Connect with us

Wisconsin

Wisconsin Elections Commission rejects effort to recall Assembly Speaker Vos • Wisconsin Examiner

Published

on

Wisconsin Elections Commission rejects effort to recall Assembly Speaker Vos • Wisconsin Examiner


The Wisconsin Elections Commission (WEC) voted 5-0, with one abstention, to reject the recall petition against Assembly Speaker Robin Vos (R-Rochester) Thursday. After confusion over which district the recall petition signatures should come from, the commission decided that the recall organizers did not have enough valid signatures from any of the districts that could have possibly been involved. 

Recall organizers began the effort to remove Vos, the longest-serving Assembly Speaker in state history, from office over complaints that he was not doing enough to advance their belief that the 2020 election was stolen from former President Donald Trump and that the election officials involved in that election should be punished. The petition began after Vos refused to move forward with an effort to impeach WEC Administrator Meagan Wolfe. 

The recall effort began as the state’s political maps were in limbo, however. In December, the state Supreme Court struck down the previous maps and Gov. Tony Evers signed new maps into law in February, but those maps don’t go into effect until the election this fall. 

With the previous maps declared unconstitutional and the new maps not yet in effect, it was unclear which district recall organizers should collect the required number of signatures. Old Assembly district 63 contains the voters that elected Vos in the first place, but it doesn’t technically exist any more. The new Assembly districts 33 and 66 contain some of those voters, but also many who did not put Vos into office. The WEC and state Department of Justice had sought clarification from the Supreme Court on which district should apply, but the Court declined to weigh in. 

Advertisement

Last month, the recall organizers filed thousands of signatures as part of their recall petition, but those petitions included signatures from all three of the potential districts, as well as many others that appeared to be forged or from voters who didn’t live in any of the districts. While the legal questions surrounding the petition worked through the Court, the statutory deadlines of a recall effort continued. No matter what district was used, Commission staff determined there were not enough valid signatures to force a recall election this summer. 

On Thursday evening, the commission met to decide on Vos’ challenge to the validity of the petition signatures. Vos’ attorney, Matthew Fernholz, said the commission should take the easy option and reject the recall petition, while adding that there should be a formal investigation into the alleged forgeries in the petitions. 

“So based on the review of all the signatures, and the challenges that have been sustained, the easiest thing and most straightforward path for WEC today is simply to reject and deny the recall petition,” Fernholz said. “They’re woefully short, regardless of whether we’re operating under the old 63rd Assembly district or the new 33rd Assembly district.”

Commissioner Ann Jacobs told Fernholz that the body is statutorily prevented from initiating investigations, adding that if Vos would like an investigation completed, he needs to submit a complaint to the agency. 

The recall organizers were represented at the hearing by former Supreme Court Justice Michael Gableman. Gableman was hired by Vos following the 2020 election to investigate allegations of fraud. After being allowed to continue his review for over a year without any results, Vos fired the former judge. Gableman has since turned on Vos, frequently appearing at anti-Vos events and supporting his 2022 primary opponent. 

Advertisement

Gableman spent about 30 minutes arguing with commissioners and WEC staff over whether or not a staff member told the recall organizers that the signatures should come from the 63rd District. At one point in the argument, Jacobs asked for a point of order after Gableman started insulting the agency’s attorney. 

“Well, you managed to be arrogant, condescending and wrong in a matter of about 20,” Gableman said before Jacobs cut him off. 

Gableman also refused to say whether or not the recall petitioners had gathered enough signatures from any of the districts because he doesn’t “know the basis for all the removals of the signatures.” 

Twice, Gableman mentioned that the recall organizers had met with the FBI about potentially investigating the alleged forged signatures, and he discussed what the petitioners are calling “recall 2.0”— their second attempt at forcing a recall election. Much of the argument between Gableman and the commissioners centered around his request that they declare which district the signatures should come from and their refusal to do so because a request for an official advisory opinion from the commission has not been made. 

The Commission ultimately approved a motion that rejected the recall on the grounds that there weren’t enough signatures from the old 63rd or new 66th districts and that the new 33rd district should not be used. Commissioner Mark Thomsen abstained from the vote after arguing for an amendment to the motion to narrow it to include just the lack of valid signatures from the 63rd district.

Advertisement

GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX

Advertisement



Source link

Wisconsin

Wisconsin Army National Guard fitness test shows endurance behind the uniform

Published

on

Wisconsin Army National Guard fitness test shows endurance behind the uniform


We often see our troops in uniform, unaware of how much they physically train to serve the country.

What we know:

Advertisement

As with any test, the grade depends on grit, hard work and preparation. One Army fitness test shows just how demanding that preparation can be, with push-ups that recruits describe as especially humbling.

Tyler Choy, an Army National Guard recruiter, keeps score. He grades each exercise using age, gender and the amount of weight lifted, or the time needed to complete the task.

FREE DOWNLOAD: Get breaking news alerts in the FOX LOCAL Mobile app for iOS or Android

Advertisement

Choy says recruits must score at least 60 points to pass each challenge, based on how heavy they lift or how fast they move.

“If you’re looking at maxing, you’re looking at 250 pounds. 60 points to pass the test, you’re looking at 140,” said Choy.

Advertisement

The training is meant to prepare soldiers for a wide range of real-world situations.

What they’re saying:

“To make sure that we have the endurance to reflect whatever our job is,” Choy said.

Advertisement

Those jobs can include responding to hurricanes, protests and voting precincts, sometimes in situations that carry potential danger. The deadly attack on Army National Guard troops in Washington, D.C., serves as a grim reminder of the reality of that work.

“I do know that, in the back of my mind, there’s a possibility that could happen, but I have the ability to serve and help other people and that’s what I decided to put above my own interests,” Choy said.

Advertisement

SIGN UP TODAY: Get daily headlines, breaking news emails from FOX6 News

Choy emphasized the importance of endurance and stamina when responding to emergencies or unexpected events.

“Sometimes, in the line of work we do, we need to react quickly and react with a lot of pressure and momentum,” he said.

Advertisement

Big picture view:

He helps build that momentum by training future leaders in the military, even before they ship out to basic training.

Advertisement

“You don’t need to pass this test before going to basic training, but the more we are able to help people prepare for it, the better chances of them passing at basic training,” Choy said.

And with any test, the goal is the same: to be ready to succeed.

The Source: The information in this post was collected and produced by FOX6 News.

Advertisement

MilitaryNewsWisconsin



Source link

Continue Reading

Wisconsin

Wisconsin winter storm: Vernon residents wait as plows stall, staffing thin

Published

on

Wisconsin winter storm: Vernon residents wait as plows stall, staffing thin


Mechanical failures and staffing shortages slowed snow removal in the Village of Vernon over the weekend, leaving some residents waiting until well after the storm for streets to be cleared.

Plows, fire trucks stuck during storm

What we know:

Advertisement

Several village vehicles – including snowplows and fire trucks – became stuck or broke down during the storm, forcing delays in clearing operations and emergency responses.

Residents contacted FOX6 questioning why Department of Public Works vehicles were not clearing streets during the storm.

Advertisement

FREE DOWNLOAD: Get breaking news alerts in the FOX LOCAL Mobile app for iOS or Android

80-year-old Don Anderson said it was nearly a day and a half after the snow stopped before he finally saw pavement on his street.

“Something that was driving that process wasn’t working,” Anderson said.

Advertisement

Village of Vernon Department of Public Works Director Brett Bartels declined to speak on camera but said nine DPW incidents occurred over the weekend in which trucks either became stuck or broke down.

Staffing shortages add to delays

What they’re saying:

Advertisement

Village of Vernon Fire Department Assistant Chief Patrick Hays said one fire truck became stuck three times Saturday while responding to a minor crash on Hillview Drive.

“We got hit and we got hit hard,” Hays said.

Advertisement

Hays said a DPW plow was sent to help but also became stuck, further slowing snow clearance efforts.

“Which created a problem for the rest of the Village and delayed streets getting plowed,” he said.

Bartels said DPW is currently operating with two employees instead of the usual five. He said an on-call snowplow driver position has been posted for about a month, but no one has applied.

Advertisement

Another worrying sign is the village’s proposed 2026 budget, which includes a nearly 47% cut to public works funding.

Village promises review of storm response

Dig deeper:

Advertisement

With more snow on the way, Anderson said he hopes the response improves.

SIGN UP TODAY: Get daily headlines, breaking news emails from FOX6 News

Advertisement

“I want the Village to do better next time,” he said.

Bartels said his crew worked about 20 hours clearing streets after the storm and does not believe the proposed budget cuts would affect snowplow operations next year.

Village officials said the administrator-clerk posted an update Sunday, stating DPW will work with the Village Board to review the response to the storm.

Advertisement

The Source: The information in this post was collected and produced by FOX6 News.

Winter WeatherVernonNews



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Wisconsin

Wisconsin football adds in-state JUCO transfer linebacker from Iowa Central

Published

on

Wisconsin football adds in-state JUCO transfer linebacker from Iowa Central


Iowa Central Community College linebacker Taylor Schaefer (33).

The University of Wisconsin football program dipped into the junior-college ranks for its second transfer portal addition of the offseason, adding a player who’s coming back home to play for the Badgers.

Linebacker Taylor Schaefer, a JUCO standout with deep Wisconsin roots, has announced he’s joining the Badgers for the 2026 season. The expectation is that he’ll have two years of collegiate eligibility remaining.

“Coming Home,” Schaefer wrote.

Taylor Schaefer on Instagram: “Coming Home. 🔴⚪️”

Advertisement

If the name sounds familiar, it should. Schaefer grew up in Sturgeon Bay, played his high school ball at Southern Door, and built the kind of reputation locally that usually ends with someone wearing Wisconsin colors.

It just took a few detours along the way for that moment to arrive.

Schaefer’s journey reads like the kind of story coaches love to retell on signing day. He wasn’t a national recruit out of high school. He didn’t have a mountain of Power Four offers waiting for him back then, and he didn’t land in the Big Ten conference on his first try. Instead, Schaefer carved out his path to Wisconsin the hard way: first redshirting at Minnesota Duluth, then grinding through developmental reps, and finally transferring to Iowa Central Community College to see if he could push his trajectory upward.

For taking the JUCO route, the return was about as good as it gets.

At Iowa Central, Schaefer didn’t just blend into a roster full of hungry players. He stood out. Over his JUCO career, he piled up 146 tackles, 70 solo stops, 15.0 tackles for loss, and seven sacks in 22 games, including a breakout 2025 season where Schaefer finished with 97 total tackles, 10.0 TFLs, and five sacks in just 10 games for the Tritons. Those numbers don’t happen by accident. They happen because of his motor. The instincts are real, and the physical tools match what the Badgers’ defensive scheme demands.

Advertisement

That production turned him into one of the most widely pursued defensive players in the JUCO ranks who was available in the portal. Schaefer quickly drew heavy interest, picking up scholarship offers from Arkansas, Kentucky, Iowa State, Nebraska, Purdue, Minnesota, and Colorado, among others, a far cry from the attention he received out of high school.

Programs were calling because they saw a linebacker with Big Ten measurables, proven productivity, and frame versatility at 6-foot-4 and around 240 pounds. He moved well enough to play multiple spots and had enough length and power to fit inside or bump out based on the front.

But for all the regional and national interest, the pull of Madison never really faded. Wisconsin was the dream when he was younger. Once the Badgers got Schaefer on campus for his official visit, the conversations in meeting rooms, the coaching staff’s demeanor, and the opportunity to come in and compete for snaps made the decision easier to see coming.

From Wisconsin’s perspective, the fit makes plenty of sense.

There’s no denying that, on paper, inside linebacker is one of the more talent-rich position groups returning in 2026, with Christian Alliegro, Mason Posa, and Cooper Catalano all positioned to play meaningful snaps again. But depth charts aren’t static, especially in Fickell’s program, and you’re always one injury away from seeing your rotation stretched past your comfort level.

Advertisement

Schaefer arrives as a player who can compete immediately while still offering developmental upside across multiple linebacker roles. He’s long enough to play in space, strong enough to play inside, and athletic enough to push for sub-package work potentially.

This is also the profile Wisconsin wanted in the portal: older, proven, physically ready, equipped for Big Ten football, and wired to embrace competition. He won’t be handed anything, and he doesn’t expect to be. But Schaefer gives the Badgers something their linebacker corps needed: an experienced, versatile defender who plays fast and tackles well.

His path to Madison may have detoured through the Division II ranks and JUCO ball, but there’s nothing accidental about how he got here. The progression has been steady: a redshirt year, a season Schaefer worked his way into the mix, followed by a breakout season, and now a Big Ten opportunity as a result. That’s a three-year arc that says as much about his trajectory as any camp evaluation or high-school film ever could.

This is also the kind of roster-building move that matters for Wisconsin in this particular offseason. You don’t retool a defense solely through high-school recruiting anymore. That’s not possible. Every program now has to explore every avenue, whether that’s the portal, lower-division standouts, or anything else that can bring in proven production and experience. In a win-now college football landscape, those traits matter more than ever.

The hope is that adding a player like Schaefer gives Wisconsin exactly that. He’s ready to compete and ready to continue pushing the room.

Advertisement

For the Badgers, it’s a nice early win in the portal cycle, the type that keeps the roster balanced and the depth chart insulated from attrition. And for Schaefer, it’s a homecoming that’s been years in the making.

Wisconsin still has more work to do when the Division I transfer portal opens on January 2. But adding Schaefer gives the defense another talented piece, another physical presence, and a competitor wired the way Luke Fickell prefers. It’s the kind of move that doesn’t grab national headlines, but often ends up mattering most when the pads come on.

We appreciate you taking the time to read our work at BadgerNotes.com. Your support means the world to us and has helped us become a leading independent source for Wisconsin Badgers coverage.

You can also follow Site Publisher Dillon Graff at @DillonGraff on X.





Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending