Connect with us

Wisconsin

Feathered jewels on a spinning chandelier: White pelicans have made an astonishing recovery in Wisconsin

Published

on

Feathered jewels on a spinning chandelier: White pelicans have made an astonishing recovery in Wisconsin


I used to be touring north for “an enormous job in Ashland,” to borrow a line from the late Jay Reed.

However as I approached Fremont on Freeway 10 a kettle of giant birds caught my eye.

No schedule is so tight to forestall a fast cease for a wildlife sighting.

Advertisement

Fortuitously an exit was just a few hundred yards forward. I pulled off, parked and pulled out the binoculars.

What I noticed was so spectacular I known as out to my viewers of nobody. “Whoa!”

Highlighted by the mid-morning solar, two dozen white-and-black birds spiraled down via the cobalt sky.

Although every seemed as large as a Piper Cub, they descended with an easy agility unmatched by any human flying machine.

The flock carved the air with steeply banked turns and with no single wing flap.

Advertisement

I watched transfixed as Mom Nature adorned the sky with feathered jewels on a spinning, helical chandelier.

In one other minute they arrived at their vacation spot, touchdown gear prolonged, and splashed to a cease.

When the birds first caught my eye, the big measurement and colour triggered my thoughts for an on the spot to suppose “whooping crane.”

However the habits was far totally different. And these birds – with 8- to 9-foot wingspans – have been even wider and heavier than whoopers.

Advertisement

After getting a pair in focus with the binoculars, large orange payments made their identities clear –  they have been American white pelicans.

Have you ever seen one of many large birds but? Or possibly even a flock?

Pelicans have gotten a standard sight on many state waterways, together with the Winnebago System, Mississippi River, the Fox River and Inexperienced Bay.

The birds have earned a starring function within the guide of recent Wisconsin wildlife restoration tales.

Advertisement

And in contrast to the wild turkey, a restored Badger State star in it is personal proper however which was introduced again via a labor- and time-intensive trap-and-transfer program, the pelicans did all of it on their very own.

“It is actually a jaw-dropping change,” stated Invoice Volkert of Dundee, a number one Wisconsin birder and conservationist. “They went from mainly absent to hundreds of nesting pairs in 25 years.”

Extra: ‘Catastrophic’ avian flu devastates endangered tern colonies in Door County

Extra: DNR’s new prairie rooster plan presents hope for threatened species in Wisconsin

Historic accounts of the massive, white pelicans in what’s now Wisconsin have been first made by Native Individuals, in line with students.

Advertisement

European immigrants then recorded experiences with the birds within the latter half of the seventeenth century. One, a French official named Nicolas Perrot who lived with Native Individuals within the Higher Nice Lakes, described pelicans as “quite common, however they’ve an oily taste, whether or not alive or lifeless, which is so unpleasant that it’s not possible to eat them,” in line with creator E.H. Blair.

Different historic accounts known as the birds “reasonably widespread” via the 1850s, together with foraging under the Kaukauna rapids, on small lakes related to the Fox River, on Lake Koshkonong and on lakes in Dane and Jefferson counties.

However the pelicans suffered the identical destiny as many different Wisconsin wildlife species within the late 1800s as an increasing inhabitants of settlers and unregulated searching reduce the chicken’s numbers.

“Although previously a standard migrant, (the pelican’s) actions have been now confined to the Mississippi River,” wrote A.W. Schorger in a 1954 article for the “Passenger Pigeon,” the e-newsletter of the Wisconsin Society for Ornithology. “So giant a mark was irresistible to gunners, and it’s obvious that the variety of migrants declined sharply by about 1870.”

The species maintained a core inhabitants that nested within the prairies of the Dakotas and southern Canada, a waterfowl-rich zone known as the Prairie Pothole Area.

Advertisement

The birds traveled yearly between that breeding space and wintering grounds within the southern U.S., Mexico and Central America.

However greater than a century would cross earlier than American white pelicans began to frequent the inside of Wisconsin.

And Volkert, who retired from the Division of Pure Assets in 2011 after 27 years at Horicon Marsh, had a entrance row seat to the change.

A protracted drought is believed to have helped push a few of the birds east.

In spring 1982, Volkert stated 4 pelicans stopped at Horicon Marsh and stayed for just a few weeks.

Advertisement

“I took 4 or 5 teams of individuals out simply to indicate them the pelicans, it was such a uncommon sight,” Volkert stated.

Ten years later, after extra drought within the west, Volkert documented 34 pelicans that stayed at Horicon Marsh for all the summer season.

However no pelican breeding was noticed in Wisconsin till 1995, when Tom Erdman discovered two pairs nesting on an island in decrease Inexperienced Bay.

In 1999 the success unfold to Horicon, the place pelicans fledged from 13 nests.

You’d have thought a flock of storks was at work: the state’s pelican inhabitants was within the midst of a increase.

Advertisement

From the 2 nests in 1993, researchers documented a rise to 1,101 nests in 1995 and to 4,123 in 2013. And that was simply within the Inexperienced Bay and East Central areas of Wisconsin.

“(Pelicans) discovered they preferred Wisconsin simply effective,” Volkert stated. “The velocity of their inhabitants improve shocked all of us, I would should say.”

The American white pelican is a colonial nester, sometimes gathering in teams on islands or different flat floor.

The birds are fish eaters, specializing in probably the most plentiful prey comparable to freshwater drum, widespread carp and bullheads, Volkert stated. If concentrations of different species can be found, comparable to walleye in spring within the Fox River, they will make the most of them, too.

Not like their shut relative the brown pelican, which dives from the air, the white pelican fishes because it sits on the floor of the water. The birds use their senses to detect fish after which plunge their open beaks under the floor.

Advertisement

In a outstanding present of cooperation, at occasions white pelicans type teams to herd fish into the middle of a circle earlier than making an attempt to seize their prey.

As pelicans continued to do nicely in Wisconsin, there was no have to proceed the annual nest counts, Volkert stated.

The species is listed as “low conservation concern,” in line with the Cornell Lab of Ornithology.

The oldest recognized American white pelican was a minimum of 23 years, 6 months and was banded in North Dakota in 1983, in line with the Cornell Lab.

Along with Horicon Marsh and the islands in Inexperienced Bay, pelican breeding colonies at the moment are present in Wisconsin in lots of spots within the Winnebago System and on Beaver Dam Lake and Lake Puckaway, to call just a few.

Advertisement

And because the birds do not mate and nest till 5 – 6 years of age, giant flocks of non-breeding pelicans are seen in different elements of the state, too.

That seemingly describes the birds I noticed a pair weeks in the past close to Fremont.

The massive, pouched birds have confirmed fairly adaptable and hardy, Volkert stated. They typically share their breeding websites with gull species and double-crested cormorants.

General the future appears to be like vibrant for pelicans in the Badger State. 

“For a very long time individuals round right here related pelicans solely with Florida,” Volkert stated. “Now the birds have develop into such a standard sight I feel we’ll have generations who will first consider Wisconsin after they consider pelicans.”

Advertisement

THANK YOU: Subscribers’ assist makes this work doable. Assist us share the data by shopping for a present subscription.



Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Wisconsin

Game 12 Wisconsin football two-deep for Minnesota Gophers game Nov. 29 at Camp Randall Stadium

Published

on

Game 12 Wisconsin football two-deep for Minnesota Gophers game Nov. 29 at Camp Randall Stadium


MADISON – A look at the unofficial two-deep for the Wisconsin football team heading into its game against Minnesota at 11 a.m. Friday at Camp Randall Stadium.

OFFENSE

Quarterback

1 – Braedyn Locke, 6-1, 205, redshirt-soph.

2 – Mabrey Mettauer, 6-4, 230, fr.

Advertisement

Running back

1 – Tawee Walker, 5-9, 218, sr.

2 – Darrion Dupree, 5-10, 205, fr.

Receiver

1 – Bryson Green, 6-3, 213, sr.

2 – C.J. Williams, 6-2, 196, jr.

Receiver

1 – Vinny Anthony II, 6-0, 188, jr.

Advertisement

2 – Quincy Burroughs, 6-2, 212, r-soph.

Slot recever

1 – Will Pauling, 5-10, 187, r-jr.

2 – Trech Kekahuna, 5-10, 187, r-fr.

Tight end

1 – Riley Nowakowski, 6-1, 243, r-sr.

2 – Tucker Ashcraft, 6-5, 255, soph.

Advertisement

Left tackle

1 – Jack Nelson, 6-7, 316, sr.

2 – Barrett Nelson, 6-6, 302, r-soph.

Left guard

1 – Joe Brunner, 6-5, 313- r-soph.

2. – James Durand, 6-5, 305, r-fr.

Advertisement

Center

1 – Jake Renfro, 6-3, 302, r-sr.

2. – Kerry Kodanko, 6-2, 308, r-sr.

Right guard

1 – Joe Huber, 6-5, 310, r-sr.

2 – JP Benzschawel, 6-6, 312, r-jr.

Right tackle

1 – Riley Mahlman, 6-8, 308, r-jr.

Advertisement

2 – Kevin Heywood, 6-8, 325, fr.

DEFENSE

Line

1 – Ben Barten, 6-5, 308, r-sr.

2 – Elijah Hills, 6-3, 282, sr.

Advertisement

Line

1 – Curt Neal, 6-0, 290, r-soph.

2 – Cade McDonald, 6-6, 285, r-sr.

Outside linebacker

1 – Darryl Peterson, 6-1, 248, r-jr.

2 – Aaron Witt, 6-6, 247, r-jr.

Inside linebacker

1 – Jake Chaney, 5-11, 233, sr.

Advertisement

2 – Tackett Curtis, 6-2, 228, soph.

Inside linebacker

1 – Christian Alliegro, 6-4, 240, soph.

2 – Jaheim Thomas, 6-4, 245, r-sr.

Outside linebacker

1 – Leon Lowery, 6-3, 252, r-sr.

2 – Sebastian Cheeks, 6-3, 230, r-soph., or John Pius, 6-4, 250, r-sr.

Advertisement

Cornerback

1 – Ricardo Hallman, 5-10, 185, r-jr.

2 – R.J. Delancy III, 5-11, 193, r-sr., or Jonas Duclona, 5-10, 190, soph.

Strong safety

1 – Hunter Wohler, 6-2, 218, sr.

2 – Owen Arnett, 5-11, 210, r-jr.

Free safety

1 – Preston Zachman, 6-1, 212, r-sr.

Advertisement

2 – Austin Brown, 6-1, 210, jr.

Cornerback

1 – Nyzier Fourqurean, 6-1, 190, r-sr.

2 – R.J. Delancy, 5-11, 193, r-sr., or Xavier Lucas, 6-2, 198, fr.

Nickel back

1 – Austin Brown, 6-1, 210, jr.

2 – Max Lofy, 5-10, 188, r-sr.

Advertisement

SPECIAL TEAMS

Punter

1 – Atticus Bertrams, 6-3, 225, soph.

2 – Gavin Meyers, 6-1, 198, r-sr.

Field goal kicker

1 – Nathanial Vakos, 6-1, 205, jr.

2 – Gavin Lahm, 6-0, 213, jr.

Kickoffs

1 – Gavin Lahm, 6-10, 213, jr.

Advertisement

2 – Nathanial Vakos, 6-1, 205, jr.

Long snapper

1 – Cayson Pfeiffer, 6-0, 205, sr.

2 – Duncan McKinley, 6-2, 222, r-sr.

Holder

1 – Gavin Meyers, 6-1, 198, r-sr.

2 – Atticus Bertrams, 6-2, 225, soph.

Advertisement

Punt returner

1 – Vinny Anthony II, 6-0, 188, jr.

2 – Hunter Wohler, 6-2, 218, sr.

Kickoff returner

1 – Vinny Anthony II, 6-0, 188, jr.

2 – Trech Kekahuna, 5-10, 197, r-fr.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Wisconsin

Where Wisconsin's class of 2025 ranks nationally after big-time addition of QB Carter Smith

Published

on

Where Wisconsin's class of 2025 ranks nationally after big-time addition of QB Carter Smith


Wisconsin football’s recruiting performance is far better than the current on-field product, to say the least.

Luke Fickell’s team has now lost four straight games after Saturday’s 44-25 defeat at Nebraska. It is just 5-6 on the season and 3-5 in Big Ten play, desperately needing a season-closing victory over Minnesota to clinch bowl eligibility.

There is more context behind that on-field performance, including the recent firing of offensive coordinator Phil Longo and historic blowout losses to rivals Iowa and Nebraska sandwiching hard-fought losses to top-ranked teams. That context doesn’t help the general trend of poor play.

But for those still optimistic about the Badgers’ future under Luke Fickell, the biggest calling card is his recruiting performance.

Advertisement

Wisconsin made headlines on Sunday when it landed a commitment from four-star class of 2025 quarterback Carter Smith. Smith is ranked as 247Sports’ No. 15 quarterback in the class and No. 164 overall player. Beating Florida State for his commitment was a statement for Fickell and his staff — even doing so after firing Longo just seven days earlier.

The addition of Smith brings Wisconsin’s class of 2025 to 25 total commitments — eight of which coming from blue-chip players. Notably, it rose the group four spots up to No. 21 in 247Sports’ national rankings.

The Badgers now boast the eighth-highest-rated class in the Big Ten, trailing just Ohio State (No. 2 overall), Oregon (No. 8), Michigan (No. 9), USC (No. 11), Penn State (No. 15), Washington (No. 18) and Nebraska (No. 20). The No. 21 ranking is an impressive follow-up after Luke Fickell finished the 2024 class with 247Sports’ No. 25 overall class and a Blue-Chip Ratio of 50%.

Smith’s addition continues a growing debate about how to weigh Wisconsin’s on-field struggles with its recruiting success. In reality, the 2025 football season will be somewhat defined by the performance of the 2024 recruiting class and another crop of transfers. If that strong recruiting doesn’t lead to improved on-field play, the clock may start ticking on his tenure.

Contact/Follow @TheBadgersWire on X (formerly Twitter), and like our page on Facebook to follow ongoing coverage of Wisconsin Badgers news, notes, and opinion.

Advertisement





Source link

Continue Reading

Wisconsin

Takeaways from No.19 Wisconsin's 81-75 Win Over Pittsburgh

Published

on

Takeaways from No.19 Wisconsin's 81-75 Win Over Pittsburgh


WHITE SULPHUR SPRINGS, W.Va. – The news was positive every time Wisconsin head coach Greg Gard got the analytical report from video coordinator A.J. Van Handel, even though the results on the court were not. Despite some early flaws guarding back cuts and allowing dribble penetration, the Badgers were holding Pittsburgh under a point per possession. He just needed Wisconsin to take and make some better shots.

That, and John Tonje hoisting the Badgers on his back and carrying them over the finish line.

The resilience, toughness, and guts of the No.19 Wisconsin was on full display in front of a packed Colonial Hall at the Greenbrier Resort, as the Badgers got 33 points from Tonje and sound offensive execution in the second half to erase a 14-pint deficit in an 81-75 victory over Pittsburgh.

It’s the third November championship for Wisconsin (7-0) in the past four seasons and a victory that could serve as a springboard in the coming weeks, not to mention a nice thing to show the selection committee in four months.

Advertisement

Here are my takeaways from the foothills of the Alleghany Mountains.

Tonje Led The Second Half Charge

Tonje said that he hopes to live in Madison when he’s retired from playing basketball. At the rate he’s going, he might have to come back anyway for his jersey retirement.

Tonje was the hero again for Wisconsin and treated as such, going into the crowd to celebrate with the vocal fan base that made the trip and mobbed by his teammates while waiting to do his postgame television interview. It was the only time anybody got the better of him after halftime.

Advertisement

Shaking off a 2-for-8 start, Tonje was 9-for-11 in the second half. He was 6-for-6 from the line, relentlessly going inside and getting rewarded because Pittsburgh kept reaching. Knowing the primary defenders on him were starting to rack up fouls, and that the Panthers haven’t shown to be a particularly deep team to this point, Tonje kept his head down and kept attacking.

“I was trying to be aggressive from the start,” said Tonje, who made all nine of his two-point shots in the second half, most coming at the rim or in the paint. “I didn’t shoot the ball well early, but I just kept with it. My coaches and teammates believed in me. I stayed with it and did everything I can in my power to get the win.”

After falling into the trap of taking quick shots or long-range jumpers, a problem that plagued the Badgers last season, Wisconsin found the gaps in Pittsburgh defense. UW scored 54 points in the second half, registered points on 83.3 percent of its possessions, and averaged a robust 1.8 points per possession.

“I don’t think we started the second half with the type of force that’s necessary,” Pittsburgh coach Jeff Capel said. “We allowed them to climb back into the game and really get into a great rhythm offensively, and then they just became really tough to guard … Their physicality wore us down.”

Tonje scored 25 of the second-half points but he had help. Kamari McGee scored eight of his 10 points in the last half and hit all three of his shots, including a pair of clutch three-pointers that were timely in the final six-plus minutes, one giving UW the lead and another extended it to four with 2:54 to go.

Advertisement

“We kept at it,” said John Blackwell (14 points). “We kept getting to the rim (and) stayed aggressive. Obviously, our shots weren’t falling in the first half, but we didn’t quit. We told ourselves at halftime just keep going. The shots are going to fall. We trusted each other.

“JT did his thing by getting to the rim, doing what he do best.”

Named the tournament’s most valuable player, Tonje averaged 24.0 points and 6.5 rebounds per game over UW’s two wins.

“He just drives and throws his body around,” Capel said of Tonje, one of only six players nationally to have two 30-point games this season. “We weren’t able to sustain the discipline required to guard someone like that. You can’t reach. He does a really good job of getting his body into yours. He’s really strong with the ball. He exposes it. You think you can swipe, and he gets a great whistle, and he’s earned that because it’s consistent.”

Wisconsin Is Handling Top Guard Play

McGee said Friday that the close call against UTRGV Monday was not a wake-up call for the Badgers, only that it emphasized the need to be better polished in defensive areas. Call it what you want, but the Badgers’ defense took a major step in slowing down guard play in West Virginia.

Advertisement

Pittsburgh’s backcourt of Ishmael Leggett and Jaland Lowe averaged 33.2 points, 12.4 rebounds, 8.0 assists, and 4.5 steals per game. They combined for 43 points, 14 rebounds, seven assists, and eight steals in Friday’s win over LSU. They managed 33 points on 32 shots.

“I just tried to match his energy,” Blackwell said of guarding Leggett, who finished 6-for-15 and 0-for-4 from three. “I know he picked up some quick fouls and he sat. All I can do is try to match his energy, because he’s a great player.”

The Badgers also took away Lowe’s ability to cleanly pass the ball. He finished with five assists but committed four turnovers.

“If we can guard ball screens as much as possible two on two and not have to send quite as much help, we knew we were going to have to plug the paint,” Gard said of the plan for Lowe.“Try to force him into some mid-range stuff. I didn’t think we were good at it early. He got loose on us, pinched us off, and got a couple lobs to Corhen, but I thought we got better with the back side of bumping the roller and plugging the lane. We forced him into some tougher shots.”

Wisconsin caught a break when Damian Dunn (13.0 ppg, .526 3FG) rolled his ankle and injured his hand two minutes into the game and didn’t return. Freshman guard Brandin Cummings replaced him and managed only two points.

Advertisement

With how poorly Wisconsin’s offense was in the first half (36.7 percent, .794 points per possession), the Badgers leaning into their defense was critical.

“We have to give all credit to the coaches,” Blackwell said. “They prepared us well to know what their tendencies are, what they like to do. We just trust each other. Our bigs got our back if they get past us with good wall ups. We just trust our technique.”

Frustrating opposing guards has become a common theme.Arizona preseason All-American Caleb Love generated more technical fouls than made three-pointers against UW’s guards. He finished 2-for-13 from the floor and scored six points before fouling out

In Friday’s semifinals against UCF, which possessed a guard trio of Jordan Ivy-Curry, Keyshawn Hall, and Darius Johnson that scored 62.4 percent of its points, the Badgers’ ability to challenge them with movement and spacing held the group to 9-for-36 from the floor.

Wisconsin Showed Growth vs Physical Rebounders 

The Panthers have proven to be one of the better rebounding teams in the country in the season’s first month. Having won the rebounding battle in five of its first six games, Pitt wasaveraging 41.2 rebounds per game, was 21st nationally in defensive rebounds (30.83) and had four players averaging at least 6.0 rebounds per game.

Advertisement

They took the Badgers to task in the first half. Finishing the first half plus-four on the glass, Pitt’s first 11 points were all on actions toward the rim, mostly on back cuts behind UW’s defense, dribble actions where a Pitt player hit the cutter, or a guard attacking the paint to hit an open pull-up jumper.

Even after reserve forward Zack Austin switched things up with a three-pointer, Pittsburgh went right back to the post with an alley-oop and multiple driving layups. The 6-10 Cameron Corhen was the biggest benefactor of UW’s lapse defense, as the 68.0 percent FG shooter had 11 points on 5-for-6 shooting in the opening half.

Wisconsin 2-for-10 to start and was largely absent in the glass when shots went up. UW started 0-for-5 from the perimeter and most attempts didn’t have a red jersey close to the rim. UW’s first offensive rebound came at the 10:54 mark, but the possession ended with Blackwell airballing a three-pointer with the shot clock about to expire, a possession that didn’t include a post touch.

Wisconsin was averaging .533 points on its first 15 possessions. UW raised it modestly at halftime because Blackwell, McGee, Tonje, and Nolan Winter (11 points) started getting to the rim and converting.

The inability to match a team’s frontcourt physicality has been an underlining theme when the Badgers have faced Power-Four schools. Arizona outrebounded UW, 52-28, including 24-2 on the offensive glass, and gave up 13 boards to forward Tobe Awaka.

Advertisement

UCF wasn’t nearly as big as Arizona, but the Knights still outrebounded Wisconsin, 41-39, with all 11 players getting at least one offensive rebound.

Things flipped in the second half. Senior Steven Crowl (6 points, season-high 9 rebounds, 3 assists) helped draw two quick fouls on Corhen, sending him to the bench for five-and-a-half minutes of the second half. He attempted only two shots in the final 12:51 after he returned.

With Corhen out and Guillermo Diaz Graham at the five, Wisconsin’s low-post offense ran more efficiently by creatingmore lanes for Tonje to attack and more space to attack the glass. After getting only two offensive rebounds in the first half, the Badgers had nine in the second half that led to 11 second-chance points.

“Once we got rolling in the second half we went to him quite a bit,” Gard said on Crowl. “I liked his physicality on Corhen. That’s one thing I felt Steve’s advantage was on Corhen on both ends of the floor was he could be physical. Corhen is a really good player but a little lighter than Steve. To be able to keep a big body on Corhen, and when we got him in foul trouble, we were able to go at the rim a little bit more with everybody else.”

Lengthy Delays

The championship game was scheduled to start at 5:30 p.m. eastern, roughly 30 minutes following the conclusion of the third-place game between LSU and UCF. The Knights’ collapse made the evening a waiting game.

Advertisement

UCF led by 20 in the first half, 18 with 12:57 left, and 14 with 8:31 to go, but ended up losing, 106-102, in triple overtime.

When the teams finally took the court, went through introductions, and were ready to start, one of the electronic game-and-shot clocks above the basket shorted out. Unable to restart the system, or find a long enough extension cord, officials agreed to shut off the working shot clock to even the playing field.

Throw in the jump ball needing to be done twice after a Pitt player jumped the gun, the game didn’t officially start until 6:43 local time, an hour, 13 minutes late.

That delayed doesn’t account for the two brief stoppages in play in the second half when the bank of lights that illuminated center court kept flickering on and off.

“I thought we handled all the adversity well,” Capel said. “What we didn’t handle was Tonje.”

Advertisement

By The Numbers

6 – Wisconsin turned the ball over just six times, including only two in the second half. Averaging 9.4 turnovers per game, Wisconsin has had fewer than 10 turnovers in four games.

17.5 – The Badgers held Pittsburgh to 5-for-23 (21.7) from three-point range and held their two Power-Four Conference opponents to 7-for-40 (17.5) on threes.

30 – After scoring just eight points in the first 10 minutes, the Badgers scored 73 in the final 30 minutes.

60 – Tonje has made 60 free throws this season to lead all Division 1 players. His 63 attempts are tops in the Big Ten and tied for fourth nationally. He’s the first UW player since Brad Davison (2017-18) to have made at least 10 free throws in three games.

300 – Gard coached his 300th game on Sunday, the fourth-most games of any coach in Wisconsin history. He improved his record to 193-107 (.643) overall and 72-22 (.766) in regular season nonconference games.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending