Wisconsin
‘Rain, rain, go away’: NE Wisconsin farmers asking for a break from Mother Nature
![‘Rain, rain, go away’: NE Wisconsin farmers asking for a break from Mother Nature](https://gray-wbay-prod.cdn.arcpublishing.com/resizer/v2/L5UQBY3L2BEKROKZIORI22K2VI.jpg?auth=e8ea9e3b20bfbbd5ac904508757d3da855167f5aba33e428265851e888c99e53&width=1200&height=600&smart=true)
GRAND CHUTE, Wis. (WBAY) – Northeast Wisconsin farmers are asking for the rain to stop, as it’s hurting their chances of planting and harvesting their crops.
This comes after a drought was declared last year due to the dry conditions farmers were facing.
Last year, farmers were concerned that it was too dry for their crops hoping for more precipitation. This year the amount of rain we’ve gotten might be too much of a good thing.
Mark Petersen of Petersen Dairy Farm says he hasn’t been able to consistently get out onto his fields because of the weather. Many of the crops he has planted are under too much moisture, while crops waiting to get put into the ground may not make it in time. He says he’s heard multiple farmers complain about this year’s season as they remain at the mercy of round after round of rain.
“We’ve still got some dry hay to harvest yet and that’s a nightmare,” says Petersen. “We can’t do it because of the weather forecast. It should’ve been harvested optimum the last week of May so we’re getting a month late and it’s getting overly ripe and feed quality is not worth a darn at this point.”
Last year, farmers were dealing with the effects of a flash drought in late May that turned into a full drought in late June and lasted until about March of this year. Around April, heavy showers started to help farmers, but now it has become too much rain for them to plant and harvest their crops.
Regional crops and soil educator Kevin Jarek says that soil typically has 25% pore space and 25% moisture. When he was gathering soil samples in March, the percentage of moisture was between 16 and 23%, which Jarek says is unheard of for that time of year.
“For that number to be down at 16, 20, 23% during a time when the soil should have been the wettest, we were sincerely worried about ‘Are we going to have moisture to grow our crops if we plant them in the ground’,” says Jarek.
Jarek says farmers can plant cover crops, which will help benefit soil health and control erosion, but it may not be enough.
“It’s going to be too late to try and plant corn and soybeans and have those crops reach maturity, so we do the best we can,” says Jarek.
Jarek says farmers do have insurance and preventative planning payments that are available during times like this, but says it doesn’t come close to replacing what a farmer has lost.
Copyright 2024 WBAY. All rights reserved.
![](https://newspub.live/wp-content/uploads/2022/03/np-logo.png)
Wisconsin
Wisconsin Supreme Court says an order against an anti-abortion protester violated First Amendment
![Wisconsin Supreme Court says an order against an anti-abortion protester violated First Amendment](https://www.gannett-cdn.com/authoring/authoring-images/2024/06/27/PDTN/74231810007-ap-23261605374913.jpg?auto=webp&crop=5273,2967,x0,y274&format=pjpg&width=1200)
Madison, Wis. – The Wisconsin Supreme Court ruled Thursday that an order barring an anti-abortion protester from coming close to a Planned Parenthood nurse violated his First Amendment free speech rights and must be overturned.
The court, controlled 4-3 by liberals, ruled unanimously in ordering that the injunction be dismissed.
A Trempealeu County judge in 2020 barred Brian Aish from being near nurse Nancy Kindschy who sometimes worked in a small family planning clinic in the western Wisconsin city of Blair. Kindschy said Aish threatened her by saying bad things would happen to her or her family if she didn’t quit her job.
Aish had argued that his comments, made from a public sidewalk, were protected free speech under the First Amendment. The Wisconsin Supreme Court agreed.
Aish regularly protested between 2014 and 2019 at the clinic, primarily holding up signs quoting Bible verses and preaching his Christian and anti-abortion beliefs, according to the court ruling. But starting in 2019, Aish began directing his comments toward Kindschy, targeting her with messages that she argued were threatening.
In October 2019, Aish said that Kindschy had time to repent and “it won’t be long before bad things will happen to you and your family” and that “you could get killed by a drunk driver tonight,” according to the court.
The Trempealeu County judge issued a four-year injunction barring Aish from being near Kindschy. Aish appealed. A state appeals court upheld the injunction against Aish in 2022, but the Supreme Court on Thursday ordered that it be dismissed.
While the Wisconsin case was pending, the U.S. Supreme Court issued a ruling in 2023 that made it more difficult to convict a person of making a violent threat. That case involved a Colorado man who was convicted of stalking a musician.
In that case, the nation’s highest court said prosecutors must show that “the defendant had some subjective understanding of the threatening nature of his statements” and that “the defendant consciously disregarded a substantial risk that his communications would be viewed as threatening violence.”
The Wisconsin Supreme Court cited that ruling in its order Thursday, saying the lower court had failed to find that Aish “consciously disregarded a substantial risk that his communications would be viewed as threatening violence.”
“Aish’s statements could not be true threats of violence because he disclaimed any desire for violence to befall Kindschy,” Justice Rebecca Bradley wrote in a separate opinion, concurring with the majority one written by Justice Rebecca Dallet.
Attorneys for Aish and Kindschy did not return messages.
Kindschy has since retired and the clinic where she worked is now closed.
Wisconsin
Forum For Wisconsin Assembly Dist. 73 – Fox21Online
![Forum For Wisconsin Assembly Dist. 73 – Fox21Online](https://www.fox21online.com/content/uploads/2024/06/m/q/66686eca6a1796f10706212e71857ea4df17d204.jpg)
SUPERIOR, Wis.– Two democrats vying for for Wisconsin Assembly Dist. 73 held a public forum in Superior this evening.
This comes after Republican Representative Angie Sapik announced she would not seek re-election after the redistricting maps were approved.
District 73 now covers the northern portion of Douglas and Bayfield counties.
Wednesday evening, Candidates John Adams and Angela Stroud answered submitted questions from residents.
The two appearing to agree on the majority of the topics. They both are against the proposed Nemadji Trail Energy Center, they agree there’s a serious need for affordable housing and are on the same page with tougher gun control regulations.
“This is a country with a 2nd amendment that the court has defined as an individual right. We have a strong gun culture, we also can absolutely regulate guns,” said Stroud. “There is nothing in statute that says that regulation is a violation of our second amendment.”
“I think the responsibly of a legislator is to finally craft those red flag laws that keep oversight on a judge that’s going to have to make that difficult decision to take away a person’s gun,” said Adams.
The republican candidate for District 73 is Frank Kostka, who says one of his goals is to support good paying jobs in Northern Wisconsin.
The primary election is August 13, the general election–November 5.
Wisconsin
Utah man convicted of impersonating federal officer, scamming Wisconsin families
![Utah man convicted of impersonating federal officer, scamming Wisconsin families](https://gray-wbay-prod.cdn.arcpublishing.com/resizer/v2/M5W37ZAU4JDZLJHJVSEXRN44QI.jpg?auth=5b7f634f4733df2c293ab4a26c3e68973fc2605befb5cc73556360b3a04d0f01&width=1200&height=600&smart=true)
MILWAUKEE, Wis. (WBAY) – A man from Utah has been sentenced to over a year in prison for wire fraud and impersonating a federal officer.
Juan Carlos Martinez-Napoles, 38, of Utah was sentenced to 15 months in federal prison on Tuesday. He’s also been ordered to pay restitution to his victims and will serve two years of supervised release.
According to court documents, between September 2018 and December 2019, Martinez-Napoles posed as an immigration agent from the United States Citizenship and Immigration Services and told victims he could assist them in achieving legal status in the U.S. for a fee. He convinced three Wisconsin families to pay him around $45,000, and threatened to have members of one of those families deported if they didn’t pay him.
“Fraudulently posing as a USCIS agent, Mr. Martinez-Napoles took advantage of vulnerable individuals, whom he convinced to pay a total of over $45,000 for his ‘help,’” said U.S. Attorney Haanstad. “In reality, he was simply lying to these individuals to line his own pockets. And when a victim questioned his activities, Mr. Martinez-Napoles even threatened to have the victim’s family deported. I commend the hard work of everyone who helped bring Mr. Martinez-Napoles to justice and commend the victims for their willingness to cooperate with the legitimate federal authorities in this matter.”
“Posing as a government official as Martinez-Napoles did for the purposes of exploiting and victimizing other individuals is intolerable,” said Special Agent in Charge Sean Fitzgerald of HSI Chicago. “HSI will continue to work with our law enforcement partners to hold such offenders accountable for their crimes.”
Copyright 2024 WBAY. All rights reserved.
-
News1 week ago
NYC pastor is sentenced to 9 years for fraud, including taking a single mom's $90,000
-
Movie Reviews1 week ago
Fancy Dance (2024) – Movie Review
-
News1 week ago
Read the Ruling by the Virginia Court of Appeals
-
Crypto1 week ago
Idris Elba Promotes Cryptocurrency in West Africa – BORGEN
-
Politics1 week ago
Trump targets House Freedom Caucus chair in intra-party Republican primary feud
-
News6 days ago
Tracking a Single Day at the National Domestic Violence Hotline
-
Politics6 days ago
Trump classified docs judge to weigh alleged 'unlawful' appointment of Special Counsel Jack Smith
-
News6 days ago
Supreme Court upholds law barring domestic abusers from owning guns in major Second Amendment ruling | CNN Politics