Connect with us

Wisconsin

What 5 Wisconsin eighth graders want to know about the state’s pivotal midterm elections

Published

on

What 5 Wisconsin eighth graders want to know about the state’s pivotal midterm elections


Studying about elections can begin earlier than college students are sufficiently old to vote.

Wisconsin Public Radio’s “The Morning Present” just lately requested eighth graders what they needed to find out about elections. WPR’s Capitol Bureau Chief Shawn Johnson joined the present with solutions. 

Past native elections and different poll measures, the statewide races in Wisconsin embody governor, lieutenant governor, secretary of state, treasurer, legal professional normal and federal races for U.S. Senate and Home of Representatives. 

READ MORE: Election protection from WPR for the 2022 fall midterms

Advertisement

The next interview with questions from Fox Level-Bayside College District college students was edited for brevity and readability. First, two college students requested about political adverts.  

Jack: Does promoting and cash have an effect on how effectively a candidate does?

Jacob: How do politicians determine how you can goal political adverts, and are they efficient? 

Shawn Johnson: It is onerous to overstate the importance of how a candidate can spend cash or have cash spent on their behalf and run these adverts that blanket the TV airwaves and social media feeds of Wisconsin with promoting for his or her campaigns. 

You see this play out in several methods. In a detailed state like Wisconsin, individuals who have cash or who wish to spend cash on politics are likely to wish to spend it right here as a result of our races are so aggressive. They matter a lot by way of what occurs in state and federal authorities. And so, donors spend cash on our candidates. That tells you that they assume it issues. 

Advertisement

You may generally see extra money begin to stream to candidates who appear to be they’ve a greater probability of successful. These donors are saying, “We’ll guess on you.”

Sorina: How will the completely different generations of voters impression the midterm elections based mostly on how their age teams and generations view present occasions? 

SJ: Usually, I might say to Sorina that it’ll be perhaps her dad and mom, perhaps her grandparents who’re going to vote extra in a given election. They characterize a big bloc of voters in any given election. So, for instance, in 2018 over the last midterm election: 

  • 18-29 12 months olds had turnout of about 36 p.c, which means out of the eligible 18-29 12 months olds, a little bit greater than 1 out of three of them voted. 
  • Out of eligible 30-44 12 months olds, nearly 50 p.c of them voted. 
  • Out of eligible 45-64 12 months olds, 60 p.c of them voted. 
  • And if you rise up to voters who’re 65 or older, 2 out of three of them voted — 66 p.c.

So, the older you get, the extra apt you might be to vote. And so, campaigns and candidates take note of these voters. I’ll say that in 2018, voter turnout was up for a midterm, and it was up for youthful voters. And in 2020, turnout was up — means up — for youthful voters in comparison with what we often see. About half of them voted. I feel although, usually, you see a decrease turnout in a midterm.

Julianna: How does one qualify to be part of the midterm elections? 

SJ: The brief reply is you simply should get signatures from a bunch of adults to get on the poll in Wisconsin. 

Advertisement

So, to run for U.S. Senate, you must be 30 years outdated; U.S. Home of Representatives, 25. To run for governor or different state places of work, you need to be 18. After which to get on the poll for the U.S. Senate, governor, lieutenant governor, legal professional normal, treasurer, secretary of state or Wisconsin Supreme Courtroom, you want 2,000 legitimate signatures on a nominating petition that you simply or another person circulated in your behalf that claims, “I wish to get this individual on the poll.”

Join every day information!

Keep knowledgeable with WPR’s e-mail publication.

To get on the poll for the U.S. Home of Representatives, it is 1,000 signatures. For state Senate, it is 400 signatures. For state Meeting — your state consultant in Madison, one in all 99 folks within the state Meeting — they should get 200 signatures. So very, very approachable by way of getting on the poll.

Advertisement

Now, successful elections, that may be a special story. However the boundaries to entry for getting on the poll in Wisconsin are fairly low. 

Quinn: How do candidates get the cash for campaigning? 

SJ: That may be a nice query, and it has turn out to be an increasing number of sophisticated over time. So, in Wisconsin, there are contribution limits for various places of work. A donor can solely give a lot to candidates for various places of work. So, a donor may give someone who’s operating for governor as much as $20,000. For state Senate, as much as $2,000. State Meeting, as much as $1,000. In case you take a look at federal places of work like U.S. Senate and Home, I feel it is $2,900 per election. 

However — and it is a huge caveat right here — in Wisconsin, folks could make limitless contributions to the state political events, and the state events could make limitless contributions to the candidates, principally. So, if I am a billionaire and I wish to contribute a couple of million {dollars} to the Democratic Celebration of Wisconsin or the Republican Celebration of Wisconsin, I can try this. Really, that is been an efficient fundraising instrument for the Wisconsin Democratic Celebration for the previous few cycles.

You even have outdoors teams, like within the U.S. Senate race, one of many huge gamers for Republicans has been Wisconsin Fact PAC (political motion committee). It is a Republican tremendous PAC, and its funders are nearly solely Diane Hendricks, and Richard and Elizabeth Uihlein — distinguished billionaire Republican donors … They spend huge on elections across the nation, they usually’re spending huge on behalf of U.S. Sen. Ron Johnson in that race. So, there are such a lot of ways in which cash can stream to elections.

Advertisement

Within the state Meeting, it typically depends extra on a candidate going on the market, elevating cash and placing in work to have the sources they should run their marketing campaign. However even within the state Meeting, if it is a actually aggressive district, outdoors cash goes to stream into the race, as a result of folks know these races matter a lot. 



Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Wisconsin

Wisconsin RB enters transfer portal. NCAA waiver gives senior another year of eligibility

Published

on

Wisconsin RB enters transfer portal. NCAA waiver gives senior another year of eligibility


play

MADISON – A recent court ruling has opened the door for former junior college players to gain another year of NCAA eligibility.

It appears that Tawee Walker is going to take advantage of the opportunity.

Advertisement

According to On3, Wisconsin’s senior running back will enter the transfer portal in search of a home for next season. The news came one day after the NCAA approved a blanket waiver granting one more year of eligibility to athletes who competed at a non-NCAA school for one or more years and would have otherwise exhausted their eligibility during the 2024-25 school year.

Walker fits the bill. He played the the 2021 season at Palomar College. a junior college in San Marcos, California, before competing for Oklahoma in 2022 and ’23 and Wisconsin this season. The NCAA counts his junior college season towards his four years of college eligibility.

The waiver stems from a case brought forward by Vanderbilt quarterback Diego Pavia. A Tennessee court ruled that counting the two seasons he played at a junior college toward his NCAA eligibility violated the Sherman Antitrust Act.

Walker, a 5-foot-9, 218-pound Las Vegas native, led the Badgers with 864 yards in 190 carries, a 4.5-yard average, and scored 10 touchdowns.

He begin the season sharing the No. 1 tailback role with Chez Mellusi and blossomed after Mellusi took what proved to be a permanent leave Oct. 3.

Advertisement

As Wisconsin’s primary ball carrier Walker ran for 718 yards in 152 carries, a 4.7-yard average, with nine touchdowns.

His best stretch was a three-game run against Purdue, Rutgers and Northwestern when he gained 418 yards in 66 carries, a 6.3-yard average, and scored six times.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Wisconsin

2024 Wisconsin Badgers Positional Review: Safeties

Published

on

2024 Wisconsin Badgers Positional Review: Safeties


2024 Wisconsin Badgers Positional Review: Safeties

Wisconsin football saw its season end without bowl practices for the first time since 2001. The Badgers hit a new low this century in year two of the Luke Fickell era, and will face a critical get-right year in 2025.

Over the next two weeks, BadgerBlitz.com will examine the 2024 Badgers position by position. Today, we’ll wrap up the series with the safeties, a unit that helped anchor a strong defensive backfield in 2024.

POSITIONAL REVIEWS: Quarterbacks | Running Backs | Wide Receivers | Tight Ends | Offensive Line | Defensive Line | Outside Linebackers | Inside Linebackers | Cornerbacks

Advertisement

2024 HIGH: Preston Zachman’s continued development

Redshirt senior Preston Zachman continued his development into a highly reliable safety in 2024, and even better news? He’s coming back next fall.

Zachman became somewhat of a surprise starter alongside Hunter Wohler last season, but he played well in the process, displaying his football IQ and a knack for being in the right place in the right time. He continued to take steps in a positive direction this season, posting a career-best stat-line of 58 total tackles, 2.5 tackles-for-loss, two interceptions and four pass breakups.

The safety has a penchant for making routine plays routinely. He missed just six tackles on 753 total snaps, per Pro Football Focus. He also surrendered just one touchdown across 366 coverage snaps. But Zachman can also make the big play. His most impressive rep of the season was likely his interception in Los Angeles, pictured above. In coverage against dynamic slot weapon Zachariah Branch, a matchup most would deem a mismatch, he blanketed the receiver, bodied him at the catch point, reeled in the interception and talked smack in the star pass-catcher’s face after the whistle.

Advertisement

The ball skills he displayed were impressive, but it was also a clinic in technique and positioning. Zachman is one of the most fundamentally sound players on Mike Tressel‘s defense, and his return for 2025 is massive for a secondary that figures to be relatively inexperienced and also just lost its best player in Wohler.

2024 LOW: Hunter Wohler vs. USC

Interestingly enough, one of Zachman’s best games (USC) was also one of Wohler’s worst. He gave up two touchdowns in the second half alone, helping the Trojans complete the comeback victory.

With time dwindling in the third quarter, USC faced a 3rd-and-7 from the Badgers eight yard-line. Wisconsin sent six pass-rushers after Trojans’ quarterback Miller Moss, leaving five one-on-ones in coverage against a five wide look. That included Wohler on the 6-foot-6 wideout Duce Robinson.

Robinson ran a skinny post and simply boxed Wohler out to reel in a touchdown, looking like a forward pulling down a rebound over a guard. It’s hard to blame Wohler for giving up four inches of height to the physical specimen of a wideout, but still, the safety was directly responsible for that touchdown.

Wohler gave up a touchdown on the very next drive as well. The Trojans marched down the field in nine plays but were faced with a 4th-and-1 on the Badgers’ seven yard line. Moss ran a read option, and kept the ball with outside linebacker Aaron Witt crashing off the strong side. Wohler read the play well, and came face-to-face with Moss in the open field. If he made the tackle, it would’ve been a turnover on downs. Instead, Moss hit him with a filthy spin move, breaking the safety’s ankles and scoring a touchdown. Another straight-up mano a mano that Wohler lost resulting in a touchdown, on consecutive drives no less.

Advertisement

ONE STORYLINE TO FOLLOW BEFORE THE 2025 SEASON: Which transfer nabs a starting role?

With the return of Zachman and Austin Brown, Wisconsin is in a solid spot at safety. The Badgers have two experienced starters, in addition to a plethora of young players including four true freshmen. Zachman and Brown both figure to be starters given their experience and solid play in 2024. But if we’ve learned anything about Tressel’s defense over the course of two seasons, it’s that he deploys three safeties frequently. Especially given the fact that Wisconsin figures to be inexperienced at cornerback with just four corners currently on the roster, safeties can be expected to play plenty of snaps.

The Badgers have signed two transfers at safety at the time of writing: Matthew Traynor (FCS Richmond) and Matt Jung (D-III Bethel). Traynor is a versatile safety who can line up anywhere, while Jung absolutely stuffed the stat-sheet at the D-III level. Both figure to get plenty of run behind Zachman and Brown. But which player looks more dynamic? Who appears to be adjusting to Big Ten competition better? Where in the alignment does either player line up? These will be critical questions to answer this spring and into fall camp.

_________________________________________________

*Chat about this article in The Badgers’ Den

*Check out our videos, interviews, and Q&As on our YouTube channel

Advertisement

*Subscribe and listen to the BadgerBlitz.com podcast (as seen on Apple, Google, Spotify and wherever you listen to podcasts)

*Follow us on Twitter: @McNamaraRivals, @TheBadgerNation, @_Perko_, @seamus_rohrer, @DonnieSlusher_

*Like us on Facebook





Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Wisconsin

Wisconsin basketball receives votes in latest men’s AP, Coaches polls

Published

on

Wisconsin basketball receives votes in latest men’s AP, Coaches polls


Despite earning a 23-point win over Detroit Mercy, the Wisconsin men received fewer votes in both the AP and Coaches Poll Top 25s, which were released on Monday.

The Badgers (10-3, 0-2) stretched their win streak to two following three straight losses, which included two in Big Ten play. Wisconsin returns to league action on Friday, Jan. 3 when they welcome Iowa to Madison.

In the AP Poll, the Badgers picked up nine votes, as No. 25 Baylor received 125. In the Coaches Poll, Wisconsin got seven votes, with No. 25 Purdue receiving 73.

Oregon is the highest-ranked Big Ten team in both rankings, coming in at No. 9. Michigan State is 18th in both with Purdue No. 21 in the AP Poll followed by UCLA, with Illinois No. 24. In the Coaches Poll, UCLA is 21st, Illinois is 22nd and Purdue is 25th.

Advertisement

Tennessee remained No. 1, receiving the majority of the first-place votes. SEC rival Auburn is second followed by Iowa State and Duke. 

Here is the college basketball men’s AP Coaches Poll Top 25 for Week 8:

(Dec. 23)

1. Tennessee (41)

2. Auburn (21)

Advertisement

3. Iowa State

4. Duke

5. Alabama

6. Florida

7. Kansas

Advertisement

8. Marquette

9. Oregon

10. Kentucky

11. Connecticut

12. Oklahoma

Advertisement

13. Texas A&M

14. Gonzaga

15. Houston

16. Mississippi

17. Cincinnati

Advertisement

18. Michigan State

19. Mississippi State

20. San Diego State

21. Purdue

22. UCLA

Advertisement

23. Arkansas

24. Illinois

25. Baylor

Others receiving votes: Maryland 119, Dayton 108, Drake 91, St. John’s 90, Memphis 65, Michigan 50, Georgia 45, Pittsburgh 27, West Virginia 26, Missouri 25, Ohio State 23, North Carolina 20, Clemson 18, Arizona State 13, Utah State 9, Wisconsin 9, Texas Tech 8, Indiana 8, St. Bonaventure 4, Penn State 3.

Dropped from rankings: Memphis 21, Dayton 22, Michigan 24, Clemson 25.

Advertisement

Here is the college basketball men’s Coaches Poll Top 25 for Week 8:

(Dec. 23)

1. Tennessee (20)

2. Auburn (11)

3. Iowa State

Advertisement

4. Duke

5. Florida

6. Alabama

7. Kansas

8. Marquette

Advertisement

9. Oregon

10. Kentucky

11. Oklahoma

12. Houston

13. Texas A&M

Advertisement

14. Connecticut

15. Gonzaga

16. Mississippi

17. Cincinnati

18. Michigan State

Advertisement

19. Mississippi State

20. San Diego State

21. UCLA

22. Illinois

23. Baylor

Advertisement

24. St. John’s

25. Purdue

Others receiving votes: Maryland 65; Michigan 52; Drake 51; Arkansas 51; Georgia 42; Clemson 40; Dayton 28; Memphis 25; Pittsburgh 22; Utah State 14; Texas Tech 9; Wisconsin 7; North Carolina 6; Missouri 6; West Virginia 5; Penn State 1.

Dropped from rankings: Michigan 21; Memphis 22; Dayton 24.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending