicant’s current legal existence:
1. Certificate of Existence or Certificate of Good Standing from state of incorporation dated no more than six months prior to
date of signing of application, or
2. Actual webpage screenshot found on a publicly accessible regulatory authority website dated no more than thirty (30) days prior to
the date the license application was signed that includes the following elements:

Exact name of the entity as it appears on the license application; and

Language clearly verifying its status as a corporation in good standing in the state of incorporation (i.e. “current” or “active”); and
• Date the information was printed on the face of the document.
For un-incorporated NC applicants: Provide a copy of your assumed name certificate filed with the register of deeds, showing the register of deeds’
stamp.
12. If Applicant’s principal place of business is located outside North Carolina, ATTACH list of street addresses of any applicant offices located in
North Carolina.
ATTACHMENT 12 included? ☐ Yes ☑ No NC office
☐ Yes
13. Are ANY of applicant’s’ owners, directors, officers, or employees RELATED as parent, spouse, child, or sibling to ANY of applicant’s other
directors, officers, owners, or employees?
☐ Yes ☑ No
If answer is YES, attach a brief written explanation. ATTACHMENT 13 included? ☐ Yes
14. Are ANY of applicant’s’ owners, directors, officers, or employees RELATED as parent, spouse, child, or sibling to ANY officer, director,
trustee, or employee of any charitable organization or sponsor under contract with applicant?
☐ Yes ☑ No
If answer is YES, attach a brief written explanation, ATTACHMENT 14 included?
15. Are ANY of applicant’s’ owners, directors, officers, or employees RELATED as parent, spouse, child, or sibling to ANY supplier or vendor
providing goods or services to any charitable organization or sponsor under contract with the applicant?
☐ Yes ☑ No
If answer is YES, attach a brief written explanation. ATTACHMENT 15 included? ☐ Yes
16. Within the last five (5) years, has the applicant, or any of the applicant’s directors, officers, employees, agents, or persons with a controlling
interest in the applicant been convicted of ANY felony?
☐ Yes ☑ No
ATTACHMENT 16 included? ☐ Yes
If answer is YES, attach a brief written explanation.
17. Within the last five (5) years, has the applicant, or any of the applicant’s directors, officers, employees, agents, or persons with a controlling
interest in the applicant been convicted of ANY misdemeanor arising from the conduct of a solicitation for ANY charitable organization or sponsor
OR charitable or sponsor purpose?
If answer is YES, attach a brief written explanation.
☐ Yes ☑ No
ATTACHMENT 17 included? ☐ Yes
18. Within the last five (5) years, has the applicant, or any of the applicant’s directors, officers, employees, agents, or persons with a controlling
interest in the applicant been enjoined from violating ANY charitable solicitation law in this or ANY other state?
☐ Yes ☑ No
ATTACHMENT 18 included?
If answer is YES, attach a brief written explanation.
Yes
\DISKSTATIONshareHotDocs TemplatesHotDocs AnswersFundraisersCD230905 CD 2023 Answers.anx

Continue Reading

News

Judge threatens jail if Donald Trump violates ‘hush money’ gag order

Published

on

Judge threatens jail if Donald Trump violates ‘hush money’ gag order

Unlock the Editor’s Digest for free

The judge overseeing Donald Trump’s Manhattan “hush money” trial threatened to jail the former president if he continued to harass witnesses and jurors, after concluding that fines had failed to deter the defendant from repeatedly violating a court-imposed gag order.

Justice Juan Merchan issued the final warning as he found Trump in criminal contempt for a 10th time, over comments made online and to the media. The presumptive Republican nominee has so far been fined $10,000 — $1,000 per violation — which is the maximum financial penalty allowed by New York State law.

“Going forward, this court will have to consider jail sanction,” Merchan said on Monday morning, directly addressing Trump. He added this was “the last thing I want to do”.

Advertisement

“There are many reasons why incarceration is truly the last resort for me,” Merchan continued. “The magnitude of the decision is not lost on me.”

Under the relevant statute, defendants held in criminal contempt can be sent to jail for 30 days. However, the constitutional questions raised by imprisoning a presidential candidate have not been raised before, nor have the logistical arrangements required for remanding a defendant who travels with a Secret Service detail been considered.

Merchan’s caution came as he found Trump in criminal contempt for a television interview last month in which he had claimed it was “unfair” that the jury had been picked from an area that was “95 per cent Democrats”. This comment “not only called into question the integrity, and therefore the legitimacy of these proceedings, but again raised the spectre of fear for the safety of the jurors and of their loved ones,” the judge concluded in a written order.

However, Merchan declined to hold Trump in contempt for three other comments that prosecutors had claimed violated the order. Two statements to the media in which Trump attacked his former fixer — and potential star witness — Michael Cohen may have been “protected political speech made in response to political attacks”, he wrote.

Trump’s lawyers had claimed that their client was merely responding to vituperative attacks by Cohen, a vocal critic of the former president and a ubiquitous media presence. 

Advertisement

Merchan again agreed with Trump’s defence team over a comment in which Trump had said that witness David Pecker, the former tabloid publisher, had “been very nice”. The court “cannot find beyond a reasonable doubt that the statement in question constituted a veiled threat to Mr Pecker or to other witnesses,” Merchan wrote.

In his comments to Trump in court, Merchan left no doubt that he would not err on the side of leniency if further violations warranted a sterner response.

“I cannot allow [the violations] to continue,” he said. “I have done everything I can”.

On his way into court on Monday, Trump once again complained that Merchan had “taken away [his] constitutional right to speak”.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

News

Columbia University cancels its main commencement ceremony after weeks of turmoil

Published

on

Columbia University cancels its main commencement ceremony after weeks of turmoil

Protesters seen in tents on Columbia University’s campus on April 24. The school later suspended protesters who didn’t leave, and called New York City police to arrest those who occupied a building on campus.

Michael M. Santiago/Getty Images


hide caption

toggle caption

Advertisement

Michael M. Santiago/Getty Images


Protesters seen in tents on Columbia University’s campus on April 24. The school later suspended protesters who didn’t leave, and called New York City police to arrest those who occupied a building on campus.

Michael M. Santiago/Getty Images

After a tumultuous few weeks on campus, Columbia University is changing its graduation plans, canceling its main ceremony to focus on multiple school-specific celebrations instead.

Officials at the New York City institution said in their Monday announcement that based on feedback from students, they will prioritize Class Days and school-level ceremonies, “where students are honored individually alongside their peers,” rather than the universitywide ceremony that had been scheduled for May 15.

Advertisement

“Our students emphasized that these smaller-scale, school-based celebrations are most meaningful to them and their families,” the announcement reads. “They are eager to cross the stage to applause and family pride and hear from their school’s invited guest speakers. As a result, we will focus our resources on those school ceremonies and on keeping them safe, respectful, and running smoothly.”

As part of that effort, the university is relocating those ceremonies, which were originally scheduled to take place on the South Lawn — where protesters picketed and camped out in tents for two weeks, calling for an end to war in Gaza and university investment in Israel, until police cleared out campus last Wednesday.

Those ceremonies will move to the Baker Athletics Complex, Columbia’s main venue for outdoor sports. The events will run from May 10-16, with tickets required. Columbia College will hold its ceremony on the morning of May 14, followed by the affiliated Barnard College the next day.

Columbia President Minouche Shafik had previously requested a New York Police Department presence on campus through at least May 17, “to maintain order and ensure encampments are not reestablished.”

She wrote to the NYPD on April 30, as police arrived to remove pro-Palestinian protesters who had occupied a building on campus earlier that day. It was the second time that month that Shafik called in city police to break up protests on campus.

Advertisement

Police broke up the “Gaza Solidarity Encampment” and arrested more than 100 people on April 18, the day after it was first set up. Demonstrators regrouped, forming another encampment that continued to grow even as administrators negotiated with student activists over an agreement that would result in its removal.

On April 29, after negotiations stalled, Columbia began suspending students who did not heed its warning to leave the encampment by 2 p.m. The next day, dozens of students began occupying Hamilton Hall — in an echo of the school’s 1968 protests — and barricading themselves inside.

The university — which had already shifted to hybrid learning for the rest of the semester — was essentially under lockdown. Police entered Hamilton Hall, arresting 112 protesters. New York City officials said over the weekend that 29% of them were not affiliated with the school.

Shafik has faced widespread criticism and calls to resign from both sides of the aisle over her handling of the protest, though maintains the backing of Columbia’s board of trustees.

Officials acknowledged on Monday that “these past few weeks have been incredibly difficult for our community.”

Advertisement

And they said they are continuing to solicit student feedback about the possibility of a “festive event on May 15 to take the place of a large, formal ceremony.”

Columbia is the second major university to cancel part of its graduation ceremony. The University of Southern California announced in late April that it would cancel its main graduation ceremony, several days and considerable backlash after it scrapped its valedictorian speech over security concerns.

Other schools are forging ahead with graduation as planned, but expecting — and for some, already experiencing — protests during the day. Over the weekend, students and faculty at Indiana University held an alternate graduation ceremony, while dozens of pro-Palestinian protesters waving flags and banners briefly disrupted the University of Michigan’s graduation.

Continue Reading

Trending