Connect with us

Wisconsin

What to know about the ‘inseminated person’ language in Wisconsin Gov. Tony Evers’ budget

Published

on

What to know about the ‘inseminated person’ language in Wisconsin Gov. Tony Evers’ budget


play

Wisconsin Gov. Tony Evers’ state budget proposal is under fire from Republicans nationwide over a provision that would change language in some areas of state law related to same-sex couples and the process of having a baby through in vitro fertilization by replacing words like “mother” and “father.”

Evers proposes to swap out “husband” and “wife” for “spouse.” In areas of state law related to legal rights to children that couples choose to have through in vitro fertilization, sperm donors or surrogates, Evers proposes replacing “woman,” “mother” and “wife” with versions of “person who is inseminated,” or “inseminated person.”

Advertisement

Here’s what to know:

The changes have been included in three budget proposals

The Democratic governor has included the changes in two previous budget proposals. They were removed by Republicans who control the state Legislature and budget-writing process in 2021 and 2023 without public discussion.

This year, however, state lawmakers and Republicans nationwide have leveled sharp criticism at Evers over the proposal, specifically for swapping out “mother” for “inseminated person.”

Rep. Amanda Nedweski, R-Pleasant Prairie, was the first to point out the changes, calling the proposal insulting to mothers.

“It is not only deeply offensive, but it is an outright attack on the very essence of motherhood,” Nedweski said in a statement released Friday. “It is unconscionable that the Governor has the audacity to take the most beautiful, life-giving act a woman can perform — bringing children into this world — and turn it into nothing more than gender-neutral, virtue-signaling  jargon to appease his far-left base.”

Advertisement

“Governor Evers is a former science teacher,” Nedweski said. “It appears to me that he needs a refresher on basic biology. Last I checked, only one gender is capable of giving birth — women. Anyone who says otherwise is denying science.”

Republicans nationwide have blasted the proposals

Since Nedweski’s comments on Friday, the proposals have received criticism from Republicans across the country.

“Hi Mom, I mean ‘inseminated person’. This is crazy!!” Elon Musk, owner of Tesla, X and SpaceX and a leader of the Department of Government Efficiency under President Donald Trump, said in a post Tuesday that was reposted about 42,000 times.

“Imagine opening a card on Mother’s Day with the message, “Happy Inseminated Person’s Day,” Republican U.S. Rep. Nancy Mace of South Carolina posted Wednesday on X.

Advertisement

“As a woman currently going through IVF I can think of countless ways I’d rather be referred to than ‘inseminated person,’” Alyssa Farah Griffin, co-host of “The View,” posted Monday.

On Tuesday, Assembly Speaker Robin Vos blasted the provisions and dismissed the idea that statutes needed to change to address situations involving fertility treatments for same-sex couples, signaling they would again be removed from the spending plan.

“It’s really one of those times where you have an answer to a problem that nobody agrees exists,” Vos said. “It’s really made Wisconsin a national embarrassment.”

Evers says the changes would provide legal clarity for same-sex couples starting families

Evers defended the provisions in an appearance Monday in Wausau, saying they are meant to provide legal clarity for same-sex couples in the process of creating or growing families through IVF.

“What we want is legal certainty that moms are able to get the care they need,” Evers said, according to WSAW. “That’s it. End of story.”

Advertisement

A spokeswoman for Evers said Republicans are lying about what the changes do.

“These are more lies, disinformation, and conspiracy theories from Republicans, Elon Musk, and right-wing extremists who are trying to politicize providing legal parental rights and certainty under the law for parents using IVF,” Evers spokeswoman Britt Cudaback said in a statement.

“Republicans are lying about the governor and budget language that’s identical to a Republican-backed bill, has nothing to do with what parents call themselves or what kids call their parents, does not eliminate ‘mother’ and ‘father’ from state law, and is about ensuring full legal rights for parents under the law. Full stop.”

The changes seek to account for court rulings legalizing same-sex marriage, requiring birth certificates to accommodate same-sex couples

According to an analysis by the nonpartisan Legislative Reference Bureau, the proposal “recognizes same-sex marriage by making references in the statutes to spouses gender-neutral, with the intent of harmonizing the Wisconsin Statutes with the holding of the U.S. Supreme Court in Obergefell v. Hodges … which recognizes that same-sex couples have a fundamental constitutional right to marriage.””The bill makes applicable to married persons of the same sex allprovisions under current law that apply to married persons of different sexes,” the analysis said. “… the bill specifies ways in which married couples of the same sex may be the legal parents of a child and, with some exceptions, makes current references in the statutes to ‘mother’ and ‘father,’ and related terms, gender-neutral.”

The proposed changes would help codify a 2016 federal court ruling requiring the state to put the names of same-sex parents on the birth certificates of their children, according to Madison-based attorney Theresa Roetter, who specializes in legal issues related to creating families.

Advertisement

The case involved a same-sex couple, Chelsea and Jessamy Torres, who were married in New York in 2012. Same-sex marriage became legal in Wisconsin in 2014. In March 2015, Chelsea gave birth in Madison to the couple’s son.

They filled out paperwork at the hospital in Madison but claimed the state health agency would not supply an accurate certificate with both Chelsea and Jessamy listed as the parents.

Their federal lawsuit pointed out that DHS issued birth certificates to children of opposite-sex couples without regard to how the child was conceived or whether both spouses were the biological parents because Wisconsin law presumes the spouse of a woman who gives birth is the father.

The changes were first proposed in 2019 and backed by a bipartisan group of lawmakers

According to drafting files related to the 2021-23 state budget bill, Evers officials included in that spending plan language from a 2019 bill that ultimately did not go anywhere.

It was supported by a group of Democratic lawmakers, including Senate and Assembly minority leaders Dianne Hesselbein of Middleton and Greta Neubauer of Racine, and two Republicans: Reps. Joel Kitchens of Sturgeon Bay and Todd Novak of Dodgeville.

Advertisement

The bill did not receive a public hearing or floor vote.

Affected state statute created in 1979

Roetter said the state statute under scrutiny was first created in 1979 to accommodate sperm donation.

“It needs to be updated for all families who need to use assisted reproduction to become parents,” Roetter said, including for same-sex couples, heterosexual couples, couples using an egg donor or donated embryos, or for a person who wants to become a single mother or single father using donated eggs, embryos or sperm.

“I know that some people feel like this is an ideological, right-left sort of issue, but I will tell you my clients are all across the board politically,” Roetter said.

Roetter said she would not have used “inseminated person” to make the changes she said are needed because it only accounts for sperm donation and suggested “intended parent” as a substitute.

Advertisement

“(The statute) only talks about somebody who’s receiving donated sperm, not (donated eggs) or embryos. So, updates are definitely needed. I just wouldn’t have used the word ‘inseminated person.’”



Source link

Wisconsin

Wisconsin teen who killed prison guard in fistfight pleads guilty but claims mental illness

Published

on

Wisconsin teen who killed prison guard in fistfight pleads guilty but claims mental illness


MADISON, Wis. — A Wisconsin teen who killed a prison guard during a fistfight pleaded guilty to homicide Friday but contends he doesn’t deserve prison time because he was mentally ill and not responsible for his actions.

Javarius Hurd, 17, entered a plea of guilty/not guilty by reason of mental disease or defect to one count of second-degree reckless homicide in connection with Corey Proulx’s death, online court records show. He also pleaded guilty to one count of battery by a prisoner. Prosecutors dropped a second battery count in exchange for the pleas.

The next step for Hurd will be a February trial in which jurors will determine whether he should be sentenced to prison or committed to a mental institution. Jurors will be asked to determine whether Hurd was indeed suffering from a mental disease at the time of the fight and, if so, whether the mental disease impaired his ability to act within the law.

“Javarius entered into a plea agreement that partially resolves the case involving the sad and tragic death of (Proulx),” Hurd’s attorney, Aaton Nelson, said in an email to The Associated Press. “Javarius, who has had a life filled with trauma and suffering, realizes that nothing will compensate the victims for their loss and suffering. We hope that this agreement will help all those suffering with their healing.”

Advertisement

According to court documents, Hurd was incarcerated at the Lincoln Hills-Copper Lakes School, the state’s youth prison in far northern Wisconsin, in June 2024.

He grew upset with a female counselor whom he felt was abusing her powers, threw soap at her and punched her. Hurd ran into the courtyard and Proulx followed to stop him. Hurd punched Proulx several times and Proulx fell, hit his head on the pavement and later died. Hurd was 16 at the time but was charged in adult court.

Another inmate at the youth prison, Rian Nyblom, pleaded guilty to two counts of being a party to battery in connection with the incident and was sentenced to five years in prison this past August.

According to prosecutors, Nyblom knew that Hurd was upset with the female counselor and wanted to splash her with conditioner and punch her. About 15 minutes before the fighting began, he got extra soap and conditioner from guards and secretly gave it to Hurd. Nyblom told investigators that he didn’t see Hurd attack the female counselor but watched as Hurd punched Proulx.

Lincoln Hills-Cooper Lake is Wisconsin’s only youth prison. The facility has been plagued by allegations of staff-on-inmate abuse, including excessive use of pepper spray, restraints and strip searches.

Advertisement

The American Civil Liberties Union filed a federal lawsuit in 2017 demanding changes at the prison. Then-Gov. Scott Walker’s administration settled the following year by agreeing to a consent decree that prohibited the use of mechanical restraints like handcuffs and the use of pepper spray.

Proulx’s death sparked calls from Republican lawmakers and from Lincoln Hills-Copper Lakes staff for more leeway in punishing incarcerated children, but Democratic Gov. Tony Evers rejected those calls, insisting conditions at the prison have been slowly improving. A court-appointed monitor assigned to oversee the prison’s progress reported this past October that the facility was fully compliant with the consent decree’s provisions for the first time.

Legislators have been trying to find a way to close the facility for years and replace with it with smaller regional prisons. Those prisons remain under construction, however, and Lincoln Hills-Copper Lake continues to operate.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Wisconsin

‘Play is the work of a child’: Wisconsin parents back bill that would double daily recess

Published

on

‘Play is the work of a child’: Wisconsin parents back bill that would double daily recess


MADISON, Wis. (WMTV) – A proposal at the state Capitol would require Wisconsin schools to increase daily recess time for students in kindergarten through sixth grade, with supporters saying more opportunities for unstructured play could improve focus, behavior and overall well-being.

Assembly Bill 810 would require public schools to provide 60 minutes of recess each school day for K-6 students, doubling the amount many schools currently offer. The bill has been referred to the Legislature’s education committee.

The bill’s author, State Rep. William Penterman of Hustisford, said the proposal is based on research showing physical activity supports learning and child development.

“Especially younger kids, like our elementary kids, it’s so important that they get moving throughout the day,” Penterman said. “We’re trying to get our kids to learn and develop mentally, emotionally, but also physically.”

Advertisement

Penterman emphasized the bill is not intended to extend the school day or reduce instructional time. Instead, he said schools could restructure existing schedules to include more frequent movement breaks.

“We’re not looking to expand the school day. Absolutely not,” Penterman said. “It’s already set. We’re going to leave it at that. It’s about increasing efficiencies.”

The proposal would give schools flexibility in how the time is scheduled, allowing recess to be broken into multiple shorter periods throughout the day.

“But 60 minutes of play a day — it could be three 20-minute recesses. It could be two 30-minute recesses,” Penterman said.

Parents in the Madison Metropolitan School District say concerns about limited recess became apparent once their children came home from school.

Advertisement

“I saw that we only had 30 minutes of recess at our school, and I felt like that wasn’t enough,” said Victoria Carey, a parent with a child in elementary school.

Carey said she initially assumed recess policies were determined by individual schools or districts, but later learned minimum requirements are set at the state level.

“So I looked into — is that our school’s policy? Is that our district’s policy?” Carey said. “And then I realized that it wasn’t either of those. Really, it was the state.”

Ally Grigg, another MMSD parent and former teacher, said a lack of movement during the school day can lead to challenges with emotional regulation and behavior at home.

“If that need is not being met at school, they come home, and my experience is my child frequently has meltdowns as soon as she gets home,” Grigg said. “A lot of times they have a lot of energy and they’re bouncing off the walls because they didn’t get that out during the day.”

Advertisement

Grigg and Carey are part of a parent-led advocacy effort ‘Say Yes to Recess’, pushing for increased recess time statewide. They say their goal is not to burden teachers or administrators, but to recognize play as a meaningful part of the learning process.

“They are great tinkerers, little scientists, as they’re referred to often,” Carey said. “And they do that through play. I think recess is a great opportunity for play to practice what they’re learning in the classroom and with each other.”

Carey said parents they’ve spoken with, including some educators, often share similar concerns, even if there are questions about how additional recess would fit into already packed schedules.

“Most of the reaction is very positive,” Carey said. “Everybody agrees that kids need recess. It’s really about finding the balance between instructional time and what kids need developmentally.”

Penterman said the bill was shaped after an earlier proposal focused on increasing overall physical activity faced pushback over concerns about unfunded mandates.

Advertisement

“So we kind of revamped it and looked at it,” he said. “What’s something we already have existing in place now that we can just expand?”

The Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction said it is in the process of analyzing the legislation and does not yet have an official position.

The bill is still early in the legislative process. Penterman said he hopes the proposal encourages broader discussion about how schools balance academic demands with students’ physical and mental health.

“Play is the work of a child,” Penterman said, quoting educator Maria Montessori. “And it’s so important to their development.”

Click here to download the WMTV15 News app or our WMTV15 First Alert weather app.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Wisconsin

Wisconsin DHS reaffirms childhood vaccine recommendations after CDC changes

Published

on

Wisconsin DHS reaffirms childhood vaccine recommendations after CDC changes


The Wisconsin Department of Health Services on Thursday reaffirmed its recommended childhood vaccine schedule after recent changes at the federal level.

Wisconsin vaccine guidance

Local perspective:

Advertisement

On Monday, the U.S. Centers for Disease Control announced changes to its childhood vaccine schedule. The DHS said those modifications further stray “from alignment with America’s leading medical associations and organizations.”

FREE DOWNLOAD: Get breaking news alerts in the FOX LOCAL Mobile app for iOS or Android

Advertisement

At this time, the DHS said it is not making changes to its vaccine recommendations – including no changes to Wisconsin’s school or child care vaccine recommendations.

The DHS said it continues to endorse the American Academy of Pediatrics schedule and has issued guidance to Wisconsin health care providers reaffirming that recommendation.

What they’re saying:

Advertisement

“The CDC’s new recommendations were based on a brief review of other countries’ practices and not based on data or evidence regarding disease risks to children in the United States,” DHS Secretary Kirsten Johnson said in a statement. “This upends our longstanding, evidence-based approach of protecting our children from the viruses that pose a risk in our country.

“Copying another country’s schedule without its health and social infrastructure will not produce the same health outcomes. It creates chaos and confusion and risks the health of Wisconsin’s youngest and most vulnerable citizens.”

Advertisement

Big picture view:

The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services said the CDC will continue to recommend that all children are immunized against 10 diseases for which there is international consensus, as well as chickenpox.

The updated schedule is in contrast to the CDC child and adolescent schedule at the end of 2024, which recommended 17 immunizations for all children. On the new schedule, vaccines – such as those for hepatitis A and B, meningitis, rotavirus and seasonal flu – are now more restricted. They are recommended only for those at high risk or after consultation with a health care provider. 

Advertisement

What they’re saying:

“President Trump directed us to examine how other developed nations protect their children and to take action if they are doing better,” Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. said. “After an exhaustive review of the evidence, we are aligning the U.S. childhood vaccine schedule with international consensus while strengthening transparency and informed consent. This decision protects children, respects families, and rebuilds trust in public health.”

Advertisement

The Source: The Wisconsin DHS released information about its childhood vaccine recommendations. Information about the CDC changes is from LiveNOW from FOX with contributions from The Associated Press.

HealthWisconsinNews



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending