Connect with us

Wisconsin

Meet Leyton Nelson, the Badgers’ first spring transfer commit

Published

on

Meet Leyton Nelson, the Badgers’ first spring transfer commit


Leyton Nelson experienced the wide-ranging emotions of entering the transfer portal this month, but he quickly found relief in Madison.

Nelson, who played at Vanderbilt the past two seasons, made the decision to move on from the SEC program and look for a new collegiate home.

Advertisement

“Definitely stressful prior to entering the portal, because a big thing is you don’t want to be the one to almost be like, I guess, selfish in that moment,” Nelson said. “But once you enter that portal and you get a lot of followers, you hear from directors of player personnel, all the scouting and coaches, it’s a little bit of a sigh of relief, I guess.

“But also at the same time in the moments, there’s a lot going on. Like who do I focus on? How would I be able to shorten this list down to be the most beneficial to myself?”

His stay in the transfer portal was relatively brief. Nelson announced his commitment to Wisconsin on Monday.

People are also reading…

Advertisement

Here are five things to know about him upon his impending arrival to Madison.

Nelson’s initial recruiting process took him to the SEC

Nelson was a high three-star recruit in the 2022 class, according to 247Sports, Rivals and ESPN. 247Sports composite rankings, whose algorithm computes ratings from the four major recruitng outlets, lists him as the No. 45 offensive tackle during that cycle.

Advertisement

As a high school recruit, Nelson announced notable offers from Cincinnati, Florida, Florida State, Miami, Penn State, South Carolina, Southern Cal and Tennessee, among others, before signing with Vanderbilt.

What led Nelson to move on from Vanderbilt

Nelson participated in 12 games for the Commodores with the Badgers’ new offensive line coach, A.J. Blazek, as his position coach. The vast majority of that playing time came last season (11), and Vanderbilt’s profile of the Orlando native states he played 60 snaps in 2023. 

Nelson said he told the Vanderbilt staff about his intentions the Friday before the opening of the spring transfer portal window, which runs from April 16 through April 30.

 

“The big thing was just a level of trust between coaching,” Nelson said. “It’s a whole new offensive staff, and I didn’t really get that relationship piece from all of them. And the OC, I didn’t really have that many words with. I think that’s a huge thing for me, is the idea of relationships.”

Advertisement

Why he committed to Wisconsin

Wisconsin director of recruiting Pat Lambert reached out, according to Nelson. The two had a prior connection when Lambert was part of Cincinnati’s staff that offered Nelson under Fickell. Contact from Blazek, his former position coach, soon followed.

Nelson and his mother were quickly in Madison for an official visit that started last Wednesday. He watched the April 18 spring practice and left that evening. 

The offensive line room, unsurprisingly, stood out the most during his visit.

“They know that they need help in the O-line room, and I think that’s a big one for me,” Nelson said. “And just getting to hang out with all the guys, young and old, I think was a good part to it, to see there’s some gaps to be filled with age also in the O-line room.”

It took less than a week for Nelson to announce his intentions to transfer to Wisconsin.

Advertisement

“Coming to a program that the expectation of more than just winning, getting to a bowl game and just getting to those championship games is huge for me,” Nelson said. “Also, where O-line is a priority for the whole program, not just the offense itself. Like that’s known there, it’s not just talked about. That’s two big things … and then also just knowing coach Blaz as a prior relationship.”

How he was used at Vanderbilt

Vanderbilt listed Nelson at 6-foot-6 and 308 pounds on last season’s roster. He played a unique role within the’ offense where PFF gave him a 71.9 grade in run blocking.

“I played strong tackle at Vandy,” Nelson said. “That’s where we go to the strength of the formation, so I played left and right basically. It’s like an average of 50% both ways.”

Where could Nelson fit within Wisconsin’s offensive line?

The Badgers’ offensive line received some hits in its depth during the offsesaon. Tanor Bortolini, who versatility shined at Wisconsin, moved on to professional aspirations and now awaits where he could land in the 2024 NFL Draft later this week. 

Three players — Trey Wedig (Indiana), Dylan Barrett (Iowa State) and Nolan Rucci (Penn State) — entered the transfer portal and found new homes at Power Four schools. Barrett Nelson has suited up but not participated in any of the 11 spring practices through Tuesday.

Advertisement

The lack of depth in this position group has affected Wisconsin during the spring. Blazek has given second-team reps to true freshmen early enrollees Kevin Heywood and Colin Cubberly. Cubberly has needed to play both within the interior and out at right tackle.

Leyton Nelson, along with 2024 signees Ryan Cory, Derek Jensen and Emerson Mandell, should provide more scholarship bodies to the position group overall once they arrive later this year.

“And then over at Wisconsin, coach Blaz said, ‘You just got to come in and basically fight for any spot, whatever we’re going through, and I’m not gonna guarantee you anything,’” Nelson said. “And I said, ‘Just be upfront with me. I’m going to come in ready to work swinging basically,’ because I don’t want to settle for second string at all. That’s not me.

“It could be anywhere. I can play interior, exterior (offensive line). Doesn’t matter to me.” 



Source link

Advertisement

Wisconsin

Wisconsin utilities expand clean energy as U.S. prepares to exit Paris Climate Agreement

Published

on

Wisconsin utilities expand clean energy as U.S. prepares to exit Paris Climate Agreement


GREEN BAY (WLUK) — As the United States prepares to withdraw from the Paris Climate Agreement, utilities in Wisconsin are ramping up their clean energy initiatives.

The Environmental Protection Agency reports that the electric power sector contributes about 25% of all U.S. greenhouse gas emissions.

Wisconsin Public Service is actively working to reduce this impact by expanding its renewable energy facilities, including solar, hydroelectric and wind energy.

“We provide reliable clean energy to our customers every day using our renewable energy facilities,” WPS spokesperson Matt Cullen said.

Advertisement

WPS recently launched Wisconsin’s first large-scale battery storage facility, which stores energy for later use when demand is high. Additionally, WPS offers programs like NatureWise and the renewable pathway program, allowing customers and businesses to choose how their electricity is generated.

Comment with Bubbles

JOIN THE CONVERSATION (2)

Despite the end of federal tax credits for solar panel installations, WPS customers can still benefit from clean energy projects, which have provided tens of millions of dollars in savings. WPS aims to be net carbon neutral by 2050 and has already reduced emissions by 56% since 2005.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Wisconsin

Wisconsin Lottery Powerball, Pick 3 results for Jan. 17, 2026

Published

on

Wisconsin Lottery Powerball, Pick 3 results for Jan. 17, 2026


play

The Wisconsin Lottery offers multiple draw games for those aiming to win big. Here’s a look at Jan. 17, 2026, results for each game:

Advertisement

Winning Powerball numbers from Jan. 17 drawing

05-08-27-49-57, Powerball: 14, Power Play: 4

Check Powerball payouts and previous drawings here.

Winning Pick 3 numbers from Jan. 17 drawing

Midday: 8-4-6

Evening: 6-8-8

Check Pick 3 payouts and previous drawings here.

Advertisement

Winning Pick 4 numbers from Jan. 17 drawing

Midday: 9-1-8-7

Evening: 3-2-8-3

Check Pick 4 payouts and previous drawings here.

Winning All or Nothing numbers from Jan. 17 drawing

Midday: 01-03-04-07-08-09-11-12-13-15-19

Evening: 01-03-05-06-07-09-14-17-18-19-21

Advertisement

Check All or Nothing payouts and previous drawings here.

Winning Badger 5 numbers from Jan. 17 drawing

12-13-18-20-29

Check Badger 5 payouts and previous drawings here.

Winning SuperCash numbers from Jan. 17 drawing

07-08-09-12-15-31, Doubler: N

Check SuperCash payouts and previous drawings here.

Advertisement

Winning Megabucks numbers from Jan. 17 drawing

08-17-28-32-43-44

Check Megabucks payouts and previous drawings here.

Feeling lucky? Explore the latest lottery news & results

Are you a winner? Here’s how to claim your lottery prize

  • Prizes up to $599: Can be claimed at any Wisconsin Lottery retailer.
  • Prizes from $600 to $199,999: Can be claimed in person at a Lottery Office. By mail, send the signed ticket and a completed claim form available on the Wisconsin Lottery claim page to: Prizes, PO Box 777 Madison, WI 53774.
  • Prizes of $200,000 or more: Must be claimed in person at the Madison Lottery office. Call the Lottery office prior to your visit: 608-261-4916.

Can Wisconsin lottery winners remain anonymous?

No, according to the Wisconsin Lottery. Due to the state’s open records laws, the lottery must, upon request, release the name and city of the winner. Other information about the winner is released only with the winner’s consent.

When are the Wisconsin Lottery drawings held?

  • Powerball: 9:59 p.m. CT on Monday, Wednesday, and Saturday.
  • Mega Millions: 10:00 p.m. CT on Tuesday and Friday.
  • Super Cash: 9:00 p.m. CT daily.
  • Pick 3 (Day): 1:30 p.m. CT daily.
  • Pick 3 (Evening): 9:00 p.m. CT daily.
  • Pick 4 (Day): 1:30 p.m. CT daily.
  • Pick 4 (Evening): 9:00 p.m. CT daily.
  • All or Nothing (Day): 1:30 p.m. CT daily.
  • All or Nothing (Evening): 9 p.m. CT daily.
  • Megabucks: 9:00 p.m. CT on Wednesday and Saturday.
  • Badger 5: 9:00 p.m. CT daily.

That lucky feeling: Peek at the past week’s winning numbers.

Feeling lucky? WI man wins $768 million Powerball jackpot **

WI Lottery history: Top 10 Powerball and Mega Million jackpots

Advertisement

This results page was generated automatically using information from TinBu and a template written and reviewed by a Wisconsin editor. You can send feedback using this form.



Source link

Continue Reading

Wisconsin

3 quick takeaways from Wisconsin’s win over Rutgers: Offense is heating up

Published

on

3 quick takeaways from Wisconsin’s win over Rutgers: Offense is heating up


The Wisconsin Badgers beat the Rutgers Scarlet Knights 96-87 on Saturday afternoon, improving to 13-5 as they won their fourth-straight game. With the win, Wisconsin now stands at 5-2 in Big Ten play.

It was a dominant start for the Badgers, as their offense exploded early with efficiency both inside and outside the arc. They also had some quality defense early in the game, while the offense maintained the lead as the game went on. Rutgers did provide some resistance as their offense heated up in the second half, but Wisconsin managed to hold on and get the win.

Here are three quick takeaways from Wisconsin’s 96-87 win over Rutgers on Saturday.

The Badgers are a team that has seen their cold spells and heaters this season. On Saturday, there were several of the latter in a 51-point first half.

Advertisement

After Rutgers took an early 7-5 lead, the Badgers went on an 11-0 run, as John Blackwell hit a pair of threes to give Wisconsin a 16-7 lead. Midway through the first half, Wisconsin found itself leading 27-20 and proceeded to really separate itself with an 8-0 run as Nick Boyd scored five straight, and Jack Janicki hit a three-pointer.

Then, the Badgers ended the half on a 16-6 run, taking a 51-29 lead into halftime. Wisconsin did a great job turning defense into offense, forcing some tough looks and turnovers, and running in transition, with Nick Boyd leading the way at 15 points.

We’ve said it before, but the potential of this team is shown during these runs, where the Badgers look tough on defense and hot on offense. On Saturday, they sustained that throughout the first half.

In the second half, there weren’t many runs to start the period as Rutgers’s offense really started to click, but Wisconsin was right there as well, continuing where they left off. That kept the game out of arm’s reach, leading the Badgers to a comfortable victory.

However, the Scarlet Knights just wouldn’t go away, as they continued to chip at the lead. They went on an 8-0 run to cut a 19-point lead to 78-67 with seven minutes remaining in the game, as Harun Zrno and Darren Buchanan Jr. both hit threes. Shortly after, they chipped the lead to single digits.

Advertisement

From there, Wisconsin was able to hang on, controlling the pace of the game to lead to a victory. But there were a few big swings in this one.

The Badgers came into the game as 15.5-point favorites. They were expected to win big. But it’s important to see how they come out to play in a game like Saturday’s.

Rather than being sloppy, I thought the ball movement was on point in the win. Wisconsin had assists on 11 of its first 14 shots, but they were just generally creating great looks without turning the ball over (three TOs in first half).

And it wasn’t just one player. After a slow start, going 1-of-6 from the field, Nick Boyd really settled in and had six assists to go with his 15 points in the first half alone. Andrew Rohde and John Blackwell both orchestrated the offense well with three assists apiece in the opening period.

I thought the Badgers were hitting from three, but also attacking well and getting the ball inside the paint before kicking out for better looks. Their offense can be really, really efficient when moving the ball like they did (1.46 points per possession in 1st half).

Advertisement

In the second half, the offense picked up where it left off, scoring 20 points over the first eight minutes of the period, as they shot 53.8 percent from the field and 50 percent from deep. Once again, the ball movement played a big factor there, as Wisconsin had six assists on seven field goals, while continuing to create open shots, both inside the arc and on the perimeter.

But, as Rutgers cut the lead, Wisconsin went on a four-minute stretch without a field goal, as its offense finally stalled. I thought the Badgers weren’t moving the ball enough here. They settled too often for threes (4/14 on threes through first 15 minutes of second half, 67 percent of field goal attempts were threes). That cost them a bit offensively, making the game closer than it should’ve been.

The Badgers were able to hold on, living at the free-throw line late as they conjured enough on both ends for the win. But there was a scare there for a few minutes.

Wisconsin’s defense has been up-and-down this year, but I think we’re slowly starting to see some better performances. I thought Saturday’s first half was one of the best of the year for Wisconsin.

I thought Wisconsin was very active defensively, forcing Rutgers into tough two-point shots and not giving them much in the paint or behind the arc. The Scarlet Knights made some tough shots, but they averaged less than one point per possession in the first half (0.967).

Advertisement

Having the size advantage, Wisconsin also didn’t allow many second-chance opportunities and forced turnovers from a team that likes to play at a slower pace. It was a good performance in the first half, especially in the paint.

The second half? Not so much. Wisconsin really struggled to open the half, allowing Rutgers to score 25 points in the first eight and a half minutes. The Scarlet Knights were 11/15 from the field in that stretch, while averaging an insane 1.92 points per possession.

Now, it ultimately didn’t matter because Wisconsin’s offense was humming at such a high rate, but that’s the consistency we’re talking about. The Badgers need to find a way to play together for 40 minutes. In that eight-minute stretch, Wisconsin allowed way too many dribble drives in the paint, as Rutgers was getting deeper in the paint as compared to the tough midrange jumpers they shot in the first half.

A few minutes later, after some back-and-forth on both sides, Rutgers really started to heat up, going on an 8-0 run with a pair of threes to cut the lead to 11. Once again, there were a few too many good looks given up, which the Scarlet Knights capitalized on. Through the first 11 and a half minutes, Rutgers had 36 points in the second half, shooting 68.2 percent from the field, and still averaging 1.9 points per possession.

The Scarlet Knights were even able to cut what was a 26-point lead at one point to single digits. But, the Badgers mitigated the damage from there, getting a few stops and not allowing Rutgers to get 10 points over the final four minutes of the game, securing the win.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending