Connect with us

Midwest

US Olympian and other fencers file class-action lawsuit against USA Fencing for alleged trans athlete incident

Published

on

US Olympian and other fencers file class-action lawsuit against USA Fencing for alleged trans athlete incident

NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

FIRST ON FOX: U.S. Olympic fencer Margherita Guzzi Vincenti, alongside fellow competitive women’s fencers Emma Griffin and Patricia Hughes, have filed a class-action lawsuit against USA Fencing over an alleged incident at the 2025 North American Cup (NAC) in Kansas City, Missouri, in January. 

Vincenti, Griffin and Hughes alleged USA Fencing knowingly permitted biological males to compete in women’s divisions while advertising events as female-only, including in competitions involving athletes under the age of 18.

“Because Defendant USFA’s youth and cadet policy authorized self-identification ‘without restriction’ and lacked any verification mechanism, biological males under 16 were permitted, and could have been expected, to compete in the women’s event,” the lawsuit alleged. 

Advertisement

Margherita Guzzi Vincenti poses for a portrait during team USA Fencing media day at New York Athletic Club on May 21, 2024 in New York City.  (Al Bello/Getty Images)

“Defendant USFA also does not disclose to members or participants whether transgender or non-binary athletes are entered in a given event, leaving female athletes and parents unable to make informed participation decisions.”

The lawsuit also alleged the organization did not enforce its own previous policy of only allowing males to compete in the women’s category after completing one year of testosterone-suppression treatment. 

“On information and belief, Defendant USFA never implemented any system to monitor or verify compliance with this requirement. In practice, this lack of oversight allowed biological males to register for and compete in women’s events regardless of whether they had completed any hormone-suppression treatment,” the lawsuit alleges. 

USA Fencing provided a statement to Fox News Digital responding to the lawsuit. 

Advertisement

“USA Fencing is aware of the class‑action complaint filed in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Missouri on Oct. 29, and we strongly dispute its allegations. We will address this matter through the legal process and have no further comment at this time,” the statement read.

Guzzi, who competed for the Team USA at the 2024 Paris Olympics, said she joined the lawsuit to protect the integrity of her sport. 

“Fencing has been my life since I was a child,” she said. “I have trained and competed with the expectation that women’s competitions are for women. It is about fairness and preserving opportunities for girls and women who dedicate their lives to competing on equal terms.”

Hughes, a veteran with 20 years of experience, expressed similar concern. 

“I have seen women’s fencing grow from a niche sport to one where female athletes can thrive internationally,” Hughes said. “That progress only continues if fairness is enforced. The next generation of girls deserves the same level playing field that inspired us decades ago.”

Advertisement

WHO IS STEPHANIE TURNER? WOMEN’S FENCER WHO KNELT TO PROTEST TRANS OPPONENT AND IGNITED GLOBAL AWARENESS

Griffin, a standout NCAA competitor, said young athletes deserve honesty and clarity from national governing bodies.

“We pay entry fees, travel across the country, and commit years to training,” Griffin said. “We deserve to know the rules and trust that women’s events are truly women’s events. It is about respect for athletes and transparency from the organizations that govern our sport.”

The suit argues that USA Fencing is an educational institution subject to Title IX, and therefore violated it by allowing males to compete in the girls’ and women’s category. 

The suit seeks to argue this by alleging the organization listed itself as an educational service organization twice in 2020 and 2021 on its applications for a Paycheck Protection Program (PPP) loan during the COVID-19 pandemic, and because the U.S. Olympic and Paralympic Committee (USOPC) receives direct federal funding, including taxpayer-derived appropriations, PPP forgivable loans, and funding from the Department of Veterans Affairs.

Advertisement

The plaintiffs are being represented by Mahdavi, Bacon, Halfhill & Young PLLC and The Dhillon Law Group. 

“Title IX was enacted to ensure equal athletic opportunities for women,” said attorney Karin Sweigart of The Dhillon Law Group, “Our clients are not asking for special treatment, only for the fairness and integrity that women’s sports have long promised.”

Attorney Charles Wang of Mahdavi Bacon and pro bono general counsel of Fair Fencing Organization said, “By allowing biological men to compete in a women’s event, USA Fencing violated Title IX by depriving women of their own sport that women had fought for over one hundred years to have.” 

Attorney James Bacon added, “this case is about restoring trust, transparency, and compliance with federal law.”

Former USA Fencing board chair Damien Lehfeldt is also listed as a defendant. Fox News Digital has reached out to Lehfeldt for comment. 

Advertisement

Lehfeldt was replaced as chair last weekend after he chose not to seek re-election. 

In Lehfeldt’s announcement that he would not seek re-election, he cited “lawsuits” and “death threats” as a reason for his decision. Lehfeldt has been at the center of controversy for USA Fencing dating back to April when women’s fencer Stephanie Turner went viral for kneeling in protest of a transgender fencer, and was disqualified. 

The incident prompted a federal subpoena of Lehfeldt to a congressional hearing to explain the organization’s policy on transgender athletes. Then, former Olympic coach and board member Andrey Geva and former Olympic fencer Abdel Salem sued Lehfeldt for allegedly making “false statements” at the hearing. 

USA Fencing then changed its transgender participation policy in July to only permit female competitors to participate in the women’s category. The change was made to ensure compliance with the USOPC’s new athlete safety policy, which now cites President Donald Trump’s “Keeping Men Out of Women’s Sports” executive order. 

Advertisement

Follow Fox News Digital’s sports coverage on X, and subscribe to the Fox News Sports Huddle newsletter.



Read the full article from Here

Advertisement

Detroit, MI

Lions defense thrives when facing sudden change: ‘We’re the firefighters’

Published

on

Lions defense thrives when facing sudden change: ‘We’re the firefighters’


Allen Park — Kelvin Sheppard knows what people have thought about the Detroit Lions in years past.

The Lions, under a head coach who came up under Sean Payton, have predominantly relied on their offense to win games in recent seasons. It’s easy to see why. Dan Campbell spent a decade in the NFL playing on that side of the ball, and the Lions roster some the league’s best offensive talent. Why not lean into it?

But in his first season as defensive coordinator, Sheppard set out for his half of the ball to pull more weight. He desired a complementary situation, with the defense helping out the offense as much as the offense had been helping out the defense.

Sheppard’s efforts have largely been successful through 10 games. The defense having the offense’s back is best illustrated in sudden-change situations, when the opponent takes over possession after an interception, fumble, turnover on downs, missed field goal or blocked punt.

Advertisement

The Lions have faced 20 of these moments this season. They’ve given up only two touchdowns, and that’s despite the opponent’s average drive starting within five yards of midfield. There were six sudden-change instances in last week’s loss to the Philadelphia Eagles. The Lions held the Eagles out of the end zone each time, limiting the damage to three made field goals.

“It started back in the offseason, and it started at training camp. We went into this thing understanding that we wanted to play complementary football,” Sheppard said this week. “We didn’t want to just live on the back of our offense. … That narrative has been such in Detroit, that we win games because of offense. As a defensive player, as a defensive coach, that’s a luxury. But at the same time, it makes you feel a certain type of way.”

The Lions have allowed an average of 21.6 points and 291.8 yards per game this season, numbers that rank 10th and fifth in the NFL, respectively. They’re also near the top of the league in run defense (99.7 yards, eighth), pass defense (192.1, eighth) and, notably, third-down defense (34.4%, fourth).

Getting off the field in those critical moments goes a long way when there’s sudden change.

Advertisement

“We’re the firefighters on this team,” Sheppard said. “What does that mean? If Jack Fox, which he rarely does, shanks a punt, we’re not complaining, nobody’s sucking their teeth. We’re running on the field even faster to make sure we’re able to go put out that fire. That’s the mentality you’ve got to have as a defensive player. No pointing the fingers. No ‘what if’ this, no ‘what if’ that.”

With the defense playing as well as it’s been, and with the offense — outside of an exception versus the Washington Commanders — sputtering since Week 7, some have suggested it’s time for Campbell to have a philosophy change. Campbell’s aggression on fourth down is well documented. It’s worked well in the past because the Lions needed their offense to win them games. Maybe that’s no longer the case, and maybe Campbell should prioritize putting the defense in positions to succeed.

Ask Sheppard, though? He sees Campbell’s gambling mentality as a nod to his group: “I love it. I absolutely love it. Because that speaks volumes to me directly that our head coach believes, no matter where I put this defense, they’re going to put the fire out. So, I don’t care if Dan goes for it on every fourth down. It’s our job as defense to go out there and stand tall in that test.”

“We want this to be a complementary team. … We want to win because we win in all three phases of the game, and I think that’s something this team is trending towards. … You see it, when the offense is on, when the defense is on, when the special teams is on, man, we have a chance to do something special this year,” Sheppard said.

rsilva@detroitnews.com

Advertisement

@rich_silva18



Source link

Continue Reading

Milwaukee, WI

112th Annual Christmas Tree Lighting in Milwaukee’s Cheer District

Published

on

112th Annual Christmas Tree Lighting in Milwaukee’s Cheer District


Deer District is transformed into Cheer District through Jan. 15. The City of Milwaukee Christmas Tree will also be displayed in Cheer District for the fourth straight year and lit by Milwaukee Mayor Cavalier Johnson at a ceremony on Friday, Nov. 21.

Advertisement

Dynamic Events by David Caruso, designer of the City of Milwaukee Christmas Tree, will produce the tree-lighting ceremony on Nov. 21 with Mayor Johnson.

The City of Milwaukee Christmas Tree is the second-longest running official tree in the United States after New York City, with this year marking the 112th year of the city’s tree.
 

InterviewsFOX 6 WakeUp News



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Minneapolis, MN

MN Shortlist: Slow Burns & Bright Lights — 6 Picks for Nov. 21–27

Published

on

MN Shortlist: Slow Burns & Bright Lights — 6 Picks for Nov. 21–27


As parade season kicks in and the evenings arrive early, this week’s picks offer a mix of music, theater and small-scale surprises. From Duluth’s gingerbread “city” to a new festival of collaborative work in Minneapolis, here are six solid ways to make the most of the week ahead.



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending