Wisconsin
As encampments sprout on Wisconsin campuses, here’s what to know about student protest rights
Across the U.S., college students are building “Gaza Solidarity Encampments” to demonstrate support for Palestinians. But as tensions rise, many students have wondered what rights they have to demonstrate on the campuses where they live and pay tuition.
The Pro-Palestinian rallies gained traction earlier this month when student organizers at Columbia University established an encampment on the main lawn. On Monday, University of Wisconsin students in Milwaukee and Madison joined the movement, calling on the university system to divest from companies that support weapons manufacturing and Israel.
The Journal Sentinel spoke to American Civil Liberties Union of Wisconsin staff attorney R. Timothy Muth for insights on the rights of student protesters. Here’s what you need to know:
What are the protection differences between an encampment and a regular protest or march?
When protesters set up an encampment, they often set up tents and sleeping quarters near or within the organization they are protesting.
According to Wisconsin law, no person may picnic or camp on university lands, except in areas specifically designated as picnic or camping grounds. These rules include pitching tents or overnight use of sleeping bags, blankets, makeshift shelters, motor homes, campers or camp trailers on university property.
Additionally, according to Wisconsin law, universities and other government organizations are allowed to place “reasonable time, place and manner restrictions” on speech or protest activity. This means that they can regulate when, where, and how expression takes place, as long as their restrictions are content-neutral, narrowly tailored and provide sufficient alternatives to express ideas.
How do protest rules differ on a public vs. private campus?
The rules and regulations for protest at a public university need to comply with the First Amendment, Muth said, meaning that individuals have the right to assemble and express their views.
However, according to Wisconsin law, private property owners can set rules for speech on their property. A private university could enact a wide variety of restrictions, some of which could be perceived as unreasonable by protesters, because they are granted more flexibility to prohibit some speech and the locations where protesters are permitted to demonstrate.
If a police officer asks for the name of a protester, but is not placing them under arrest, does the protester have to respond?
According to Muth, a person is not required to answer any questions of law enforcement since they have rights under the Fifth Amendment to not speak. If a person is being arrested, they have the right to state that they do not want to answer questions without an attorney present.
However, Muth recommends that student protesters confirm whether or not their campuses have established rules which require them to identify themselves to campus security, as some private institutions might have a rule in place to maximize student safety.
In most cases, like at UW-Madison, campus policies do not supersede state law and protesters have a right to not respond to law enforcement.
Are there rules that govern the behavior of opposing groups at a protest?
Police are permitted to keep antagonistic groups separated, but, according to state law, the groups should be allowed to be within sight and sound of one another. Protesters of opposing groups are allowed to speak to and shout at one another during rallies and demonstrations. According to Muth, a protester cannot be arrested for exhibiting those behaviors.
At a protest, Muth said, “the police are responsible for protecting each group and their expression.”
What types of speech are not protected?
Though almost all speech is protected at a protest, there is an exception for so-called “fighting words” that have the potential to cause harm to an individual or group.
This type of speech is an incendiary, obscene or defamatory statement that aims to incite violent action. This speech is directed at a specific individual or group that create an imminent threat or incite violence.
Protesters should avoid using this language, as it could lead to arrest or removal from the protest premises.
What rules should people be aware of when capturing video recording or photos at a protest?
Generally, the courts state that if a person is in a public space, they do not have any particular expectation of privacy. Therefore, individuals can be photographed or surveilled while walking down a public street, protesting, or partaking in any activities within a public area.
Campus security, the police, and counter-demonstrators are legally allowed to take photos of protesters, according to Muth.
Additionally, he said, “If the police are arresting people or using force, protesters have the First Amendment right to to record and photograph. We generally encourage people not to photograph identifiable pictures of protesters who have not agreed to be photographed.”
Do police officers have the right to view photos and videos captured at an event?
Muth said protesters who want to guarantee that their photos and videos are not accessible to law enforcement should establish a lock or password on their phone before attending a protest.
“Under the Fourth Amendment, it is prohibited for the police to search your phone without a warrant, but that doesn’t mean they won’t look through an unlocked phone,” Muth said.
If protesters are concerned about privacy, Muth said that it is important to evaluate their personal approach to digital security. In addition to locking phones, anything that protesters post publicly to social media can be evaluated by law enforcement following a protest and used as evidence.
Are there any restrictions when it comes to carrying weapons while at a protest?
Wisconsin law allows for the carrying of firearms in a wide variety of settings. However, according to the Wisconsin Administrative Code UWS 18.10(3), individuals are prohibited from “carrying, possessing, or using any dangerous weapon on university lands or in university buildings or facilities, unless it is for law enforcement purposes or the person receives written approval of the chief administrative officer.”
This rule applies to all lands controlled by the Board of Regents of the University of Wisconsin System. At private institutions like Marquette University, many schools prohibit the possession of weapons in campus buildings, offices and residence halls.
What other safety precautions should student protesters should keep in mind?
If protesters think there is a possibility of them getting arrested, Muth said they should memorize a phone number for somebody who can pick them up from the police station or contact a lawyer on their behalf.
If protesters believe their rights have been violated, the ACLU recommends they complete the following steps:
- Write down everything they can remember, including officers’ badge and patrol car numbers and the agency they work for
- Get contact information for witnesses
- Take photographs of all injuries
- File a written complaint with the agency’s internal affairs division or civilian compliant board
Tamia Fowlkes is a Public Investigator reporter for the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel. Contact her at tfowlkes@gannett.com.
Wisconsin
Wisconsin DHS reaffirms childhood vaccine recommendations after CDC changes
MADISON, Wis. – The Wisconsin Department of Health Services on Thursday reaffirmed its recommended childhood vaccine schedule after recent changes at the federal level.
Wisconsin vaccine guidance
Local perspective:
On Monday, the U.S. Centers for Disease Control announced changes to its childhood vaccine schedule. The DHS said those modifications further stray “from alignment with America’s leading medical associations and organizations.”
FREE DOWNLOAD: Get breaking news alerts in the FOX LOCAL Mobile app for iOS or Android
At this time, the DHS said it is not making changes to its vaccine recommendations – including no changes to Wisconsin’s school or child care vaccine recommendations.
The DHS said it continues to endorse the American Academy of Pediatrics schedule and has issued guidance to Wisconsin health care providers reaffirming that recommendation.
What they’re saying:
“The CDC’s new recommendations were based on a brief review of other countries’ practices and not based on data or evidence regarding disease risks to children in the United States,” DHS Secretary Kirsten Johnson said in a statement. “This upends our longstanding, evidence-based approach of protecting our children from the viruses that pose a risk in our country.
“Copying another country’s schedule without its health and social infrastructure will not produce the same health outcomes. It creates chaos and confusion and risks the health of Wisconsin’s youngest and most vulnerable citizens.”
Big picture view:
The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services said the CDC will continue to recommend that all children are immunized against 10 diseases for which there is international consensus, as well as chickenpox.
The updated schedule is in contrast to the CDC child and adolescent schedule at the end of 2024, which recommended 17 immunizations for all children. On the new schedule, vaccines – such as those for hepatitis A and B, meningitis, rotavirus and seasonal flu – are now more restricted. They are recommended only for those at high risk or after consultation with a health care provider.
What they’re saying:
“President Trump directed us to examine how other developed nations protect their children and to take action if they are doing better,” Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. said. “After an exhaustive review of the evidence, we are aligning the U.S. childhood vaccine schedule with international consensus while strengthening transparency and informed consent. This decision protects children, respects families, and rebuilds trust in public health.”
The Source: The Wisconsin DHS released information about its childhood vaccine recommendations. Information about the CDC changes is from LiveNOW from FOX with contributions from The Associated Press.
Wisconsin
Wisconsin man accused of killing parents to fund Trump assassination plot set to enter plea deal
MADISON, Wis. (AP) — A Wisconsin man accused of killing his parents and stealing their money to fund a plan to assassinate President Donald Trump is set to enter a plea deal resolving the case Thursday.
Nikita Casap, 18, is expected to agree to the deal during a morning hearing in Waukesha County Circuit Court in suburban Milwaukee. He goes into the hearing facing multiple charges, including two homicide counts, two counts of hiding a corpse and theft, with a trial scheduled to begin March 2.
Online court records did not list the terms of the plea agreement. Harm Venhuizen, a spokesperson for the state public defender’s office, which is representing Casap, said state Supreme Court ethics rules prevent the office from commenting on cases. The Waukesha County District Attorney’s Office did not respond to questions about the deal.
According to a criminal complaint, investigators believe Casap shot his mother, Tatiana Casap, and his stepfather, Donald Mayer, at their home in the village of Waukesha on or around Feb. 11.
He lived with the decomposing bodies for weeks before fleeing across the country in his stepfather’s SUV with $14,000 in cash, jewelry, passports, his stepfather’s gun and the family dog, according to the complaint. He was eventually arrested during a traffic stop in Kansas on Feb. 28.
Federal authorities have accused Casap of planning his parents’ murders, buying a drone and explosives and sharing his plans with others, including a Russian speaker. They said in a federal search warrant that he wrote a manifest calling for Trump’s assassination and was in touch with others about his plan to kill Trump and overthrow the U.S. government.
“The killing of his parents appeared to be an effort to obtain the financial means and autonomy necessary to carrying out his plan,” that warrant said.
Detectives found several messages on Casap’s cellphone from January 2025 in which Casap asks how long he will have to hide before he is moved to Ukraine. An unknown individual responded in Russian, the complaint said, but the document doesn’t say what that person told Casap. In another message Casap asks: “So while in Ukraine, I’ll be able to live a normal life? Even if it’s found out I did it?”
Wisconsin
Wisconsin bill stirs issue of parental voice, trans youth autonomy
A Republican-authored bill would require Wisconsin school boards to adopt a policy that would inform a parent or guardian if a student requests to be called by names and pronouns not aligned with their gender assigned at birth.
The bill would require legal documentation, parental approval and a principal to approve changes to a student’s name and pronouns. The bill makes exceptions for nicknames or students going by their middle names.
Although the bill has no chance of being signed into law by Democratic Gov. Tony Evers, it reflects the continuing political energy of two issues: parental authority in schools, and the treatment of trans youths.
Notably, hundreds of trans-related bills were introduced at multiple levels of government across the country in the last year.
The lawmakers who introduced the bill, Rep. Barbara Dittrich (R-Oconomowoc) and state Sen. Andre Jacque (R-Franken), said it is about parental rights and transparency. At a Capitol public hearing Jan. 6, Jacque cited a ruling from October 2023 in which a Waukesha judge sided with parents who sued the Kettle Moraine School District after staff at the middle school used a child’s chosen name and pronouns. The parents did not support their child’s transition.
But the Senate Committee on Education hearing grew heated as LGBTQ+ youth, parents of transgender children, Democratic lawmakers and other advocates called the bill unnecessary and potentially violence-inducing. They said it makes life worse for a vulnerable population that makes up less than 1% of Wisconsin pupils.
Jacque argued that without the bill, educators can make decisions about children’s health and well-being in secrecy.
“Hiding from us important things that are going on in their lives is not only disrespectful to parents, it is harmful to our children and deliberately sabotaging the ability for vital communication to take place,” Jacque said.
Sen. Sarah Keyeski (D-Lodi) questioned why the Legislature should be involved when school boards already have the ability to approve such policies.
“I think it’s interesting how much you lean on local control for certain things, but then all of a sudden, you want government control,” she said.
Abigail Swetz, executive director of Fair Wisconsin, said such a bill would prevent educators from “engaging in the best practice” for using names and pronouns. Swetz, a former middle school teacher who advised a Gender and Sexuality Alliance club, said she’s seen firsthand the positive impact of affirming trans and nonbinary students.
“The mental health struggles that trans youth face are not a self-fulfilling prophecy. They’re entirely pressured outcomes, and bills like SB120 add to that pressure,” Swetz said.
Jenna Gormal, the public policy director at End Abuse Wisconsin, said forcing students to come out to parents before they’re ready reinforces power and control while stripping students of their autonomy.
Alison Selje, who uses they/them pronouns, spoke of the seismic shift in their well-being and academic performance when someone used their correct pronouns. Selje was a student at Madison West High School at the time. The Madison Metropolitan School District has a policy – which has survived a court challenge – protecting the use of names and pronouns of trans students.
“I remember the first time I heard someone use the right pronoun for me. This was during the pandemic so I was still wearing a mask, but underneath it, I was smiling ear to ear,” Selje said. “The use of my pronouns was a confidence boost, but it was also a lifesaver.”
Support for the bill came from two women representing Moms for Liberty. Laura Ackman and Amber Infusimo shared stories of parents finding out about their children’s new gender identity through school playbills and yearbooks.
“This bill rightly affirms schools shouldn’t be making significant decisions without parental knowledge or involvement,” Ackman said. “It does not prevent kindness, respect or compassion.”
-
Detroit, MI5 days ago2 hospitalized after shooting on Lodge Freeway in Detroit
-
Technology2 days agoPower bank feature creep is out of control
-
Dallas, TX4 days agoDefensive coordinator candidates who could improve Cowboys’ brutal secondary in 2026
-
Health5 days agoViral New Year reset routine is helping people adopt healthier habits
-
Nebraska2 days agoOregon State LB transfer Dexter Foster commits to Nebraska
-
Iowa2 days agoPat McAfee praises Audi Crooks, plays hype song for Iowa State star
-
Nebraska2 days agoNebraska-based pizza chain Godfather’s Pizza is set to open a new location in Queen Creek
-
Entertainment1 day agoSpotify digs in on podcasts with new Hollywood studios