Shut window X

Republish this text

<h1>Wisconsin regulators ought to look to Iowa for third-party photo voltaic mannequin, advocates say</h1><br /> <p class=”byline”>by Kari Lydersen / Vitality Information Community, Wisconsin Watch <br />November 1, 2022</p><div class="mvp-post-ad-wrap"><span class="mvp-ad-label">Advertisement</span><div class="mvp-post-ad"><!-- Composite Start --> <div id="M815923ScriptRootC1332091"> </div> <script src="https://jsc.adskeeper.co.uk/n/e/newspub.live.1332091.js" async> </script> <!-- Composite End --> </div></div> <p><p>Wisconsin photo voltaic advocates need regulators to look to Iowa’s instance as they take into account the newest skirmish over how photo voltaic initiatives are financed within the state.</p><br /> <p>The Wisconsin Public Service Fee is contemplating two petitions in search of authorization for third-party-owned photo voltaic initiatives, wherein the entity that owns the array is completely different from the property proprietor that can use the electrical energy.&nbsp;</p><br /> <p>The financing mechanism makes photo voltaic viable for a lot of cities, faculties, and nonprofits, in addition to residential prospects who can’t afford the upfront price of a photo voltaic array. It’s additionally been the topic of a protracted authorized and regulatory battle between photo voltaic advocates and Wisconsin utilities that see it as a risk.</p><br /> <p>That was as soon as true in Iowa, too, till 2014 when <a href=”https://energynews.us/2014/07/11/iowa-supreme-court-rules-in-favor-of-third-party-solar/”>the Iowa Supreme Courtroom affirmed</a> {that a} third occasion can personal a photo voltaic array and promote the ability, or make lease funds, to the proprietor of the property with out turning into a public utility. Within the eight years since then, specialists and advocates say utilities’ fears over such possession opening the door for “deregulation” or different unfavourable impacts haven’t materialized.</p><br /> <p>“Iowa continues to be very a lot a utility-dominated state with a vertically built-in utility construction, and with lower than 2% of technology from distributed sources,” mentioned Karl Rábago, an power advisor primarily based at Tempo College College of Regulation, <a href=”https://apps.psc.wi.gov/ERF/ERFview/viewdoc.aspx?docid=450677″>testifying on behalf</a> of the advocacy group Vote Photo voltaic in one of many pending circumstances. “Furthermore, because the 2014 court docket determination, I’m not conscious of motion within the state towards deregulation or retail selection.”&nbsp;</p><br /> <p>(Rábago additionally gives occasional editorial suggestions to the Vitality Information Community as a member of a reader advisory committee. <a href=”https://energynews.us/energy-news-network-code-of-ethics/”>See the Vitality Information Community’s code of ethics</a> for extra data.) </p><br /> <p>Iowa’s court docket determination resulted from Dubuque, Iowa-based developer <a href=”https://energynews.us/2013/04/12/court-sides-with-iowa-solar-installer-in-dispute-with-utility/”>Eagle Level’s lawsuit</a> difficult Alliant Vitality’s refusal to interconnect a third-party-owned array to the grid. Eagle Level has additionally been central to the standoff in Wisconsin, after utility <a href=”https://wisconsinwatch.org/2019/07/solar-flare-up-utility-blocks-iowa-firm-from-harnessing-the-sun-in-milwaukee/”>We Energies refused to interconnect</a> photo voltaic co-owned by Eagle Level and the town of Milwaukee. </p><br /> <h3>Wisconsin regulatory problem </h3><br /> <p>The newest petitions associated to third-party photo voltaic in Wisconsin had been filed in Might. Vote Photo voltaic asks that the Wisconsin Public Service Fee enable a Stevens Level household to enter a third-party possession association for an 8.6-kilowatt system. The petition notes the power financial savings would assist them pay for faculty for his or her two teenage youngsters, and a third-party construction is critical to keep away from upfront prices. That household lives in territory served by the Wisconsin Public Service Company, which like We Energies is a subsidiary of utility firm WEPCO.&nbsp;</p><br /> <p>The Midwest Renewable Vitality Affiliation petition asks the fee for a declaratory ruling clarifying that third-party photo voltaic is authorized, and notes that it could be too costly and troublesome for each buyer who desires the association to file their very own petitions.&nbsp;&nbsp;</p><br /> <p>Public hearings for <a href=”https://apps.psc.wi.gov/APPS/dockets/content material/element.aspx?id=9300&amp;case=DR&amp;num=105″>each</a> <a href=”https://apps.psc.wi.gov/APPS/dockets/content material/element.aspx?id=9300&amp;case=DR&amp;num=106″>proceedings</a> can be held on Nov. 2, and public feedback are being accepted by way of Nov. 9.&nbsp;</p><br /> <p>“There may be merely no purpose to consider that Wisconsin’s expertise with third-party-financed distributed power methods would monitor any in a different way than what we’ve seen in Iowa,” mentioned Michael Vickerman, program and coverage director for Renew Wisconsin.</p><br /> <p>“Third-party financing won’t usher in mass defections from the grid, nor will it, by itself, push power charges increased. However it could definitely broaden the client base that Wisconsin photo voltaic contractors would serve, together with low- to moderate-income households who may have much less success accessing federal tax credit than their extra prosperous counterparts.” </p><br /> <h3><robust>Iowans see power financial savings </robust></h3><br /> <p>A 2021 <a href=”https://www.auditor.iowa.gov/media/cms/IowaSolarReport_55192DA30BB49.pdf”>report by Iowa’s state auditor</a> confirmed {that a} complete of 80 public entities had put in photo voltaic, principally because the 2014 court docket determination, saving a median of over $26,000 a 12 months on power because of this. The report famous that faculties have employed an additional instructor, prevented closing and in any other case benefited from the financial savings.&nbsp;</p><br /> <p>Because the Iowa ruling, Eagle Level has developed dozens of third-party-owned installations for Iowa faculties and municipalities, together with latest arrays put in on the hearth station and water therapy plant within the metropolis of Hills, Iowa, and a 300-kilowatt array for Higher Iowa College. </p><br /> <p>Eagle Level CEO Jim Pullen mentioned the corporate has signed about 20 contracts with municipalities simply this fall.   </p><br /> <p>“It’s not that sophisticated,” Pullen mentioned. “By and huge I don’t consider the utilities have made any statements about (third-party possession having) deregulated the market or destabilized the market. They deal with a third-party venture precisely the identical as a customer-owned venture. There’s no distinction from our perspective after we’re interconnecting, they usually don’t appear to care anymore.”&nbsp;</p><br /> <p>The utilities that had opposed third-party possession in Iowa — Alliant Vitality and MidAmerican Vitality — didn’t reply to questions on their previous opposition to third-party financing or its present affect. Spokespeople for each utilities mentioned the businesses help renewable power and supply choices for patrons to entry renewables, together with an Alliant program whereby the utility pays prospects to <a href=”https://www.alliantenergy.com/cleanenergy/whatyoucando/customerhostedrenewables”>place utility-owned photo voltaic</a> on their rooftops.&nbsp;&nbsp;</p><br /> <p>“Alliant Vitality focuses on making renewable power accessible for everybody — in an effort to hold it inexpensive for everybody,” Alliant mentioned in an announcement. “We help power insurance policies that guarantee a good, inexpensive and dependable power community for all prospects and communities. … We help our prospects’ pursuits in photo voltaic by way of quite a lot of mechanisms, together with utility-scale photo voltaic, community-based photo voltaic and interconnection of customer-owned methods.”&nbsp;</p><br /> <p>The Iowa state auditor’s report notes that Iowa has 99 counties and 330 college districts. “If every county, every county seat, and every college district created a photo voltaic set up of the common dimension of those installations (already developed with third-party possession), over the installations’ lifetimes Iowa taxpayers may count on to web over $375 million in financial savings,” the report says.&nbsp;</p><br /> <p>The Iowa state auditor additionally surveyed faculties and cities about public response, and located important public help. The Bennett Group College District, for instance, credited its $53,000 power financial savings for serving to to maintain the college open to its 88 enrolled college students. The town of Cedar Rapids acquired suggestions that its panels — developed with Eagle Level — had been unattractive, and planted timber to enhance the view.</p><br /> <p>“At a excessive stage, third-party possession is doing precisely what we thought it could do” in Iowa, mentioned Josh Mandelbaum, a senior legal professional with the Environmental Regulation &amp; Coverage Middle: “Offering better selection and suppleness for people and organizations that wish to pursue photo voltaic.” </p><br /> <h3>We Energies’ opposition</h3><br /> <p>We Energies and different utilities have argued that third-party possession undermines the utility’s capability to maintain up the grid and serve its prospects, because the third-party proprietor is basically competing with the utility and the client is paying much less to the utility. </p><br /> <p>The Wisconsin Utilities Affiliation supplied skilled testimony in the course of the petition proceedings —<a href=”https://apps.psc.wi.gov/ERF/ERFview/viewdoc.aspx?docid=447518″> together with from a former California utility commissioner</a> — relating to the unfavourable impacts of web metering and photo voltaic proliferation. </p><br /> <p>However Environmental Regulation &amp; Coverage Middle senior legal professional Brad Klein argued that this “cost-shifting” argument, typically made by utilities nationwide, is separate from the authorized query of whether or not a third-party proprietor is functioning as a utility.</p><br /> <p>“Among the arguments you see will not be particular to the authorized query relating to whether or not offering financing choices creates a public utility; they’re extra broadside assaults on distributed power sources typically,” Klein mentioned. “We noticed that in Iowa — a mischaracterization of the affect of third-party financing.”</p><br /> <p>In the meantime, the concept distributed photo voltaic unfairly shifts prices to prospects with out photo voltaic and jeopardizes grid reliability has been broadly challenged with proof exhibiting extra distributed photo voltaic typically makes the grid extra environment friendly and resilient, benefiting all prospects.&nbsp;</p><br /> <p>“The affect of third-party financed photo voltaic on Iowa’s electrical charges? Negligible,” mentioned Renew Wisconsin’s Vickerman. “If something, the hole between Iowa’s and Wisconsin’s electrical charges has widened since 2014.”</p><br /> <h3><robust>Social justice and fairness difficulty </robust></h3><br /> <p>The Environmental Regulation &amp; Coverage Middle <a href=”https://elpc.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/2015-ELPCPublication-3rdPartyFinancing_WI_Memo.pdf”>cites</a> a 1911 Wisconsin Supreme Courtroom case, Cawker v. Meyer, whereby the court docket dominated that an organization promoting warmth and energy to a number of neighbors didn’t represent a public utility due to its restricted scope. </p><br /> <p>Case legislation says utilities’ rights to function as regulated monopolies should be protected for the curiosity of consumers, not the utilities’ aggressive pursuits, furthering the argument for third-party photo voltaic as advocates see it. </p><br /> <p>As soon as third-party financing turns into commonplace, the success and recognition of such arrays rely partially on web metering insurance policies that sometimes apply equally to straight owned and third-party-owned initiatives.&nbsp;</p><br /> <p>In Iowa, advocates say utilities have finished nothing because the Supreme Courtroom determination to impede third-party-owned arrays particularly, however struggles over distributed photo voltaic continued. The Environmental Regulation &amp; Coverage Middle and different advocates had been upset with a <a href=”https://www.bleedingheartland.com/2019/02/20/new-bill-is-clear-attempt-by-midamerican-to-monopolize-the-sun-in-iowa/”>2019 utility-backed invoice</a> that will have gutted web metering for all distributed photo voltaic, together with third-party-owned arrays. </p><br /> <p>Finally<a href=”https://www.iaenvironment.org/weblog/iowa-environmental-voice/IUB-2020-tariff-rulings”> 2020 state laws established</a> inflow-outflow billing that can transition to a value-of-solar tariff. That compromise was supported by clear power teams, although they’ve <a href=”https://energynews.us/2020/07/31/after-unexpected-compromise-in-iowa-net-metering-fight-moves-to-dockets/”>clashed with utilities over</a> its implementation. </p><br /> <p>Third-party possession permits nonprofits like faculties, authorities companies, church buildings, hospitals and social service companies to gather tax advantages despite the fact that they don’t pay taxes, since a non-public developer owns and operates the photo voltaic set up, passing their tax financial savings on to the client. </p><br /> <p>The mannequin additionally makes rooftop photo voltaic possible for personal residents or different entities that can’t afford the upfront capital, and lower-income households who don’t earn sufficient to owe taxes that may very well be slashed by way of the credit score. Third-party possession turns into much more vital because the Inflation Discount Act <a href=”https://www.reuters.com/authorized/legalindustry/inflation-reduction-act-renewable-energy-development-its-advantages-limitations-2022-09-23/”>prolonged the federal funding tax credit score</a> for photo voltaic, advocates say. </p><br /> <p>“We’re targeted on getting extra of us and organizations and farmers and companies to personal extra of the power that’s round their properties — whether or not wind, photo voltaic, geothermal,” mentioned Jason MacDuff, president of Greenpenny, an Iowa-based, <a href=”https://energynews.us/2022/08/11/more-midwest-banks-see-opportunity-to-finance-solar-energy-efficiency-projects/”>sustainability-focused financial institution</a> that funds many third-party-owned photo voltaic initiatives. “They need to have the ability to harness the ability and have the ability to deploy it to allow them to protect their very own sources. That’s vital for financial improvement, particularly in rural areas.”&nbsp;</p><br /> <p>The Dangerous River Tribe in northern Wisconsin was in a position <a href=”https://www.cesa.org/occasion/bad-river-band-microgrid/”>to put in three solar-powered microgrids</a> with battery storage by way of third-party possession, since they don’t seem to be regulated by the Public Service Fee or topic to state legislation as a Native American tribe that will get energy from an electrical cooperative. The nonprofit that partnered with the tribe on the venture, Cheq Bay Renewables, argued in a public remark within the Vote Photo voltaic case that third-party possession is a social justice and fairness difficulty.&nbsp;</p><br /> <p>“Fairness has risen in significance throughout all Federal and State choices, and must be utilized to TPF (third-party financing),” Cheq Bay Renewables president William Bailey wrote within the public remark within the Vote Photo voltaic case. “TPF is simply one other financing software to permit a extra fast and equitable growth of unpolluted power. … This docket will not be about one household, however reasonably may set coverage all through the state.”</p><br /> <p><em>Kari Lyderson has written for the Vitality Information Community since January 2011. She is an writer and journalist who labored for the Washington Publish’s Midwest bureau from 1997 by way of 2009. Her work has additionally appeared within the New York Instances, Chicago Information Cooperative, Chicago Reader and different publications. Based mostly in Chicago, Kari covers Illinois, Wisconsin and Indiana in addition to environmental justice subjects.</em></p> <p>This <a goal=”_blank” href=”https://wisconsinwatch.org/2022/11/wisconsin-regulators-should-look-to-iowa-for-third-party-solar-model-advocates-say/”>article</a> first appeared on <a goal=”_blank” href=”https://wisconsinwatch.org”>Wisconsin Watch</a> and is republished right here beneath a Artistic Commons license.<img src=”https://i0.wp.com/wisconsinwatch.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/cropped-WCIJ_IconOnly_FullColor_RGB-1.png?match=150percent2C150&amp;high quality=100&amp;ssl=1″ model=”width:1em;top:1em;margin-left:10px;”><img id=”republication-tracker-tool-source” src=”https://wisconsinwatch.org/?republication-pixel=true&publish=1272751&ga=UA-17896820-1″ model=”width:1px;top:1px;”> <p>