Connect with us

News

A pregnant mom crossed the Rio Grande decades ago to give her unborn child a better life. Now her daughter is becoming a member of Congress | CNN Politics

Published

on

A pregnant mom crossed the Rio Grande decades ago to give her unborn child a better life. Now her daughter is becoming a member of Congress | CNN Politics


Washington
CNN
 — 

Delia Ramirez walks towards the microphone decided to make her message heard.

“It’s time – it’s previous time that we ship on the promise that we now have made to our Dreamers,” she says.

On a crisp morning in early December, Ramirez is standing steps away from the US Capitol, with its white dome gleaming in opposition to the blue sky behind her. It is a rallying cry we’ve heard right here again and again – however Ramirez hopes when she says it, the phrases will carry much more weight. This isn’t merely a speaking level from her marketing campaign platform.

“This,” the Illinois lawmaker says, “could be very private for me.”

Advertisement

It’s private as a result of if Congress doesn’t act, Ramirez’s husband may very well be amongst tons of of hundreds of individuals dealing with potential deportation. And it’s private as a result of Ramirez herself is about to turn out to be a member of Congress.

She’s known as this information convention, flanked by a number of of her fellow incoming freshmen lawmakers and Congressional Progressive Caucus Chair Pramila Jayapal, a Washington state Democrat, to push for members of Congress to move a number of key items of laws whereas Democrats nonetheless management the US Home. Amongst them: the DREAM Act, which might give a potential pathway to citizenship to some 2 million undocumented immigrants who have been delivered to america as kids.

“I’m the spouse of a DACA recipient. I’m the daughter of Guatemalan working immigrants. I do know firsthand the challenges and fixed worry our households dwell each single day,” Ramirez tells reporters. “We have now to finish this.”

That’s far simpler mentioned than performed, as a long time of debate over immigration reform on Capitol Hill clearly present.

However Ramirez says irrespective of what number of obstacles pop up in her path, she’ll maintain pushing.

Advertisement

As fixed and controversial as conversations round immigration in Washington have turn out to be, many lawmakers weighing in don’t have direct private connections to the problems they’re debating.

Ramirez, 39, has lived them her total life.

Her mother was pregnant together with her when she crossed the Rio Grande – a element Ramirez made some extent to incorporate in a candidate bio on her marketing campaign web site, which notes that her mother went on to work “a number of low-wage jobs to offer her kids a combating probability to flee poverty.”

Ramirez says through the years a few of her political opponents have tried to make use of particulars like this from her background in opposition to her, accusing her of being in favor of open borders and talking dismissively about her household throughout debates. However Ramirez sees her household’s story as a energy that’s helped her join with voters and higher perceive the problems that matter to her constituents.

Advertisement

“I didn’t need to shrink back from the truth that I’m working class and my husband’s a DACA recipient, that I’m apprehensive about how I’m going to pay for housing. That’s the actuality of so many individuals,” she says. “And I would like women and men, younger and previous, to see me and assume, ‘That was my m’hija, That was my daughter.’ Or…’I’m an intern someplace and I don’t really feel seen. But when she might do it, so can I.’”

Ramirez says the story of her mother’s journey from Guatemala to america infused her childhood in Chicago, the place Ramirez was born.

In accordance with the story Ramirez grew up listening to, when her mother crossed the Rio Grande, sturdy currents practically swept her away. She’d hidden her being pregnant from others on the journey, however in that second she known as out in desperation, “Assist! Assist! Save me! Save my daughter!” A person did, Ramirez says, however after that day, her mother by no means noticed him once more.

As she struggled with melancholy as a young person, Ramirez says her mother would regularly invoke this a part of her previous, saying, “I practically died in order that you would be born. Now I’ve to battle to maintain you alive.”

That struggling teen, Ramirez says, would by no means have imagined that she’d run a homeless shelter and different profitable nonprofits, go on to turn out to be a state lawmaker and in the future be on the cusp of getting into US Congress.

Advertisement

“However that’s the journey, proper?” Ramirez says. “Possibly not the Congress half as typically appropriately, however the journey of so many individuals and so many kids of immigrants who contribute and accomplish that a lot for this nation.”

How does her household’s journey form her view of what’s unfolding now on the border?

“I’m clear that anybody prepared to danger dying, ravenous and even being raped within the lengthy journey by means of desert, chilly and tunnels is crossing as a result of they really feel like there isn’t any different resolution to their state of affairs. Their migration is the one approach they see themselves and family members surviving deep poverty and, in some instances, persecution,” Ramirez says.

“My mom wouldn’t have risked my life or hers had it not been the one choice she noticed for her unborn baby to have an opportunity at a life and childhood higher than hers.”

As Ramirez shares these and different particulars from her previous with CNN within the Longworth Home Workplace Constructing one night in early December, an aide steps in together with her telephone in hand.

Advertisement

“It’s time,” he tells her.

Ramirez remains to be an Illinois state legislator for just a few extra weeks, and she or he must vote on a measure that may not move if she doesn’t.

She holds the telephone in a single hand and appears into the digital camera.

“Consultant Ramirez votes sure,” she says, then fingers the telephone again to her aide.

“Completed,” she says with a triumphant smile.

Advertisement

It’s the most recent in quite a few payments Ramirez has helped move since her 2018 election to the Illinois Basic Meeting.

In that approach alone, she is aware of it will likely be an adjustment to work as a lawmaker in Washington, the place partisan fights typically get in the way in which of passing legal guidelines.

She nonetheless remembers the primary state invoice she sponsored that handed in March 2019 – a measure to broaden homelessness prevention programming, a high concern for Ramirez, who beforehand directed a homeless shelter.

“It was a really emotional second,” she says. And the very first thing she did after the invoice handed, she says, was name her mother and share the information.

Ramirez in a portrait from her campaign website.

“I mentioned, ‘Mother, in three months I used to be in a position to do extra (to forestall homelessness) than I had performed in nearly 15 years,’” Ramirez recollects.

Advertisement

Her mother responded that she was proud however reminded Ramirez that her work wasn’t completed.

“Go dangle up, and do extra,” she mentioned, in keeping with Ramirez. “And don’t neglect the place you come from.”

It’s with that mantra in thoughts, and with reminiscences of rising up because the daughter of immigrants who labored a number of jobs to help their household in Chicago, that Ramirez is heading to Washington.

Each her mother and father are US residents now, however Ramirez says they’re nonetheless struggling to make ends meet.

“I’m the daughter of a lady who at 61 has given a lot to this nation and is a minimum-wage employee that may’t afford well being care, so she’s on Medicaid, and diabetic,” Ramirez says. “I’m the daughter of a person who spent 30 years working in an industrial bakery, a union busting firm, and the day he retired, he acquired a frozen pie. He didn’t get a retirement pension and he struggled with Medicare supplemental, overlaying the fee.”

Advertisement

Ramirez’s newly redrawn Illinois congressional district is almost 50% Latino and closely Democratic, spanning from Chicago’s Northwest aspect into the suburbs, in keeping with CNN affiliate WLS. She received greater than 66% of the vote within the normal election, defeating Republican mortgage firm government Justin Burau.

After Ramirez’s election, her background landed her on many lists of firsts. She would be the first Latina elected to Congress from the Midwest.

She’s additionally helped set one other file as a part of the biggest variety of Latinos ever within the Home of Representatives.

There’s one other notable element about her background that Ramirez has pointed to often in interviews since her election: She has a “mixed-status household.”

Greater than 22 million folks in america dwell in mixed-status households, in keeping with immigrant advocacy group fwd.us, that means a minimum of one member of the family is an undocumented immigrant and others are US residents, inexperienced card holders or different lawful non permanent immigrants. However it’s uncommon to listen to a member of Congress use the time period to explain themselves.

Advertisement

Due to her household’s expertise, Ramirez is aware of lots of the individuals who supported her candidacy see her as a voice who will converse out for them, and for thus many immigrants who’re within the shadows and infrequently heard.

Ramirez married Boris Hernandez in October 2020. They met earlier that 12 months in what she describes as “a kind of pandemic loves.”

Delia Ramirez, left, with her husband, Boris Hernandez, center, and Ramirez's mother.

She’s greatest mates together with his cousin. Hernandez is initially from the identical city in Guatemala as her mother and father. He got here to america when he was 14. And for years, like tons of of hundreds of different folks, he’s relied on the Obama-era program often known as DACA, quick for Deferred Motion for Childhood Arrivals, which granted sure younger undocumented immigrants who have been delivered to america as kids work permits and safety from deportation.

On her marketing campaign web site and social media feeds, Ramirez has shared photos of Hernandez. And he or she’s invoked her husband’s story in current speeches and conversations with constituents.

Hernandez typically stood by her aspect at marketing campaign occasions. He often took photographs, too (he’s a photographer, along with additionally having labored in nonprofits and early childhood improvement). He accompanied Ramirez as she voted on Election Day, though he couldn’t forged a poll.

Advertisement

Ramirez acknowledges that she’s privileged in comparison with many family members of DACA recipients. She’s a US citizen, and due to that, Hernandez has a pathway to citizenship it doesn’t matter what Congress decides. However nonetheless, she says, they may find yourself in a precarious place.

If a federal choose’s ruling ends DACA – one thing many immigrant rights advocates warn is prone to occur within the subsequent 12 months – and her husband’s paperwork to regulate his immigration standing is pending, Ramirez is aware of she might have much more to fret about along with her busy schedule as a first-term congresswoman.

“I’m going to be combating to maintain my husband right here,” she says, “and I’m a member of Congress. …. What occurs to the opposite 2 million (undocumented immigrants that the DREAM Act would defend)? What occurs to his brother? What occurs to my greatest buddy from highschool? What occurs to all of them who don’t have any pathway, who don’t have a citizen husband or spouse or companion?”

Ramirez says that query retains her up at evening.

Standing beside Ramirez exterior the Capitol on that morning in December, Congressman-elect Robert Garcia of California praises her for bringing the group of freshmen lawmakers collectively even earlier than they’ve taken workplace.

Advertisement

“She’s been main on problems with immigration, on DACA for Dreamers, to make sure that our nation’s caring for those that actually need our assist,” Garcia says.

Serving to Dreamers isn’t the one matter on the agenda throughout this December information convention; Ramirez and the others are additionally pushing for extensions to the kid tax credit score and the earned earnings tax credit score, and extra funding for early childhood teaching programs.

In her interview with CNN, Ramirez mentioned her plans to battle for insurance policies that assist immigrants lengthen past immigration reform. One key problem she needs to work on whereas in workplace: housing, an space that she says is critically essential to immigrant households and working-class households on the whole.

Ramirez ascends a staircase at the US Capitol on November 18, 2022.

The progressive insurance policies she champions, she says, would profit immigrants and US residents alike. “It’s an ‘and,’” she says, “not an ‘or.’”

Ramirez’s voice cracks with emotion because the information convention ends and she or he makes her closing argument.

Advertisement

“It’s time to ship for our Dreamers,” she says. “It’s time for Boris Hernandez to lastly have a pathway to citizenship.”

Ramirez says she feels overwhelmed by gratitude that her constituents have given her this opportunity to symbolize them, and a robust sense of urgency to ship the outcomes she is aware of so many individuals desperately want.

Weeks later, the 117th Congress adjourned with out taking many of the steps Ramirez and her fellow incoming freshmen had been pushing for.

And with the steadiness of energy shifting, she is aware of the battles to come back might be even harder. However for Ramirez, the phrases she proudly proclaimed in that first information convention exterior the Capitol nonetheless maintain true. She and different new members of the Home Progressive Caucus have solely simply begun to make their voices heard.

“We’re rooted,” she says, “and we’re prepared to assist with this battle. … Let’s get to work.”

Advertisement

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

News

G7 warms to plan for Trump-proofing Ukraine aid

Published

on

G7 warms to plan for Trump-proofing Ukraine aid

Unlock the US Election Countdown newsletter for free

Washington’s G7 allies are warming to a US plan to rush tens of billions of dollars in funding to Ukraine before Donald Trump’s potential return to the White House.

Under the plan, set to be discussed at a June summit, Kyiv would receive money upfront from a G7 loan. The loan would be backed by future profits generated from around $350bn of Russian assets which have been immobilised in the west in response to Moscow’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine.

Some G7 members have been reluctant to endorse the plan but their sentiments have shifted after a diplomatic push by the US, which is seeking to secure agreement at a summit of G7 leaders next month, according to eight western officials.

Advertisement

The plan would generate around $50bn to be disbursed to Ukraine as early as this summer, US officials have said. The funding would arrive at a crucial time for Kyiv as its forces struggle to hold the line amid a renewed Russian offensive following delays in delivery of western military aid.

The more reluctant G7 members have warmed to the plan as a way to ensure long-term funding for Kyiv if Joe Biden loses this year’s presidential election to Trump, who has opposed US aid to Ukraine.

It could be “done before November so, even if Trump wins, the money has already been deployed”, one person involved in the discussions said.

Officials from Italy, which holds the rotating G7 presidency, have said the summit will seek to reach consensus on how to “maximise the use of windfall profits to ensure the long-term financing of Ukraine”.

Negotiations are ongoing ahead of a meeting of G7 finance ministers and central bank governors in Italy in the coming week, when the issue will be discussed.

Advertisement

“I feel there is momentum and there is interest,” a senior US Treasury official said on Friday. “And what we’re involved in is trying to engage in hard, detailed economic diplomacy to make sure we can all get on the same page. And I think we’re making progress there.”

The US wants to include language in the joint G7 statement referring to leveraging the proceeds from Russians state assets — and has secured backing from Canada and the UK, the western officials said.

France, Germany, Italy and Japan have previously opposed more far-reaching US plans, such as seizing Russia’s underlying assets, fearing it could create a precedent for the seizure of state property and wreak havoc in financial markets. They have shown more openness in recent weeks to the idea of leveraging profits to generate loans for Ukraine, officials have said.

These four countries are “coming around”, one official said.

Details are yet to be agreed, however, the official added, including who would issue the debt — the US alone or G7 countries via a special purpose vehicle — who would guarantee it, and how risks and repayment would be shared in case the future profits don’t materialise.

Advertisement

The senior US Treasury official said any decision would be “fundamentally a political decision, one that’s going to be taken by leaders” of the G7 next month. “The goal is to have consensus coming out of the finance ministers to provide advice to leaders,” the US official said.

A different person familiar with the talks on Russian sovereign assets said the US was not driven by the timing of the election.

Separately, EU countries earlier this month agreed to use part of these profits to jointly buy weapons for Ukraine. Under that plan, Belgium’s central security depository Euroclear, where most Russian-sanctioned state assets being held in the bloc are stuck, would pay out the first tranche of profits as soon as July. 

The G7 scheme faced an additional snag, according to officials in Brussels, since any plan to leverage the profits would need a fresh unanimous decision at EU level. Countries such as Hungary could potentially cause more delays.

Additional reporting from Kana Inagaki in Tokyo and Martha Muir in Washington

Advertisement
Continue Reading

News

Marco Rubio says he would not accept 2024 election results ‘if it’s unfair’

Published

on

Marco Rubio says he would not accept 2024 election results ‘if it’s unfair’

The Republican Florida senator Marco Rubio said on Sunday he would not commit to accepting the 2024 presidential election results, insisting that “if it’s unfair” his party will “go to court and point out the fact that states are not following their own election laws”.

Rubio’s statements on Meet the Press come as he is considered among former president Donald Trump’s top candidates for vice-president. Trump has continuously said falsely that the 2020 election was stolen.

Those claims spurred the 6 January 2021 insurrection, during which participants stormed the Capitol building as lawmakers were in the midst of certifying the election results. Trump is facing a variety of charges related to alleged election meddling.

When asked by host Kristen Welker: “Will you accept the election results of 2024, no matter what happens, senator?” Rubio replied: “No matter what happens? No.

“If it’s an unfair election, I think it’s going to be contested … by either side.”

Advertisement

Welker kept pushing Rubio to answer whether he would contest the results “no matter who wins”.

“Well, I think you’re asking the wrong person,” Rubio said. “The Democrats are the ones that have opposed every Republican victory since 2000, every single one.”

Welker repeatedly pointed out that Democrats who had issues with election results nevertheless conceded. Rubio, in turn, asked repeatedly whether Welker had asked Democrats this same question.

Rubio – who did certify the 2020 election results, and said on that day that “democracy is held together by people’s confidence in the election and their willingness to abide by its results” – would not directly respond to whether Trump’s unwillingness to accept election results served to undermine confidence in democracy.

He also refused to criticize Trump for his comments on Florida’s six-week abortion ban, during which Trump called the law a “terrible thing, a terrible mistake” – despite also repeatedly claiming credit for overturning the federal protection for abortion.

Advertisement
skip past newsletter promotion

“I support any bill that protects unborn human life, but I don’t consider other people in the pro life movement who have a different view to be apostate,” said Rubio, who has long pushed for strict limits on abortion. “They just have a different view about the best way to approach this issue. We are not like the Democrats where, unless you are in favor of their bills that basically say, ‘Let’s just put in all this fancy language, but it’s not meaningful in terms of any restrictions.’”

Advertisement

He played coy about whether he would agree to be Trump’s running mate in the 2024 presidential election, saying he had not discussed the possibility with Trump, but adding, “I think anyone who’s offered that job, to serve this country in the second highest office, assuming everything else in your life makes sense at that moment, if you’re interested in serving the country, it’s an incredible place to serve.”

Continue Reading

News

Video: A Student Protester Facing Disciplinary Action Has ‘No Regrets’

Published

on

Video: A Student Protester Facing Disciplinary Action Has ‘No Regrets’

“This is the graduation gown that I may or may not be wearing — if they let me walk. I’m leaving UChicago with a criminal record and maybe not with a degree. My name is Youssef. I’m a Brooklyn native. I’m half Palestinian, half Moroccan, and UChicago was definitely my dream school.” “Oh my God. I got to the University of Chicago. Mom!” “And during my time here my mission was to make it a dream school for other folks. And that sort of led me straight into the admissions office. I became a student visit coordinator. I gave tours. I got to act as a college rep. And that sort of bubble of being an ambassador for UChicago on the global scale popped when I started talking about my identity, and I started talking about being Palestinian and critiquing the university.” [chanting] [unclear] “We’ve been doing actions all year. Blockades, sit-ins, rallies, protests, banner drops, flyers, brochures — everything. We really just wanted a meeting with Paul, the president of the University of Chicago. So we wanted, like, financial records. We wanted transparency. We wanted to know where our money was going. And then we wanted the university to divest from all Israeli entities. And it took having to occupy a building and perform a sit-in. Like, 30 of us went into Rosenwald, which is the admissions office, and we just sort of set up camp.” [chanting] [unclear] “I was just thinking to myself, Oh, like, I’m going to be arrested.” [chanting] “You invest in genocide.” “The state attorney had made a statement that she wasn’t going to prosecute protest charges. So as soon as our charges were dropped, the university decided to go through the formal process for us, which means everything is on the table. We could be suspended. We could be expelled.” “We came back to join a national encampment movement.” “We won’t stop until we win.” “We actually were planning an encampment as well, prior to Columbia’s launch. Just seeing solidarity all over the country made us more confident to do this encampment.” “What do you know.” “Where does all our money go.” “Where does our money go.” “I have family in Palestine, and I’m living in Palestine. This is my 24/7. I mean, I’m done. Like, I have nothing left here. And that’s weird, like, coming from me, who spent so many years, not just, like, loving this university, but helping others love it. Like, I’m crushed that the university would ever do this. I feel like I have nothing left at the university here, but people in Palestine truly have nothing.”

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending