Connect with us

Wisconsin

Wisconsin’s sandhill cranes are beautiful but damage our crops. Let hunting help. | Opinion

Published

on

Wisconsin’s sandhill cranes are beautiful but damage our crops. Let hunting help. | Opinion



In addition to crane festivals and viewings, hunting can honor the bird — and carefully manage flocks while funding more conservation.

play

The sandhill crane descending on the Wisconsin countryside is a beautiful thing.

Its gray wings are long and graceful, and it doesn’t swoop — it floats in, like a cloud slipping from the sky. Its forehead is a proud red. It often travels in pairs, because it tends to prefer one mate for life. And it is prone to dance, bowing and leaping in a ritual that it has honed for eons as one of Earth’s oldest animals.

The problem is in between, it eats the hell out of your local farmer’s crops.

That’s the rub that has made such a striking bird the subject of fierce political debate as Wisconsin considers a sandhill crane season this year. As a farm boy and a conservationist, I’m here to tell you the reality: If we want to save the sandhill crane, it’s time to organize a responsible hunt. At the root of this argument is the idea that hunting is conservation — one I know not everyone who loves the sandhill crane supports. But for the sake of our gray feathered friend, I hope you’ll hear me out and reserve hate mail for the end.

Advertisement

Regulated hunting and conservation have protected endangered wildlife

Good hunters know that to continue to enjoy their way of life, a hunt must have boundaries so that our natural resources of woods, water, and game can persist. It’s the reason our country did away with unregulated hunting in favor of seasons and bag limits. It’s the reason hunters fund so much conservation, not only through government license fees, but also through voluntary organizations like Ducks Unlimited that have literally restored or conserved millions of acres of natural habitat, and raised billions of dollars. And it’s the path for transforming a once protected bird into a sustainable success story.

Almost wiped out in the 1800s by unregulated hunting and habitat loss, the sandhill crane has since surged to more than 1 million, with experts of all stripes acknowledging stable populations in Wisconsin and numerous other states. Reported crop damage in Wisconsin, meanwhile, has reached more than $2 million annually, mainly corn and wheat.

Now, the crane is at a crossroads. It can go the way of the sustainable success story, like the whitetail deer, the wild turkey and the duck, all persisting in Wisconsin as a beloved animal that nature-lovers and hunters alike are able to appreciate in abundance. Or, it can go the way of the invasive presence like the coyote in Wisconsin, the wild boar in many parts of the country, and other animals facing open season — without limits — to thin them out.

Comparing the sandhill crane to a mangy coyote is where some may get hot, if they’re not already, given the crane’s history and beauty. Yes, there are reasons particular to coyote and boar that they’re capable of becoming so problematic. But let’s not insult the clever coyote — also a sight to behold slipping from field to woods in the early morning — or the proud boar once held in high regard by western civilization.

Advertisement

Gray wolves show how attitudes about animal’s can change

And we’ve seen how attitudes about animals can change.

Consider the gray wolf, once deeply endangered, now going off and on the endangered species list depending upon which political party is in power. The crane is headed toward similar division. The first time I saw a crane was as a kid in the 1990s, when my mom told me the story of their recovery as two cranes drifted across an evening field, then issued their softly purring trumpet of a call before taking flight. I remember her gasping at their beauty. Today I usually hear them referred to as “those dang things,” if profanity isn’t involved, as they ravage farmers’ fields.

A responsible hunt — with well-timed seasons to protect the hatching of new cranes, bag limits, and fees to fund game law enforcement and even more conservation — can prevent this. Keeping the crane in its hallowed, no-hunt status for too long simply leaves it vulnerable to future generations not giving a damn what happens to it.

This spring, North America’s sandhill cranes will begin their great journey north, from as far south as Mexico. They’ll rest on the Platte River in Nebraska near the sandhills that gave them their name, a sight National Geographic calls “one of the greatest wildlife phenomena in North America.” Then they’ll stop off in the fertile fields of Wisconsin.

Advertisement

You can believe that nature is a delicate ecosystem, with a natural balance that we must protect to preserve such a sight. I certainly do. All I’m saying is, mankind is a part of that balance.

Brian Reisinger is a writer who grew up on a family farm in Sauk County. He contributes columns and videos for the Ideas Lab at the Journal Sentinel, and is the author of “Land Rich, Cash Poor: My Family’s Hope and the Untold History of the Disappearing American Farmer.” Reisinger works in public affairs consulting for Wisconsin-based Platform Communications. He splits his time between Sacramento, Calif. — America’s “farm-to-fork capital,” near his wife’s family — and the family farm in Wisconsin. You can find him on X at @BrianJReisinger



Source link

Advertisement

Wisconsin

Badgers football losses go beyond field and into Wisconsin’s economy, UW report says

Published

on

Badgers football losses go beyond field and into Wisconsin’s economy, UW report says



Ripple effects could be felt in other UW athletic programs

The 2025 Badger football season is one fans already want to forget − but the negative economic impact could be felt well beyond the final game on Nov. 29.

If the team’s poor performance continues, it could reduce the program’s profit by $20 million annually, according to a new report from the Center for Research on the Wisconsin Economy, housed at University of Wisconsin-Madison

Advertisement

The ripple effects can be felt in other university athletic programs subsidized by the football program, and could impact student applications to the university, alumni donations, and research output, according to the report − titled “The Economic Impact of Badger Football’s Declining Performance.”

Beyond the financial blow to the campus, the report estimates the city of Madison could could lose up to $160 million, and the state could lose up to $280 million “stemming from reduced attendance, game day spending, tourism and reputational value.”  

The UW Athletic Department disputes the findings of the report.  

“Wisconsin Athletics respects the work and research of our world-renowned academic partners, along with their passion for the sports that represent our institution,” a department statement said.

“Although we do not believe that this study portrays a complete and accurate representation of the economic factors around the football program, we all share a common interest in its successful future.

Advertisement

“We welcome the opportunity to collaborate with the Center for Research on the Wisconsin Economy on any future works on this topic,” according to the statement.

Badger football is profitable 

In 2023, the football team had revenue of $106. 7 million and expenses of $42.3 million, with the program earning more than $64 million, according to the U.S. Department of Education’s Equity in Athletics Data Analysis cited in the report.  

In 2024, Badger football had $107.4 million in revenue according to its NCAA membership filing, and had expenses of $49.6 million − posting a profit of $57.8 million. The Badgers men’s basketball program earned a $7.3 million profit that year.

If the winning percentage falls from nearly 80%, as it was during the 2017 to 2019 seasons, to 50%, that could mean “Badger Football’s annual profit could drop by about $20 million,” the report reads. 

Advertisement

The team this season so far has a 2-6 record with four games remaining in November.

Is it Luke Fickell’s fault? 

Short answer: not in the beginning.  

The report says the program’s profit didn’t decline during 2022 and 2023 despite the 14-12 regular season record. That was during Luke Fickell’s first two seasons as head coach.

“This is probably because there was a lot of excitement” about Fickell’s hiring, the report states.  

Advertisement

Fans recently have been chanting “fire Fickell” at home games. Wisconsin Athletic Director Chris McIntosh addressed fans concerns in an Oct. 20 letter.

It said the football season has “fallen well short of our standards” and added the department is committed “to elevating the investment into our football program to position us to compete at the highest level.” 

Financial impact is already being felt 

 This year the program is on pace to have the lowest attendance in more than 30 years with a 51,980 average scanned attendance during the first four home games. That’s according to data obtained via an open records request and analyzed by the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel.  

But fans have been signaling their disappointment before this season.  

According to the research center report, “Badgers sold 38,082 season tickets for general seating areas in 2025, down from 42,197 in 2024 and 41,206 in 2023.” 

Advertisement

Football helps subsidize other programs, generates donations 

The Athletic Department’s total profit was less than $11 million in 2023, including the football program’s $64 million profit.

“This suggests that the department’s other programs and operations are subsidized heavily by the football team,” the report states.  

The report cites research that shows “when a male graduate former team wins its conference championship, his donations for general purposes increase by about 7% and his donations to the athletic program increase by about the same percentage.

“Moreover, if a male alumnus’s team won its conference championship during his senior year, his subsequent giving to the athletic program is about 8% a year higher.” 

Advertisement

The Badgers last won the Big Ten football title in 2012.

“If the poor performance continues, its impact on alumni donations and engagement is likely to diminish,” the report reads.

Local economic impact of athletic program 

College sports programs affect communities and states as fans go to games, restaurants, and bars, buy merchandise, and pay for hotel rooms.  

The report compared the UW athletic program’s impact on Madison and Wisconsin with the University of MinnesotaTwin Cities program on Minneapolis area and Minnesota. Both football teams had similar performances in 2022 and 2023.  

It showed the Badgers’ impact on Madison contributed to 3,360 jobs and $462 million of economic output.

Advertisement

The Gophers’ impact on the Twin Cities contributed to 1,152 jobs and $298 million of economic output.  

Statewide, the Badger athletic program contributed to 5,640 jobs and $757 million of economic impact in Wisconsin. In Minnesota, the Gophers contributed to $474 million of economic impact. 

The report says the Twin Cities population is larger than Madison’s population − making the latter “likely more sensitive to Badger Football’s performance.”  

NIL and program investment 

UW can revitalize the program by investing in facilities, recruiting budgets, NIL (name, image and likeness) deals for athletes, and competitive compensation for players and coaches, the report said.

The report estimates the Badgers NIL collective funding in 2023 and 2024 was $8.9 million. The highest spent in the conference was Ohio State at $20.2 million, it said.

Advertisement

NIL deals aren’t public information and the estimate is based on methodology from nil-ncaa.com/big10. .

Spending more money on the football program “could help reverse the team’s declining performance,” the report said.

“Enhanced facilities can attract top transfers and recruits, while better coaching and talent ensure the return on these assets are maximized,” it said. “Strategic, dual-focused investments are essential to rebuild competitiveness and mitigate the economic risks estimated above.” 

Milwaukee Journal Sentinel reporter John Steppe contributed to this report.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Wisconsin

Three former Wisconsin Badgers make Utah Jazz G League training camp roster

Published

on

Three former Wisconsin Badgers make Utah Jazz G League training camp roster


Recent Wisconsin basketball graduates John Tonje, Steven Crowl and Max Klesmit officially made the Salt Lake City Stars’ training camp roster on Monday. The Stars, the G League affiliate of the Utah Jazz, began their training camp on Monday. Their first game of the 2025-26 season is scheduled for Tuesday, Nov. 11.

Tonje’s inclusion on the roster is no surprise. Following an All-American 2024-25 season leading the Badgers, the Jazz selected him with the No. 53 overall pick in the 2025 NBA draft. He then officially signed a two-way deal with the organization in late August. He’s one of three two-way players on the Stars’ roster, along with Elijah Harkless and Oscar Tshiebwe.

Crowl, meanwhile, converted a Summer League roster spot into this training camp invitation. He should have an inside track at G League action, given his fast-growing experience within the organization.

Finally, this opportunity is Max Klesmit’s first at the NBA or G League level. He’ll likely need strong play throughout training camp to earn a spot on the team’s regular-season roster.

Advertisement

Contact/Follow @TheBadgersWire on X (formerly Twitter) and like our page on Facebook to follow ongoing coverage of Wisconsin Badgers news, notes and opinion





Source link

Continue Reading

Wisconsin

Wisconsin will join lawsuit against USDA to force release of FoodShare funds, Evers says

Published

on

Wisconsin will join lawsuit against USDA to force release of FoodShare funds, Evers says


play

  • Wisconsin is joining a multi-state lawsuit against the U.S. Department of Agriculture over FoodShare funding.
  • The lawsuit aims to force the release of contingency funds before benefits run out on November 1 due to a federal government shutdown.
  • The USDA recently changed its guidance, stating contingency funds cannot be used for benefit payments.
  • Wisconsin’s state legislature is unlikely to provide state funding to continue the program.

Wisconsin will join a multi-state lawsuit against the U.S. Department of Agriculture to force the release of contingency funding for FoodShare before benefits run dry for thousands of Wisconsin residents on Nov. 1.

Democratic Gov. Tony Evers made the announcement Oct. 27 at a roundtable event at the Milwaukee Public Library’s Martin Luther King Branch, where community advocates warned looming cuts to government programs would impact their businesses.

Advertisement

“The good news is, the federal government can (release the FoodShare money),” Evers told reporters. “They can do it; there’s nothing stopping them from doing it. In fact, we’re going to be suing them for not using the funds that they have.”

The forthcoming lawsuit will argue that both USDA and the Office of Management and Budget have previously and recently said that SNAP benefits are an obligation of the United States.

Before Friday, the USDA advised $3 billion worth of contingency funding could be used for administrative costs and benefit payments in the event of a shutdown. But on Oct. 24, the agency issued a new memo saying funding cannot legally be used for such purposes.

The lawsuit is scheduled to be filed just a few days before federal funding for the FoodShare program will evaporate because of the federal government shutdown.

Advertisement

At that point, FoodShare enrollees may use leftover benefits during the month of November but will not receive any new benefits until the government reopens.

Wisconsin and the other states suing the federal government together provide more than 21 million individuals with food assistance, according to Evers’ office.

State lawmakers could create a new state-funded appropriation to keep the program alive as the shutdown continues, but Senate President Mary Felzkowski said this week the Legislature is unlikely to do that, calling the matter a federal issue.

Advertisement

Evers cannot act alone by issuing an executive order to continue the program, his office said, because the state Legislature has the power to appropriate money.

In September, about $116 million in benefits were issued to FoodShare recipients, according to the nonpartisan Legislative Fiscal Bureau. 



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending